Upper Primary Teacher Recruitment UP / Allahabad Highcourt
: Final Decision of Neelam Kumari Gautam is not updated on Allahabad HC
Website, And we will try to update as soon as possible after available
on Allahabad HC website
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 52521 of 2013
Petitioner :- Neelam Kumari Gautam
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 2 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Kshetresh Chnadra Shukla
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.K.Yadav
Hon'ble Vikram Nath,J.
Put up on 06.11.2013.
Order Date :- 31.10.2013
RPS
Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=2897863
**********************************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 55925 of 2013
Petitioner :- Shailendra Kumar Singh
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Radha Kant Ojha,Shailesh Upadhyay
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Syed Nadeem Ahmad
Hon'ble Vikram Nath,J.
For orders see orders of date passed in WRIT - A No. - 52521 of 2013, Neelam Kumari Gautam vs. State Of U.P.& 2 Ors.
Order Date :- 23.10.2013
pk
http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=2874581
*************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 24
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 52521 of 2013
Petitioner :- Neelam Kumari Gautam
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 2 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Kshetresh Chnadra Shukla
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.K.Yadav
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J.
1. Submission of learned Counsel for the petitioner is that the government order dated 11.07.2013 is contrary to the U.P. Basic Education (Teachers) Service Rules, 1981 and U.P. Basic Education (Teachers) (Sixteenth Amendment) Service Rules, 1981 (as amended by Sixteenth Amendment Rules, 2012). He further submits that the amended Rule 15 provides that each vacancy should be advertised in two newspapers.
2. The grievance of the petitioner is that by the impugned government order dated 11.07.2013 and the advertisement dated 19.08.2013 the selection process has been initiated only in respect of two subjects (i) Mathematics and (ii) Science, whereas there are large number of vacancies in other subjects also. He further submits that the government order and the advertisement will cause serious prejudice to the interest of the candidates other than Mathematics and Science as they would become junior to the persons selected in pursuance of this advertisement.
3. Learned Standing Counsel seeks time to get instructions.
4. Put up this case in Additional Cause List on 07.10.2013, before appropriate Bench.
Order Date :- 24.9.2013
DS
Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=2817746
ISWAR KEHTA HAI:
ReplyDeleteUDAS MAT HONA KHABHI
KYOKI HAMESHA MAIN TERE SATH HUE
SAMNE NAHI
PR AAS PASS HUE
PALKO KO BAND KR DIL SE YAAD KRNA
MAIN AUR KOI NAHI TERA VISHWASH AUR AATM VISWASH HUE.
MR SANJEEV I LIKE YOUR THOUGHTS.
Deleteis bharti me b tet merit hi leni chahiye isse compitition level sb k ly same hoga ,acadimic merit me alag-2 university me alag-2 tarike se marks distribute hote h,jisse sb candidate satisfy ni ho pate or court chale jate h,tet merit se c.b.s.e,i.c.s.c or up board walo k marks ka diffrens ni hota isly tetmerit hi lena chahiye
ReplyDelete