Basic Shiksha UP : HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD - इंटर डिस्ट्रिक्ट ट्रांसफर का लाभ लेने वालों को प्रमोशन का दोहरा लाभ नहीं

Basic Shiksha UP : HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD - इंटर डिस्ट्रिक्ट ट्रांसफर का लाभ लेने वालों को प्रमोशन का दोहरा लाभ नहीं 

 

 Court No. - 38

  

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5234 of 2020

 

Petitioner :- Dharmendra Singh

 

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others

 

Counsel for Petitioner :- Neeraj Shukla

 

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Vikram Bahadur Singh

 

 

Hon'ble Vivek Agarwal,J.

 

Heard Sri Neeraj Shukla, counsel for the petitioner and Sri Arun Kumar, learned counsel for the respondents.

Petitioner has filed this petition claiming therein that petitioner was earlier working in Junior High School, Mohnapur, Block- Laxmipur, District- Maharajganj on 05.05.2015. On 23.06.2016, State Government issued a transfer policy for transferring the teachers of the Institutions run by Basic Shiksha Parishad in pursuance of the transfer policy dated 23.06.2016. Petitioner was transferred to District- Fatehpur vide order dated 21.08.2016. It is petitioner's contention that he was informed by the District Basic Education Officer, Fatehpur that the batchmates of the petitioner functioning in the District-Fatehpur at that time were not promoted and, therefore, petitioner has to go to his district from where he was transferred or he will have to work on a demoted post as an Assistant Teacher available at that time in district-Fatehpur. Petitioner in para-10 of the writ petition has mentioned that he was left with no other option but to approach his district i.e. Maharajganj for the required order as per the direction issued by the District Basic Education Officer, Fatehpur. Petitioner's contention is that since transfer has been made in terms of the policy, therefore his Grade-pay could not have been reduced from Rs.4600 to Rs.4200. Petitioner is entitled to pay protection.

In support of this contention, petitioner has placed reliance on the order dated 06.12.2018 passed in Writ-A No.25804 of 2018 and order dated 08.08.2019 passed in Writ-A No.14899 of 2019 and has sought a relief that he be paid salary with Grade-pay of Rs.4600 as he was getting before his transfer to District-Fatehpur.

Sri Arun Kumar, learned counsel appearing for respondent nos.3 and 4 submits that case of the petitioner is different from what has been canvassed by the petitioner and petitioner is not entitled to any relief.

It is submitted that as per the transfer policy dated 23.06.2016 as contained in Annexure-3, there is a specific provision that persons seeking transfer will be transferred in the desired district only when in the concerned district where a person is seeking transfer, persons of his batch are working on an equal post. It is submitted that admittedly in District-Fatehpur where petitioner sought transfer, his batcmates were not promoted to the Grade-pay of Rs.4600 and petitioner was given an option to either revert back to the district from where, he was transferred i.e. district-Maharajganj or in the alternative except the position as was obtaining in relation to his batch-mates.

At this stage, learned counsel submits that with a view to enjoy his transfer to District-Fatehpur, petitioner had gone back to district-Maharajganj, got himself reverted in the Grade-pay of Rs.4200 and thereafter joined at Fatehpur in the Grade pay of Rs.4200.

In view of such facts, now at this distance of time it is not open to the petitioner to claim relief and these facts have not been appreciated or were not brought to the notice of the co-ordinate bench when orders were passed in Writ-A No.25804 of 2018 and Writ-A No.14899 of 2019.

At this stage, Sri Shukla submits that under similar facts and circumstances, Secretary, U.P. Basic Education Council, Allahabad has passed orders and has allowed pay protection. He has drawn attention of this court to order no. Basic Shiksha Parishad/5468/2018-19 dated 23.07.2018, relevant portion of the order is reproduced hereinunder:-

";kphx.kksa }kjk izLrqr izR;kosnu ,ao vki }kjk izLrqr vk[;k ds voyksduksijkUr ;g rF; izdk'k esa vk;k fd ;kphx.kksa dk vUrtZuinh; LFkkukUrj.k izns'k ds fofHkUu tuinksa ls tuin tkSuiqj ds fy, ifj"kn ds fofHkUu vkns'kksa }kjk fd;k x;kA pwafd ;kphx.kksa dh inksUufr vius dk;Zjr tuin esa gks pqdh Fkh vkSj ml cSp ds fu;qfDr f'k{kdksa dh tuin tkSuiqj esa inksUufr ugha gq;h Fkh] ,slh fLFkfr esa ;kphx.kksa }kjk vius dk;Zjr tuinksa ls viuk inkour ysdj tuin tkSuiqj esa dk;ZHkkj xzg.k fd;kA ;kphx.kksa dk dFku gS fd budk osru ,y0ih0lh0 ds vk/kkj ij u fu/kkfjr djrs gq, inkuour in dk fu/kkZj.k fd;k x;kA tcfd c<+k gqvk osru fdlh Hkh n'kk esa de ugha fd;k tk ldrk gSA mDr ds lEcU/k esa lwP; gS fd ;kphx.kksa dks Pay Protection dk ykHk fn;k tkuk pkfg;sA vr% ,y0ih0lh0 (vfUre osru izek.k i=) ds vk/kkj ij u;s tuin esa osru dk vkx.ku dj Pay Protection ds fu;eksa dk ikyu fd;k tkuk pkfg,A mDr ds lEcU/k esa vkidks funsZf'kr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;kphx.kksa dks vfUre osru izek.k i= (,y0ih0lh0) ds vk/kkj ij osru vkWx.ku dj Pay Protection ds fu;eksa dk ikyu djrs gq, osru Hkqxrku djus dh dk;Zokgh dj ek0 mPp U;k;ky; ds vkns'k dk vuqikyu lqfuf'pr djsaA"

Thus, it is evident that petitioner himself had furnished an affidavit before the B.S.A. and vide order dated 22.07.2013, petitioner was demoted and then his pay was fixed in the Grade-pay of Rs.4200. Thus, there is no question of any pay protection because once petitioner sought transfer in a district of his own choice and decided to forego his promotion in the district where he was functioning on account of the fact that his batchmates were not promoted in the district of his choice where he sought his transfer, therefore, in terms of the order dated 23.06.2016 Clause-2 which reads as follows:

"2&mYys[kuh; gS fd m0 iz0 csfld f'k{kk ¼v/;kid½ lsok fu;ekoyh 1981 ¼;Fkk la'kksf/kr½ ds fu;e&4 ds vuqlkj ifj"knh; v/;kidksa dk lsok dk laoxZ LFkkuh; fudk; dk gS izR;sd tuin esa nks LFkkuh; fudk; xzkeh.k ,oa uxj {ks= ifjHkkf"kr gSA fu;ekoyh ds fu;e&21 ds vuqlkj v/;kidksa dk LFkkUkkUrj.k ,d LFkkuh; fudk; ls nwljh LFkkuh; fudk; esa v/;kid ds Lo;a ds vuqjks/k ij fd;s tkus dk izkfo/kku gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa vUrtZuinh; LFkkUkkUrj.k v/;kid dk vf/kdkj ugh gS] fQj Hkh v/;kidksa ds Lo;a ds vuqjks/k ,oa ifjfLFkfrtU; dkj.kksa ds n`f"vxr okafNr tuinksa esa miyC/k fjfDr ds lkis{k LFkkUkkUrj.k ij fd;k tk;sxkA vr% LFkkUkkUrj.k ds i'pkr ,d LFkkuh; ffudk; ls nwljs LFkkuh; fudk; esa LFkkuh; LFkkukUrfjr gksdj tkus ij v/;kid ml LFkkuh; fudk; laoxZ dh T;s"Brk dze esa dfu"Bre ekuk tk;sxkA"

Clause 3.2 reads as under:-

3.2 vUrtZuinh; LFkkukUrj.k gsrq bPNqd v/;kid }kjk fu/kkZfjr izk:i ij vkuykbUk vkosnu fd;k tk;sxk ftlesa v/;kid vf/keku dze esa 05 tuinksa dk fodYi izLrqr dj ldrs gSA v/;kidksa dk LFkkukUrj.k muds }kjk vf/keku dze esa fn;s x;s fodYi ds vk/kkj ij okafNr ftysa esa miyC/k fjfDr ds lkis{k gh mudh izkFkfedrk dze rFkk ojh;rk ds n`f"Vxr fd;k tk ldsxkA In view of the aforesaid Clauses, it is apparent that firstly, it is not a right vested in a Assistant Teacher/Teacher to seek transfer from one local body to another local body but a facility has been given under the provisions contained in Uttar Pradesh Basic Shiksha (Adhyapak) Seva Niyamawali, 1981 for transfer of teachers from one local area to another local area, if posts in the equivalent cadre are vacant. The connotation of equivalent cadre means that posts in the same Grade pay is available. Once, petitioner exercises this right and has failed to produce any material to show that post in the Grade-pay of Rs.4600 was vacant and available at the place where petitioner sought transfer i.e. in District-Fatehpur then petitioner is not entitled to pay protection as he had voluntarily foregone the promotion in the Grade-pay of Rs.4600 and opted for demotion in the Grade Pay of Rs.4200 and to suppress this fact petitioner has deliberately not enclosed the copy of Last Pay Certificate (L.P.C.) to substantiate that they were not demoted to be accommodated in a transferred district on lower Grade pay of demoted post.

Law in regard to protection of pay is well settled as has been laid down in case of Comptroller and Auditor General of India Vs. Farid Sattar as reported in (2000) 4 SCC 13 wherein, it has been held that where a person on his own volition seeks transfer on certain terms and conditions accepted by him and the terms and conditions of unilateral transfer are very clear and there is no ambiguity in it. The terms and conditions provided that the respondent on transfer could be appointed to a post which is lower to the post which he was occupying prior to his transfer in such a situation, the pay of the respondent had to be fixed with reference to the lower pay scale and not with reference to the pay drawn by him in the higher posts. In para-6, it has been specifically mentioned that under the terms and conditions of the transfer the pay which the respondent was drawing on the higher post was not required to be protected when he joined the lower post of accountant.

The facts of this case decided by Hon'ble Supreme Court are applicable in all force to the facts of the present case and once the petitioner himself had foregone promotion in the Grade-pay to Rs.4600 and opted for his promotion in the Grade-pay of Rs.4200, he is estopped from claiming dual advantage of transfer to a district of his own choice and drawing of higher Grade-pay from which he was demoted in terms of the policy so to be accommodated in the district of his own choice.

Thus, the orders on which petitioner has placed reliance are of no relevance for the present and the principles of pay protection will not be applicable in the case of the petitioner because once he was demoted then he was not drawing the salary in the Grade-pay of Rs.4600.

Accordingly, petitioner has failed to make out a case for pay protection and, therefore, petition fails and is dismissed.

Order Date :- 9.7.2020 Ashutosh    

 UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  / शिक्षक भर्ती /  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  
,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET),  , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
 

Allahabad High Court Basic Teacher Transfer : Anurag Tiwari And 56 Others vs State Of U.P. And 6 Others on 20 April, 2023 : विशेष परिस्थितियों में शिक्षकों का ट्रांसफर किया जा सकेगा

Allahabad High Court Basic Teacher Transfer : Anurag Tiwari And 56 Others vs State Of U.P. And 6 Others on 20 April, 2023 : विशेष परिस्थितियों में शिक्षकों का ट्रांसफर किया जा सकेगा 

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

 

Court No. - 36

 

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5869 of 2023

 

Petitioner :- Anurag Tiwari And 56 Others

 

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others

 

Counsel for Petitioner :- Ishwar Kumar Upadhyay

 

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Archana Singh,Ashok Kumar Singh,Rajesh Khare

 

 

Hon'ble Ashutosh Srivastava,J.

 

1. Heard Shri I.K.Upadhyaya, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondnets, Smt. Archana Singh, learned counsel, who has put in appeearance on behalf of the respondent no. 2, Shri Ashok Kumar Singh, learned counsel, who has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent no. 5.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to permit Inter District Transfer of the petitioners working in Junior Basic Schools/ Senior Basic Schools established and administered by Board of Education, Prayagraj in eight districts termed to be aspirational districts within a period specified by this Court.

3. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the all the petitioners were appointed as Assistant Teachers in aspirational Districts Bahraich, Shravasti, Siddhartha Nagar and Chitrkoot between the year 2014 to 2018 and all of them have completed 5 years of their services at their respective places of posting.

4. It is contended that the U.P. Basic Education (Teachers) (Posting) Rules, 2008 have been framed under Section 19 (1) of the U.P. Basic Education Act, 1972. Rule 8 of the 2008 Rules provides for Inter-District Transfer. Rule 21 of the U.P. Basic Education (Teachers) Service Rules, 1981 also relates to transfer of the teachers. The State Government has issued a Government Order dated 02.12.2019 laying down the policy for the year 2019-20 for Inter-District Transfer. Clause 13 of the Government Order dated 02.12.2019 imposes restriction upon the teachers appointed in the aspirational districts like Siddharth Nagar, Shravasti, Bahraich, Sonebhadra, Chandauli, Fatehpur, Chitrakoot and Balrampur. The Clause 13 of the Government Order dated 02.12.2019 is being reproduced here under:-

"13. आकांक्षी (Aspirational) जनपदों यथा-सिद्धार्थनगर, श्रावस्ती, बहराइच, सोनभद्र, चन्दौली, फतेहपुर, चित्रकूट एवं बलरामपुर में से प्रत्येक जनपद से उतने ही अध्यापकों को अन्यत्र जनपदों में स्थानान्तरित किया जायेगा, जितने अध्यापकों द्वारा अन्य जनपदों से सम्बन्धित आकांक्षी जनपद में आने के लिए स्थानान्तरण हेतु अनुरोध किया जायेगा। परन्तु, यह प्रावधान भारतीय सेना/वायु सेना/नौ सेना/अर्ध सैनिक बलों यथा, CRPF/ CISF/ SSB/ASSAM RIFLES/ITBP/NSG/BSF, से सम्बन्धित प्रकरणों पर लागू नही होगा। "

5. The Government Order dated 02.12.2019 came to be challenged in a bunch of writ petitions leading amongst them being Writ (A) No.878 of 2020 (Divya Goswami Vs. State of U.P. and others). The writ petition was finally decided vide order dated 03.11.2020. The Court concluded that the following observations/directions be necessarily kept in mind before finalizing the list of teachers seeking inter-district transfer:-

"(I) No inter district transfer shall be done in the mid of the academic session. (II) Transfer application should be entertained strictly in the light of the provisions as contained in Rule 8(2)(a) (b) and (d) of the Posting Rules, 2008. (III) Once a teacher has successfully exercised the option for inter district transfer, no second opportunity shall be afforded to any teacher of any category except in case of female teacher who has already availed benefit of inter district transfer on the ground of parents dependency, prior to her marriage. However, in case if the marriage has taken place then she will have only one opportunity to exercise option for inter district transfer either on the ground of parents dependency or spouse residence/ in-laws residence. (IV) In case of grave medical emergency for any incurable or serious disease that may as of necessity, require immediate medical help and sustained medical treatment, either personally or for the spouse, a second time opportunity to apply for inter district transfer should be afforded to such a teacher even if he/she had exercised such option for inter district transfer for any other reason in the past. (V) Application of differently abled person should have very sympathetic consideration looking to physical disability but they should also have only one time opportunity to exercise option for inter district transfer. In case of female teachers, such exception would apply, as referable to rule 8(2) (d) of Posting Rules, 2008. (VI) In case of female teacher's right to seek transfer, relaxation given under Rule 8(2)(d) shall be read with rule 8(2) (b) and relaxation shall, therefore, be subject to rule 8(2) (b). (VII) Save as observed and directed herein above (Direction Nos.III, IV and V), no second opportunity to exercise option for inter district transfer be made available to any candidate of any category whatsoever. (VIII) The exercise of inter-district transfer since is exception to the general rule of appointment and posting, every application for transfer has to be addressed to by the competent authority keeping in mind the objectives set forth under the Act, 2009 and Posting Rules, 2008 as amended in the year 2010 and must be acceded to citing a special circumstance specific to the case considered."

6. The order dated 03.11.2020 was modified by the Court vide order dated 03.12.2020 to the extent that and the Direction No.1 in the order dated 03.11.2020 would not be pressed in the cases of medical emergency thus permitting transfers in mid academic session. The medical emergency cases were required to be dealt with by the Government strictly in accordance with its own guidelines and the prescribed procedure to identify such cases which were to be religiously followed.

7. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that after the decision of this Court in the case of Divya Goswami (supra) the State Government issued Government Order dated 15.12.2020 and circular dated 17.12.2020. Both the Government Order dated 15.12.2020 and the circular did not contain any restriction with regard to aspirational districts. He submits that Clause 13 of the Government Order dated 02.12.2019 provided that from the aspirational districts only such number of teachers would be transferred as the number of requests for transfer from other districts to the said districts are received. The Government Order dated 02.12.2019 having been struck down by this Court and the State Government having issued the Government Order dated 15.12.2020 and circular dated 17.12.2020 which did not provide anything about the aspirational districts, the inter-district transfer request of the petitioner was required to be considered positively and was not liable to be rejected. Reliance is also placed upon a Government Order dated 29.03.2018 which provides in Clause II(vii) that transfers out of aspirational districts could be considered after two years of the posting by accepting options. Reliance is also placed upon information received under the Right to Information Act from Government of India, Niti Ayog, New Delhi obtained on 18.01.2021 to demonstrate that now no restrictions have been imposed by the Central Government as regards Inter District Transfers of Teachers and the same is within the domain of the State Government. It is thus contended that in the absence of any restrictions imposed by subsequent Government Orders regarding Inter-District Transfers the request of transfer of the petitioner is liable to be considered under Rule 8 of the Rules, 2008 and Rule 21 of the 1981 Rules.

8. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents, has resisted the writ petition by submitting that the entire proceedings of Inter-District Transfer of teachers working in Institutions run by the Basic Education Board is done through a software developed by NIC in accordance with the provisions contained in the Government Order issued by the Basic Education Department. For the Academic Session 2019-20, a transfer policy was framed vide Government Order dated 02.12.2019. Clause 13 of the Government Order imposes restriction upon Inter-District Transfers and provides that from the districts Siddharth Nagar, Shravasti, Bahraich, Sonebhadra, Chandauli, Fatehpur, Chitrakoot and Balrampur only such number of teachers would be transferred as the number of requests for transfer from other districts to the said districts are received. The validity of the said clause has been upheld by a Division Bench of this Court in Writ (A) No.9177 of 2021 (Aradhana and another vs. State of U.P. & 5 others) decided on 05.08.2021. Clause 8 of the Government Order dated 02.12.2019 provides for fixation of preferential points and the transfer requests shall be entertained on the basis of the preferential points obtained by each candidate seeking transfer.

9. It is next contended by learned counsel for the Respondents that the writ petitioners in their online application opted for being transferred to several districts. It is submitted that the claim of transfer from aspirational districts has been laid to rest by a decision this Court dated 13.8.2018 passed in Writ (A) No.14395 of 2018 (Smt. Ruchi vs. State of U.P. and others) and 126 connected writ petitions by holding that the writ petitioners working in aspirational districts have no right for Inter District Transfer. Petitioners does not have any legally protected or judicially enforceable subsisting right to ask for mandamus for transfer from the aspirational district.

10. It is further submitted that the post of Assistant Teacher in Primary School is a district level cadre and Inter-District Transfer is an exceptional measure not to be made routinely except in terms of Rule 21 of the 1981 Rules. It is thus submitted that the writ petition is misconceived and is liable to be dismissed.

11. Learned counsel for the petitioners has refuted the averments made by the learned counsel for the respondents by submitting that the respondents have been adopting pick and choose policy in affecting the inter-district transfers. At one instance the genuine transfer request of the petitioners have been denied on the ground that the transfer is being sought from an aspirational district and on the other hand several transfers have been affected from aspirational districts of Gautam Buddh Nagar, Ghaziabad and Jalaun. It is further contended that the case of the writ petitioners are liable to be considered in the light of the decision of this Court in the case of Divya Goswami (Supra).

12. Having heard the respective learned counsels for the parties and having perused the record, the Court finds that the case of the writ petitioners have not be considered only on the ground that the transfer is being sought from an aspirational district and such transfers from aspirational districts have been not permitted by Clause 13 of the Government Order dated 02.12.2019.

13. The Court further finds that the aspirational districts programme was launched by the Prime Minister in January, 2018 which aimed to quickly and effectively transform 112 most under developed districts across the country. The broad contours of the programme are convergence (of Central, State Schemes) Collaboration (of Central, State Level Nodal Officers & District Collectors) and competition among districts through monthly delta ranking; all driven by a mass movement. This programme focuses on the strength of each district, identifying low handing fruits for immediate improvement and measuring progress by ranking districts on a monthly basis. The ranking is based on the incremental progress made across 49 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) under 5 Broad Socio-Economic Themes i.e. Health and Nutrition, Education, Agriculture & Water Resources, Financial Inclusion & Skill Development and Infrastructure.

14. The Court further finds that a Coordinate Bench of this Court while dealing with the issues of Inter-District Transfers as also the Government Order dated 02.12.2019 laying down the Transfer Policy for 2019-20 in the case of Divya Goswami (Supra) deliberately did not deal with the Inter-District Transfers from aspirational districts and to the restrictions imposed by Clause 13 of the Government Order dated 02.12.2019 presumably on the ground that the issue of transfer from aspirational districts stood decided by the decisions rendered in Writ (A) No.9177 of 2021 (Aradhana and another Vs. State of U.P. & 5 others) as also Writ (A) No.14395 of 2018 (Smt. Ruchi Vs. State of U.P. & others) and 126 connected writ petitions holding that candidates working in aspirational districts have no right to seek transfer from aspirational districts. However, the Transfer Policy evolved subsequent to the decision of this Court in the case of Divya Goswami (Supra) vide Government Order dated 15.12.2020 and Circular dated 17.12.2020 do not impose any restriction for Inter-District Transfer from aspirational districts. In the opinion of the Court, the request of the petitioners, for transfer from the district of their posting to the aspirational district, are required to be sympathetically considered in the light of the provisions of the U.P. Basic Education Teachers (Posting) Rules 2008, read with Rule 21 of the Basic Education (Teachers) Service Rules, 1981 as also any policy framed by the State Government for Inter-District Transfer. Admittedly, no policy for effecting Inter-District Transfer is in vogue currently.

15. The petitioners were appointed as an Assistant Teacher in the Primary Schools are Members of District Level Cadre, which have been allotted to them after considering the preference of the teachers concerned. Being Members of District Level Cadre, the petitioners are required to remain posted within the cadre and transfer beyond the cadre/outside the district is ordinarily not concerned under the Rules. A transfer outside the district can be considered in normal circumstances only in accordance with the Rules. Rule 8(2)(d) of the Posting Rules, 2008 provides that in normal circumstances the applications for Inter-District Transfer of Female Teachers will not the entertained before 5 years of completing their posting. However, the Rule contemplates that in exceptional or extra-ordinary circumstances an application for transfer can be considered by the Basic Education Board/Director (Basic Education) even before the expiry of such term. The question whether in a given case the exceptional or extra-ordinary circumstances exists or not has to be examined by the Basic Education Board/Director (Basic Education).

16. In such circumstance, the writ petition stands disposed of by permitting the petitioners to represent the matter before the Director, Basic Education, U.P., individually, annexing all the materials in support of their plea that there exists exceptional circumstances justifying their transfer from the districts of their posting to the aspirational districts along with certified copy of the order of this Court within three weeks from today.

17. In the eventuality of such representations being filed within the time allowed, it is expected that the Director, Basic Education, U.P., shall examine as to whether the ground on which the petitioners are seeking their transfer would fall within the exceptional circumstances or not and pass a reasoned and speaking order within further period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation of the petitioner along with certified copy of this order.

18. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.

Order Date :- 20.4.2023 Deepak/    

 UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  / शिक्षक भर्ती /  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  
,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET),  , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
 

Basic Teacher Transfer - महिलाओं को हस्बेंड या ससुराल में ट्रांसफर दिए जाने का नियम है , इलाहबाद हाई कोर्ट ने शिक्षिका के ट्रांसफर हेतु प्रत्यावेदन पर विचार करने को कहा

Basic Teacher Transfer - महिलाओं को हस्बेंड या ससुराल में ट्रांसफर दिए जाने का  नियम है , इलाहबाद हाई कोर्ट ने शिक्षिका के ट्रांसफर हेतु प्रत्यावेदन पर विचार करने को कहा  

Smt. Poonam Dubey vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. ... on 31 March, 2023

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
 
?Court No. - 18
 
 
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2551 of 2023
  
Petitioner :- Smt. Poonam Dubey
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Basic Education Lko. And 4 Others
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Mrs.Suniti Sachan,Gangeshwar Pandey,Shishir Chandra
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ajay Kumar,Rajiv Singh Chuahan,Ran Vijay Singh
 

 
Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
 

The petitioner is an Assistant Teacher. She is presently posted at Prathmik Vidyalaya, Kanhara, Vikas Khand - Chopan District Sonbhadra. Her husband is suffering from tongue cancer and is being treated at New Delhi and requires frequent hospitalization. She has made a representation for her transfer from Sonbhadra to District Unnao i.e. to the place of residence of her husband and in-laws, which is also close to New Delhi as compared to District Sonbhadra.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Uttar Pradesh Basic Education (Teachers) (Posting) Rules, 2008 deals with the posting and transfer of the teachers working in Junior Basic Schools and Senior Basic Schools run by the Board.

The Rule 8(2)(d) of the Rules, 2008 provides that in normal circumstances the applications for inter-district transfers can be entertained of only those teachers who have completed five years of their posting, however, the exception is provided that an application of a female teacher for her transfer at the place of her husband or in-laws would be entertained.

It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that in case the petitioner is directed to submit on-line application in terms of Government Order dated 13.6.2017, in that event the petitioner would not be eligible for transfer as she has not completed five years of requisite service.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on a judgment of Full Bench of this Court in the case of R.B. Dixit v. Union of India and others, (2005) 1 UPLBEC 83.

Sri Ghaus Beg, learned Advocate, who has put in appearance on behalf of the District Basic Education Officer submits that the State Government has issued guidelines on 13.6.2017 in respect of inter-district transfer of the assistant teachers of Junior Basic Schools and Senior Basic Schools for the session 2017-18. He further submits that on-line applications would be accepted from 7th to 20th August, 2017 and the procedure has been laid down under the said guidelines.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties. With their consent the writ petition is being disposed of finally at this stage in terms of the Rules of the Court.

The Uttar Pradesh Basic Education (Teachers) (Posting) Rules, 2008 have been framed under Section 19(1) of the U.P. Basic Education Act, 1972. The Rule 8(2)(d) provides as under:

"(d) In normal circumstances the applications for inter-district transfers in respect of male and female teachers will not be entertained within five years of their posting. But under special circumstances, applications for inter-district transfers in respect of female teachers would be entertained to the place of residence of their husband or in law's district."

From a reading of the aforesaid Rule it is evident that under the special circumstances an application of a female teacher can be entertained for her transfer at the place of residence of her husband or in-law's district. In such cases the requirement of five years of posting has been relaxed.

It is trite that in most of the services of the Central Government and the State Governments, there is provision in their transfer policy that an endeavour should be made that husband and wife may be posted at the same place. In view of the said principle, under the Rules 2008 the provision of the couple posting has been incorporated.

The intention of rule making authority is very clear and it needs no elaboration. Relevant it would be to mention that in transfer policy of State Government for Government employees there is provision only for husband and wife but in Rule 8(2) (d) of the Rules, 2008 the in-laws of the female teachers have also been included.

Hence, in my view, in spite of the Government Order dated 13.6.2017 a female teacher's application for her transfer on the ground of couple posting or in-laws can be entertained notwithstanding some of the contrary provisions of the said Government order.

For the above-mentioned reasons, there is no legal bar in considering the representation of the petitioner in terms of Rule 8(2)(d) of the Rules, 2008.

Accordingly, a direction is issued upon the third respondent i.e. Secretary, Basic Education Board, U.P., Allahabad to consider the representation of the petitioner in the light of the observations made herein-above and pass appropriate order expeditiously, preferably within six weeks from the date of communication of this order.

The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.

No order as to costs.

(Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 31.3.2023 Ravi/    

 UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  / शिक्षक भर्ती /  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  
,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET),  , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
 

इलाहबाद हाई कोर्ट बेंच के नए आर्डर से हज़ारों नियुक्तियां मुश्किल में पढ़ी , एन सी टी ई नोटिफिकेशन क्या हैं Junior Teacher Qualification देखें -

इलाहबाद हाई कोर्ट बेंच के नए आर्डर से हज़ारों नियुक्तियां मुश्किल में पढ़ी , एन सी टी ई नोटिफिकेशन क्या हैं  Junior Teacher Qualification देखें  - 

NCTE notification 23rd August 2010.

Junior Science math teacher related qualifcation - http://ncte-india.org/ncte_new/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Minimum-Qualification-2010.pdf

NCTE Notification 2011 :-
http://ncte-india.org/ncte_new/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Minimum-Qualification-2011.pdf
















NCTE Notification 2014:
http://ncte-india.org/Minimum%20Qualification_2015.pdf

 UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  / शिक्षक भर्ती /  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
 Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
 

LT Grade - - विज्ञापित विषय की डिग्री पर ही दिया जा सकता क्वालिटी प्वाइंट मार्क

LT Grade - - 



विज्ञापित विषय की डिग्री पर ही दिया जा सकता क्वालिटी प्वाइंट मार्क

विधि संवाददाता, इलाहाबाद : इलाहाबाद हाईकोर्ट ने कहा है कि क्वालिटी प्वाइंट मार्क्‍स उसी विषय की डिग्री पर दिया जा सकता है जिसमें सहायक अध्यापकों की भर्ती का विज्ञापन निकाला गया था। विज्ञापित विषय से इतर दूसरे विषय की स्नातक डिग्री को क्वालिटी प्वाइंट देने का कोई औचित्य नहीं है, क्योंकि यह व्यवस्था भर्ती में शामिल अभ्यर्थियों में से योग्यतम अभ्यर्थियों के चयन के लिए अपनाई गई है। जिससे कि संबंधित विषय के पढ़ाने वाले योग्यतम अध्यापक नियुक्त हो सकें व शिक्षा की गुणवत्ता में सुधार हो सके। 

यह आदेश न्यायमूर्ति एसपी केशरवानी ने रवींद्र बाबू श्रीवास्तव व अन्य समेत दर्जनों याचिकाओं को स्वीकार करते हुए दिया है। कोर्ट ने एलटी ग्रेड के सहायक अध्यापकों की भर्ती में संबंधित विषय के परास्नातक डिग्री को ही क्वालिटी प्वाइंट मार्क्‍स देने को सही माना है। 1संबंधित सभी संयुक्त शिक्षा निदेशकों/सक्षम प्राधिकारियों को संबंधित विषय पर स्नातक डिग्री को क्वालिटी प्वाइंट अंक देकर तीन महीने में चयन प्रक्रिया पूरी करने का निर्देश दिया है। कोर्ट ने कहा है कि विज्ञापित विषय से इतर किसी विषय की डिग्री को क्वालिटी प्वाइंट मार्क्‍स देना शासनादेश की गलत व्याख्या करना है। याचिका पर वरिष्ठ अधिवक्ता राधाकांत ओझा, विभु राय ने बहस की। 

नियुक्ति व कार्यभार ग्रहण करने पर रोक

मालूम हो कि प्रदेश के राजकीय माध्यमिक विद्यालयों में क्षेत्रीय संयुक्त शिक्षा निदेशकों ने 2012 में 1425 एलटी ग्रेड सहायक अध्यापकों की भर्ती का विज्ञापन निकाला। जिसमें परास्नातक डिग्री धारकों को क्वालिटी प्वाइंट मार्क्‍स देने की व्यवस्था की गई। लेकिन, इसकी गलत व्याख्या करते हुए विषय से इतर दूसरे विषय के परास्नातकों को अंक दिए गए। कई को नियुक्ति पत्र भी जारी हो गया। कोर्ट ने नियुक्ति पर रोक लगा दी और चयनितों को कार्यभार ग्रहण करने से रोक दिया गया है



 UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  / शिक्षक भर्ती /  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
 Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
 

UP Teacher Transfer - - पति पत्नी आधार पर स्थानांतरण के लिए हाल में राहत वाले निर्णय इस आधार पर दिए गे , उत्तर प्रदेश सरकार की न्यूनतम 5 वर्ष सर्विस की बाध्यता विशेष परिस्थतियों के लिए लागु नहीं , निर्णय का आधार बना केस न 7096 / 2010

UP Teacher Transfer - - 


पति पत्नी आधार पर स्थानांतरण के लिए हाल में राहत वाले निर्णय इस आधार पर दिए गे , उत्तर प्रदेश सरकार की न्यूनतम 5 वर्ष सर्विस की बाध्यता 
विशेष परिस्थतियों के लिए लागु नहीं , निर्णय का आधार बना केस न 7096 / 2010 


आज कल तमाम महिलाएं दूर दराज के जिलों में पोस्टेड हैं और उनके पति कहीं अन्यत्र कार्यरत हैं , ऊपर से बच्चों की  भी देखरेख करना होता है , इन परिस्थतियों को देखते हुए केंद्र व राज्य सरकार ने पति पत्नी को एक ही जगह पोस्टिंग देने की नीति बना रखी है | 
बेसिक शिक्षा परिषद् ने एक कदम आगे बढ़ते हुए महिलाओं को ससुराल के नजदीक पोस्टिंग करने की नीति भी बना दी थी | 

लेकिन कई लोगो के सामने समस्या थी की सेवाकाल न्यूनतम 5 वर्ष की अवधि , जिसको पूरा करने पर ही स्थानांतरण पर विचार होता | 

लेकिन कोर्ट ने हाल में 2 क्रम बद्ध निर्णय (WRIT - A No. - 30808 of 2017, WRIT - A No. - 35382 of 2017) दिए , जिसमे महिलाओं को पति के स्थान पर पोस्टिंग को विशेष परिस्थिति में माना गया , और 5 वर्ष की न्यूनतम सेवा 
की बाध्यता इस निर्णय (WRIT - A No. - 7096 of 2010 ) के आधार पर ख़ारिज  की :-


इस आदेश में कोर्ट ने महिला के पक्ष में निर्णय देते हुए सचिव को उसके स्थानांतरण आवेदन पर फैसला लेने को कहा , लेकिन सचिव ने स्थानांतरण पर बताया था की सरकार ने order dated 6.6.2009  के आधार पर  स्थानांतरण पर रोक लगा रखी है , लेकिन कोर्ट ने तर्क ख़ारिज करते हुए ट्रांसफर मसले को पोज़िटिवली 3 हफ्ते में निर्णय करने को कहा 

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 

?Court No. - 23 

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7096 of 2010 

Petitioner :- Sarita Gupta 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others 
Petitioner Counsel :- Awadhesh Tiwari 
Respondent Counsel :- Chandra Narayan Tripathi 

Hon'ble Sibghat Ullah Khan,J. 

Petitioner as well as her husband Shri Anurag Gupta both are teachers in Schools run by Basic Shiksha Parishad, Allahabad. At present petitioner is posted as Assistant teacher in primary school Jhawar Hardopatti, Block ? Lalganj, District, Raibarelly. In February, 2009 petitioner has married with Shri Anurag Gupta who is Assistant teacher in Primary school, Mirzapur, Sunahari Block Purwa District Unnao. Petitioner has applied for her transfer to some school run by Basic Shiksha Parishad situate in district Unnao. Earlier also petitioner had filed a petition for her transfer being writ petition no.63444 of 2009 which was disposed of on 24.11.2009 with the direction to Secretary U.P. Basic Shiksha Parishad, Allahabad to decide the matter. 
Secretary rejected the representation through order dated 6.1.2010 on the ground that through order dated 6.6.2009 the government had imposed restriction on transfer. The said order has been challenged through this writ petition. 
Shri C.N.Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for Basic Shiksha Parishad states that except the ban mentioned in the impugned order there is no other hindrance in posting both husband and wife at one place. 
The ban is general in nature. However, the provision of transfer for the purposes of placing husband and wife in the same district is a special provision which will normally prevail upon general temporary restriction on transfer. 
Accordingly, writ petition is allowed. Impugned order is set aside. Secretary, U.P. Basic Shiksha Parishad, Allahabad is directed to decide the matter ignoring the ban order dated 6.6.2009. The decision shall be taken positively within three weeks from today. 
Office is directed to supply a copy of this order free of cost to Shri C.N.Tripathi, learned counsel for Basic Shiksha Parishad (Chamber No.141) by 3.8.2010. 

Order Date :- 30.7.2010 

RS 





 UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  / शिक्षक भर्ती /  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
 Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
 

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News -गुपचुप ऑफ लाइन ट्रांसफर को रद्द किया कोर्ट ने , कहा ऑनलाइन पारदर्शी प्रक्रिया से नहीं आये , वापस पुराने स्कूल में भेजा जहाँ मूल तैनाती थी -

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI   News -गुपचुप ऑफ लाइन ट्रांसफर को रद्द किया कोर्ट ने , कहा ऑनलाइन पारदर्शी प्रक्रिया से नहीं आये , वापस पुराने स्कूल में भेजा जहाँ मूल तैनाती थी  - 




HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH 

?Court No. - 7 

Case :- SERVICE SINGLE No. - 333 of 2017 

Petitioner :- Mohd. Arif And Another 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Secy.Basic Edu.Govt.Of Up Lucknow & Ors. 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Krishan Kanhaya Pal,Pooja Pal 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Manish Mishra 
connected with 
Case :- SERVICE SINGLE No. - 489 of 2017 

Petitioner :- Manju Singh 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Edu.Basic Civil Sectt.Lko.&Ors. 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Yogendra Kumar Pandey 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ajay Kumar 
and 
Case :- SERVICE SINGLE No. - 587 of 2017 

Petitioner :- Manish Kumar Bajpai & Ors 
Respondent :- State Of U.P Thru Secy Basic Edu Lko & Ors 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Manjive Shukla 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C,Manish Mishra,Rajiv Singh Chauhan 
and 
Case :- SERVICE SINGLE No. - 795 of 2017 

Petitioner :- Faheem Beg 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Basic Edu.Civil Sectt.Lko.&Ors. 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Karunesh Singh Pawar 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ajay Kumar,Manish Mishra 
Hon'ble Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya,J. 
Pursuant to order dated 25.01.2017, Sri D.P.Singh, Special Secretary, Department of Basic Education is present.� He has stated that after issuance of the Government Order dated 23.06.2016, the State Government has issued another Government Order dated 19.12.2016 providing therein that in terms of the earlier transfer policy embodied in the Government Order dated 23.06.2016, the remaining on-line application forms submitted by the teachers seeking their inter-district transfers can be considered in terms of the earlier policy itself.� The Government Order dated 19.12.2016 is taken on record. 
However, on a query being put to him as to whether before passing the transfer order dated 03.01.2017 whereby several inter-district transfers of the teachers has been effected, prior approval of the Basic Education Board, as is required to be taken under Rule 21 of U.P. Basic Education (Teachers) Service Rules, 1981, was taken or not, it has been stated by Sri D.P.Singh, Special Secretary that no such approval was sought before passing the order dated 03.01.2017.�� 
Such a course adopted by the State Government while passing the transfer order on 03.01.2017 is not only against the statutory provisions contained in Rule 21 of the aforesaid Rules but is also in violation of the Government Order dated 23.06.2016. 
It is noticeable that the Government Order dated 19.12.2016 permitted consideration of remaining on-line applications only in terms of the Government Order dated 23.06.2016 and as such without seeking approval of the Basic Education Board, no such inter-district transfers could have been effected. 
At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that it is not only that only one order on 03.01.2017 effecting several inter-district transfers of teachers was passed but there are several such orders. 
Learned Chief Standing Counsel on the basis of instructions received from Special Secretary present today has stated that in fact on 03.01.2017 two orders effecting several inter-district transfers of teachers have been passed by the State Government.� He has also stated that these two orders passed on 03.01.2017 contain lists of teachers most of whom had submitted off-line applications, which was impermissible under the Rules and the Government Order. 
Such a procedure of effecting inter-district transfer is neither contemplated in Rule 21 of the Rules nor in the Government Order dated 23.06.2016. 
This bunch of writ petitions contain averments that while effecting inter-district transfers of teachers, the Basic Education Board and the respective Basic Shiksha Adhikaris have not followed the priority as contemplated in the Government Order dated 23.06.2016.� There appears to be large scale discrepancies in the inter-district transfers made by the respondents. 
Any statute or statutory Rules or even a Government Policy is binding on the Government as much as it is binding on others.�� The facts of this case clearly establish that State Government has acted against its own norms which are embodied in the Service Rules, 1981 and the Government order dated 23.06.2016.� Further, despite prescribing that only on-line applications seeking inter-district transfer shall be considered, the State Government while passing at least two orders on 03.01.2017 has considered off-line applications of teachers and passed orders thereon, which has not only resulted in making the process adopted by the Government non-transparent but has also deprived several teachers of the opportunity of making applications.� Such a course adopted by the State Government is, thus, prima facie, arbitrary and also suffers from the vice of malice in law as prima facie there is no justification for deviation from the prescribed norms. 
Accordingly, till further orders of this Court, operation and implementation of these two orders said to have been issued by the State Government on 03.01.2017 effecting inter-district transfers of the teachers in Primary and Junior High Schools in the State of U.P. are hereby stayed. 
The teachers who have been transferred in terms of the said orders will not be allowed to work and discharge their duties at the places of their new posting.� They shall, however, be permitted to discharge their duties in the schools where they have been working prior to passing of the orders on 03.01.2017 by the State Government. 
Let counter affidavit be filed in these matters by the respondents within a period of two weeks.� One week's time thereafter shall be available to learned counsel for the petitioners to file rejoinder affidavit. 
List after expiry of the aforesaid period showing the name of Sri Upendra Nath Mishra as counsel for the respondent. 
It will be open to the teachers who are affected by the order passed on 03.01.2017 by the State Government to seek their intervention in this case. 
Order Date :- 27.1.2017 
Renu/- 


 UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  / शिक्षक भर्ती /  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
 Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET