Sunday, January 29, 2012

CTET 2012 - Central Teacher Eligibility Test , Kanpur News : 36000 appeared from Kanpur, So many answers given based on Guess


सीटीईटी में बैठे 36,000 अंदाज से दिए खूब जवाब

(CTET 2012 - Central Teacher Eligibility Test , Kanpur News : 36000 appeared from Kanpur, So many answers given based on Guess)

कानपुर, नगर प्रतिनिधि : सेंट्रल टीचर एलिजबिल्टी टेस्ट (सीटीईटी) में शामिल परीक्षार्थी सवालों के जवाब में काफी देर उलझे रहे। जब परीक्षा का समय समाप्त होता दिखा तो माइनस मार्किग न होने से अंदाज से खूब गोले काले किये।
सर पदमपत सिंहानिया एजूकेशन सेंटर, केंद्रीय विद्यालय आईआईटी, हडर्ड समेत 49 केंद्रों पर दोनों पालियों में 36,000 परीक्षार्थी सीटीईटी में शामिल हुए। परीक्षा केंद्रों पर दोनों पालियों में 30 फीसदी परीक्षार्थी काफी देर तक सिर खपाते रहे और अंत में माइनस मार्किग न होने से गोले काले कर परीक्षा पूरी की। प्राथमिक स्तर की परीक्षा प्रात: 10 से 11.30 बजे के बीच हुई। 150 अंक के इस परीक्षा में बाल विकास एवं शिक्षा शास्त्र, गणित, पर्यावरण अध्ययन, हिंदी एवं अंग्रेजी भाषा से जुड़े तीस-तीस सवाल पूछे गये। परीक्षार्थियों का कहना था कि पर्चा न सरल था और न कठिन।

UPTET : TET Certificate / Marsheet issued on plain paper


सादा कागज पर मिल रहे टीईटी प्रमाणपत्र

(UPTET : TET Certificate / Marsheet issued on plain paper)

आगरा, जागरण संवाददाता: शासन ने खुद ही शिक्षकों की भर्ती में फर्जीवाड़े की बुनियाद रख दी है। ए 4 साइज के सादे कागज पर टीईटी के प्रमाणपत्र छपवाए गए हैं। उन पर न तो उ.प्र. माध्यमिक शिक्षा परिषद का कोई मोनोग्राम है और न ही मुहर।
राजकीय इंटर कॉलेज में प्रमाणपत्र लेने पहुंचे अभ्यर्थियों ने बोर्ड की इस लापरवाही पर आक्रोश जताया। युवाओं का कहना था कि ऐसे में कोई व्यक्ति आसानी से फर्जी प्रमाणपत्र तैयार कर सकता है। फीरोजाबाद के नीलेश सिंह ने कहा कि प्रमाणपत्रों में अंक भी बढ़ाए जा सकते हैं। ऐसे में शिक्षक भर्ती के दौरान सही या गलत सर्टिफिकेट की पहचान विभाग के लिए भी टेढ़ी खीर साबित होगा।

Saturday, January 28, 2012

Vishist BTC : Candidates selected through Vishist BTC 2004 with forged marksheets gets salary still after found their fake document in investigation


एडी ने बीएसए से मांगा जवाब

(Vishist BTC  : Candidates selected through Vishist BTC 2004  with forged marksheets gets salary still after found their fake document in investigation)

 फर्रुखाबाद। जांच में फर्जी पाए जाने के बाद भी बेसिक शिक्षा विभाग शिक्षकों का वेतन निकलता रहा। मामले में बीएसए ने भी कोई कार्रवाई नहीं की । एडी बेसिक ने बीएसए से नाराजगी जाहिर कर एक पखवारे के अंदर जवाब मांगा है। एडी बेसिक के पत्र से बेसिक शिक्षा विभाग में खलबली मची है।बेसिक शिक्षा विभाग में शिक्षकों की भर्ती का फजीवाड़ा शिक्षा माफियाओं के सहयोग से चल रहा है। शिकायत के बाद तीन शिक्षक जांच में फर्जी सामने आए है। वहीं सूची में सात शिक्षक अभी और है जिन्होंने नौकरी हासिल करने के लिए फर्जीवाड़ा किया है।
विभाग में वर्ष 2004 विशिष्ट बीटीसी के माध्यम से भर्ती हुए शिक्षकों के अंकपत्र. प्रमाणपत्रों की जांच में सत्यापान के बाद तीन शिक्षकों के संलग्न किए गए प्रमाणपत्र,अंकपत्र फर्जी पाए गए थे। उक्त शिक्षक वर्तमान समय में विद्यालय अलीदादपुर मोहम्मदाबाद में तैनात सहायक अध्यापक राजनारायण शाक्य निवासी मतापुर पिपरगांव, प्राथमिक विद्यालय दाउदपुर में तैनात शिक्षक नरेद्र शाक्य पुत्र सूबेदार निवासी ग्राम दौदापुर और प्राथमिक विद्यालय बरुआनगला कमालगंज में तैनात शिक्षक श्रवण कुमार पुत्र पहरीलाल निवासी उदीनगला, गदनपुर, देवराजपुर, फर्रुखाबाद में तैनात हैं। इधर डायट के सत्यापन के बावजूद बीएसए ने इन शिक्षकों का वेतन आहरण नहीं रोका और न ही इन शिक्षकों के खिलाफ रिपोर्ट दर्ज करने की कार्रवाई हो सकी।

UPTET Agra News : Crowd of TET candidates collected to take Marksheet / Certificate


टीईटी: प्रमाणपत्रों के लिए जुटी भीड़
(UPTET Agra News :  Crowd of TET candidates collected to take Marksheet / Certificate)
 
आगरा: शिक्षक पात्रता परीक्षा (यूपी टीईटी) के सफल उम्मीदवारों को प्रमाणपत्रों का वितरण शुरू हो गया। राजकीय इंटर कॉलेज पंचकुइयां में 20 काउंटर बनाकर प्रमाणपत्र बंटवाए गए। पहले दिन ही युवाओं की भीड़ उमड़ पड़ी। इसके चलते पुलिस बल की व्यवस्था करनी पड़ी। कई उम्मीदवार बिना प्रवेश पत्र और परिचय पत्र के पहुंचे तो उन्हें लौटा दिया गया।

UPTET Saharanpur : TET Certficate distribution from JD office


टीईटी प्रमाणपत्र को जेडी आफिस पर उमड़ा हुजूम

(UPTET Saharanpur : TET Certficate distribution from JD office )

सहारनपुर : टीईटी के प्रमाणपत्र लेने के लिए संयुक्त शिक्षा निदेशक कार्यालय में अभ्यर्थियों का भारी हुजूम उमड़ा। प्रमाणपत्र वितरण के लिए छह काउंटर बनाए गए थे। शाम तक 450 प्रमाणपत्रों का वितरण हो चुका था।
माध्यमिक शिक्षा परिषद द्वारा 13 नवंबर को मंडल मुख्यालय(सहारनपुर) पर कराई गई टीईटी परीक्षा में 38 हजार से अधिक अभ्यर्थी पंजीकृत थे इनमें से करीब 95 फीसदी परीक्षा में शामिल हुए थे। परीक्षा का रिजल्ट कई दुश्वारियों से होकर गुजरा। अंतत: सारी अड़चनें पार के करने के बाद परिषद द्वारा सफल अभ्यर्थियों को संयुक्त शिक्षा निदेशक कार्यालय से प्रमाणपत्र देने का निर्णय लिया गया। शुक्रवार से चकरौता रोड स्थित संयुक्त शिक्षा निदेशक कार्यालय से प्रमाणपत्रों का वितरण शुरू करा दिया गया।

UPTET : BSA suspended teacher, who was involved in TET forgery


बीएसए ने शिक्षक को किया निलंबित

(UPTET : BSA suspended teacher, who was involved in TET forgery)

टीईटी के पेपर आउट कराने का मामला

रमाबाई नगर के पुलिस अधीक्षक ने बीएसए को भेजा था कार्रवाई को पत्र
जनवरी माह में थाना अकबर पुलिस ने किया था गिरफ्तार
जालसाजी और भ्रष्टाचार समेत कई धाराओं में हैं मामले दर्ज
गिरोह से अन्य शिक्षा माफियाओं के भी जुड़े हैं तार, हड़कंप
सुशील कुमार
बदायूं। शिक्षक पात्रता परीक्षा (टीईटी) 2011 के पेपर आउट कराने की योजना बनाने वाले गिरोह में पकडे़ गए बदायूं के एक शिक्षक को पुलिस अधीक्षक रमाबाई नगर की रिपोर्ट के आधार पर जिला बेसिक शिक्षा अधिकारी ने निलंबित कर दिया है। शिक्षक के खिलाफ रमाबाई नगर के थाना अकबरपुर में जालसाजी समेत तमाम धाराओं में मुकदमे दर्ज हैं। शिक्षक के निलंबन के बाद यह प्रकरण जिले में चर्चा का विषय बना हुआ है। सूत्रों का कहना है इस प्रकरण के सामने आने से जिले के शिक्षा माफियाओं में हड़कंप मचा हुआ है कि इसमें उनका नाम शामिल न हो जाए। रमाबाई नगर की पुलिस सूत्रों के मुताबिक जिले में कभी भी छापामारी कर सकती है।

UPTET : TET Certificate Distribution upto 2nd Feb 2012

दो फरवरी तक मिलेंगे टीईटी प्रमाण पत्र

(UPTET : TET Certificate Distribution upto 2nd Feb 2012)

मेरठ : उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य शिक्षक पात्रता परीक्षा (टीईटी) के प्रमाण पत्र जीआईसी मेरठ से अब दो फरवरी तक बांटे जाएंगे। अभ्यर्थियों की भीड़ को देखते हुए यह तिथि आगे बढ़ाई गई है।
शुक्रवार को जीआईसी में प्रमाण पत्र लेने के लिए जबरदस्त भीड़ रही। 11 बजे से बंटने वाले प्रमाण पत्र के लिए सुबह नौ बजे से ही मंडल के जिलों से अभ्यर्थी पहुंचने शुरू हो गए थे। तीन बजे तक प्रमाणपत्र बांटने का समय निर्धारित था, लेकिन शाम पांच बजे के बाद भी चौदह काउंटरों पर भीड़ छंटने का नाम नहीं ले रही थी।

Friday, January 27, 2012

UPTET News : TET Pass B. Ed Distance Education holder can Provisionally Submit their Applications for PRT Subject to Final Decision of Writ Petition (Petition listed in the week commencing from 20th Feb 2012)


UPTET News : TET Pass B. Ed Distance Education holder can Provisionally Submit their Applications for PRT Subject to Final Decision of Writ Petition (Petition listed in the week commencing from 20th Feb 2012)
 See Case Details -
---------------------------
This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 7

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 74411 of 2011

Petitioner :- Suraj Kumar Tiwari & Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Arun Kumar Mishra
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Ajit Kr. Singh,C.N. Tripathi,R.A. Akhtar

Hon'ble Dilip Gupta,J.
The petitioners, who had appeared at the Teachers Eligibility Test-2011 and were declared successful, have filed this petition for a direction upon the respondents to accept the application forms of the petitioners for the post of Assistant Teachers in the Institutions run by the U.P. Basic Education Board, Allahabad pursuant to the advertisement dated 30th November, 2011. It is the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners that since the petitioners had obtained the B.Ed. degree by Distance Education, they are not being considered eligible. He has placed reliance upon the interim order dated 12th December, 2011 passed by the Division Bench in Special Appeal No. 2296 of 2011 in which candidates placed similarly were provisionally permitted to submit their application forms, which would be subject to the final decision of the appeal.
Learned Standing Counsel appears for respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 5. Sri C.N. Tripathi, appears for respondent No.3. Sri R.A. Akhtar, appears for respondent No.4 while Sri Ajit Kumar Singh, appears for respondent No. 6. The respondents may file a counter affidavit within four weeks. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.
List this petition for admission/hearing in the week commencing 20th February, 2012.

UPTET : Appointment of Urdu Teachers in UP while TET (Teacher Eligibility Test ) does not Apply


UPTET : Appointment of Urdu Teachers in UP while TET (Teacher Eligibility Test ) does not Apply

There are many points regarding Appointment of Urdu Teachers -
compelling the applicants to appear for the Teacher Eligibility Test, which test does not apply to the applicants

On the said date whoever is posted as Principal Secretary / Secretary Basic Education, Government of U.P., Director, Basic Education and the Director, State Council for Education, Research and Training U.P. shall remain present before this Court along with their respective parawise response to the averments contained in the affidavit filed in support of the contempt application the other affidavits filed by the applicant and also the observations made in this order.
See Case Details -
--------------------------
This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Court No. - 34

Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1226 of 2010
Petitioner :- Furqan Ali And Others
Respondent :- Sri Anup Chandra Pandey, Secy. Basic Education And Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Shailendra
Respondent Counsel :- B.P.Singh,S.C.

Hon'ble Vikram Nath,J.
Heard Sri Shailendra, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri K. S. Kushwaha, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party.
The writ petition filed by the applicants being Writ Petition No.1393 of 2009 was allowed by the learned Single Judge vide judgement and order dated 5.11.2009. The operative operation of the judgement read as follows :
"Writ petition is allowed and the respondents are commanded to consider the claim of the petitioners and such other candidates possessed of Diploma in Teaching granted by the Aligarh Muslim University provided they satisfy all other conditions for appointment as Assistant Teachers in Basic School against the posts covered by Rule 8(4) of 1981 Rules. The respondents(Secy. Basic Education) are further directed not to make appointment on the posts covered by Rule 8(4) of 1981 Rules from the candidates who have or who may obtain training under the Special BTC Training (Urdu). In the facts of this case it is further necessary to direct the State respondents to initiate proceedings for appointment of Assistant Teachers in primary institutions for teaching Urdu language qua posts covered by Rule 8(4) inasmuch as it is admitted to the State Government that large number of such posts are lying vacant as per the letters dated 16.02.2005 and 12.04.2005 on record, of the Secretary of the Department. It is to be noted that these letters were written prior to addition of Rule 8(5) to 1981 Rules and, therefore, posts referred to as Urdu teachers therein, are those covered by Rule 8(4) only. The petitioners will be at liberty to apply.
Let the entire exercise as indicated above qua both the directions be completed by the respondents concerned from the date a certified copy of this order is filed. "

The State of U.P. assailing the correctness of the order of the learned Single Judge filed an intra court appeal registered as Special Appeal No. (416) of 2010. The Division Bench vide judgement and order dated 27.10.2010 dismissed the said appeal filed by the State. The State further took the matter to the Apex Court by way of Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.2541 of 2011, which was dismissed by the Apex Court vide order dated 11.7.2011. Thus, the judgement of the learned Single Judge dated 05.11.2009 became final and binding interse parties. As the declaration made in the judgement dated 05.11.2009 and the directions contained therein were not being complied with the present contempt application was filed in which notices were issued on 18th March, 2010. Affidavits have been exchanged between the parties.
The operative portion of the judgement of the learned Single judge is in four parts. Firstly, there is declaration that the applicants who possessed the Diploma in teaching from the Aligarh Muslim University were eligible for being appointed as Assistant Teachers in the Basic School against the post covered by Rule 8(4) of the U.P. Basic Education Teachers Service Rules 1981 (hereinafter referred to as the 1981 Rules). The second part was a direction to the respondents not to make appointments on the post covered by Rule 8(4) of the 1981 Rules from the candidates who have undergone Special B T C Training (Urdu). Third part was a further directions to the State respondents to initiate proceedings for appointment of Assistant Teachers in Primary institution for teaching Urdu language against the post covered by Rule 8(4) of the 1981 Rules as it was an admitted situation that large numbers of such posts were lying vacant. There was further a declaration that the post referred to in the letters dated 16th February, 2005 and 12th April,2005 issued by the Secretary of the Department were posts referable to Rule 8(4) of the 1981 Rules and were to be filled up accordingly.
Non-compliance / disobedience has been alleged in this contempt application in the following manner.
(I) Despite the fact that applicants had been held to be eligible for being appointed as Assistant Teacher in Basic School against posts of Rules 8(4) of the 1981 Rules, the opposite parties have not considered the claim of the applicant on such posts.
(II) The opposite parties have made appointments on the post covered by Rule 8(4) of the 1981 Rules from the candidates who have undergone Special B T C Training (Urdu).
(III) The directions for initiating proceedings for appointment of Assistant Teacher against the posts covered by Rule 8(4) of the 1981 Rules had still not been initiated despite lapse of more than two years.
(IV) After the dismissal of intra Court appeal filed by the State and Special Leave to Appeal filed before the Apex Court in October, 2010 and July 2011 respectively, the opposite parties have continued to make appointments from the Special B.T.C. Training (Urdu) candidates against the post covered by Rule 8(4) of the 1981 Rules.
(V) The opposite parties are adding further eligibility condition for the applicants on the basis of certain amendments brought in the year 2010 compelling the applicants to appear for the Teacher Eligibility Test, which test does not apply to the applicants.

From the records, it is apparent that the opposite parties have not filed any counter affidavit giving para-wise reply to the affidavit filed in support of the contempt application. Initially affidavits filed by the opposite parties were only to the effect that the State had decided to file intra court appeal and also further take the matter to the Apex Court. It may be noted here that there was no stay against the judgement of the learned Single Judge dated 05.11.2009. Subsequently after dismissal of the intra court appeal and the Special Leave to Appeal, no detailed counter affidavit giving para-wise reply to the contents of the affidavit filed in support of the contempt application has been filed.
The only affidavit filed after dismissal of Special Leave to Appeal of the State is dated 9.12.2011 filed by opposite party no.5 / Ramesh Chandra Verma, presently posted as District Basic Education Officer, Bulandshahr. The basic objection taken in the said affidavit is that after dismissal of the Special Leave to Appeal the State has started the process and in that regard the eligibility test as provided by the NCTE and as adopted by the State of U.P., is being conducted and successful candidates would be considered. No explanation has come forward with regard to the appointments made by the opposite parties of those candidates who had under gone Special B.T.C Training (Urdu) and who have been appointed against the post covered by Rule 8(4) of the 1981 Rules. In order to appreciate the controversy with regard to the post covered Rule 8(4) and Rule 8(5) of 1981 Rules it would be relevant to refer to the said provisions in brief.
Rule 8 defines the eligibility for appointment of Assistant Teachers in primary / basic schools.
Rule 8(4) of 1981 Rules deals with the eligibility conditions of Assistant teachers to be appointed in Primary schools in general.
Rule 8(4) of 1981 Rules provides qualification of candidates for appointment as Assistant Teachers to impart teaching of Urdu language i.e. to teach Urdu as a subject.
Rule 8(5) of 1981 Rules which was inserted in the year 2007
provides essential qualification for candidates having proficiency in Urdu i.e. to teach all subject in Urdu medium. The qualification for having proficiency in Urdu to be eligible to teach in Urdu medium was a Bachelor's Degree from a University established by Law in India or a Degree recognized by the Government as equivalent thereto, a training qualification of two years BTC Urdu special training course, and the qualification for proficiency in Urdu will be such as may be prescribed from time to time by the Government.
So from the above discussion, it is apparent that for appointment to a post covered by Rule 8(5) of the 1981 Rules, there were three educational qualification to be possessed, firstly a Bachelor Degree, secondly a training qualification of two years Special BTC (Urdu) and lastly the qualification for proficiency in Urdu was to be prescribed by the Government.
On a query being made from Sri K. S. Kushwaha, learned Counsel appearing for the opposite parties as to whether or not the Government has prescribed the qualification for proficiency in Urdu, the answer was no i.e. the Government has still not defined as to what would be the qualification for proficiency in Urdu. Until and unless such qualification was prescribed, no candidate would be eligible to be appointed against Rule 8(5) of 1981 Rules. Despite the same in District Bulandshahr alone as many as 175 Assistant Teachers are said to have been appointed to teach in Urdu medium i.e. on a post covered by Rule 8(5) of the 1981 Rules.
There is also an issue as to whether any posts have been earmarked to be covered by Rule 8(5) of 1981 Rules. Admittedly the 1981 Rules had been amended in 2007 whereby Rule 8(5) had been inserted. The training in the Special B.T.C Urdu had been started pursuant to the Government order dated 18th March, 2006 and 5th September, 2006 at a time when Rule 8(5) had not been inserted. Subsequent to the insertion of Rule 8(5) of 1981 Rules in the year 2007 there is no Government order on record declaring or identifying the posts to be filled up by candidates possessing qualification as required by Rule 8(5) of the Rules.
The training is imparted by the SCERT as such the response of its Director is also necessary.
All these questions need to be answer by the State authorities as otherwise the State would be indulging into misrepresentation and concealment of material facts in an attempt to circumvent the judgement of the writ Court.
Accordingly, let this matter be listed on 13th February, 2012.
On the said date whoever is posted as Principal Secretary / Secretary Basic Education, Government of U.P., Director, Basic Education and the Director, State Council for Education, Research and Training U.P. shall remain present before this Court along with their respective parawise response to the averments contained in the affidavit filed in support of the contempt application the other affidavits filed by the applicant and also the observations made in this order. A copy of this order may be furnished to Sri K. S. Kushwaha, learned counsel for the opposite party, within 48 hours for necessary compliance.
Order Date :- 17.1.2012
SS

---------------------------------

UPTET : Criminal Case against a candidate Who is giving TET Exam in place of his Brother


UPTET : Criminal Case against a candidate Who is giving TET Exam in place of his Brother


This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only.
--------------
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 51

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 662 of 2012

Petitioner :- Ashok Pratap Singh
Respondent :- State Of U.P.
Petitioner Counsel :- I.K. Chaturvedi
Respondent Counsel :- Govt. Advocate

Hon'ble Shashi Kant Gupta,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated. He further submits that there is no cogent evidence against the applicant connecting him with the alleged offence. He further submits that the allegation against the applicant is that he was appearing in the examination of Teachers Eligibility Test (T.E.T.) in place of his brother Indra Pratap at Rajeev Gandhi D.A.V. Degree College, Banda. He further submits that the applicant has not committed the offence as alleged by the prosecution and the present prosecution has been launched maliciously just to harass, victimise and exert undue pressure on him. He further submits that the applicant has got no criminal history to his credit and there is no chance of his fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the prosecution evidence. The applicant is in jail since 13.11.2011. Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment and submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, I am of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail.

Without Amendment in U.P. Recognized Basic Schools (Junior High Schools) (Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Teachers) Rules, 1978, How TET Qualified Candidates are eligible for Junior Highschool


Without Amendment in U.P. Recognized Basic Schools (Junior High Schools) (Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Teachers) Rules, 1978, How TET Qualified Candidates are eligible for Junior Highschool

If I am correct, then above inference is derived from below Case details (Hearing shall be on 1st Feb 2012) -
-------------------
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. - 2

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 54362 of 2011

Petitioner :- Indrasan Singh
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others
Petitioner Counsel :- R.P.Dubey,Manoj Kumar Singh
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,V.K.Kushwaha

Hon'ble Arun Tandon,J.
The Secretary of Education (Basic), U.P. Government at Lucknow may file an affidavit categorically disclosing as to how because of issuance of the Government Order dated 7th December, 2011 with reference to TET examination, it is being contended on behalf of the State that no appointment in a recognized and aided junior high schools can be made unless the candidate has passed his TET examination, when there has been no amendment in the statutory rules framed regulating the conditions and qualification for appointment of teachers in a recognized institution, namely, U.P. Recognized Basic Schools (Junior High Schools) (Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Teachers) Rules, 1978, more so when, no power has been given to the State Government under the Rules, 1978 to amend the qualifications by Executive Order. He shall also explain as to how merely because certain qualifications have been laid down by the National Council for Teachers Education in the matter of appointment of teachers, the State can insist when appropriate amendment in the statutory rules.

Thursday, January 26, 2012

UPTET : Cases in Allahabad Highcourt - Lucknow Bench on 25.01.2012

UPTET : Cases in Allahabad Highcourt - Lucknow Bench on 25.01.2012

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?
Court No. - 5

Case :- MISC. SINGLE No. - 6694 of 2009

Petitioner :- Jyoti Verma
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thorugh The Secy. Basic Education Deptt. Lko.
Petitioner Counsel :- Sanjay Misra
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,D.R.Misra

Hon'ble Ritu Raj Awasthi,J.
Learned Standing Counsel prays for and is allowed one week's time to seek instructions as to what is the status of the enquiry which was to be conducted by the State Government in compliance of the Court's order dated 7.12.2011.
List after one week. Order Date :- 25.1.2012
Arjun

------------------------------------

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?
Court No. - 5

Case :- CONTEMPT No. - 232 of 2012

Petitioner :- Kundan Lal
Respondent :- Sri Anil Sant Presently Posted As Principal Secretary
Petitioner Counsel :- Amit Dwivedi

Hon'ble Ritu Raj Awasthi,J.
Issue notice to opposite party as to why the contempt proceedings may not be initiated against him for non-compliance of the order dated 07.12.2009 passed in Writ Petition No. 1996 (SS) of 2008.
Order Date :- 25.1.2012
Prajapati

http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=1653531

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only
----------------
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?
Court No. - 5

Case :- CONTEMPT No. - 234 of 2012

UPTET News : Hearing postponed in Allahabad Highcourt for Special Appeal of TET Candidates


UPTET News : Hearing postponed in Allahabad Highcourt for Special Appeal of TET Candidates

इलाहाबाद। टीईटी अभ्यर्थियों द्वारा दाखिल विशेष अपील पर बुधवार को समयाभाव के कारण सुनवाई नहीं हो सकी। याचिका पर अब अगले सप्ताह सुनवाई की संभावना है।

News : Amar Ujala (26.1.12)

UPTET Lucknow News : TET Marksheet / Certificate Distribution from 6th


टीईटी प्रमाण पत्रों का वितरण 6 से
 
(UPTET Lucknow News : TET Marksheet / Certificate Distribution from 6th)
 
लखनऊ। अध्यापक पात्रता परीक्षा (टीईटी) के सफल अभ्यर्थियों के प्रमाण पत्र वितरण की तिथि में परिवर्तन किया गया है। सभी प्रमाण पत्र छह फरवरी से उपलब्ध कराए जाएंगे। इससे पहले वितरण प्रक्रिया को 27 जनवरी से शुरू किए जाने की घोषणा की गई थी। यह जानकारी संयुक्त शिक्षा निदेशक विकास श्रीवास्तव ने दी। उन्होंने बताया कि राजधानी के राजकीय जुबली इंटर कॉलेज को प्रमाण पत्र वितरण केंद्र बनाया गया है। लखनऊ मंडल से टीईटी में शामिल होने वाले अभ्यर्थियों के प्रमाण पत्र यहीं से उपलब्ध कराए जाएंगे।
News : Amar Ujala
 

UPTET Merrut : Huge crowd for geting TET - Marksheet / Certificate


टीइटी प्रमाण पत्र के लिए उमड़ी भीड़

( UPTET Merrut : Huge crowd for geting TET - Marksheet / Certificate )

आज नहीं मिलेंगे प्रमाण पत्र

पिता और पति को भी मिलेंगे महिलाओं के प्रमाण पत्र -
प्रमाण-पत्र वितरण में महिलाओं को राहत देते हुए छूट दी गई है। इसमें यदि पति अपनी पत्‍‌नी का प्रमाणपत्र लेना चाहता है तो उसे पत्‍‌नी से एक एप्लीकेशन लिखवानी होगा। इसमें वह इसकी अनुमति देगी कि उसका प्रमाण पत्र उन्हें जारी कर दिया जाए। इसी तरह अविवाहित बेटी का प्रमाण पत्र उसके पिता को दिया जा सकेगा।

मेरठ : राज्य शिक्षक पात्रता परीक्षा (टीइटी) के प्रमाण पत्र के लिए बुधवार को राजकीय इंटर कालेज में भीड़ उमड़ी रही। सभी काउंटरों पर अभ्यर्थियों की काफी संख्या रही। सुबह दस बजे की जगह ग्यारह बजे से प्रमाणपत्र बांटे गये।

UPTET News : Now Tight Scrutin over Recruitments in UP

अब नियुक्तियों पर होगी पैनी नजर
(UPTET News : Now Tight Scrutin over Recruitments in UP)

Marksheet/Certificate details shall be avaliable on Website, See News -
लखनऊ, 25 जनवरी (जासं): फर्जी प्रमाण पत्रों के सहारे नौकरी पाने वालों पर नकेल लगाने के लिए शासन ने कमर कस ली है। प्रमाण पत्रों की जांच में जोर जुगाड़ कर बच निकलना अब आसान नहीं होगा। शासन ने प्रदेश के सभी छात्रों का ब्योरा वेबसाइट पर डालने का निर्देश समस्त विश्वविद्यालयों को दिया है। नियुक्तियों के समय अभ्यर्थियों के अंकपत्र व प्रमाणपत्रों का सत्यापन आसानी से कराया जा सकेगा। सारा डाटा वेबसाइट पर होने से पारदर्शिता रहेगी और गड़बड़ी की संभावना पर विराम लग जाएगा। सचिव उच्च शिक्षा अवनीश अवस्थी की ओर से बीती 12 जनवरी को प्रदेश के सभी विश्वविद्यालयों को पत्र जारी करके इस बाबत निर्देशित किया गया है। पत्र में स्पष्ट है कि जिन छात्र-छात्राओं की परीक्षा विवि द्वारा ली जाती है और प्रमाणपत्र एवं अंकपत्र दिए जाते हैं, उनका परीक्षा संबंधी सम्पूर्ण विवरण वेबसाइट पर उपलब्ध कराया जाए। विद्यार्थियों मूल पता, जन्मतिथि, परीक्षा का वर्ष, परीक्षा केंद्र, श्रेणी, पूर्णाक, प्राप्तांक व अन्य विवरण इसमें शामिल हो। नौकरी के लिए यह विद्यार्थी कोई आवेदन करता है तो संबंधित विभाग द्वारा वेबसाइट के आधार पर उनके प्रमाण पत्रों की सत्यता की जांच कराई जा सकती है। नियुक्तियों के समय अभ्यर्थियों के अंकपत्र एवं प्रमाण पत्रों का सत्यापन भी शीघ्र हो सकेगा।

UPTET - Vishist BTC/BTC/Urdu BTC : Unemploed Association submitted Memorandum


बेरोजगार संघ ने सौंपा ज्ञापन
(UPTET - Vishist BTC/BTC/Urdu BTC : Unemploed Association submitted Memorandum)
 
B. Ed Candidates are not eligibile for Primary Teacher posts as their time limit is Over
इलाहाबाद : बीटीसी, विशिष्ट बीटीसी व उर्दू बीटीसी बेरोजगार संघ के तत्वाधान में मुख्यमंत्री के नाम एक ज्ञापन सौंपा गया। इसमें प्रशिक्षण उत्तीर्ण अभ्यर्थियों की नियुक्ति की मांग की गई है। इसमें कहा गया है कि अध्यापक सेवा नियमावली 1981 में वर्णित नियम 14 (1) में प्रशिक्षण अभ्यर्थी ही योग्य हैं। साथ में प्रशिक्षण जिस जिले में चयन के उपरान्त होता है। नियुक्ति भी उसे जिले में करने को कहा। एनसीटीई की 23 अगस्त 2010 की अधिसूचना के अनुसार पैरा 3 द्वारा गयी समय सीमा बीएड अभ्यर्थियों के लिए खत्म हो गयी है
News : Jagran (26.1.12)

UPTET Allahabad News : 7000 TET Certificate distributed in 2 days


दो दिन में बांटे गए सात हजार टीईटी सर्टिफिकेट
(UPTET Allahabad News : 7000 TET Certificate distributed in 2 days)
 
अभ्यर्थियों को अपने साथ स्नातक के अंकपत्र अथवा प्रमाण पत्र की मूल कॉपी व टीईटी का प्रवेश पत्र लाने को कहा गया।
इलाहाबाद : माध्यमिक शिक्षा परिषद द्वारा नवंबर में ली गई शिक्षक पात्रता परीक्षा में सफल अभ्यर्थियों को सर्टिफिकेट बांटे जाने का काम शुरू कर दिया गया है। दूसरे दिन लगभग चार हजार टीईटी सर्टिफिकेट बांटे गए। पहले दिन तीन हजार सर्टिफिकेट बांटे गए थे। 26 जनवरी को अवकाश पर सर्टिफिकेट नहीं बांटे जाएंगे। अब 27 जनवरी को सर्टिफिकेट का वितरण किया जाएगा।

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

UPTET : TET Candidates angry over returning PRT Applications


टीईटी: आवेदन पत्र वापस आने पर अभ्यर्थियों में आक्रोश

(UPTET : TET Candidates angry over returning PRT Applications)

मैनपुरी: शिक्षक पात्रता परीक्षा के लिये आवेदन करने वाले आवेदकों के आवेदन पत्र अपने नियत स्थान पर पहुंचने से पहले ही डाक विभाग द्वारा अभ्यर्थियों को लौटा दिये गये। इसे डाक विभाग का कारनामा कहें या कुछ और जो अभ्यर्थियों के भविष्य के साथ खिलवाड़ किया जा रहा है। टीईटी आवेदक अब न्यायालय की शरण लेने का मन बना रहे हैं। जिसके चलते विगत दिवस नगर के लोहिया पार्क के प्रांगण में आवेदकों ने बैठक कर निर्णय लिया कि वह अपने साथ हुई नाइंसाफी के लिये न्यायालय का दरवाजा खटखटायेंगे।

Teachers Appointment Prior to 29 July 2011, TET Exam is Mandatory OR Not


Teachers Appointment Prior to 29 July 2011, TET Exam is Mandatory OR Not

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only
See Case Details :-
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

Chief Justice's Court

Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 2366 of 2011

Petitioner :- Prabhakar Singh And Others

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others

Petitioner Counsel :- Siddharth Khare, Ashok Khare

Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C., R.A. Akhtar

Hon'ble Syed Rafat Alam, Chief Justice
Hon'ble Ran Vijai Singh, J.


During the course of argument, Sri Ashok Khare, learned Senior Counsel, appearing on behalf of the appellants submitted that the NCTE for the first time introduced Teachers Eligibility Test on 23rd August, 2010 and thereafter vide notification dated 29th July, 2011 carved out an exception under para 5(a), providing that where advertisement initiating the process of appointment of Teachers has been issued prior to the commencement of notification dated 29th July, 2011, the appointments may be made in accordance with the National Council for Teacher Education (Determination of Minimum Qualifications for Recruitment of Teachers in Schools) Regulations, 2001. Sri Khare further submits that in the State of Uttarakhand, in identical situation, the Teachers have been appointed without qualifying in Teachers Eligibility Test. NCTE did not raise any objection nor compelled them to appear in the TET.

Sri R.A. Akhtar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the NCTE prays for and is granted 10 days' time to seek instruction and file counter affidavit.

Sri K.S. Kushwaha, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State - respondents shall also seek instructions from the State Government in the light of the decision taken by the State of Uttarakhand and if necessary, may file supplementary counter affidavit indicating the stand of the State Government.

The matter shall appear for further hearing on 24th January, 2012.

Order Date :- 4.1.2012
VMA

UPTET : Highcourt - If Matter is not resolved after filing OBJECTION for TET Marks/Result

UPTET : Highcourt - If Matter is not resolved after filing OBJECTION for TET Marks/Result

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only
See a case in Allahabad highcourt for such matters -

See Case :
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. - 18

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3005 of 2012

Petitioner :- Surendra Kumar Yadav
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Lalta Prasad,Prabhat Kumar Singh
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.

Hon'ble Ran Vijai Singh,J.
It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that he has been shown absent in Uttar Pradesh Teacher Eligibility Test (Basic Standard) Examination, 2011 (TET, in short), whereas he has appeared in the examination. The OMR Answer Sheet-2011 has been brought on record by the petitioner as Annexure '2'. It is also contended that pursuant to the judgment of this Court in Writ Petition No. 71563 of 2011, decided on 16th December, 2011, the petitioner has also filed his objection before the respondent No. 2, but nothing has been communicated to him.

UPTET Merrut : TET Marksheet / Certificate shall be distributed from Today


आज मिलेंगे टीईटी के प्रमाण पत्र
(UPTET Merrut : TET Marksheet / Certificate shall be distributed from Today)

मेरठ। टीईटी के प्रमाण-पत्रों का वितरण मंगलवार से जीआईसी मेरठ में शुरू होगा। प्रमाण पत्र 24 से 30 जनवरी तक मिलेंगे। समय सुबह दस बजे से तीन बजे का रखा गया है। पहले प्राथमिक स्तर वाले प्रमाण पत्रों का वितरण होगा। इसके लिए अभ्यर्थियों को प्रमाण पत्र लेने के लिए फोटो के साथ टीईटी परीक्षा 2011 का प्रवेश पत्र साथ लाना होगा। प्रमाण पत्र के वितरण के लिए कालेज में 14 काउंटर बनाए गए हैं।
News : Amar Ujala (24.1.12)

UPTET Moradabad : Disturbance in GIC over TET Marksheet/Certificate


टीईटी मार्क्सशीट को लेकर जीआईसी में हंगामा

(UPTET Moradabad : Disturbance in GIC over TET Marksheet/Certificate)

मुरादाबाद। शिक्षक योग्यता परीक्षा में बैठने वाले छात्रों की मार्क्सशीटों का वितरण किया जा रहा है। महानगर में सोमवार से कई सेंटरों पर इनका वितरण किया जा रहा है। राजकीय इंटर कालेज में मंगलवार को मार्क्सशीट मिलने में देरी होने पर कुछ लोगों ने हंगामा शुरू कर दिया। ये वे लोग थे जिन्हें सोमवार को अंक तालिका नहीं मिल पाई थी। साथ ही जिन्होंने दूसरी भाषा में उर्दू का विकल्प भरा था उनकी मार्क्सशीट नहीं आई थी। राजकीय इंटर कालेज में टीईटी मार्क्सशीट का वितरण चल रहा है। इन्हें जिले वार वितरित कराया जा रहा है। सोमवार को अमरोहा के अभ्यर्थियों को मार्क्सशीट दी गई थीं। बड़ी संख्या में लोगों को अंक तालिका नहीं मिल पाने के कारण बैरंग लौटना पड़ा था। मंगलवार को वे लोग फिर से आए थे। लेकिन उनका क्रम नहीं होने के कारण मना कर दिया गया। इस पर उन्हाेंने हंगामा करना शुरू कर दिया।

Tuesday, January 24, 2012

TET versus Acadmic Marks for Selection of Teacher


TET versus Acadmic Marks for Selection of Teacher

Hi Friends,

See NCTE Notification for TET Marks is Selection Process :
Qualifying marks
(9). A person who scores 60% or more in the TET exam will be considered as TET pass. School managements (Government, local bodies, government aided and unaided)
(a) may consider giving concessions to persons belonging to SC/ST, OBC, differently abled persons, etc., in accordance with their extant reservation policy;
(b) should give weightage to the TET scores in the recruitment process; however, qualifying the TET would not confer a right on any person for recruitment/employment as it is only one of the eligibility criteria for appointment.
Source Link : http://education.nic.in/Elementary/RTE-TET.pdf
----------------------------
NCTE Clearl specified weightage of TET Marks in selection of teachers for RTE.

Earlier I see many comments in favour of Acadmic marks (I am not against acadmic OR TET), But I have not seen in Highcourt verdict favouring acadmic marks, not in the rules of UP Edu. Niyamavali which was changed before UPTET, not in NCTE notification.

However common exam ( If, multiple stage then it is more fair to select right candidates) is a good process to provide fair opportunity to all.
If Acadmic marks includes then it should be properly scaled ( it is very very tough to make scaling for each university, board therfore COMMON Exam is good approach) and weightage should be lower to eliminate anything biased against candidates.

Right of Children to Free And Compulsory Education Act , 2009


Right of Children to Free And Compulsory Education Act , 2009


See Various Acts related to TET exam, Educational Qualification  (Some states already gets some relaxation
to appoint teacher to implement RTE Act, e.g. Assam , Chattisgarh, Manipur, West Bengal, Bihar )


  Notification for the UT of Andaman & Nicobar Island defining the Disadvantaged group and weaker section under Section 2(d) and 2(e) of RTE Act.
  Notification for appointment of a teacher in the state of assam and chhattishgarh U/s 23(2) of the RTE-2009
  Grant of Relaxation to the State Government of Manipur in respect of the Min. Qualifications required for appointment as teacher under RTE-2009
  Regarding granting relaxation to the state govt. of West Bengal and Bihar Dated 10-06-2011.
  The Right of Children to Free And Compulsory Education Act, 2009.
  Article 21A of the Constitution - Constitution (Eighty - Sixth Amendment) Act , 2002.
 
 
 
 The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Rules , 2010. 
 Guidelines under Section 35(1) of the RTE Act regarding implementation of Section 25( 1 )  
Corrigendum in respect of section 19(1) of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act , 2009
Notification of Constitution of National Advisory Council ( NAC ) u/s 33(1) of the RTE Act.
Development of framework of national curriculum u/s 7 of the RTE Act.
Guidelines u/s 35(1) regarding deployment of teachers for elections u/s 27 of the RTE Act.
Notification of NCTE laying down the minimum qualification for a person to be eligible for appointment as a School teacher u/s 23 (1) of the RTE Act.
Minutes of the Meeting on the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 held on 14th August, 2010
Guidelines for Relaxation U/s 23 (2) of the RTE Act, 2009. 
Guidelines Regarding applicability of RTE Act on Minority Institutions. 
 Guidelines Regarding Procedure  for School Admission Under RTE Act,  
Guidelines for conducting Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) under RTE Act.,