Monday, June 17, 2013

UPTET / Allahabad HC : Peitioner an OBC Candidate Declared Fail in GEN cat in UPTET 2011 Exam, But Late in Approaching Court therefore Petition Dismissed

UPTET / Allahabad HC : Peitioner an OBC Candidate Declared Fail in GEN cat in UPTET 2011 Exam, But Late in Approaching Court therefore Petition Dismissed






HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. - 30

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 29785 of 2013

Petitioner :- Yogendra Singh
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Kamla Mishra,Prashant Mishra
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Virendra Chaubey

Hon'ble Amreshwar Pratap Sahi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Virendra Chaubey for the respondent.
The petitioner appeared in the TET Examination, 2011. He contends that he is of the O.B.C. Category but in the OMR Sheet the correct marking could not be made as a result whereof the petitioner was treated to be a general category candidate and he was declared fail as he had not obtained the minimum of 60% marks.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that if the petitioner is treated to be of the other backward category then there was an exemption of 5%, and according to that he had more than 55% marks therefore he may be declared successful. 
The petitioner appeared in the examinations in November, 2011. Fresh examinations are now going to be conducted very shortly. The petitioner has waited for more than one and a half years and therefore there is no valid reason to interfere at his instance. 

This alleged error which is being described as a human error has been discovered after one and a half years for approaching this court, therefore I am not inclined to exercise jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. It is open to the petitioner to apply for fresh examinations again. 
The writ petition is dismissed with the aforesaid observation. 
Order Date :- 27.5.2013
Sahu



UPTET / Allahabad HC : Petitioner Requested that B.Ed Sanskrit / English sjould also consider as one of essential qualification for UPTET 2013


UPTET / Allahabad HC : Petitioner Requested that B.Ed Sanskrit / English sjould also consider as one of essential qualification for UPTET 2013




HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 

?Court No. - 19 

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 30606 of 2013 

Petitioner :- Shakil Ahmad And 6 Ors. 
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 3 Ors. 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Shamsul Islam 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,R.A.Akhtar 

Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J. 
Grievance of the petitioner is that for� English and Sanskrit� language B.Ed.� degree is also considered� as� one of the essential qualifications in U.P. Teachers Eligibility Test (UPTET) 2013� however, in the case of Urdu language,� B.Ed. degree� has not been� taken into consideration. 
Learned counsel for the petitioner urged that this decision of the State Government is discriminatory and in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution. 
I have heard Sri R.A. Akhtar, learned counsel for the National Council of Teacher Education, Jaipur and Sri J.K.Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel. 
Sri Akhtar and Sri J.K.Tiwari pray for and are granted ten days time to seek instructions in the matter. 
Put up this case on 17.6.2013 as supplementary fresh. 
In the meantime, Principal Secretary, Basic Education Government of U.P. Lucknow may consider the cause of the petitioner and pass� an appropriate speaking� order, if possible, within two� weeks from the date of communication of this order. 
Let a copy of this order be supplied to Sri J.K.Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel� without any charge for communication of this order to the authority concerned. 
Order Date :- 30.5.2013 
Gss 


UPTET / Allahabad Highcourt : Petitioner Possess NTT Qualification And Wants to Become Primary Teacher , Petition Dismissed


UPTET  / Allahabad Highcourt : Petitioner Possess NTT Qualification And Wants to Become Primary Teacher , Petition Dismissed




HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 

?Court No. - 30 

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 31229 of 2013 

Petitioner :- Neetu Srivastava And Anr. 
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 5 Ors. 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Siddharth Khare,Ashok Khare 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.K.Yadav 

Hon'ble Amreshwar Pratap Sahi,J. 
Heard Sri Ashok Khare learned senior counsel for the petitioners. 
Sri Khare contends that the government order dated 26.4.2013 issued for appointment as Assistant Teachers wrongly excludes the qualification of two years Nursery Teachers Training Course which is a course recognised as per the norms of the National Council for Teacher Education and is also a qualification indicated in the qualification of Teachers Eligibility Test. 

He therefore submits that the respondents have erroneously advertised the posts for recruitment without including the aforesaid training course which is possessed by the petitioners.He also places reliance on the amended Rule 8 of the 1981 Rules. 

Having heard Sri Khare it is relevant to mention that the qualifications that are prescribed for appointment are contained in U.P.Basic Education Teachers Service Rules, 1981 as amended up to the Sixteenth Amendment where no such qualification as indicated by the petitioner is mentioned. 

The contention is that such qualifications are recognized by the National Council for Teacher Education both for appointments and for Teacher Eligibility Test. The same may be correct but the Court is unable to find out a generic nexus between the qualifications mentioned in Rule 8 of the qualifications prescribed under the 1981 Rules with the qualification of the petitioners. Thus even assuming for the sake of arguments that the prescription of the qualifications are not exhaustive yet in the absence of any specific mention of the said qualification� in the rules, the argument cannot be accepted. 
It is relevant to mention that the petitioners are seeking recruitment as Assistant Teachers in Primary Schools. 

In the opinion of the Court a qualification cannot be read into by a judicial interpretation unless there is any material of equivalence available. The Court does not find any such material and therefore to accept the said qualification would fall within the realm of the policy decision or any executive decision by an appropriate induction of the said qualification in the rules by the Rule making authority. 
For this the petitioners will have to approach the State Govt. namely the respondent No.1 for the redressal of their grievances. No mandamus can be issued as prayed for. 
The writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to approach the respondent no.1 for the rederessal of their grievances. 
Order Date :- 31.5.2013 
mna 

UPTET / Allahabad HC : Petitioner Possess Upper PRT-TET Qualification, And She Want To Become Primary Teacher / Class I to V with this Qualification


UPTET / Allahabad HC : Petitioner Possess Upper PRT-TET Qualification, And She Want To Become Primary Teacher / Class I to V with this Qualification





HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. - 30

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 27622 of 2013

Petitioner :- Suman Rajpoot
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 2 Ors.
Petitioner Counsel :- Vinod Kumar Singh
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Shivam Yadav

Hon'ble Amreshwar Pratap Sahi, J.
The petitioner holds the upper elementary TET Certificate which is for classes VI to VIII. This was detected and accordingly the petitioner has not been offered appointment in a Primary School of the level of classes I to V.
The petitioner has come up praying for a mandamus that since she has been successful in the examination, she is entitled for being appointed in a Primary School according to the directions of the Secretary of the U.P. Basic Education Board dated 8.3.2013.
The TET is held for both category of teachers namely those who want to apply for classes� I to V and those who want to apply for classes VI to VIII.
Once the petitioner does not possess the eligibility test qualification, which is required for classes I to V, she cannot compel the respondent to issue a letter of appointment to the petitioner.
There is no merit in the writ petition and is, accordingly, dismissed.
Order Date :- 17.5.2013
Irshad


UPTET / ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT : Candidate Having Less Than 50% Marks in Graduation


UPTET / ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT : Candidate Having Less Than 50% Marks in Graduation, But Obtained B. Ed Degree on the Basis of PG Marks, Candtidate want to appear in UPTET 2013 But NCTE norms for TET exam is Problem




HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH

?Court No. - 5

Case :- MISC. SINGLE No. - 3347 of 2013

Petitioner :- Smt. Deepa Bharati
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Basic Education &Or
Petitioner Counsel :- Alok Singh Chauhan
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,M.M. Asthana

Hon'ble Ritu Raj Awasthi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Standing Counsel and perused the record.
The writ petition has been filed seeking suitable order or direction to the opposite parties to modify the eligibility conditions prescribed in the guidelines issued vide Government Order dated 17.4.2013 with respect to UP-TET.
It is submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that in the graduation the petitioner has obtained less than 45% marks whereas in the post graduation she has obtained more than 50% marks. As per the eligibility criteria prescribed for admission, such as B.Ed. course run by the State Universities a candidate having graduation or post graduation with 50% marks shall be eligible for admission, however in the eligibility criteria for UP-TET laid down vide Government Order dated 17.4.2013 a candidate is required to have passed graduation with 50% marks. There is no provision for the candidates who have passed post graduation with 50% marks. 
It is further submitted that once the candidates having passed post graduation with 50% marks are eligible for admission in teachers course as such B.Ed. they shall also be eligible for appearing in UP-TET which is a Teachers Eligibility Test.
It is also submitted that N.C.T.E. vide notification dated 23.8.2010,� modified on 1.4.2011� has modified� the eligibility conditions� for T.E.T. and relaxation of 5% in qualifying marks (Graduation) to the candidates belonging to the SC/ST etc. has been provided, however no relaxation in graduation marks for such candidates has been provided in UP-TET. 
Learned Standing Counsel on the basis of instructions submits that as per the eligibility criteria as provided� by the Government Order dated 17.4.2013 the requirement is that a candidate should have passed graduation with minimum 50% marks. The petitioner has not got minimum 50% marks in graduation, as such she is not eligible to appear in UP-TET. 
I have considered the submissions made by the parties' counsel.
It appears that in the eligibility criteria as prescribed vide Government Order dated 17.4.2013, there is no provision for candidates who have passed post graduation with 50% or more than 50% marks. It is for the State Government to decide as to whether such candidates who have passed post graduation with 50% marks or more than 50% marks are to be treated eligible for appearing in UP-TET or not, as has been provided by the N.C.T.E. for B.Ed. course. 
Since the last date for filling Online application forms for UP-TET is 27.5.2013, the matter is relegated to the State Government to decide the aforesaid issue before the last date for filling the application forms. 
The petitioner may move appropriate representation in this regard before the opposite party no. 1/Principal Secretary, Basic Education, who may take appropriate decision in this regard in the light of the observations made hereinabove.
With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of.

Order Date :- 24.5.2013
Arjun/-
Office is directed to issue a certified copy of this order to the learned counsel for the petitioner on payment of usual charges, today.
24.5.2013


Source :http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=2601631


UPTET अब अर्हता को लेकर शिक्षकों की नियुक्ति पर संकट


UPTET  अब अर्हता को लेकर शिक्षकों की नियुक्ति पर संकट

Recruitment in Government Aided College UP 



कानपुर : संबद्ध प्राथमिक शिक्षकों की नियुक्ति के लिए एक कालेज द्वारा प्रसारित विज्ञापन में अर्हता में टीईटी की अनिवार्यता और दूसरे विज्ञापन में टीईटी का जिक्र तक नहीं? आखिर सही अर्हता क्या है? जानकारी न होने पर भी नियुक्ति प्रक्रिया कैसे शुरू कर दी गई?

ये कुछ महत्वपूर्ण सवाल हैं जिन्हें हरजेंदर नगर इंटर कालेज में शिक्षक पदों पर नियुक्ति के लिए आवेदन करने वाले अभ्यर्थियों ने प्रबंधतंत्र व शिक्षा अधिकारियों के सामने उठाए थे परंतु उन्हें सही जवाब नहीं मिला। अब उच्च न्यायालय ने इसका जवाब मांगा है तो हड़कंप है। हुआ यूं कि सफीपुर की प्रतिमा द्विवेदी ने उच्च न्यायालय में एक याचिका दाखिल की जिसमें उन्होंने एक समाचारपत्र में 9 जुलाई 2011 तथा दूसरे समाचारपत्र में 14 जुलाई 2013 को प्रकाशित विज्ञापनों का हवाला देकर कहा कि एक में टीईटी की अनिवार्यता दी है और दूसरे में शासन के अधिनियम का जिक्र करते हुए जो अर्हता दी उसमें टीईटी का जिक्र नहीं है।

न्यायालय ने जिला विद्यालय निरीक्षक को जवाब लगाने का निर्देश दिया और कहा कि यदि इस बीच नियुक्ति प्रक्रिया की जाती है तो वह याचिका के निर्णयाधीन रहेगी। विद्यालय निरीक्षक कोमल यादव ने प्रबंधक को पत्र जारी करके इस बाबत स्पष्टीकरण मांगा है। उन्होंने यह भी कहा है कि इंटरमीडिएट शिक्षा अधिनियम में वर्णित परिषद के विनियम एक अध्याय 2 के परिशिष्ट क में इंटरमीडिएट अनुभाग से संलग्न प्राथमिक अध्यापकों की अर्हता केवल प्रशिक्षित स्नातक दी है। कालेज प्रबंधन ने पिछली दस जून को साक्षात्कार लिया था


News Source / Sabhaar : Jagran (17 Jun 2013 07:28 PM (IST))

UPTET : B. Ed Candidates are in Trouble, Due to Ignorance they Applied in UPTET 2013 (Level 1 - Primary) , And failed to get Admit Card


UPTET  : B. Ed Candidates are in Trouble, Due to Ignorance they Applied in UPTET 2013 (Level 1 - Primary) , And failed to get Admit Card




Lo Bhaiya Thage Gaye, B. Ed Candidate.
Hamne apne Blog par niyam saaf saaf bataye the, usmen B. Ed vaale TET-PRT ke paatr ka kahin jikra nahin tha.
Goshnayen Alag Hotee Hain, Aur On Paper Record Alag Hote Hain.
Kanoon/Court aur Sarkar Kagjee / Written Matter par chalta hai Na ki kisee ke kehne se




UPTET : फॉर्म रिजेक्ट होने से अभ्यर्थी परेशान


UPTET : फॉर्म रिजेक्ट होने से अभ्यर्थी परेशान
टीईटी ः हेल्पलाइन से भी नहीं मिल रही हेल्प




लखनऊ। राजधानी के तेलीबाग निवासी प्रीति ने यूपी शिक्षक पात्रता परीक्षा-2013 (यूपी-टीईटी) में भाग लेने के लिए आवेदन किया था। उनका रजिस्ट्रेशन नंबर 2900013745 है। प्रीति ने परीक्षा का प्रवेश-पत्र पाने के लिए बेसिक शिक्षा परिषद की आधिकारिक वेबसाइट पर लॉग-इन किया तो उन्हें आवेदन निरस्त होने की सूचना मिली। कारण जानने के लिए उन्होंने टीईटी-2013 की हेल्पलाइन सेवा पर संपर्क किया पर उन्हें कोई जानकारी नहीं मिली।
प्रीति को बताया गया कि इस समस्या को लेकर प्रदेशभर से रोज 200 से ज्यादा कॉल आ रहे हैं। उनके पास इस संबंध में कोई जानकारी नहीं है। प्रीति की ही तरह राजधानी की सुषमा, अनुराग समेत दर्जनों आवेदक आवेदन निरस्त होने से परेशान हैं। 27 और 28 जून को आयोजित होने वाली इस परीक्षा के प्रवेश-पत्र अब तक उन्हें नहीं मिल पाए हैं।
अभ्यर्थियों की समस्याओं को दूर करने के लिए हेल्पलाइन सेवा की शुरुआत की गई है। यूपी परीक्षा नियामक प्राधिकरण इलाहाबाद से 0532-2466761 व 0532-2466769 पर संपर्क किया जा सकता है। वहीं, एसबीआई गवर्नमेंट बिजनेस शाखा में 9454713363, 8004923042 और 8004922875 पर सुबह 10:30 से शाम छह बजे तक संपर्क करने की सूचना जारी की गई। आवेदकों के अनुसार इन हेल्पलाइन नंबर पर फोन तक रिसीव करने वाला नहीं है।


News Source / Sabhaar :  अमर उजाला
*********************
Note -

Download UPTET 2013 Admit Card | UPTET 2013 Hall Tickets | UPTET 2013 Roll No 

 Visit Following Link  - http://upbasiceduboard.gov.in/helpline.htm

Try to do email also -


UPTET 2013 Exam Helpline / Contact Numbers / HELPLINE
Contact Department
Land Line Phone Number
Mobile Number
Email ID
U.P. PARIKSHA NIYAMAK PRADHIKARI, ALLAHABAD

0532-2466761, 0532-2466769
------
secretarypnp.up@gmail.com
siseup.alld@gmail.com
S.B.I Govt. Business Branch Lucknow
------
9454713363, 8004923042, 8004922875
(During 10.30 AM to 6 PM)
------




UP PSC / PCS (Prelims) Download Admit Card / Hall Ticket


UP PSC / PCS (Prelims) Download Admit Card / Hall Ticket

Exam center is a Big Problem as candidates got allotment of exam center in other city instead of their choice.

Combined State/Upper Subordinate Services Preliminary Examination - A-1/E-1/2013
उत्तर प्रदेश पीसीएस (प्री) के प्रवेश पत्र के लिए क्लिक करें-
http://uppsc.up.nic.in/



Examination/Advet. Number
Download Start Date
Download Last Date

Combined State/Upper Subordinate Services Preliminary Examination - A-1/E-1/2013
PCS-Exam. 2013
PRELIM. EXAMINATION 2013 (GENERAL/SPECIAL RECTT.)
15/06/2013
26/06/2013


According to candidate -
Navin Pandey -लेकिन ध्यान रहे कि ये केवल इन्टरनेट एक्सप्लोरर ही सपोर्ट करेगा.
एक बात ये भी बता दूँ कि आयोग ने इस बार परीक्षा-केंद्र का निर्धारण आँख मुदकर किया है. मेरठ वाले को वाराणसी भेज दिया है और वाराणसी वाले को आगरा. जिसको 27 जून को UPTET की परीक्षा देना होगा वो क्या करेगा
***
Sanjay Rao-  Mera gaziyabaad bejha hai batao ab 300 km ka safar karna parega
**
Priti Singh - Mujhe to sharanpur bhej diya...

Priti Singh So sad utni door...lagta hai exam dena cancle.

Anurag Agarwal maanga tha bareilly mil gaya lucknow

Anand Nishad Jen manga varanasi mila mirjapur

Manoj Kumar maanga gkp mila varanasi

****

News - मांगा था लखनऊ केंद्र, भेज दिया गाजियाबाद

लखनऊ (ब्यूरो)। राजधानी के नीरज सिंह ने 26 जून को होने वाली सम्मिलित राज्य/प्रवर अधीनस्थ सेवा सामान्य चयन (प्रारंभिक) परीक्षा के लिए आवेदन किया था। फॉर्म में नीरज ने राजधानी में ही परीक्षा केंद्र देने को प्राथमिकता दी थी। इसके बावजूद उत्तर प्रदेश लोक सेवा आयोग की ओर से जारी प्रवेश-पत्र में नीरज को गाजियाबाद में परीक्षा केंद्र आवंटित किया गया है। नीरज कहते हैं कि गाजियाबाद में केंद्र कहां है, वहां तक कैसे पहुंचेंगे, कितना समय लगेगा आदि सोचकर वे इतने परेशान हैं कि पढ़ाई में ध्यान नहीं लगा पा रहे। राजधानी से परीक्षा के लिए आवेदन करने वाले तमाम अभ्यर्थी इस परेशानी से दो-चार हो रहे हैं।

सम्मिलित राज्य/प्रवर अधीनस्थ सेवा सामान्य चयन (प्रारंभिक) परीक्षा-2013 26 जून को होगी। सुबह 9:30 बजे से 11:30 बजे तक और दोपहर 2:30 से शाम 4:30 बजे तक दो पालियों में परीक्षा होनी है। वर्तमान परीक्षा में पहली बार आयोग ने केंद्र आवंटन के तरीके में भारी फे रबदल कर दिया है। राजधानी से आवेदन करने वाले रामजनक पटेल को शाहजहांपुर में केंद्र दिया गया है। आयोग के इस कदम से सबसे बड़ी परेशानी 27 जून को होने वाली टीईटी में शामिल होने वाले अभ्यर्थियों को होगी। मंजुल कहते हैं कि सहारनपुुर में पीसीएस की परीक्षा देने जा रहे अभ्यर्थी के लिए अगले दिन राजधानी में टीईटी में शामिल होना आसान नहीं होगा