Friday, February 6, 2015

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News - GRACE MARKS SE BANEE 1ST DIV KO NAHIN KIYA CONSIDER

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News -  GRACE MARKS SE BANEE 1ST DIV KO NAHIN KIYA CONSIDER


SARKAREE VAKEEL NE KAHA KI AB COUNSELING POOREE HO CHUKEE HAI, AUR APPOINTMENT LETTER DIYE JAANE BAKEE HAIN.
COURT NE KAHA KI AGAR VACANCY HAI TO DEKHA JAYE KI GRACE MARKSE SE 1ST DIV KO CONSIDER KIYA JA SAKTA HAI YA NAHIN.
AGAR CONSIDER KIYA JA SAKTA HAI TO YACHEE KO RAHAT DEE JAYE


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. - 4

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2838 of 2015

Petitioner :- Indumati
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Vineet Kumar Yadav,Prabhat Kumar Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,S.K. Singh

Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel.
The petitioner submits that she has obtained 419 marks out of 700 marks in theory and 252 marks out of 300 marks in practical in B.Ed.Examination, 2009 which was conducted by Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut. As per statement of marks obtained from the university, it appears that as per statute of the university, the petitioner was given one grace mark and her division has been indicated as first, though she has obtained 419 marks only. In the application form for appointment of Assistant teacher in Upper Primary level school� i.e. class 6 to 8 in the column provided for indicating marks of theory the petitioner has mentioned her marks as 419 without adding one grace marks, on account of which she has passed� in theory in First Division in B.Ed. Examination, 2009.
Submission is that,� in case, the� division of the petitioner� is� treated as "first",� she�� would attain� 65.5 quality point marks which is more than cut off merit i.e. 65.21 for� counseling� in� District Kanpur� Nagar. The counseling� was held on 7.1.2015, however, the petitioner was not permitted to�� participate� in the counseling for the reason� that she has� obtained lesser� quality point marks than 65.2� marks.� She has�� submitted � a detailed� representation to� respondent Nos. 2� and� 3�� mentioning therein� entire facts and with request to allow her to make� correction in the application form.� No response� has been received and hence this writ petition.�
Admittedly, the petitioner has obtained� 419 marks� out of� 700 marks� in theory� paper of� B.Ed. Examination, 2009. As per the university. Rules, she was given one grace mark and her division was described as� "first".� It� appears that there is no column in the application form� to� mention�� the division� of� candidate in theory and practical papers.�
The question as to whether� one grace mark awarded to the petitioner� to award her first division can be considered by the� Director of�� State� Council of� Education, Research and� Training, U.P. i.e. respondent no. 2.
However, at this� juncture, learned� Standing� Cousnel� informs that� counseling � as against 27,000 vacancies� of� Assistant� Teachers in upper� level primary� schools is over and the appointment letters�� are� being issued to the selected candidates.
As the matter requires adjudication on the� part of respondent no.2,� this Court is of the view that at the first instance, the claim of the petitioner be examined by respondent no.2.
The writ petition is, therefore, disposed of with the following directions:-
1) The petitioner shall make a comprehensive representation before respondent no. 2 alongwith certified copy of this order within� two weeks.
2) In the event of� such an application filed by the petitioner,� the respondent no. 2 shall take an appropriate� decision as to whether� the petitioner is entitled for addition of� one� grace mark and� first division awarded by the� university in "theory� paper" of� B.Ed. Examination, 2009.
3) In case, the petitioner is found� entitled for consideration/addition� of one� grace mark in theory paper� in the� B.Ed. Examination, 2009 and further, in case,� any� vacancy exists for the post of� Assistant� Teacher as against the advertised� 27,000 posts in upper level primary schools and� any fresh� counseling� is held, the petitioner's� candidature may be considered.

4)� A reasoned and speaking order shall be� passed in accordance with law by the respondent No.2 expeditiously, preferably within 15 days from the date of submission of� application by the petitioner.
5) The decision� taken shall be� communicated to the petitioner� immediately.
Order Date :- 23.1.2015
P.P.





UPTET 29334 Latest News In Hindi | Join UPTET
Uptet | Uptet news |  29334  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News |  29334  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News |  29334  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet |  29334  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi |  29334  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling |

29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment, Upper Primary Teacher Recruitment UP , 29334 junior teacher vacancy in up latest news, , UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS ,  SARKARI NAUKRI
|
http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com/
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com/

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News - COUNSELING KE DORAN CANDIDATE PHYSICALLY HANDICAPE HO GAYA

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News  -  COUNSELING KE DORAN CANDIDATE PHYSICALLY HANDICAPE HO GAYA, AUR PH KOTE KE TEHT BHRTEE KI MAANG, COURT MEIN YACHIKA KHARIJ, KAHA COUNSELING POOREE HO GAYE, AB RAHAT NAHIN


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. - 4

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 509 of 2015

Petitioner :- Mukesh Kumar
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 8 Ors
Counsel for Petitioner :- D.K.S. Chandel,Babu Lal Ram
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashok Kumar,P.D. Tripathi,R.A. Akhtar,U.S. Upadhyay

Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri R.A. Akhtar, learned counsel for respondent no. 2, Sri Ashok Kumar, learned counsel for respondent nos. 3 & 7, Sri U.P. Upadhayay, learned counsel for respondent no. 8, Sri P.D. Tripathi, learned counsel for respondent no. 9 and learned Standing Counsel for respondent no. 1.
The petitioner has appeared in TET Examination-2011 in SC category. The contention is that during the course of the counseling, he has developed visual impairment of 75% and has got certificate of visual disability issued by the C.M.O., Unnao.
The prayer is to allow him to appear in the fourth round of the counseling scheduled from 2.1.2015 and consider his candidature in Scheduled Caste category with a special category of visual disability.
Learned counsel for respondents submits that counseling for the appointment on the post of Assistant Teacher in Junior Basic School (class 1 to 5) is over on 14.1.2015. The petitioner has obtained disability certificate on 26.6.2013 i.e. much before the first round of counseling held in the month of August, 2014. He has never claimed benefit of special category/visual impaired, till 26.11.2014, when for the first time he approached authorities for consideration of his claim in special category.
The petitioner has taken a calculated risk and when he could not qualify for the post of Assistant Teacher in the SC category, he submitted his claim for special category/visually impaired. The petitioner's claim for inclusion in the special category cannot be considered at this stage for the reason that the counseling is over. Any interference would result in unsettling the candidates who have already participated in counseling as per their merit. As the selection process has already been completed, no relief can be granted to the petitioner.
The writ petition is dismissed as such
.
Order Date :- 15.1.2015
B.K.


 UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  /SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS 

UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com

http://joinuptet.blogspot.com

UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / 4th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TETRTETBETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
 

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News : JRT TEACHER COUNSELING MEIN BHEE REPLACEMENT TYPE PROBLEM



UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News : JRT TEACHER COUNSELING MEIN BHEE REPLACEMENT TYPE PROBLEM

YE PRT KI TARH REPLACEMENT NAHIN HAI, LEKIN ISMEN CANDIDATE KO 2 JAGH CUTOFF KE ANUSAAR MOKA MILA, AUR CANDIDATE JIS JAGH GAYEE WAHAN UNKA NUMBER NAHIN AAYA.
COURT NE USKO AAGE COUNSELING KE LIYE MOKA DIYA HAI

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. - 4
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3162 of 2015
Petitioner :- Shaista Anjum
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Z.A. Siddiqui,Sanjeev Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.K. Yadav,S.K. Gupta,Saiyeed Nadeem Ahmad
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.
The contention of the petitioner is that she has appeared in the counseling held in District Deoria on 19.9.2014 as against 29,334 vacancies of Assistant Teacher in Junior High School in Mathematics subject with 65.61 quality point marks. Submission is that on the same date, the counseling was held in two districts namely District Deoria and District Mau. On account of the said fact, the petitioner could only appear in District Deoria and it was not possible for her to go to District Mau and participate in the counseling at Mau. In Mathematics subject the cut-off was 65.15 which is much below the quality point marks of the petitioner. It is further submitted that though 6th round counseling is over, however, a decision has been taken to hold fresh counseling on account of the vacancies existing on the post of Assistant Teacher.
As the petitioner has appeared in the counseling on 19.9.2014 in District Deoria, she apprehends that in future counseling,� she may not be allowed to participate despite having higher quality point marks than the cut-off.
Sri S.K. Gupta, learned counsel for respondent no. 4 and Sri A.K. Yadav, learned Standing Counsel for respondent no. 2 submit that the petitioner may approach respondent no. 2 who can take a decision to allow the petitioner to appear in the counseling after examining the matter.
In view thereof, this Court is of the opinion that in case, the petitioner's quality point marks are higher than the cut-off in the district for which she has applied, she shall not be stopped from appearing in the future counseling, if any, held against the existing vacancies.
However,� the appointment of the petitioner shall be subject to the result of the writ petition.
In the meantime, counter affidavit be filed by the respondents within two weeks'.
One week, thereafter for filing rejoinder affidavit.

Put up on 20.2.2015 as fresh.
Order Date :- 29.1.2015/B.K. 






UPTET 29334 Latest News In Hindi | Join UPTET
Uptet | Uptet news |  29334  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News |  29334  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News |  29334  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet |  29334  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi |  29334  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling |

29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment, Upper Primary Teacher Recruitment UP , 29334 junior teacher vacancy in up latest news, , UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS ,  SARKARI NAUKRI
|
http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com/
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com/



SHIKSHA MITRA : BIMAREE KI CHUTTI LENE PAR SERVICE KHATM

SHIKSHA MITRA : BIMAREE KI CHUTTI LENE PAR  SERVICE KHATM

SIHIKHA MITRA 2007 MEIN BIMAREE KI VAJE SE SCHOOL NAHIN JA PAYEE, SERVICE BREAK KAR DEE, HAAL MEIN COURT MEIN MAAMLA PAHUNCHNE PAR SARKAREE VAKEEL NE CONTRACTUAL SHIKSHA MITRA SCHEME KHATM HONE KEE BAAT KAHEE, AUR COURT SE KOEE RAHAT NAHIN MILEE


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. - 30

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4231 of 2015

Petitioner :- Smt. Anjana Mall (Shiksha Mitra)
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Neerja Singh,Rajneesh Tripathi,Sharve Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shyam Krishna Gupta,Tariq Maqbool Khan

Hon'ble Rajesh Dayal Khare,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Shyam Krishna Gupta, learned counsel forthe respondent no.3 and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner was appointed as Shiskha Mitra in Primary School Ram Nagar, Vikas Khand Gauri Bazar, District Deoria, in the year 2006� thereafter she was sent for training and after completion of training, the petitioner was also given certificate in her favour. Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that on 07.03.2007 the petitioner fell ill and she went on leave and when she reported back on 15.07.2007, she was not permitted to join and sign on the attendance register since then she has been continuously representing but her grievances has not been considered, therefore the present petition has been filed for seeking writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the respondent no.3� contends that the engagement of the Shiksha Mitra is purely contractual in nature for a period of one year and the scheme of the Shiksha Mitra has already been abolished in view of the Full Bench decision of this Court reported in the matter of Km. Sandhya Singh Vs. State of U.P. and others reported in 2013 (3) UPLBEC 2377.
After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and after perusing the averments made in the present petition, this Court is of the opinion that learned counsel for the petitioner could not make any good ground for the interference of this Court in exercise of powers conferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Accordingly, the writ petition lacks merit and is dismissed.
Order Date :- 2.2.2015
S.Ali




Shiksha Mitra, Shiksha Mitra News Samayojan, Shiksha Mitra Counslling Primary Teacher Samayojan News SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS,  ,   SARKARI NAUKRI
SHIKSHA MITRA Latest News In Hindi
  SHIKSHA MITRA news | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | Shiksha Mitra Breaking News | Shiksha Mitra Fastest News | Shiksha Mitra Result 2014 | Shiksha Mitra News Hindi | Shiksha Mitra cutoff/counseling Niyukti Patra / Appointment Letter |

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News : PRIMARY KE BAAD JRT COUSELING KRAANE VAALON KO RAHAT COURT DWARA DEE GAYEE

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News : PRIMARY KE BAAD JRT COUSELING KRAANE VAALON KO  RAHAT COURT DWARA DEE GAYEE

JNR TEACHER RECRUITMENT 7TH COUNSELING


EK LADKEE BEENA VERMA NE PRIMARY TEACHER KI COUNSELING MEIN ORIGINAL DOCUMENT JAMA KAR DIYE THE. USKE BAAD USKA NUMBER JRT COUNSELING KE LIYE BHEE AA GAYA. LEKIN USKO ORGINAL DOCS KE ABHAV MEIN COUNSELING NAHIN KARNE DEE. COURT NE NIRDEH DIYA HAI KI USE AAGE COUNSELING MEIN BAGER ORIGINAL DOCUEMNET KE ATTESTED COPY KE SAATH MOKAA DIYAA JAAYE.


SEE ORDER :-

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH

?Court No. - 23

Case :- SERVICE SINGLE No. - 210 of 2015

Petitioner :- Beena Verma
Respondent :- The State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Education & 2 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar,Meva Lal Yadav
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sandeep Kr. Yadav

Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J.
Ms. Beena verma, petitioner is present in person. She submits that she would argue her case herself.
In view of the above, vakalatnama of the counsel for the petitioner is discharged.
Heard petitioner in person, learned Standing counsel for respondents no. 1 and 2 and Sri Sandeep Kumar Yadav, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 3.
The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that she had earlier applied for Assistant Teacher in Primary Schools and had submitted her original testimonials therein. She thereafter also applied for appointment as Assistant Teacher (Maths and Science) in Senior Basic Schools but was not allowed to participate in the counselling held on 7.1.2015 on the ground that she is not possessed of original testimonials.
The submission of the petitioner is that once the original testimonials were presented in the counselling for the Assistant Teacher in Primary Schools, she is not supposed to reproduce them in the counselling Senior Basic Schools.�
Learned Standing counsel accepts that the petitioner had duly furnished her original testimonials in the counselling for Assistant Teacher� for Primary Schools and in view of the Government Order on the subject she is not required to produce the original testimonials again in the counselling for the purposes of appointment as Assistant Teacher in Senior Basic Schools.
In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondents to permit the petitioner to participate in the second or subsequent counselling scheduled to be held hereinafter for appointment of Assistant Teachers, Senior Basic Schools on the basis of the attested testimonials without insisting for the originals which have already been submitted by the petitioner during counselling of Assistant Teacher (Primary Schools).
The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
Order Date :- 6.2.2015
SKS







UPTET 29334 Latest News In Hindi | Join UPTET
Uptet | Uptet news |  29334  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News |  29334  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News |  29334  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet |  29334  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi |  29334  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling |

29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher RecruitmentUpper Primary Teacher Recruitment UP , 29334 junior teacher vacancy in up latest news, , UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS ,  SARKARI NAUKRI
|
http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com/
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com/

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment - PROF. IN OR OUT

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News
29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment -  PROF. IN OR OUT

ABHEE COURT EK RECENT  ORDER MEIN BBA VAALE OUT HO GAYE HAIN,

ABHEE PROF VS NON PROF MEIN DEBATE CHALU HO GAYEE HAI.

AUR PROF. VAALON NE APNE PAKSH KE TARK MEIN NIMN ORDER PRASTUT KIYA HAI, JO KI HAMNE HEE BAHUT PEHLE BLOG PAR SHARE KIYAA THAA.

 DEKHTE HAIN KYA HAI -

IS ORDER MEIN COURT NE SAAF KAHA HAI KI - NCTE NE SIRF MINIMUM QUALIFICATION KA JIKRA KIYA HAI, AUR SCIENCE / MATH TEACHER KE LIYE KISEE QUALIFICATION KA JIKRA NAHIN KIYA HAI.

AUR YE NCTE NE ISKE BAAD GOVT PAR CHODA HAI KI SCIENCE/MATH TEACHER KE LIYE KYA QUALIFICATION RAKHEE JAAYE.

AUR GOVT NE JO QUALIFICATION TAY KEE HAIN, VHE KAARAN DETE HUE SAHEE BATAYA HAI.

ANT MEIN PETITIONER KI YACHIKA KO IN KARANO SE FAIL KARAR DETE HUE YACHIKA KHARIJ KAR DEE.





HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

Court No. - 1

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 53620 of 2013

Petitioner :- Jitendra Singh And 4 Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 2 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Sadanand Mishra, Seemant Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C., Santosh Kumar

Hon'ble Vikram Nath, J
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned standing counsel for the State-respondents, S/Sri Santosh Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent nos.2 & 3 and Rizwan Akhtar, learned counsel for the respondent nos.4 & 5.
By means of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have prayed for quashing of the Government Orders dated 11.7.2013 and 23.8.2013 as being contrary to law and being in contravention to the notifications issued by the National Council for Teacher Education relating to the qualifications and selection of the Assistant Teachers for Junior High Schools (Classes VI to VIII). Further prayer made is to the effect that necessary directions may be issued to the respondents to treat the posts of the Assistant Teachers (Science) and Assistant Teachers (Mathematics) as one cadre and not separate cadre and only one selection process be adopted.
Annexure-1 is an advertisement issued by the District Basic Education Officer, Shahjahanpur dated 29.8.2013 inviting online applications for 288 posts of Assistant Teachers (Science) and 288 posts of Assistant Teachers (Mathematics) for the Junior High Schools in the district run by the Basic Education Board.
Annexure-2 is the bank challan of depositing the application fee for the post of the Assistant Teachers.
Annexure-3 to the petition is the certificate of the petitioner no.1 for having successfully pass the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) - 2011 conducted by the High School and Intermediate Education Board, U.P., Allahabad.
Annexure-4 is the circular issued by the Member Secretary, National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) dated 11.2.2011, laying down the guidelines for conducting the TET. Referring to the said annexure the learned counsel for the petitioners has referred to the details given with regard to Paper II for Classes VI to VIII Teachers, which is part of paragraph no.7 of the guidelines. The relevant extract of paragraph 7 of the guidelines relating to Paper II is reproduced below :
Paper II (for classes VI to VIII); No. of MCQs - 150;
Duration of examination : one-and-a-half hours
Structure and Content
(i)
Child Development & Pedagogy (compulsory)
30 MCQs
30 MCQs
(ii)
Language I (compulsory)
30 "
30 "
(iii)
Language II (compulsory)
30 "
30 "
(iv)
(a) For Mathematics and Science teachers : Mathematics and Science

(b) For Social studies teachers : Social Studies

(c) for any other teacher - either 4(a) or 4(b)
60 MCQs of 1 mark each

60 MCQs of 1 mark each

While designing and preparing the questions for Paper II, the examination body shall take the following factors into consideration :

The test items of Child Development and Pedagogy will focus on educational psychology of teaching and learning, relevant to the age group 11-14 years. They will focus on understanding the characteristics, needs and psychology of diverse learners, interaction with learners and the attributes and qualities of a good facilitator of learning.

The test items for Language I will focus on the proficiency related to the medium of instruction, as chosen from list of prescribed options in the application form.

The Language II will be a language other than Language I. The person may choose any one language from among the available options and as in the specified list in the application form and attempt questions in the one indicated by the candidate in the application form by him. The Test items in Language II will also focus on the elements of language, communication and comprehension abilities.

The test items in Mathematics and Science, and Social Studies will focus on the concepts, problem solving abilities and pedagogical understanding of these subjects. The test items of Mathematics and Science will be of 30 marks each. The test items shall be evenly distributed over different divisions of the syllabus of that subject as prescribed for classes VI-VIII by the appropriate government.

The questions in the tests for Paper II will be based on the topics of the prescribed syllabus of the State for classes VI-VIII but their difficulty standard as well as linkages could be upto the senior secondary stage.

Annexure-5 is the circular issued by the Department of Education, addressed to the Director of Education (Secondary) as also to the Secretary, Intermediate Education Board dated 7.9.2011, laying down the guidelines for conducting the TET Examination. The said guidelines are in conformity to the guidelines issued by the NCTE, referred to above.
Annexure-6 is the notification issued by the NCTE dated 23.8.2010 laying down the minimum qualifications for a person to be eligible for appointment as a Teacher of Classes I to VIII. The notification contains minimum qualifications for Teachers from Classes I to V and from Classes VI to VIII separately. The relevant extract of the minimum qualifications with regard to Teachers of Classes VI to VIII is reproduced below:
Class VI - VIII
(a) B.A./B.Sc. and 2 - year Diploma in Elementary Education (by whatever name known)
OR
B.A./B.Sc. with at least 50% marks and 1 - year Bachelor in Education (B .Ed.)
OR
B.A./B.Sc. with at least 45% marks and 1 - year Bachelor in Education (B.Ed.), in accordance with the NCTE (Recognition Norms and Procedure) Regulations issued from time to time in this regard
OR
Senior Secondary (or its equivalent) with at least 50% marks and 4-year Bachelor in Elementary Education (B.El.Ed.)
OR
Senior Secondary (or its equivalent) with at least 50% marks and 4-year B.A./B.Sc.Ed. or B.A. Ed//B.Sc.Ed.
OR
B.A./B.Sc. with at least 50% marks and 1-year B.Ed. (Special Education)
AND
(b) Pass in the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), to be conducted by the appropriate Government in accordance with the Guidelines framed by the NCTE for the purpose.

Annexure-7 is a notification issued by the NCTE on 29.7.2011 whereby certain amendments were made in the notification dated 23.8.2010 laying down the minimum qualifications for the Teachers for Classes I to V and VI to VIII. The amendment made with regard to Classes VI to VIII is reproduced below :
1 (ii) Class VI - VIII
(a) Graduation and 2-year Diploma in Elementary Education (by whatever name known)
OR
Graduation with at least 50% marks and 1-year Bachelor in Education (B.Ed.)
OR
Graduation with at least 45% marks and 1-year Bachelor in Education (B.Ed.), in accordance with the NCTE (Recognition Norms and Procedure) Regulations issued from time to time in this regard.
OR
Senior Secondary (or its equivalent) with at least 50% marks and 4-year Bachelor in Elementary Education (B.El.Ed.)
OR
Senior Secondary (or its equivalent) with at least 50% marks and 4-year B.A./B.Sc.Ed. or B.A. Ed./B.Sc.Ed.
OR
Graduation with at least 50% marks and 1-year B.Ed. (Special Education)
AND
(b) Pass in Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), to be conducted by the appropriate Government in accordance with the Guidelines framed by the NCTE for the purpose.

From a perusal of the notification dated 23.8.2010 and the notification dated 29.7.2011 what is to be noticed is that the word B.A./B.Sc. has been substituted by word Graduation.
Annexure-8 is the Government Order dated 11.7.2013 whereby the Government has laid down the procedure to be followed for filling up 50% posts of the Assistant Teachers in Mathematics and Science for the Junior High Schools being run by the Basic Education Board. The said Government Order provides that Basic Education Board on its request had sought permission to fill up 14667 Assistant Teachers in Science and 14667 Assistant Teachers in Mathematics, that is a total number of 29334 vacant posts. The said Government Order also laid down that the qualifications required would be B.Sc. by a University established by law in India and two years B.T.C., Special B.T.C. or a B.Ed. Course from an Institution recognised by the NCTE or B.Ed. (Special Education) recognized by the Indian Rehabilitation Council (IRC) and further a TET meant for Classes VI to VIII conducted by the Government of Uttar Pradesh or Central Government.
Annexure-9 is the Government Order dated 23.8.2013 which is in continuation to the Government Order dated 11.7.2013, referred to above, which clarifies that the applicants for the post of Assistant Teachers (Science/Mathematics) for Junior High Schools would be eligible only if they have obtained a Degree of Graduation from any University established by law or any other degree declared to be equivalent by the Government in which, as the case may be, Science/Mathematics is one of the subjects along with other training course and a certificate qualifying the TET.
Annexure-10 is again a direction issued by the Secretary, U.P. Basic Education Board dated 27.8.2013 whereby it has been provided that for applying to the post of Assistant Teacher in Science/Mathematics for the Junior High Schools, candidates who have obtained Degree in B.Sc. (Agriculture), B.Sc. (Home Science), B.A.M.S., B.H.M.S. and B.U.M.S. would be eligible to apply in the Science Stream only. It further provides that the candidates having B.Tech. Degree can apply for both streams i.e. Science and Mathematics. Further it mentions that the candidates having B.C.A. Degree, who had Science subjects in the Intermediate Course, can apply both for Science and Mathematics.
Annexure-11 is a judgment of the Full Bench of this Court dated 31.5.2013 given in a bunch of writ petitions led by Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.12908 of 2013, Shiv Kumar Sharma vs. State of U.P. and others, which was dealing with the question as to whether TET was an essential qualification for all appointments to be made after the notification issued by the NCTE on 23.8.2010 and other related questions. The said judgment at present is not of much relevance for deciding the controversy raised in the instant writ petition.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has made the following submissions :
The State Government while issuing the Government Orders dated 11.7.2013 and 23.8.2013 has not strictly followed the minimum qualifications laid down by the NCTE.
As the NCTE Guidelines/Notifications did not provide for selection of the Assistant Teachers (Science) and Assistant Teachers (Mathematics) separately, the qualifications laid down by the State Government in the impugned Government Orders were contrary to the NCTE Notifications/Guidelines for minimum qualifications.
The NCTE Guidelines only provided that 60 MCQs for Mathematics and Science would form part of question papers but the State Government by the impugned orders has fixed that there would be 30 questions of Mathematics and 30 questions of Science subjects.
The earmarking of posts for Assistant Teachers (Science) and Assistant Teachers (Mathematics) separately is also not contemplated in the notifications issued by the NCTE.
The candidates, who had Science and Mathematics subjects in their Graduation Course, are at an advantage as they can apply for the posts of the Assistant Teachers (Science) and Assistant Teachers (Mathematics) but so far as the candidates, who are graduate in Science but without Mathematics, they can apply only for the post of Assistant Teachers (Science) only. This argument is apparently based on the notification issued by the NCTE where Science and Mathematics subjects have not been specifically separated.
The first argument advanced on behalf of the petitioner is to the effect that the minimum qualifications laid down by the NCTE for selection / appointment of Assistant Teachers in Science / Mathematics stream for the Junior High Schools have not been strictly followed by the State Government while issuing the Government Orders dated 11.7.2013 and 23.8.2013.
From a perusal of the two notifications issued by the NCTE on 23.8.2010 and 29.7.2011, the minimum qualifications which emerge are a Graduation Course, a Degree / Diploma in Education whether one year or two years, as the case may be and a pass in the TET. In the Government Orders dated 11.7.2013 and 23.8.2013 we find that the minimum qualifications are similar to the qualifications prescribed by the NCTE. Since the posts advertised are for Science and Mathematics Subjects, as such it has been specifically stated that the Graduation should be in the Science stream i.e. B.Sc. Degree. Further in the Notification dated 23.8.2013 it has only been clarified that it should be a Graduation Degree in which Science / Mathematics was one of the subjects. Further by the said notification it has also been clarified that Graduates in B.Sc. (Agriculture), B.Sc. (Home Science), B.A.M.S., B.H.M.S. and B.U.M.S. have also been made eligible to apply only for Science stream whereas students who have Graduated with the B.Tech. Degree have been made eligible to apply both for Science & Mathematics stream. It further clarifies that the candidates with B.C.A. Degree who have studied Science at Intermediate level are eligible to apply for Science and Mathematics both. There does not appear to be any difference or discrimination or in any manner reducing the minimum qualifications prescribed by the NCTE. The NCTE notifications only provide the minimum qualifications to be possessed by the candidate for being eligible to apply for the post of Assistant Teacher. The State Government in its notification / advertisement has nowhere relaxed the minimum qualifications laid down by the NCTE and as such it cannot be said that the Government Orders are not strictly in accordance to the minimum qualifications laid down by the NCTE.
The next argument is to the effect that the NCTE guidelines / notifications did not provide for selection of Assistant Teachers (Science) and Assistant Teachers (Mathematics) separately as such the qualifications laid down by the State Government for the post of Assistant Teachers are contrary to the guidelines of the NCTE. This argument is also misconceived. If the State Government has decided as a policy to make selections subject-wise, it has to prescribe the minimum qualifications accordingly. The NCTE in its subsequent Notification dated 29.7.2011 has already substituted the words B.A. / B.Sc. by the word Graduation. This was done apparently not only to generalise and leave it open for the respective Governments to provide the minimum qualifications depending upon the subject for which selection was being made but also to cover the other Graduation Degrees like B.Tech., B.C.A., B.Sc. (Agriculture), B.Sc. (Home Science), B.A.M.S., B.H.M.S. and B.U.M.S. as being eligible. The NCTE guidelines did not provide that the minimum qualifications for Science Teachers or Mathematics Teachers would be same or that their selections were to be made by a common examination. Apart from general aptitude test, the language test and the knowledge of the candidate is also to be tested for the subject for which he / she has applied and therefore no fault can be found in the Government Orders being not in accordance to the NCTE notifications / guidelines.
The next arguments raised is that the NCTE guidelines for holding the TET Examination as contained in its Notification dated 11.2.2011 provided that for the Mathematics and Science Teachers there would be 60 multiple choice questions in Mathematics and Science but the State Government while holding the TET Examination gave 30 questions of Mathematics and 30 questions of Science and therefore it was contrary to the guidelines of the NCTE.
This argument is totally misconceived inasmuch as the NCTE in its notifications has clearly stated that the test items shall be evenly distributed over different divisions of the syllabus of that subject. This clearly means that there should be even distribution not only of the subjects but also the entire syllabus. The State Government did not in any manner either violate or depart from the guidelines laid down by the NCTE.
The next argument is to the effect that the State Government could not have earmarked the posts for Assistant Teachers (Science) and Assistant Teachers (Mathematics) separately as there was no such contemplation in the notifications issued by the NCTE.
The NCTE is the body which lays down the minimum qualifications and the standard to be maintained with regard to selection and appointment of the Assistant Teachers. The NCTE does not provide whether or not to earmark the posts subject-wise. If the State in its wisdom has decided to make the selections of Assistant Teachers (Science) and Assistant Teacher (Mathematics) separately, apparently there can be no illegality or discrimination or any violence to the guidelines laid down by the NCTE.
The last argument advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners to the effect that candidates who have studied Science and Mathematics at Graduation level are at advantage as they can apply both for the Science as well the Mathematics streams cannot be said to be discriminatory in any manner. The choice of subjects taken by a particular candidate at Graduation level can give rise to different benefits in pursuing future courses or their career. The petitioners cannot have a grievance if a candidate has studied both Science and Mathematics at Graduation level. Mathematics is a subject which can be studied at Graduation level by students pursuing Bachelor of Art Courses as also Bachelor of Science Courses. Since the applications have been invited for selection and appointment of the Assistant Teachers in Science stream as also in Mathematics stream, candidates who have studied both the subjects at Graduation level have rightly been held to be eligible to apply against both the streams. Likewise a candidate who had studied Mathematics along with subjects of Arts steam can only apply against the post of Assistant Teacher (Mathematics) and similarly a candidate who had studied only Science at the Graduation level without Mathematics as a subject, has rightly been held to be eligible only for Science stream. The argument is thus also devoid of merits.
No other point was argued.
For all the reasons recorded above, petition fails and is dismissed.

Order Date :- 11.10.2013
pk 



UPTET 29334 Latest News In Hindi | Join UPTET
Uptet | Uptet news |  29334  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News |  29334  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News |  29334  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet |  29334  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi |  29334  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling |

29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher RecruitmentUpper Primary Teacher Recruitment UP , 29334 junior teacher vacancy in up latest news, , UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS ,  SARKARI NAUKRI
|
http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com/
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com/

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News - रिप्लेस्ड कैंडिडेट के लिए एक राहत

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News  - 


रिप्लेस्ड कैंडिडेट के लिए एक राहत

तीसरी काउंसलिंग तक चयनित मगर चौथी काउंसलिंग में रिप्लेस लोगों के लिए सस्ती लागत में के हल उपलब्ध है ।

इलहाबाद हाई कोर्ट इसी तरह के एक मामले में निर्णय दे चुकी है , जिसमें रिप्लेस होने वाला  टी ई टी आवेदक किसी अन्य जिले में जा कर
काउंसलिंग / भर्ती का दावा कर सकता है , अगर वहां रिक्तियां शेष हैं और कोई भी छोटा मोटा वकील 5 -7 हज़ार रूपए में इस निर्णय का सन्दर्भ ले कर आपको भी ऐसा ही निर्णय दिला सकता है ।
अगर लोग मिलकर कम्बाइंड रिट डालें तो जितने लोग होंगे , खर्चा भी उतने ही लोगों में विभाजित हो जाएगा ।

10 -15 लोग होंगे तो 500 रूपए तक में काम हो जाएगा


लेकिन ये काम जल्दी करना होगा, क्यूंकि भर्ती चरम पर है , शायद थर्ड राउंड मैं मौका मिल जाए



See Court Order Here : http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.in/2015/02/3rd-counseling-tak-select-ho-chuke-but.html

3RD COUNSELING TAK SELECT HO CHUKE BUT 4TH COUNSELING KE BAAD REPLACED LOGON KE LIYE KHUSHKHABREE HAI,
EK YACHEE KO VACANCY HONE PAR KAHNIN BHEE JAHAN USNE AAVEDAN KIYA HAI ALLOW KAR DIYA HAI COURT NE



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. - 4

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5006 of 2015

Petitioner :- Gaurav Agnihotri
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Uma Nath Pandey,Ashok Khare
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,K.K. Chand

Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.
The petitioner belongs to General Male Science category in the selection for the post of Assistant Teacher in Primary School as against 72825 vacancies advertised in the year 2011. Submission is that the petitioner has secured 124 marks in T.E.T. Examination 2011 (Primary School). Accordingly, he has participated in the 3rd counseling, however, cut-off in the counseling was higher than the marks secured by the petitioner and hence he was excluded from consideration. The petitioner has appeared for 3rd counseling in District Jalaun and could not participate in the counselling held in other districts as per the norms fixed by the respondents..
Submission of learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner is that in view of the circular dated 5.1.2015, the candidates having higher marks than the petitioner have been allowed to participate in the 4th round of counseling who have not appeared in the previous counseling. This has resulted in an anomaly on account of which, the candidates having higher marks than the candidates who had appeared upto 3rd counseling, were selected. As the petitioner has already appeared in the 3rd counseling, he could not participate in the 4th round of counseling for other districts. Now the petitioner came to know that the candidates having lesser marks than the petitioner have been selected in another District namely Sitapur.
Submission is that the petitioner having higher marks than the last selected candidates, has right for consideration as against the vacancy existing as on date.
Only prayer of learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner is to direct the Director of Education (Basic), U.P., Allahabad, Camp Office, Lucknow to consider the claim of the petitioner for appointment on the post of Assistant Teacher as against 72825 vacancies, in case, vacancy exist as on date.
To this submission learned Standing Counsel could not raise any objection. He submits that the claim of the petitioner can be considered by the Director of Education (Basic), U.P., Allahabad, Camp Office, Lucknow.
Sri K.K. Chand, learned counsel has received notices on behalf of respondent nos. 4 & 6 and learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos. 1, 2, 3 & 5.
In view thereof, the writ petition is being disposed of with a direction to respondent no. 2 i.e. the Director of Education (Basic) U.P., Allahabad, Camp Office, Lucknow to consider the claim of the petitioner for appointment on the post of Assistant Teacher, as against the vacancy existing as on the date of consideration, after calling for the comments of the Principal, DIET.
It is made clear that the petitioner's candidature can only be considered for the district for which he has applied.
The entire exercise be completed expeditiously preferably within a period of three weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him.
Order Date :- 2.2.2015
B.K.




 UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  /SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS 

UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com

http://joinuptet.blogspot.com

UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / 4th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TETRTETBETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
 

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News - सुप्रीम कोर्ट का आदेश नहीं मान रही सरकार

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News  - 

सुप्रीम कोर्ट का आदेश नहीं मान रही सरकार

इलाहाबाद (ब्यूरो)। प्रदेश के प्राथमिक विद्यालयों में हुई शिक्षक भर्ती में सुप्रीम कोर्ट के मानक पूरे नहीं करने का टीईटी पास अभ्यर्थियों ने आरोप लगाया है। टीईटी पास अभ्यर्थियों का कहना है कि कोर्ट ने सामान्य में 105 और आरक्षित कोटे में 97 अंक पाने वाले अभ्यर्थियों को नौकरी देने को कहा था, इसके बाद भी इस मानक का पालन नहीं किया गया है। इन अभ्यर्थियों ने आजाद पार्क में बैठक करके ऐलान किया कि वह 10 फरवरी को लखनऊ में प्रदर्शन के बाद सुप्रीम कोर्ट में अवमानना याचिका दाखिल करेंगे।


 UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  /SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS 

UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com

http://joinuptet.blogspot.com

UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / 4th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TETRTETBETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET