Join Uttar Pradesh Teacher Eligibility Test UPTET News

Tuesday, July 4, 2017

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News - Transfer milne ke baad Joining nahin dene par Court ne Joining dene ka aadesh diya -

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News - Transfer milne ke baad Joining nahin dene par Court ne Joining dene ka aadesh diya -

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. - 32

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 14921 of 2017

Petitioner :- Rekha Jaiswal
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Dharmendra Kumar Pandey
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ram Prakash Shukla

Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Ram Prakash Shukla, learned counsel for the respondents No.2 and 3 as well as learned Standing Counsel for the respondent No.1-State.�
By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has come to this Court raising a grievance that the petitioner is a teacher in a Primary School run by the Basic Education Board. The petitioner made a request for transfer and order of transfer was passed on 28.12.2016, by which, the petitioner was transferred from Primary School Jairampur Block, District-Bhadohi to Primary School Saraiya Block,�District-Bhadohi. When she went to join at Saraiya, the respondent No.4, who was also transferred from Prathmik Vidyalaya Saraiya Block, District-Bhadohi refused to give charge. The petitioner then filed a writ petition being Writ Petition No.2974 of 2017, which was disposed of by this Court by order dated 20.01.2017 directing the District Basic Education Officer to consider the claim of the petitioner.
It appears that the District Basic Education Officer accepted the claim of the petitioner and directed her to join Primary School at Saraiya. The petitioner again was not allowed to join the Institution. Therefore, the petitioner made a representation to the respondent No.2 that in spite of direction of the District Basic Education Officer, she is not being allowed to join the Institution at Saraiya, District-Bhadohi.
Shri R.P. Shukla, learned counsel for the respondent No.2, upon instruction, submits that the respondent No.4 has now been relieved from the Primary School Saraiya at the behest of District Basic Education Officer. Therefore, now the writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
I have considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties.
The writ petition is disposed of with the direction that if the respondent No.4 has been relieved from the Primary School Saraiya, there is no impediment for the petitioner to join in the Primary School Saraiya. Therefore, a direction is issued to the District Basic Education Officer to consider the claim of the petitioner and allow her to join at Primary School Saraiya since now, a post is vacated as per instruction of the Shri R.P. Shukla, learned counsel for the respondents No.2 and 3.
Order Date :- 11.4.2017

Ashish Tripathi

UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment / शिक्षक भर्ती /  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825 Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News - पति के सरकारी सेवा में होने के आधार पर बेसिक शिक्षिका ने माँगा ट्रांसफर , विभाग ने निर्धारित प्रोफार्मा में आवेदन न होने की बात कही , कोर्ट ने माना की विभाग ने निर्णय नहीं लिया और विभाग को कहा की निर्णय ले व् स्पीकिंग ऑर्डर में जवाब शिक्षिका को दे -

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News - पति के सरकारी सेवा में होने के आधार पर बेसिक शिक्षिका ने माँगा ट्रांसफर , विभाग ने निर्धारित प्रोफार्मा में आवेदन न होने की बात कही ,
कोर्ट ने माना की विभाग ने निर्णय नहीं लिया और विभाग को कहा की निर्णय ले व् स्पीकिंग ऑर्डर में जवाब शिक्षिका को दे -

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. - 17

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8996 of 2017

Petitioner :- Smt. Shilpa Singh
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Rishu Mishra,Uma Kant Mishra
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Awadhesh Kumar,Brij Bhushan Prasad Shriv

Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.
Heard counsel for the petitioner, learned standing counsel for respondent no.1, Sri Awadhesh Kumar and Sri Brij Bhushan Prasad Srivastava appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 2, 3 and 4.
The petitioner who is presently working as Assistant Teacher in Junior High School, Ekadgawan Development Block Gilaula, District Shrawasti, sought her transfer to an institution in district Basti on the ground that her husband is working as Headmaster in Primary Pathshala, Gangapur-II, Development Block Kaptanganj, District Basti. The application in that regard was filed by the petitioner� on 18.10.2016. The grievance of the petitioner is that no decision has been taken on the said application by the respondents.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents 2, 3 and 4 submitted that a circular has been issued by the Board prescribing the format for submitting application for inter-district transfer. It is urged that the application filed by the petitioner� does not seem to have been field in the said proforma.
It is not disputed before this Court that the Board has yet not taken any decision on the application filed by the petitioner seeking inter-district transfer. In such view of the matter, this Court is of the opinion that the interest of justice would be served in directing the U.P. Basic Shiksha Parishad, Allahabad� to take decision in the matter by means of� a speaking order.
It is directed accordingly.
Decision in this regard shall be taken by the Board within a period of six weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order alongwith fresh representation as well as a photostat copy of the application dated 18.10.2016.

(Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.)��
Order Date :- 28.2.2017
skv

UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment / शिक्षक भर्ती /  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825 Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News -सचिव को सीधा ट्रांसफर आवेदन किया, कोर्ट में याचिका दायर कर जवाब मांगा, कोर्ट ने 2 महीने के अंदर निर्णय लेने को कहा -

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News -सचिव को सीधा ट्रांसफर आवेदन किया, कोर्ट में याचिका दायर कर जवाब मांगा, कोर्ट ने 2 महीने के अंदर निर्णय लेने को कहा -

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. - 17

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 13691 of 2017

Petitioner :- Smt. Anuj Mahalwal
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Lavkush Kumar Bhatt
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohd Shere Ali

Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; Mohd Shere Ali, learned counsel appearing for the respondents no. 2 and 3 as well as the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondent no. 1.
The petitioner is an Assistant Teacher in a Primary School, namely, Prathmik Vidyalaya Ballo Khas, Vikas Khand-Siswa, District-Maharajganj. It is submitted that the petitioner is a permanent Teacher and is serving in the rural area of District-Maharajganj. By means of an application dated 8.11.2016, addressed to the Secretary, Basic Education Board, Allahabad, the petitioner has prayed for transfer to Amroha which is another district.
According to Rule 21 of the Uttar Pradesh Basic Education (Teachers) Service Rules, 1981 such a transfer is possible but only on the request of the Teacher with the consent of the authority.
Let the application of the petitioner dated 8.11.2016 be decided by respondent no. 2 within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order is presented before it.
With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 3.4.2017
Sunil Kr. Gupta

UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment / शिक्षक भर्ती /  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825 Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News - बेसिक की ऑफलाइन ट्रांसफर अपारदर्शी और कोर्ट ने स्टे लगाया -

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News - बेसिक की ऑफलाइन ट्रांसफर अपारदर्शी और कोर्ट ने स्टे लगाया -

हालाँकि आगे के केस स्टेटस में देख कर ही पता चलेगा कि स्टे हटा की नहीं

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH

?Court No. - 7

Case :- SERVICE SINGLE No. - 333 of 2017

Petitioner :- Mohd. Arif And Another
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Secy.Basic Edu.Govt.Of Up Lucknow & Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Krishan Kanhaya Pal,Pooja Pal
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Manish Mishra
connected with
Case :- SERVICE SINGLE No. - 489 of 2017

Petitioner :- Manju Singh
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Edu.Basic Civil Sectt.Lko.&Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Yogendra Kumar Pandey
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ajay Kumar
and
Case :- SERVICE SINGLE No. - 587 of 2017

Petitioner :- Manish Kumar Bajpai & Ors
Respondent :- State Of U.P Thru Secy Basic Edu Lko & Ors
Counsel for Petitioner :- Manjive Shukla
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C,Manish Mishra,Rajiv Singh Chauhan
and
Case :- SERVICE SINGLE No. - 795 of 2017

Petitioner :- Faheem Beg
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Basic Edu.Civil Sectt.Lko.&Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Karunesh Singh Pawar
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ajay Kumar,Manish Mishra
Hon'ble Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya,J.
Pursuant to order dated 25.01.2017, Sri D.P.Singh, Special Secretary, Department of Basic Education is present.� He has stated that after issuance of the Government Order dated 23.06.2016, the State Government has issued another Government Order dated 19.12.2016 providing therein that in terms of the earlier transfer policy embodied in the Government Order dated 23.06.2016, the remaining on-line application forms submitted by the teachers seeking their inter-district transfers can be considered in terms of the earlier policy itself.� The Government Order dated 19.12.2016 is taken on record.
However, on a query being put to him as to whether before passing the transfer order dated 03.01.2017 whereby several inter-district transfers of the teachers has been effected, prior approval of the Basic Education Board, as is required to be taken under Rule 21 of U.P. Basic Education (Teachers) Service Rules, 1981, was taken or not, it has been stated by Sri D.P.Singh, Special Secretary that no such approval was sought before passing the order dated 03.01.2017.��
Such a course adopted by the State Government while passing the transfer order on 03.01.2017 is not only against the statutory provisions contained in Rule 21 of the aforesaid Rules but is also in violation of the Government Order dated 23.06.2016.
It is noticeable that the Government Order dated 19.12.2016 permitted consideration of remaining on-line applications only in terms of the Government Order dated 23.06.2016 and as such without seeking approval of the Basic Education Board, no such inter-district transfers could have been effected.
At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that it is not only that only one order on 03.01.2017 effecting several inter-district transfers of teachers was passed but there are several such orders.
Learned Chief Standing Counsel on the basis of instructions received from Special Secretary present today has stated that in fact on 03.01.2017 two orders effecting several inter-district transfers of teachers have been passed by the State Government.� He has also stated that these two orders passed on 03.01.2017 contain lists of teachers most of whom had submitted off-line applications, which was impermissible under the Rules and the Government Order.
Such a procedure of effecting inter-district transfer is neither contemplated in Rule 21 of the Rules nor in the Government Order dated 23.06.2016.
This bunch of writ petitions contain averments that while effecting inter-district transfers of teachers, the Basic Education Board and the respective Basic Shiksha Adhikaris have not followed the priority as contemplated in the Government Order dated 23.06.2016.� There appears to be large scale discrepancies in the inter-district transfers made by the respondents.
Any statute or statutory Rules or even a Government Policy is binding on the Government as much as it is binding on others.�� The facts of this case clearly establish that State Government has acted against its own norms which are embodied in the Service Rules, 1981 and the Government order dated 23.06.2016.� Further, despite prescribing that only on-line applications seeking inter-district transfer shall be considered, the State Government while passing at least two orders on 03.01.2017 has considered off-line applications of teachers and passed orders thereon, which has not only resulted in making the process adopted by the Government non-transparent but has also deprived several teachers of the opportunity of making applications.� Such a course adopted by the State Government is, thus, prima facie, arbitrary and also suffers from the vice of malice in law as prima facie there is no justification for deviation from the prescribed norms.
Accordingly, till further orders of this Court, operation and implementation of these two orders said to have been issued by the State Government on 03.01.2017 effecting inter-district transfers of the teachers in Primary and Junior High Schools in the State of U.P. are hereby stayed.
The teachers who have been transferred in terms of the said orders will not be allowed to work and discharge their duties at the places of their new posting.� They shall, however, be permitted to discharge their duties in the schools where they have been working prior to passing of the orders on 03.01.2017 by the State Government.
Let counter affidavit be filed in these matters by the respondents within a period of two weeks.� One week's time thereafter shall be available to learned counsel for the petitioners to file rejoinder affidavit.
List after expiry of the aforesaid period showing the name of Sri Upendra Nath Mishra as counsel for the respondent.
It will be open to the teachers who are affected by the order passed on 03.01.2017 by the State Government to seek their intervention in this case.
Order Date :- 27.1.2017
Renu/-

UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment / शिक्षक भर्ती /  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825 Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET

UPTET News - बेसिक शिक्षकों के अवैध ट्रांसफर की दलील देकर ट्रांसफर करने की याचिका ख़ारिज -

UPTET News - बेसिक शिक्षकों के अवैध ट्रांसफर की दलील देकर ट्रांसफर करने की याचिका ख़ारिज -

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH

Court No. - 7
Case :- SERVICE SINGLE No. - 1908 of 2017
Petitioner :- Smt. Anuranjani
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Basic Edu. Civil Sectt.& Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Raj Kumar Upadhyaya (R.K.
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ajay Kumar
Hon'ble Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel representing the State-respondent and Sri Ajay Kumar, learned counsel representing the Basic Shiksha Parishad, Allahabad and District Basic Education Officer, Siddhartha Nagar.
The petitioner, who is working on the post of Assistant Teacher in Siddhartha Nagar, has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India questioning the validity of the Clause 3(1) of the Government Order dated 23.06.2016 which prescribes three years minimum service to be possessed to his/her credit by a teacher for being eligible to apply for inter-district transfer. The petitioner has also prayed that the respondents be directed to consider her case for transfer from district Siddhartha Nagar to district Barabanki.
Service conditions of the Assistant Teachers working in the Primary Institutions which are run and managed by the Basic Education Board, Allahabad, which is a statutory body created under the U.P. Basic Education Act, 1972, are governed by the U.P. Basic Education (Teachers) Service Rules, 1981, Rule 21 whereof provides the procedure for transfer and clearly states that there shall be no transfer of any teacher from the rural local area to an urban local area or from one urban local area to another of the same district or from local area of one district to that of another district except on request of or with the consent of the teacher and with the approval of the Board.
The State Government for the purpose of effecting inter-district transfers of the teachers working in the institutions run by the Basic Education Board issued a Government Order dated 23.06.2016 enunciating therein the transfer policy. Clause 3(1) of the Government Order dated 23.06.2016, which is under challenge in this writ petition, is as follows:-
" 3-bl laca/k esa eq>s ;g dgus dk funs'k gqvk gS fd m0 iz0 csfld f'k{kk ifj"kn }kjk lapkfyr fo|ky;ksa esa dk;Zjr v/;kidksa ds 'kkSf{kd l= 2016&17 gsrq vUrtZuinh; LFkkukUrj.k gsrq fuEuor~ uhfr fu/kkZfjr dh tkrh gS%&
¼1½ vUrtuZinh; LFkkukUrj.k gsrq dsoy ogh v/;kid vgZ gksaxs] ftUgksaus dk;Zjr tuin esa izFke fu;qfDr frfFk ls fnukad 31 ekpZ] 2016 rd U;wure 03 o"kZ dh lsok iw.kZ dj yh gksA"
The aforesaid provision in the said Government Order dated 23.06.2016 states that only those teachers will be eligible for seeking inter-district transfer who have completed three years service from the date of their first appointment till 31.03.2016. The said stipulation of having completed three years service to seek inter-district transfer is a policy decision taken by the Government and is in fact referable to Section 13 of the U.P. Basic Education Act, 1972, which provides that Basic Education Board shall carry out such directions as made to it from time to time by the State Government.
It is observed that any policy decision by the State Government can though be scrutinized by this court, however, the grounds of challenge are limited and for successful challenge to a policy decision the petitioner has to lay a strong foundation of violation of any statutory or constitutional provision.
From a perusal of entire averments made in the writ petition, it is clear that no such foundation has been laid by the petitioner to challenge Clause 3(1) of the Government Order dated 23.06.2016.
At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the impugned Clause 3(1) of the Government Order dated 23.06.2016 is violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and to strengthen the said submission, it has been stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the State Government by means of order dated 03.01.2017 (annexure No.6 to the writ petition) has even effected inter-district transfers of several teachers including the trainee teachers who have not completed three years service and as such existence of such Clause 3(1) in the Government Order dated 23.06.2016, which is not being implemented by the State Government would dis-entitle the petitioner from making application seeking inter-district transfer and thus the same is violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.
The aforesaid submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is absolutely misconceived. In case any Government Policy of the Government embodied either in the Government Order or for that matter in some statutory prescriptions is not being adhered to, that in itself would not render the said policy to be bad in law, neither on the said ground can it be said that the policy itself is violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.
It has also been stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner, to challenge the Government Order dated 23.06.2016 to the extent as aforesaid, that several teachers who had not put in three years service, have been considered for inter-district transfer and the State Government did not make it known to the petitioner that the transfers of those teachers are also being considered who have not put in three years service, hence, Clause 3(1) of the Government Order dated 23.06.2016 having not been acted upon makes the same unlawful. The aforesaid submission being advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner is again highly mis-conceived. The purported action in terms of the Government Order dated 23.06.2016 may be bad or lawful, however, the same would depend on analysis of the facts of a particular case, but the same cannot be a ground to challenge the alleged offending clause of the Government Order itself.
Since the learned counsel for the petitioner has utterly failed to establish any tenable grounds to challenge Clause 3(1) of the Government Order dated 23.06.2016, the prayer No.1 made by the petitioner in this writ petition cannot be acceded to.
So far as the prayer No.2 made by the petitioner in this case is concerned, admittedly, the petitioner was appointed on 09.11.2015 and has not put in requisite period of service of three years as on 31.03.2016 as stipulated in Clause 3(1) of the Government Order dated 23.06.2016, hence she is not eligible to apply seeking inter-district transfer. The prayer No.2 made by the petitioner in this writ petition, thus, also cannot be granted.
Lastly, it has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that by means of order dated 03.01.2017, passed by the State Government, which has been annexed as Annexure No.6 to the writ petition, various teachers who have not put in three years service as on 31.03.2016 have been transferred out of district where they were initially appointed. Such transfers appear to be in contravention of Clause 3(1) of the Government Order dated 23.06.2016, however, the petitioner cannot be permitted to claim any parity with an illegality. The said submission is also, thus, rejected.
For the reasons aforesaid, the writ petition is hereby dismissed.
However, there will be no order as to costs.
Order Date :- 25.1.2017
Sanjay

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News - - गाजियाबाद में बेसिक शिक्षकों को तबादला मिलने के बाद तैनाती नहीं मिलने से शिक्षकों में रोष

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News - -

गाजियाबाद में बेसिक शिक्षकों को तबादला मिलने के बाद तैनाती नहीं मिलने से शिक्षकों में रोष

जागरण संवाददाता, गाजियाबाद : गाजियाबाद में अंतरजनपदीय तबादले होने के बाद भी कई शिक्षक-शिक्षिकाओं की अब तक भी तैनाती नहीं हुई है। ऐसे में शिक्षकों को काफी परेशानियों का सामना करना पड़ रहा है। मंगलवार को यह सभी शिक्षक बेसिक शिक्षा अधिकारी से मिलने बेसिक शिक्षा विभाग भी पहुंचे, लेकिन इन्हें वहां बीएसए नहीं मिले। इस कारण शिक्षक- शिक्षिकाओं में रोष और बढ़ गया। शिक्षिका सुनीता ने बताया कि वह अलीगढ़ में पढ़ाती हैं और उनका पैतृक घर यहां पर है। लंबे समय से वह अंतरजनपदीय तबादले के लिए कोशिश कर रही हैं। अब लंबे समय बाद उनका तबादला किया गया है तो अब यहां उन्हें नियुक्ति नहीं मिल रही है। ऐसे में वह क्या करें? इसी कारण सभी अध्यापकों में रोष है। लगभग 15 शिक्षकों के तबादले हुए हैं। वहीं इस बारे में बेसिक शिक्षा अधिकारी लाल जी यादव का कहना है कि शिक्षकों ने ऑनलाइन माध्यम से तबादलों की प्रार्थना की थी। इसका अभी तक लिखित रूप से कोई आदेश नहीं आया है। इसलिए वह अभी यहां इनकी तैनाती नहीं करा सकते हैं।

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News - - शिक्षा महकमे में खाली पदों की भरमार

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News - -
शिक्षा महकमे में खाली पदों की भरमार

राज्य ब्यूरो, इलाहाबाद : माध्यमिक शिक्षा का नया सत्र शनिवार से शुरू हो गया है। छात्र-छात्रओं को प्रवेश देने की प्रक्रिया भी चल पड़ी है। कालेजों में शिक्षकों की पहले से कमी है, ग्रामीण क्षेत्रों में तो चंद शिक्षक विद्यालय का जैसे-तैसे संचालन करेंगे, वहीं इन विद्यालयों की निगरानी करने वाले अफसरों की भी बड़े पैमाने पर कमी है। ऊपर से नीचे तक हर संवर्ग में रिक्त पदों की संख्या लगातार बढ़ रही है। शिक्षा निदेशालय से पद भरने के लिए कई बार सूचनाएं मांगी जा चुकी हैं, लेकिन कुछ ही पदों को भरा जा सका, अधिकांश अब भी खाली पड़े हैं। तमाम अहम पदों को प्रभारी और कार्यवाहक के भरोसे संचालित किया जा रहा है। निदेशालय पदोन्नति के लिए अर्ह अधिकारियों की रिपोर्ट लगातार भेज रहा है। यह प्रकरण कैंप कार्यालय में डंप हो रहे हैं। शिक्षा निदेशक जैसा अहम पद चार महीने से रिक्त है, अपर शिक्षा निदेशक के तीन पदों को नियमित अफसरों का इंतजार है और दो पद चार महीने बाद और खाली हो रहे हैं। ज्ञात हो कि एडी माध्यमिक रमेश और एडी महिला शैल कुमारी यादव अक्टूबर में सेवानिवृत्त होंगे। खाली पदों से जूझने वाले महकमे ने आश्चर्यजनक तरीके से माध्यमिक शिक्षा के तमाम अफसरों को बेसिक शिक्षा में भेज दिया है।

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News - - डीएलएड के लिए साढ़े छह लाख से अधिक पंजीकरण

UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News - -
डीएलएड के लिए साढ़े छह लाख से अधिक पंजीकरण

राब्यू, इलाहाबाद : डीएलएड यानी डिप्लोमा इन एलीमेंटरी एजुकेशन प्रशिक्षण 2016 में साढ़े छह लाख से अधिक पंजीकरण हुए हैं। 14 जून से अब तक करीब तीन लाख 79 हजार 266 आवेदन हो चुके हैं, आवेदकों की संख्या में अभी और बढ़ोतरी होगी, क्योंकि सात जुलाई तक ऑनलाइन आवेदन होंगे। प्रदेश के 63 डायट की 10500 व 1422 निजी कॉलेजों की 71100 (कुल 81600) सीटों पर दाखिला होना है। अंतिम तारीख तीन जुलाई को शाम छह बजे तक इन सीटों के सापेक्ष छह लाख 67 हजार 282 अभ्यर्थियों ने पंजीकरण कराया है, वहीं तीन लाख 79 हजार 266 अभ्यर्थियों ने फाइनल आवेदन यानी शुल्क के साथ कर दिया है। पिछली बार इतनी ही सीटों पर करीब साढ़े चार लाख से अधिक पंजीकरण हुए थे, इस बार ढाई लाख अधिक अभ्यर्थियों ने पंजीकरण कराया है। परीक्षा नियामक प्राधिकारी सचिव डॉ. सुत्ता सिंह ने बताया कि आवेदन शुल्क पांच जुलाई तक जमा किए जा सकेंगे। ऑनलाइन आवेदन सात जुलाई तक होंगे। ऐसे में आवेदकों की संख्या पिछले वर्षो का रिकॉर्ड तोड़ सकती है। इस बार ऑनलाइन काउंसिलिंग कराने की तैयारी है। वहीं, ऑनलाइन आवेदन में संशोधन 10 से 13 जुलाई की शाम छह बजे तक होंगे।

UP SARKARI NAUKRI News - - भर्तियों को लेकर सड़क पर उतरे अभ्यर्थी

UP SARKARI NAUKRI News - -

भर्तियों को लेकर सड़क पर उतरे अभ्यर्थी

राज्य ब्यूरो, इलाहाबाद : भर्तियां शुरू कराने की मांग अब सड़क पर उतरकर हो रही है। उच्चतर शिक्षा सेवा आयोग के बाद माध्यमिक शिक्षा सेवा चयन बोर्ड उप्र कार्यालय के सामने सोमवार को दिन भर अभ्यर्थियों का आंदोलन चला। मंगलवार से यह मुहिम और तेज करने की तैयारी है। अभ्यर्थी किसी भी दशा में भर्तियों को टालने के पक्ष में नहीं है।

सूबे में सत्ता परिवर्तन होने के बाद से विभिन्न आयोगों व चयन बोर्ड में कुछ अपवाद को छोड़कर नियुक्तियां ठप हैं। भर्तियां शुरू होने की उम्मीद में तीन माह का लंबा समय बीत गया है, अब अभ्यर्थी चुप बैठने को तैयार नहीं है। पिछले दिनों उच्च शिक्षा निदेशालय में असिस्टेंट प्रोफेसर भर्ती के अभ्यर्थियों ने निदेशक के कक्ष में कब्जा करके आरपार की लड़ाई लड़ने के संकेत दे चुके हैं। उच्चतर शिक्षा सेवा आयोग कार्यालय के सामने धरना देकर रुके साक्षात्कार को पूरा कराने व 1150 असिस्टेंट प्रोफेसर भर्ती की लिखित परीक्षा की मांग हो चुकी है। सोमवार को चयन बोर्ड के सामने विक्की खान व अन्य अभ्यर्थियों ने एकजुट होकर धरना दिया। उनकी मांग है कि 2011 प्रवक्ता व स्नातक शिक्षक का साक्षात्कार की तारीख घोषित हो, साथ ही 2016 की लिखित परीक्षा का भी एलान किया जाए। यह आंदोलन शाम तक चला और चयन बोर्ड अध्यक्ष से वार्ता करने के बाद अभ्यर्थी वापस लौट गये, लेकिन मंगलवार से आंदोलन और तेज करने की तैयारी है।

विक्की खान ने कहा है कि तारीख की घोषणा तक क्रमिक आंदोलन जारी रहेगा। यहां सैकड़ों अभ्यर्थी मौजूद रहे।

आज फैसला होने की उम्मीद

चयन बोर्ड अध्यक्ष हीरालाल गुप्त मंगलवार को अभ्यर्थियों के आंदोलन को देखते हुए लंबित लिखित परीक्षा और 2011 के साक्षात्कार पर सदस्यों के साथ बैठक करके निर्णय ले सकते हैं। हालांकि चयन बोर्ड पहले से ही सितंबर माह में लिखित परीक्षा कराने और उसी के आसपास साक्षात्कार कराने की रूपरेखा तैयार कर रहा है। इस पर अंतिम निर्णय अध्यक्ष के न होने से नहीं हुआ था