सुप्रीम कोर्ट के आदेश की महत्वपूर्ण पक्तियां जी सभी कोर्ट अक्सर पति पत्नी ट्रांसफर मामले में उल्लेख करती हैं , ये सही जरूरतमंद ट्रांसफर चाहने वालों के राहत भरे भी हैं साथ ही प्रशासन / समाज के लिये भी राहत भरे हैं:-
In the case of Union of India -Vs- S.L. Abbas, reported in (1993) 4
SCC 357, have observed that “Who should be transferred where, is a matter for the appropriate authority to decide. Unless the order of transfer is vitiated by mala fides or is made in violation of any statutory provisions, the court cannot interfere with it. While
ordering the transfer, there is no doubt, the authority must keep in mind the guidelines issued by the Government on the subject. Similarly if a person makes any representation with respect to his transfer, the appropriate authority must consider the same having regard to the exigencies of administration. The guidelines say that as far as possible, husband and wife must be posted at the same place. The said guideline however does not confer upon the Government employee a legally enforceable right. The order of
transfer can be questioned in a court or tribunal only where it is passed mala fide or where it is made in violation of the statutory provisions.”
In Sarvesh Kumar Awasthi -Vs- U.P. Jal Nigam, reported in (2003) 11 SCC 740, Hon’ble Supreme Court have observed that –
“In our view, transfer of officers is required to be effected on the basis of set norms or guidelines. The power of transferring an officer cannot be wielded arbitrarily, mala fide or an exercise against efficient and independent officer or at the instance of politicians whose work is not done by the officer concerned. For better administration the officers concerned must have freedom from fear - 14 - W.P. (C) No. 6492 of 2015 Page 14 of 17 of being harassed by repeated transfers or transfers ordered at the instance of someone who has nothing to do with the business of administration.”
Source: http://www.ghconline.nic.in/Judgment/WPC64922015.pdf
UPTET / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates / Teacher Recruitment / शिक्षक भर्ती / SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS
UP-TET 2011,
72825 Teacher Recruitment,
Teacher Eligibility Test (
TET),
72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog ,
UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS,
SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more:
http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet News Hindi | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,
CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET ,
Rajasthan TET / RTET, BETET / Bihar TET, PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
2016 इंटरडिस्ट्रिक्ट ट्रांसफर में कोर्ट ने पति पत्नी सरकारी नौकरी के ट्रांसफर मामले को वरीयता देकर नार्मल ट्रांसफर से ऊपर रखा , कुछ गलत ट्रांसफर हो जाने पर ट्रांसफर आदेश संशोधन करने को कहा -
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 48327 of 2016
Petitioner :- Sunita Rani
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Seemant Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashok Kumar Yadav
Hon'ble Manoj Misra,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; learned Standing Counsel for respondents 1 and 2; and Sri Sanjay Kumar Srivastava for respondent no. 3.
Considering the nature of the order that is being passed, this Court does not find it necessary to call for counter affidavits from the respondents as it would serve no useful purpose, therefore, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is being disposed of finally.
The petitioner is a teacher under the U.P. Basic Shiksha Parishad. For inter district transfer of teachers under the U.P. Basic Shiksha Parishad, a detailed transfer policy was notified / vide circular dated 23.6.2016. Under the transfer policy a candidate interested in transfer was required to submit application online giving option of five districts where he or she wanted posting by way of transfer. According to the petitioner, pursuant to the above transfer policy, she submitted online application, which was assigned no. 1711222, seeking transfer from Etah to any school in Agra or Firozabad. The options 1 to 4 were in respect of being posted at Agra whereas the 5th option was for posting in Firozabad.
The case of the petitioner is that under paragraph 3(6) of the notification /circular dated 23.6.2016, a priority was laid for considering posting of a candidate when, in respect of a particular place, more applications than vacancies are received. According to sub clause (6) of Clause 3, priority is to be provided as follows:
(1) first priority to physically handicapped candidate;
(2) second to candidates suffering from specified diseases;
(3) third to a widow;
(4) fourth to an Ex-servicemen or an Ex-employee belonging to specified category;
(5) fifth to a candidate who is either husband or wife and both of them are teachers under the U.P. Basic Shiksha Parishad, and seek posting in a common district;
(6) sixth to a candidate who is either husband or and wife and both of them are in government service and they seek posting at common place; and
(7) where a candidate applies for posting in the home town district.
The policy further provides that where applications of candidates belonging to a single category are received in excess of the vacant posts, then candidate older in age would be given preference.
The grievance of the petitioner is that though by order dated 21.8.2016, posting/ transfer has been made but the said posting/ transfer is not in accordance with the priority fixed by Clause 3 (6) of the notification/ circular dated 23.6.2016.
It is the case of the petitioner that her husband had been posted in district Agra and, therefore, she was entitled to be treated 6th in the order of preference for being posted at Agra but instead of her claim being considered for posting at Agra, 31 candidates who are 7th in the order of priority have been posted in Agra when, in fact, their claim ought to have been considered only after exhausting the claim of the petitioner. It is thus the case of the petitioner that the transfer order dated 21.8.2016 requires to be amended and made in-consonance with the transfer policy.
Learned counsel representing the respondent no. 3 has submitted that the petitioner may make a representation before the Secretary of U.P. Basic Education Board, Allahabad in respect of her grievance who can pass appropriate order, if it is justified by the transfer policy.
Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction upon the 3rd respondent (Secretary, U.P. Basic Education Board, Allahabad) to consider the grievance of the petitioner in respect of transfer/ posting and thereafter pass appropriate order keeping in mind the priority fixed by the notification/ circular dated 23.6.2016 governing the transfer process. Accordingly, liberty is given to the petitioner to file a comprehensive representation before 3rd respondent in respect of her grievance. If any such representation is filed along with certified copy of this order, the 3rd respondent shall verify the facts and pass appropriate order in accordance with law, keeping in mind the transfer policy, preferably, within a period of three weeks from the date of filing of such representation.
It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the claim of the petitioner. The aforesaid exercise shall be completed strictly in accordance with law after verifying the facts from the record.
Order Date :- 4.10.2016
Arvind
UPTET / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates / Teacher Recruitment / शिक्षक भर्ती / SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS
UP-TET 2011,
72825 Teacher Recruitment,
Teacher Eligibility Test (
TET),
72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog ,
UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS,
SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more:
http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet News Hindi | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,
CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET ,
Rajasthan TET / RTET, BETET / Bihar TET, PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
अध्यापिकाओं के तबादले पर निर्णय लेने का निर्देश, 9 जुलाई के बाद कल 11 जुलाई को सुनवाई की तारिख
विसं, इलाहाबाद : इलाहाबाद हाईकोर्ट ने सहारनपुर जिले में महिला सहायक अध्यापिकाओं के तबादले पर दो सप्ताह में निर्णय लेने का निर्देश दिया है। कोर्ट ने यह भी कहा है कि यदि याचियों की तबादले की अर्जी पर आदेश हो चुका हो तो उन्हें सूचित किया जाए। यह आदेश न्यायमूर्ति एसपी केशरवानी ने नीतू व 11 अन्य सहारनपुर की अध्यापिकाओं की याचिका पर दिया है। याचियों का कहना है कि विभा सिंह कुशवाहा केस में दिए गए कोर्ट के आदेश का पालन नहीं किया गया है। याचीगण 2015 से अध्यापक है। नियमावली के तहत उन्हें तबादला मांगने का अधिकार है। सरकारी वकील ने कोर्ट से कहा कि शीघ्र ही तबादला सूची जारी कर दी जाएगी। इस पर कोर्ट ने यह आदेश दिया है।
दूसरी सूची के लिए हाईकोर्ट पर टिकीं निगाहें : परिषदीय स्कूलों के दर्जनों शिक्षकों ने अंतर जिला तबादलों के बाद हाईकोर्ट में याचिका दायर की है। शिक्षकों का कहना है कि उनका कटऑफ अंक अधिक है, फिर भी उनका स्थानांतरण नहीं किया गया है, बल्कि कम कटऑफ वालों को दूसरे जिलों में भेजा गया है। ऐसे ही दिव्यांग शिक्षकों ने भी कोर्ट में अर्जी दायर करके कहा है कि शासनादेश में उन्हें वरीयता देने का निर्देश था लेकिन, उसका अनुपालन नहीं हुआ। बेसिक शिक्षा विभाग ने ऐन वक्त पर आठ अति पिछड़ा जिलों से कोई तबादला नहीं किया है, जबकि आवेदन मांगने के समय और आदेश जारी करने से पहले इस संबंध में कोई विज्ञप्ति जारी नहीं की गई। एकाएक नियम बदलना कहां तक जायज है। यदि तबादला करना नहीं था तो उन जिलों के लिए आवेदन ही क्यों मांगे गए। मुख्य याचिका विभा सिंह कुशवाहा ने की है
**********************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 14105 of 2018
Petitioner :- Bibha Singh Kushwaha And 24 Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Indra Raj Singh,Adarsh Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sanjay Chaturvedi
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J.
Put up on 11.7.2018 at 10.00 a.m. along with the records of Writ-A Nos.14278 and 14395 of 2018 and all connected matters.
Order Date :- 9.7.2018
Ak
*************
C/P
फीमेल ट्रांसफर मैटर हाईकोर्ट अपडेट——————————
आज सुबह सुनवाई विभा सिंह कुशवाहा केस से ही शुरु हुई, इंद्रराज सिंह जी ने वहां से बहस तो चालू की तब जज साहब ने 8 (2)(D) नियम को एक दया पर आश्रित व्यवस्था बताया,, कि ट्रांसफर आपका अधिकार नहीं है,,, बाद में शैलेंद्र श्रीवास्तव और आर के ओझा ने जोरदार बहस करके किसी तरह इंस्पिरेशनल के मुद्दे को बचाने का प्रयास किया और वह काफी हद तक उस में सफल भी रहे। इंस्पिरेशनल जनपद के प्रेस नोट पर सरकार से जवाब मांगा गया है
UPTET / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates / Teacher Recruitment / शिक्षक भर्ती / SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS
UP-TET 2011,
72825 Teacher Recruitment,
Teacher Eligibility Test (
TET),
72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog ,
UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS,
SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more:
http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet News Hindi | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,
CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET ,
Rajasthan TET / RTET, BETET / Bihar TET, PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
रिटायर्ड शिक्षकों से 10 दिन में भरें दो हजार रिक्त पद: संजय
राज्य ब्यूरो, लखनऊ : राजकीय और सहायता प्राप्त माध्यमिक विद्यालयों के दो हजार रिक्त पदों पर दस दिन के भीतर सेवानिवृत्त शिक्षकों की नियुक्ति कर ली जाएगी। अपर मुख्य सचिव संजय अग्रवाल ने सोमवार को विभागीय समीक्षा बैठक में इसमें ढिलाई पर नाराजगी जताई और कहा कि बच्चों की पढ़ाई का नुकसान बर्दाश्त नहीं किया जाएगा। ऐसे शिक्षक मानदेय के आधार पर रखे जाएंगे।
सोमवार को योजना भवन में वीडियो कांफ्रेंसिंग के जरिए विभागीय कार्यो की समीक्षा करते हुए अपर मुख्य सचिव संजय अग्रवाल ने कहा कि 302 माध्यमिक विद्यालयों में जहां गणित एवं विज्ञान के नये पद सृजित हुए हैं, उसका प्रचार प्रसार कराकर प्रवेश लिया जाए। उन्होंने छात्र-छात्रओं के लिए शौचालय, बिजली, पानी आदि आधारभूत सुविधाएं भी उपलब्ध कराने के निर्देश दिए। कहा कि इसमें कमी मिलने पर अधिकारियों के खिलाफ कार्रवाई की जाएगी। साथ ही कहा कि बरसात के कारण कोई भी अप्रिय घटना न घटे, इसके लिए विद्यालय में सुरक्षा के सभी मानकों का परीक्षण कर लिया जाए। प्रत्येक पं. दीन दयाल उपाध्याय राजकीय माडल इण्टर कालेज में फर्नीचर की उपलब्धता सुनिश्चित की जाए।
UPTET / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates / Teacher Recruitment / शिक्षक भर्ती / SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS
UP-TET 2011,
72825 Teacher Recruitment,
Teacher Eligibility Test (
TET),
72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog ,
UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS,
SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more:
http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet News Hindi | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,
CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET ,
Rajasthan TET / RTET, BETET / Bihar TET, PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
एक और तबादला सूची जारी होगी!
इलाहाबाद। परिषदीय शिक्षकों की एक और तबादला सूची जारी हो सकती है। 13 जून को 11,963 शिक्षकों की तबादला सूची जारी होने के बावजूद बड़ी संख्या में आवेदक संतुष्ट नहीं है। दो से छह जुलाई तक तकरीबन छह हजार शिक्षकों ने सचिव बेसिक शिक्षा परिषद से आपत्तियां की हैँ।सभी शर्तें पूरी करने के बावजूद तबादला न होने से असंतुष्ट कुछ शिक्षकों ने हाईकोर्ट में याचिका भी कर दी है। सालभर की कवायद के बाद जारी लिस्ट में कई कमियां मिली हैं। जो आपत्तियां मिली हैं उनका परीक्षण करवाने के बाद देखा जाएगा कि शर्तें पूरी करने के बावजूद किन का ट्रांसफर नहीं हुआ। बेसिक शिक्षा विभाग के अफसर सरकार व हाईकोर्ट का भी रुख देख रहे हैं। अधिक कमी मिलने पर दूसरी लिस्ट भी जारी हो सकती है
UPTET / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates / Teacher Recruitment / शिक्षक भर्ती / SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS
UP-TET 2011,
72825 Teacher Recruitment,
Teacher Eligibility Test (
TET),
72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog ,
UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS,
SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more:
http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet News Hindi | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,
CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET ,
Rajasthan TET / RTET, BETET / Bihar TET, PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
शिक्षिकाओं ने भरा मनचाहे स्कूल का अपना विकल्प , सोशल मीडिया पर ट्रांसफर में लग रहा धांदलेबाजी का आरोप
************************
सोशल मीडिया पर ट्रांसफर में लग रहा धांदलेबाजी का आरोप -
कहीं अविवाहितों को ट्रांसफर दिया गए तो कहीं नहीं दिये गए ,
कहीं से फिरोजबाद ट्रांसफर हो गया तो कहीं से नहीं हो पाया ,
कहीं से ऑफलाइन नोयडा ट्रांसफर हो गया तो कहीं से हस्बेंड वाइफ बेसिक शिक्षा में होने व् ऑनलाइन आवेदन करने के बाद भी नहीं हो पा रहा
**********************
अंतरजनपीदय स्थानांतरण पर आए शिक्षकों की हुई काउंसिलिंग सीडीओ के निरीक्षण में गैरहाजिर मिले 10 बाबुओं का वेतन रोका
जागरण संवाददाता, फीरोजाबाद : अंतरजनपदीय स्थानांतरण पर फीरोजाबाद आईं महिला शिक्षिकाओं को आखिर विभाग ने स्कूलों का आवंटन कर दिया। काउंसिलिंग के जरिए इनसे एकल स्कूलों के विकल्प भरवाए गए। वहीं बीएसए अर¨वद कुमार पाठक ने बीते दिनों सीडीओ की निरीक्षण रिपोर्ट के आधार पर सख्त कार्रवाई करते हुए दफ्तर के दस बाबुओं का वेतन रोकने के आदेश जारी कर दिए हैं। 1ब्लाक संसाधन केंद्र फीरोजाबाद पर संपन्न काउंसिलिंग में जूनियर हाईस्कूल के 57 शिक्षकों में से 56 पहुंचे। बीएसए के निर्देशन में संपन्न हुई काउंसिलिंग में मेरिट के आधार पर एक-एक शिक्षिका को बुलाकर विकल्प भरवाए गए। इससे पूर्व सूची को ब्लॉक पर चस्पा कर दिया था, ताकि शिक्षक सूची के आधार पर स्कूल छांट सकें। अधिकांश शिक्षिकाओं की पहली पसंद टूंडला ब्लॉक रहा तो कई ने नारखी को भी चुना। वहीं 11 हैडमास्टर में से दस शिक्षिकाओं ने काउंसिलिंग में प्रतिभाग किया। वहीं पदानवत करने के बाद में सहायक अध्यापक के पद पर आए चार शिक्षकों की भी काउंसिलिंग हुई। पिछले दिनों सीडीओ के निरीक्षण में बाबुओं की लापरवाही मिली थी। पत्रवली पूरी होने के बाद भी शिक्षकों के देयकों का भुगतान नहीं हो रहा था। सीडीओ के निर्देश पर इन बिल बाबुओं का वेतन रोके जाने के आदेश बीएसए ने देर शाम जारी कर दिए। इससे लिपिकों में अफरातफरी मच गई है। 1एबीआरसी की बैठक आज : बीएसए अरविंद कुमार पाठक ने सभी सहायक ब्लॉक समन्वयक एवं खंड शिक्षाधिकारियों की बैठक सुबह नौ बजे से विकास भवन सभागार में बुलाई है। बैठक में सीडीओ इन्हें दिशा निर्देश देंगी।
UPTET / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates / Teacher Recruitment / शिक्षक भर्ती / SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS
UP-TET 2011,
72825 Teacher Recruitment,
Teacher Eligibility Test (
TET),
72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog ,
UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS,
SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more:
http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet News Hindi | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,
CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET ,
Rajasthan TET / RTET, BETET / Bihar TET, PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
याची ने ट्रांसफर में लापरवाही का आरोप कंटेम्प्ट लगाया, याची का जौनपुर से ट्रांसफर की जगह अन्य सहकर्मी का ट्रांसफर कर दिया, कोर्ट ने पहले ही आदेश दिया था कि लापवाही नहीं चलेगी, और सचिव के देखरेख में ट्रांसफर होंगे, अवमानना की याचिका - -
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 32
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3259 of 2018
Applicant :- Smt. Paramjit Kaur
Opposite Party :- Mr. Sanjay Sinha, The Secretary Of Basic Shiksha Parishad
Counsel for Applicant :- Gopal Ji Rai
Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.
It has been contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in pursuance of the order passed by this Court in her Writ-A No. 3715 of 2018 (Smt. Paramjit Kaur Vs. State of U.P. & another) on 6.2.2018 giving her benefit of judgment rendered in Writ-A No. 2868 of 2018 (Bibha Singh Kushwaha & 21 others Vs. State of U.P.).
The petitioner filed an online application on 13.2.2018 for transfer, but the said application has not been considered and when the transfer list was published on the net by the Secretary, Basic Shiksha Parishad, the name of the petitioner was not mentioned. On the other hand, one other teacher, Reetu Yadav wife of Dhanesh Yadav who was working in the petitioner's institution was transferred from Jaunpur to Rai Bareilly.
It has been alleged that the respondent has committed wilful contend of the order passed by this Court on 6.2.2018.
Issue notice to the respondent returnable at an early date.
The petitioner shall take steps within a week.
List this matter after service.
In case the order passed by this Court has been complied with, the respondent shall not appear in person, but he file his compliance affidavit through his counsel.
Order Date :- 22.6.2018
Arif
UPTET / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates / Teacher Recruitment / शिक्षक भर्ती / SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS
UP-TET 2011,
72825 Teacher Recruitment,
Teacher Eligibility Test (
TET),
72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog ,
UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS,
SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more:
http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet News Hindi | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,
CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET ,
Rajasthan TET / RTET, BETET / Bihar TET, PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
बिभा सिंह कुशवाह का ट्रांसफर न होने पर उन्होंने रिट दाखिल करी, कोर्ट ने उपयुक्त बेंच में 9 जुलाई को सुनवाई के आदेश दिया - -
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 42
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 14105 of 2018
Petitioner :- Bibha Singh Kushwaha And 24 Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Indra Raj Singh,Adarsh Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sanjay Chaturvedi
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J.
Put up on 9.7.2018 as fresh before the appropriate Bench as the other similar matters are listed on that date.
Order Date :- 26.6.2018
Abhishek
UPTET / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates / Teacher Recruitment / शिक्षक भर्ती / SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS
UP-TET 2011,
72825 Teacher Recruitment,
Teacher Eligibility Test (
TET),
72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog ,
UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS,
SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more:
http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet News Hindi | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,
CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET ,
Rajasthan TET / RTET, BETET / Bihar TET, PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
नियम 8 2(d) के बावजूद ट्रांसफर न होने पर कोर्ट का दरवाजा खटखटाया, सरकार ने कहा कि सहारनपुर की ट्रांसफर लिस्ट जारी होना बाकी है, कोर्ट ने ट्रांसफर लिस्ट जारी करने को कहा, रिट डिस्पोज़ ऑफ हुई - -
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 14356 of 2018
Petitioner :- Neetu And 11 Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Indra Raj Singh,Adarsh Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Bhola Nath Yadav
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned standing counsel for State-respondents and Sri Bhola Nath Yadav, learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that all the petitioners are female Assistant Teachers appointed in the year 2015 and they are seeking their transfer in terms of provisions of Rule 8(2)(d) of the U.P. Basic Education (Teachers)(Posting) Rules, 2008 but despite a clear direction of this court in the order dated 06.02.2018 in Writ-A No.2868 of 2018 (Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others vs. State of U.P.), no transfer order has been passed as yet in so far as the District Saharanpur is concerned.
Learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3 states on instruction that a transfer list for transfer of Assistant Teachers relating to District Saharanpur shall be issued shortly.
In view of the aforesaid, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent Nos.2 and 3 to pass orders on all pending applications for transfer relating to District Saharnpur, within two weeks from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order. In the event, transfer applications relating to transfer for District Saharanpur have already been disposed of, then the decision with respect to the transfer applications of the petitioners shall be communicated to them within the same period.
Order Date :- 6.7.2018
NLY
UPTET / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates / Teacher Recruitment / शिक्षक भर्ती / SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS
UP-TET 2011,
72825 Teacher Recruitment,
Teacher Eligibility Test (
TET),
72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog ,
UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS,
SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more:
http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet News Hindi | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,
CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET ,
Rajasthan TET / RTET, BETET / Bihar TET, PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
Transfer News - अगर पति पत्नी एक जिले में पोस्टिंग को इस जजमेंट को आधार बना कर लड़ा होता तो शायद सभी कपल को एक ही जिले में पोस्टिंग मिल जाती , इस निर्णय में कोर्ट ने साफ साफ़ यह भी कहा की छठा वेतन आयोग तो कपल पोस्टिंग को चाइल्ड केयर आदि के आधार पर मेंडेटरी कर रहा था , और चाइल्ड केयर लीव का प्रावधान दर्शाता है की जितना संभव हो कपल को निकटस्थ कार्यस्थल पर पोस्टिंग दी जाये , देखें आदेश -
इस आदेश में कोर्ट ने कड़े शब्दों में कहा की अक्सर देखा गया है की कुछ भी कारण जो विभागों को अच्छा लगे बताकर कपल को एक जगह पोस्टिंग न देकर परेशान किया जाता है
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad
Original Application ... vs Jagdish Kaur 2013 (2) Scc (L&S) ... on 18 September, 2014
RESERVED
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ALLAHABAD BENCH ALLAHABAD
(THIS THE DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2014)
Present
HON BLE MS. JASMINE AHMED, MEMBER (J)
Original Application No.330/01090 OF 2014
(U/S 19, Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985)
Gyan Chandra Sharma, aged about 54 years, S/o Sadanand Sharma, R/o House No.3, Village-Bholepur, PS-Fatehgarh, District-Farukhabad.
Applicant
V E R S U S
1. Union of India through the General Manager, Eastern Railway, Gorakhpur.
2. The Divisional Railway Manager (P), Eastern Railway, Izzatnagar.
3. The Sr. Divisional Personnel Officer, Eastern Railway, Izzatnagar.
4. The Sr. Section Engineer (Sig.), Eastern Railway, Fatehgarh.
..Respondents
Advocates for the Applicant:- Shri L.M. Singh
Advocate for the Respondents:- Shri A. Tripathi
O R D E R
DELIVERED BY HON BLE MS. JASMINE AHMED, MEMBER (J) Shri L.M. Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Avnish Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. The applicant was initially appointed as a Telephone Operator on 16.9.1997 with the Railway. In the year 2002 due to administrative reason the post of Telephone Operator got surrendered and due to that circumstances the applicant was absorbed against the post of TCM-III on 26.7.2002 but the applicant did not accept the post as similarly situated persons were absorbed against Group C post i.e. Assistant Clerk. Consequently, the applicant was also absorbed against the post of Assistant Clerk and was posted at Fatehgarh during the year 2005.
3. This is the second round of litigation. The applicant preferred OA No.330/00777/2014 challenging the transfer order dated 23.4.2014 whereby he was transferred from Izzatnagar to Mathura. After getting the transfer order the applicant preferred a representation dated 1.5.2014. The OA was disposed of on 24.6.2014 with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the representation of the applicant dated 1.5.2014 as expeditiously as possible by a reasoned and speaking order. The court also granted an interim measure of status-quo as on date in favour of the applicant till the time the representation is decided, and directed not to disturb the applicant. In pursuance of the order dated 24.6.2014 the respondents have passed an order dated 4.8.2014 rejecting the request of the applicant which resulted the present original application.
4. The counsel for the applicant is challenging the legality and validity of the transfer order dated 23.4.2014 passed by the respondent no.2 as well as the rejection of representation dated 4.8.2014 passed by respondent no.3. The applicant states that his wife is a working lady who is working as Assistant Teacher in the Education department under the State Government in Prathamik Vidyalaya, Chawki, Mahmudpur, Kamalganj, Farrukhabad. Prior to posting at Farrukhabad the wife of the applicant was posted at Lalitpur and taking into consideration the spouse ground she was posted at Farrukhabad from Lalitpur vide transfer order dated 12.10.2000 and on 13.10.2000 she joined her duty. Now the applicant has been transferred from Fatehgarh (Farrukhabad) to Mathura.
5. The contention of the counsel for the applicant is that taking into consideration that the wife of the applicant is posted at Farrukhabad he should not be transferred out from Farrukhabad as the O.M dated 30.9.2009 issued from Department of Personnel and Training in respect of posting of husband and wife at the same station says that to enhance the status of women in all walk of life and to enable them to lead a normal family life, also at the same time, to ensure education and welfare of the children till the children attain the age of 18 years husband and wife may be posted at the same station. While bringing in this O.M., Government even thought of making the provision of posting at the same station mandatory. While reviewing the issue of posting of husband and wife at same station Government has taken into considerations the 6th CPC Report, where Govt. Servants have already been allowed the facility of child care Leave which is admissible till the children attain 18 years of age. Adhering with this principle of Care , on the similar lines, consolidated guidelines of provisions about posting of the working spouse has been formulated. The counsel for the applicant also stated that in absence of statutory rules, relevant government orders would hold good and in this regard he places reliance on the judgment passed by Hon ble Apex Court in the case of State of Punjab & Others Versus Jagdish Kaur 2013 (2) SCC (L&S) 257. And he states that the O.M. dated 30.9.2009 shall be followed and adhered in its letter and spirit while passing transfer orders.
6. In the similar line of the O.M. from the DOP&T dated 30.9.2009 respondent no.2 has already issued a letter dated 1.6.2006 with the same principle in respect of posting of husband and wife at the same station with a clear stipulation/intention to ensure the posting of working couples in Grade C & D in the same station.
7. The counsel for the respondents vehemently opposes the contention of the applicant and says that if this is so, then the respondents would be restrained to transfer the applicant anywhere anytime from the present place of posting where he is enjoying a stay of long 17 years i.e. Fatehgarh/Farrukhabad. He also states that this will hamper in the routine/periodical transfer and this type of problems will be there with other government employees also. As the transfer is an incidence of service hence the applicant every time cannot take shelter of the spouse ground.
8. Heard the rival contentions of the parties, perused the documents and pleadings available on record.
9. Though the Hon ble Apex Court in catena of judgments has held that as transfer is an incidence of service hence generally it should not be interfered into, unless until the order is arbitrary, punitive, against the statutory provisions or in exercise of colorable powers, irrespective of that, transfer orders are challenged and assailed time and again before the courts of law and orders have been passed taking into consideration facts and circumstances of each case. With the changing scenario, when more and more ladies are joining the bigger world leaving the comfort of their cozy home, the government as a model employer and a welfare state taking into consideration this advancement, provided some facilities for working women just to help them to lead a normal healthy family life and also to ensure that the children who are the future of the world/society shall not be deprived of the affection and care of the mother till they are attaining the age of 18 years. It cannot be said that while making this provision the government was not aware about the catena of judgments not to interfere in the transfer order. Instead of that, the government has made special provisions for working spouses by O.M. dated 30.09.2009 to encourage the increase of representations of women in every walk of life especially in government jobs. The government has made and categorized certain provisions for the working spouses in O.M. dated 30.9.2009. The subject, theme and the spirit in the overall guidelines for posting of husband and wife as envisaged is very categorical:
Subject:Posting of husband and wife at the same station.
The subject itself equivocally without any ambiguity speaks about posting of husband and wife in a same station. The Railway Board by their letter dated 1.6.2006 had already issued direction about posting of husband wife in group C and D category Railway employees in the same station. In a very clear term, it also stated that even if the categories of the employees are changed, it shall be ensured (,d LFkku ij iRuh vkSj ifr dh rSukrh lqfuf pr dh tk;A) that the husband and wife are posted at the same station.
10. While rejecting the representation of the applicant, the respondents have taken three pleas.
(i) The applicant is posted at Fatehgarh almost for 17 years. .
(ii) To make time bound transfers and adjustments.
(iii) The wife may request her employer for her transfer.
The above stated reasons are seems to be vague and unsubstantiated ground, showing no administrative exigency. When the post is there, and the work of the applicant is also satisfactory, only on the ground that he is there for a long time or to make time bound periodical transfers, the applicant needs to be transferred hold no justification. Nor does the wife need to request for her transfer to the place where her husband has been transferred. None of these reasons seem to be very urgent administrative nature which cannot be done away otherwise without transferring the applicant.
11. The motive behind the O.M. dated 30.9.2009 though not very categorically transcribed as mandatory but the theme & spirit behind the issuing of this O.M. is almost mandatory in nature. Clause 4(vii) categorically prescribes how to deal with the issue of transfer when one spouse is employed under the central Government and the other spouse is employed under the State Government:-
The spouse employed under the Central Government may apply to the competent authority and the competent authority may post the said officer to the station or if there is no post in that station to the State where the other spouse is posted.
12. In clause 5 of the O.M. dated 30.09.2009 government has also dealt into about unaccomodative attitude of employers at times, and directed as under:-
5.Complaints are sometimes received that even if posts are available in the station of posting of the spouse, the administrative authorities do not accommodate the employees citing administrative reasons. In all such cases, the cadre controlling authority should strive to post the employee at the station of the spouse and in case of inability to do so, specific reasons, therefore, may be communicated to the employee.
13. The reasons given by the respondents rejecting the request do not reflect that kind of administrative exigencies which cannot be mete out without transferring the applicant.
14. In Deepa Vaishistha Versus State of U.P. 1996(1) ESC 148 (All-DB) it has been categorically held that:-
If the administrative exigencies or public interest so requires, certainly husband and wife may be transferred to different places but only in exceptional cases i.e. in respect of rare cases, for which no illustration can be given.
But now a days it is invariably seen that for the reasons best known to the department, this kind of transfers are being made disturbing the couple. In the opinion of this court, as such practice needs to be deprecated.
15. In view of the entire above discussions the transfer order dated 23.4.2014 in respect of the applicant and the rejection order dated 4.8.2014 of his representation is quashed and set aside. Accordingly, the OA is allowed. No Costs.
[Jasmine Ahmed] Member-J /ns/ ??
UPTET / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates / Teacher Recruitment / शिक्षक भर्ती / SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS
UP-TET 2011,
72825 Teacher Recruitment,
Teacher Eligibility Test (
TET),
72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog ,
UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS,
SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more:
http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet News Hindi | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,
CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET ,
Rajasthan TET / RTET, BETET / Bihar TET, PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
