Tuesday, February 13, 2018

UP Teacher Transfer - कोर्ट का कहना है कि ट्रांसफर गाइडलाइंस के विरुध्द प्रक्रिया होने पर ही एम्प्लॉई ऐसी प्रक्रिया को चुनौती दे सकते हैं -

UP Teacher Transfer   - कोर्ट का कहना है कि ट्रांसफर गाइडलाइंस के विरुध्द प्रक्रिया होने पर ही एम्प्लॉई ऐसी प्रक्रिया को चुनौती दे सकते हैं  



If the transfer order is in violation of the Transfer Policy, the Supreme Court in the case of Union of India v. S.L.Abbas reported in (1993) 4 SCC 357 has held that Guidelines/Transfer Policy does not confer upon the government employee a legally enforceable right to challenge it under Article 226 of the Constitution
***********************


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 

A.F.R. 
Court No. - 4 

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 45473 of 2015 

Petitioner :- Sandeep Yadav 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijay Gautam 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. 

Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J. 
The petitioner is a Sub-Inspector. He has been transferred in public interest from Gorakhpur to Varanasi Zone. He has challenged his transfer order on the ground that his wife is a teacher in Gorakhpur and on his request he was earlier transferred to Gorakhpur. The said transfer was cancelled and he was transferred from Gorakhpur Zone to Devi Patan Range. He again made an application to the Inspector General of Police, Gorakhpur Zone and his transfer order was cancelled. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite the said fact the third respondent has passed the impugned order transferring the petitioner from Gorakhpur to Varanasi Zone. 
It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner's wife is a teacher in Gorakhpur and the transfer policy of the State Government provides that endeavour should be made to post the husband and wife at a same place. He further submits that once the Inspector General of Police has made a recommendation the third respondent should not have transferred the petitioner from Gorakhpur to Varanasi. No other argument has been raised. 
In the transfer matter the scope of judicial review is very limited. It is a trite law that no Government Servant has any legal right to be posted at any particular place of his choice. Transfer is an incident of government service. Transfer order can be challenged only on the ground of violation of the statutory rules or malafide. 
If the transfer order is in violation of the Transfer Policy, the Supreme Court in the case of Union of India v. S.L.Abbas reported in (1993) 4 SCC 357 has held that Guidelines/Transfer Policy does not confer upon the government employee a legally enforceable right to challenge it under Article 226 of the Constitution. 
In the case of N.K. Singh v. Union of India and others, reported in (1994) 6 SCC 98, the appellant Sri N.K.Singh was an I.P.S. Officer. He was allocated to State cadre of Orissa. He was I.G., C.I.D. in Orissa. His services were placed on deputation to Ministry of Home Affairs and was posted as Joint Director in Central Bureau of Investigation (C.B.I.). He was In-charge of a Special Investigation Group conducting some sensitive investigation. He was abruptly transferred to Boarder Security Force (B.S.F.) in an equivalent post of I.G.P.. He challenged his transfer order on the ground of malafide against the then Prime Minister Shri Chandrashekhar and the then Union Law Minister Dr. Subramanyam Swami. The grievance of the appellant therein was that he was In-charge of a Special Investigation Group investigating into St. Kitts affair. Therefore, he was eased out from the C.B.I. to scuttle the fair investigation. Against this background, the Supreme Court ruled as under: 
"6. Shri Ram Jethmalani, learned counsel for the appellant did not dispute that the scope of judicial review in matters of transfer of a government servant to an equivalent post without any adverse consequence on the service or career prospects is very limited being confined only to the grounds of mala fides and violation of any specific provision or guideline regulating such transfers amounting to arbitrariness. In reply, the learned Additional Solicitor General and the learned counsel for Respondent 2 did not dispute the above principle, but they urged that no such ground is made out; and there is no foundation to indicate any prejudice to public interest." 
"24. ...Challenge in courts of a transfer when the career prospects remain unaffected and there is no detriment to the government servant must be eschewed and interference by courts should be rare, only when a judicially manageable and permissible ground is made out. This litigation was ill-advised." 

The Supreme Court again dealt with the matter of transfer in the case of State of U.P. and others v. Gobardhan Lal, reported in (2004) 11 SCC 402. Said case arose out of the judgment of a Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court (2000 All LJ 1466), wherein the High Court had issued some general directions in the matter of transfers. The Government servants were given liberty to file representation against their transfer directly to the Chief Secretary and further direction was issued to the State Government to constitute Civil Service Board for dealing with transfers and postings of Class-I officers. The Supreme Court found that the High Court fell in serious error and such general direction will leave an impression that the Courts are attempting to take over the reign of the executive administration. In paragraph-8 of the judgement, the Supreme Court held as follows: 
"8. A challenge to an order of transfer should normally be eschewed and should not be countenanced by the courts or tribunals as though they are Appellate Authorities over such orders, which could assess the niceties of the administrative needs and requirements of the situation concerned. This is for the reason that courts or tribunals cannot substitute their own decisions in the matter of transfer for that of competent authorities of the State and even allegations of mala fides when made must be such as to inspire confidence in the court or are based on concrete materials and ought not to be entertained on the mere making of it or on consideration borne out of conjectures or surmises and except for strong and convincing reasons, no interference could ordinarily be made with an order of transfer." 

In the case of Mohd. Masood Ahmad v. State of U.P. And others, reported in (2007) 8 SCC 150, the Supreme Court has elaborately considered the well settled principle again and observed as under: 
"4. ....Since the petitioner was on a transferable post, in our opinion, the High Court has rightly dismissed the writ petition since transfer is an exigency of service and is an administrative decision. Interference by the courts with transfer orders should only be in very rare cases. As repeatedly held in several decisions, transfer is an exigency of service .." 

In the aforesaid case i.e. Mohd. Masood Ahmad (supra) the Supreme Court approved the view taken by the Allahabad High Court wherein this Court had refused to interfere in the transfer cases. The Supreme Court observed as under: 
"7. .... Following the aforesaid principles laid down by the Supreme Court, the Allahabad High Court in Vijay Pal Singh v. State of U.P, (1997) 3 ESC 1668, and Onkar Nath Tiwari v. Chief Engineer, Minor Irrigation Deptt., (1997) 3 ESC 1866, has held that the principle of law laid down in the aforesaid decisions is that an order of transfer is a part of the service conditions of an employee which should not be interfered with ordinarily by a court of law in exercise of its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 unless the court finds that either the order is mala fide or that the service rules prohibit such transfer, or that the authorities who issued the orders, were not competent to pass the orders." 

Similar view has been reiterated by the Supreme Court in the case of Rajendra Singh and others v. State of Uttar Pradesh and others, reported in (2009) 15 SCC 178, and held as under: 
"8. A government servant has no vested right to remain posted at a place of his choice nor can he insist that he must be posted at one place or the other. He is liable to be transferred in the administrative exigencies from one place to the other. Transfer of an employee is not only an incident inherent in the terms of appointment but also implicit as an essential condition of service in the absence of any specific indication to the contrary. No Government can function if the government servant insists that once appointed or posted in a particular place or position, he should continue in such place or position as long as he desires [see State of U.P. v. Gobardhan Lal, (2004) 11 SCC 402; SCC p. 406, para 7). 
9. The courts are always reluctant in interfering with the transfer of an employee unless such transfer is 8 vitiated by violation of some statutory provisions or suffers from mala fides..." 

An employee has no right to be posted at a particular place. He cannot exercise his option for his posting at a place of his choice. It is entirely to the employer to decide where and at what point of time a public servant is to be transferred from the present place of posting. The Supreme Court has consistently taken the view that an order of transfer is a part of service conditions of an employee which should not be interfered with ordinarily by the Court of law in exercise of its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution unless the order has been passed in violation of the service rules or it is infected with malice. 
The petitioner belong to a disciplined force. He cannot be treated at par with other Government employees, while dealing with them in transfer matter. The police personnel should obey the transfer order immediately without any delay. The Supreme Court in the case of State of Haryana and others v. Kashmir Singh and another, (2010) 13 SCC 306, has considered the transfer of police personal and observed thus:
"12. Transfer ordinarily is an incidence of service, and the courts should be very reluctant to interfere in transfer orders as long as they are not clearly illegal. In particular, we are of the opinion that transfer and postings of policemen must be left in the discretion of the State authorities concerned which are in the best position to assess the necessities of the administrative requirements of the situation. The administrative authorities concerned may be of the opinion that more policemen are required in any particular district and/or another range than in another, depending upon their assessment of the law and order situation and/or other considerations. These are purely administrative matters, and it is well settled that courts must not ordinarily interfere in administrative matters and should maintain judicial restraint, vide Tata Cellular v. Union of India 
[(1994) 6 SCC 651]." 

The Supreme Court in the case of S.C. Saxena v. Union of India and Others, (2006) 9 SCC 583, has observed that government servant in the matter of transfer should first report/join for work where he is transferred. After joining the transferred place, he may make a representation to the higher authority to ventilate his grievance. 
Insofar as the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that Inspector General of Police has made a recommendation for cancellation of the transfer order, therefore his transfer should not have been made. In my view the said submission has no force. The Police Establishment Board has been constituted in compliance of the order of the Supreme Court in the case of Prakash Singh and others v. Union of India and others, (2006) 8 SCC 1. The Supreme Court has entrusted the transfer, posting, promotions and other service related matters of Police Force to the Police Establishment Board exclusively. Thus the said submission has no force. 
The principle which can be discerned from above mentioned and other various decisions of the Supreme Court is that although the breach of guidelines does not give any legally enforceable right in favour of the employee but at the same time the guidelines/transfer policy/Government orders issued to deal with transfer of officers and employees cannot be ignored altogether by the competent authority. While transferring an officer, the broad guidelines mentioned in the transfer policy, executive orders or guidelines must be kept in the mind. 
If in the administrative exigency or in public interest, transfer of an officer/employee is necessary, then the competent authority may record the reasons for departing/deviating from the policy or the guidelines. Recording of such reason in the files would facilitate the superior officers to decide the representation of the officer concerned objectively. It is not necessary that while transferring an officer/ employee, reasons should be communicated to the concerned officer/employee. 
This Court in the case of Dharmendra Kumar Saxena v. State of U.P. & others, 2013 (7) ADJ 53 has held that the Government is bound by executive orders/policies, and the guidelines are made to follow it and not to breach it without any justifiable reasons. The Court also followed the view consistently taken by the Supreme Court. Relevant paragraph of the order read as under: 
"24...the Government is bound by executive orders/policies. The guidelines are made to follow it and not to breach it without any justifiable reasons. Whenever the Government deviates from its policies/guidelines/ executive instructions, there must be cogent and strong reasons to justify the order; when transfer order is challenged by way of representation, there must be material on record to establish that the decision was in public interest and it does not violate any statutory provision, otherwise the order may be struck down as being arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution. The authorities cannot justify their orders that breach of executive orders do not give legally enforceable right to aggrieved person. As observed by Justice Frankfurter "An executive agency must be rigorously held to the standards by which it professes its action to be judged". 

Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on a Division Bench judgment of this court in the case of Heera Lal Tewari v. Sate of U.P. And Another, 2007(25)LCD 1296. A bare reading of the judgment clearly indicates that the said judgment is based on the facts of that case. Moreover, no judgment laying down the law in respect of transfer has been referred in the order. 
In view of the above the judgment cited by learned counsel for the petitioner does not help the petitioner. 
After careful consideration of the matter, I am of the view that the writ petition lacks merit and it is accordingly dismissed. 
No order as to costs. 
Order Date:-13.8.2015 
ssm 





 UPTET  / टीईटी TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  / शिक्षक भर्ती /  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  
UP-TET 201172825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
 Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,

CTETTEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET)NCTERTEUPTETHTETJTET / Jharkhand TETOTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility TestWest Bengal TET / WBTETMPTET / Madhya Pradesh TETASSAM TET / ATET
UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TETHPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
 

Thursday, February 8, 2018

UP Teacher Transfer News - All females writ disposed off according to Bibha judgement allowing females to apply for online transfer process , See orders

UP Teacher Transfer  News - All females writ disposed off according to Bibha judgement allowing females to apply for online transfer process , See orders 



WRIT - A No. - 5235 of 2018 at Allahabad : Priyanka Chaudhary Vs. State Of U.P.

WRIT - A No. - 5258 of 2018 at Allahabad : Reena Rani And 4 Others Vs. State Of Up And 2 Others

WRIT - A No. - 5231 of 2018 at Allahabad : Smt. Rashmi Verma Vs. State Of U.P.

WRIT - A No. - 5315 of 2018 at Allahabad : Smt. Sapna Vs. State Of U.P.

WRIT - A No. - 5243 of 2018 at Allahabad : Archana Singh Vs. State Of Up And 2 Others


WRIT - A No. - 5242 of 2018 at Allahabad : Rishu Gupta Vs. State Of U.P.


WRIT - A No. - 5234 of 2018 at Allahabad : Bhavna Maurya Vs. State Of U.P.

WRIT - A No. - 5207 of 2018 at Allahabad : Smt. Anuradha Vs. State Of U.P.

WRIT - A No. - 5210 of 2018 at Allahabad : Meetu Rani Vs. State Of U.P.


WRIT - A No. - 5211 of 2018 at Allahabad : Reetu Tyagi Vs. State Of U.P. And 3 Others

WRIT - A No. - 5212 of 2018 at Allahabad : Rashmi Rani Vs. State Of U.P. & Ors.

WRIT - A No. - 5215 of 2018 at Allahabad : Mamta Singh Vs. State Of U.P.

WRIT - A No. - 5219 of 2018 at Allahabad : Anita Pal Vs. State Of U.P.

WRIT - A No. - 5222 of 2018 at Allahabad : Deepa Vs. State Of U.P. And 3 Others

WRIT - A No. - 5309 of 2018 at Allahabad : Nidhi Sharma Vs. U.P. Basic Education Board, Ald., Through Its Secretary

WRIT - A No. - 5247 of 2018 at Allahabad : Samsun Nisha Vs. State Of U.P.

WRIT - A No. - 5329 of 2018 at Allahabad : Beena Rani Vs. State Of U.P.

WRIT - A No. - 5256 of 2018 at Allahabad : Sonal Singh Vs. State Of Up And 3 Others

WRIT - A No. - 5257 of 2018 at Allahabad : Vibha Yadav Vs. State Of U.P.

WRIT - A No. - 5267 of 2018 at Allahabad : Richa Rana Vs. State Of U.P.

WRIT - A No. - 5233 of 2018 at Allahabad : Saroj Kumari Yadav Vs. State Of U.P.



 UPTET  / टीईटी TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  / शिक्षक भर्ती /  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  
UP-TET 201172825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
 Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,

CTETTEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET)NCTERTEUPTETHTETJTET / Jharkhand TETOTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility TestWest Bengal TET / WBTETMPTET / Madhya Pradesh TETASSAM TET / ATET
UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TETHPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
 

Wednesday, February 7, 2018

UP Teacher Transfer कोर्ट आदेश - सभी महिलााओं को बिभा की तर्ज पर ऑनलाइन ट्रांसफर में मौका देकर याचिकाएँ डिस्पोज़ ऑफ हुई, देखें आदेश

UP Teacher Transfer कोर्ट आदेश - सभी महिलााओं को  बिभा की तर्ज पर ऑनलाइन ट्रांसफर में मौका देकर याचिकाएँ
डिस्पोज़ ऑफ हुई, देखें आदेश  


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 

?Court No. - 18 

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4954 of 2018 
Petitioner :- Shikha 
Respondent :- U P Basic Education Board, Ald And 02 Others 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramesh Chandra Sinha 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashok Kumar Yadav 

Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. 
Learned counsel for the parties submit that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order rendered on 06.02.2018 in Writ A No. 2868 of 2018 (Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others vs. State of U.P. and 2 others). 
The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of in terms of the judgment rendered in Writ A No. 2868 of 2018 (Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others vs. State of U.P. and 2 others). 
Order Date :- 7.2.2018 
sailesh 

*****************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 

?Court No. - 18 

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3880 of 2018 
Petitioner :- Mayanka Singh 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Ors. 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinay Kumar Tiwari,Prem Shanker Tiwari 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sanjay Chaturvedi 

Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. 
Learned counsel for the parties submit that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order rendered on 06.02.2018 in Writ A No. 2868 of 2018 (Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others vs. State of U.P. and 2 others). 
The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of in terms of the judgment rendered in Writ A No. 2868 of 2018 (Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others vs. State of U.P. and 2 others). 
Order Date :- 7.2.2018 
sailesh 

***†********************†***
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 

?Court No. - 18

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2868 of 2018

Petitioner :- Bibha Singh Kushwaha and others
Respondent :- State Of U.P
Counsel for Petitioner :- Mr Arvind Kumar Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
Heard Shri Indra Raj Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners; Shri Vivek Rai, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents; Shri Sunil Kumar Singh, Advocate as well as Shri A.K. Yadav, learned counsel for second and third respondents.
Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 other similarly situated Assistant Teachers are before this Court assailing the validity of order impugned dated 13.06.2017 and 20.09.2017 passed by Secretary Basic Education, U.P. at Lucknow as well as order dated 12.01.2018 issued by U.P. Basic Education Board, Allahabad through its Secretary on the ground that the same are violative of Rule 8(2)(d) of The Uttar Pradesh Basic Education (Teachers Posting) Rules, 2008 (in brevity the 'Rules 2008'). Further prayer has been made to command the second respondent to consider the transfer of the petitioners on the post of Assistant Teachers in Junior Basic Schools in their respective districts against the existing vacancies within stipulated period.
Shri Indra Raj Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners has apprised to the Court that in the present matter Bibha Singh Kushwaha, who has been arrayed as first respondent, has been before this Court by preferring Writ Petition no.30808/2017 (Bibha Singh Kushwaha vs. U.P. Basic Education, Board, Allahabad and others) wherein she, being as Assistant Teacher claimed transfer from Kushinagar to Ballia, where her husband is posted as Assistant Teacher. It has also been apprised that at the relevant point of time, petitioners have set up their claim on the basis of provisions contained under Rule 8(2)(d) of the Rules 2008, which deals with transfer and posting of the Teachers working in Junior Basic School and Senior Basic School run by the Board. It has also been submitted that while dealing with the aforesaid case, the Court has taken cognizance regarding online application in terms of the Government Order dated 03.05.2017 and placed reliance on the judgement passed by Full Bench of this Court in the case of R.B. Dixit vs. Union of India and others 2005 (1) UPLBEC 83 and has also considered the order dated 30.07.2010 passed in Sarita Gupta vs. State of U.P. and others, Writ A no.7096 of 2010 and as such, this Court has proceeded to dispose of the Writ petition with following observations:-
"This issue has been considered by this Court in the case of Sarita Gupta v. State of U.P. & Others, Writ-A No. 7096 of 2010, decided on 30.7.2010. The Court had occasion to deal with the similar arguments and at that time a Government order was issued imposing certain restrictions on transfer. The Court has expressed its view in the following terms:
"The ban is general in nature. However, the provision of transfer for the purposes of placing husband and wife in the same district is a special provision which will normally prevail upon general temporary restriction on transfer.
Accordingly, writ petition is allowed. Impugned order is set aside. Secretary, U.P. Basic Shiksha Parishad, Allahabad is directed to decide the matter ignoring the ban order dated 6.6.2009. The decision shall be taken positively within three weeks from today."
It is trite that in most of the services of the Central Government and the State Governments, there is provision in their transfer policy that an endeavour should be made that husband and wife may be posted at the same place. In view of the said principle, under the Rules 2008 the provision of the couple posting has been incorporated.
The intention of rule making authority is very clear and it needs no elaboration. Relevant it would be to mention that in transfer policy of State Government for Government employees there is provision only for husband and wife but in Rule 8(d) of the Rules, 2008 the in-laws of the female teachers have also been included. Hence, in my view, in spite of the Government Order dated 3.5.2017 a female teacher's application for her transfer on the ground of couple posting or in-laws can be entertained notwithstanding some of the contrary provisions of the said Government order.
For the above-mentioned reasons, there is no legal bar in considering the representation of the petitioner in terms of Rule 8(d) of the Rules, 2008.
Accordingly, a direction is issued upon the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner in the light of the observations made herein-above and pass appropriate order expeditiously, preferably within six weeks from the date of communication of this order.
The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
No order as to costs."
In this backdrop, Shri Indra Raj Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners submits the impugned Government Order dated 13.06.2017 and 20.09.2017 as well as modified order dated 12.09.2017 and consequential advertisement are in teeth of aforesaid Rule 8(2)(d) of Rules 2008 as well as the dictum in the Full Bench judgement of this Court in R.B. Dixit (supra) and earlier order dated 19.07.2017 passed in Bibha Singh (supra). He further apprised to the Court that the advertisement issued on 12.01.2018 whereby the second respondent has proceeded to fill up 25% of existing vacancies of respective districts by way of transfer from the aforesaid candidates, who have completed five years regular satisfactory service. Even though their case fall under Rule 8(2)(d) of the Rules 2008 but on account of non completion of five years regular satisfactory service, petitioners are unable to move such an application online. It has also been apprised that by the subsequent order, the respondents, reason best known to them, had also proceeded to discriminate their rightful claim with other working female teachers, whose husbands are posted in Paramilitary Forces, B.S.F., C.R.P.F., I.T.B.P., C.I.S.F., S.S.B., N.D.R.F., Army, Air Force and Navy as relaxation has been extended in their favour by impugned order dated 13.03.2017. The same is also discriminatory and hit by Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. He further apprised to the Court that in most arbitrary manner, they have already fixed date i.e. 29.01.2018 whereby all the applications are to be invited online whereas the petitioners as well as other similarly situated Assistant Teachers, who claim their right under Rule 8(2)(d) of the Rules 2008, are not permitted to move such an application online and for all practical purpose, direction for deciding their representation would in-fact be futile exercise and as such, this Court should come to the rescue and reprieve of the petitioner.
Shri A.K. Yadav on the basis of instructions apprises the Court that at present the claim set up by Bibha Singh Kushwaha has not been turned down and as per letter dated 17.1.2018 issued by the Deputy Secretary (Basic), this much is clear that the claim for inter-district transfer would definitely be looked into in terms of Rule 8 (2) (d) of the Rules of 2008. On the basis of letter dated 23.01.2018 sent by Secretary, Basic Education Board, Allahabad addressed to the Joint Secretary, Basic Education, Education Anubhag-5, Lucknow, he submits that as per Government Order dated 23.06.2017 and 20.09.2017, the NIC has developed the software and accordingly applications are invited. The said applications can be filled up from 16.01.2018 to 29.01.2018 and on the basis of software security audit, the said process is on and as such in between there is no scope to interfere in the software but relaxation regarding service period can be accorded in the same and in this regard, request has already been made to the Secretary, U.P. Basic Education Board, Allahabad.
In the aforesaid circumstance, this Court is of the considered opinion that the Joint Secretary, Basic Education, Education Anubhag-5, Lucknow shall pass an appropriate order on the letter dated 23.01.2018 sent by Secretary Basic Education Board, Allahabad forthwith for enabling the candidates to fill up online applications.
Once the assurance has been given on the basis of aforementioned letter, then the Court hopes and trusts that the department would come with better suggestions on the next date fixed in the matter. For necessary instructions, let the copy may be given to learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel free of cost within 48 hours.
Put up this matter on 06.02.2018 in Additional Cause List.
Order Date :- 23.1.2018
A. Pandey 





 UPTET  / टीईटी TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  / शिक्षक भर्ती /  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  
UP-TET 201172825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
 Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,

CTETTEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET)NCTERTEUPTETHTETJTET / Jharkhand TETOTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility TestWest Bengal TET / WBTETMPTET / Madhya Pradesh TETASSAM TET / ATET
UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TETHPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
 

महिलाओं को ट्रांसफर हेतु ऑनलाइन आवेदन में मिली बड़ी राहत,विज्ञप्ति जारी -

महिलाओं को ट्रांसफर हेतु ऑनलाइन आवेदन में मिली बड़ी राहत,विज्ञप्ति जारी 









 UPTET  / टीईटी TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  / शिक्षक भर्ती /  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  
UP-TET 201172825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
 Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,

CTETTEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET)NCTERTEUPTETHTETJTET / Jharkhand TETOTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility TestWest Bengal TET / WBTETMPTET / Madhya Pradesh TETASSAM TET / ATET
UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TETHPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
 

Tuesday, February 6, 2018

यूपी में शिक्षक की नौकरी पाना होगा बेहद मुश्किल, योगी सरकार का फैसला, देश भर के युवा करेंगे आवेदन

यूपी में शिक्षक की नौकरी पाना होगा बेहद मुश्किल, योगी सरकार का फैसला, देश भर के युवा करेंगे आवेदन
*क्या यू पी के युवा देश के किसी भी अन्य राज्य में शिक्षक की नोकरी हासिल कर सकते हैं?*


See news below :- 
न्यूज डेस्क, अमर उजाला, लखनऊ 
Updated Tue, 06 Feb 2018 09:16 PM IST



यूपी में अब बेसिक शिक्षा परिषद के स्कूलों में शिक्षक की नौकरी पाना आसान नहीं होगा। इसके लिए कड़ी प्रतिस्पर्धा होगी। प्रदेश सरकार ने भर्ती देश भर के युवाओं के लिए खोलने का फैसला किया है। एनसीटीई डिग्री धारक किसी भी राज्य के हों, वे आवेदन कर सकेंगे। सीएम योगी आदित्यनाथ की अध्यक्षता वाली कैबिनेट ने इस महत्वपूर्ण प्रस्ताव को मंगलवार को मंजूरी दे दी।

सरकार के प्रवक्ता व स्वास्थ्य मंत्री सिद्धार्थनाथ सिंह ने बताया कि हाईकोर्ट ने एक निर्णय में शिक्षकों की भर्ती में देश भर के पात्र युवाओं को मौका देने का निर्देश दिया था। कैबिनेट ने हाईकोर्ट के फैसले के मद्देनजर यूपी बेसिक शिक्षा अध्यापक सेवा नियमावली-1981 में 21वें संशोधन को मंजूरी दे दी है।

वर्तमान में प्राइमरी स्कूलों में शिक्षक भर्ती के लिए सिर्फ प्रदेश के डिग्रीधारक युवा ही आवेदन कर सकते हैं। लेकिन अब एनसीटीई की डिग्री मान्य कर दी गई है। इससे अब देश भर के एनसीटीई डिग्री धारक युवा प्रदेश की शिक्षक भर्ती के लिए आवेदन कर सकेंगे।

एक सवाल के जवाब में उन्होंने कहा कि जब जीएसटी से एक देश एक कर हो सकता है तो पात्रता रखने पर देश का नागरिक कहीं भी आवेदन कर सकता है। इससे जिले के लोगों को प्राथमिकता की व्यवस्था भी खत्म हो गई है।



 UPTET  / टीईटी TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  / शिक्षक भर्ती /  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  
UP-TET 201172825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
 Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,

CTETTEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET)NCTERTEUPTETHTETJTET / Jharkhand TETOTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility TestWest Bengal TET / WBTETMPTET / Madhya Pradesh TETASSAM TET / ATET
UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TETHPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
 

अंतर्जनपदीय स्थानांतरण का संशोधित कार्यक्रम -

 अंतर्जनपदीय स्थानांतरण का संशोधित कार्यक्रम - 






 UPTET  / टीईटी TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  / शिक्षक भर्ती /  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  
UP-TET 201172825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
 Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,

CTETTEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET)NCTERTEUPTETHTETJTET / Jharkhand TETOTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility TestWest Bengal TET / WBTETMPTET / Madhya Pradesh TETASSAM TET / ATET
UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TETHPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
 

अध्यापिकाओं के स्वीकार होंगे ऑनलाइन आवेदन अंतर जिला तबादला शासन का शिक्षा निदेशक बेसिक व परिषद सचिव को आदेश जारी


अध्यापिकाओं के स्वीकार होंगे ऑनलाइन आवेदन

अंतर जिला तबादला

शासन का शिक्षा निदेशक बेसिक व परिषद सचिव को आदेश जारी 

राज्य ब्यूरो, इलाहाबाद 

अब बेसिक शिक्षा परिषद की अध्यापिकाओं को पति के निवास स्थान या ससुराल वाले जिले में जाने का मौका मिलेगा। शासन ने इस संबंध में शिक्षा निदेशक बेसिक व बेसिक शिक्षा परिषद सचिव को आदेश जारी कर दिया है। इसमें कहा गया है कि विशेष परिस्थिति का परीक्षण कर जिलों में रिक्त पदों के सापेक्ष ही तबादले होंगे। अब परिषद जल्द ही ऑनलाइन आवेदन लेने के लिए समय सारिणी जारी करेगा और वेबसाइट पर संशोधन कराएगा। 

बेसिक शिक्षा परिषद के प्राथमिक व उच्च प्राथमिक विद्यालयों के शिक्षकों की प्रक्रिया कुछ दिनों ठप है। परिषद ने 16 से 29 जनवरी तक शिक्षकों से ऑनलाइन आवेदन लिए थे। वहीं, अध्यापिकाओं ने हाईकोर्ट में याचिका दाखिल कर कहा था कि नियमावली में उन्हें पति के निवास या फिर ससुराल वाले जिले में नियुक्ति की छूट है। ऐसे में उन पर पांच वर्ष की सेवा पूरी करने की शर्त नहीं रखी जा सकती। कोर्ट ने परिषद व सरकार को निर्देश दिया कि इन पर विचार किया जाए। ऐसे में शासन सिर्फ उन्हीं अध्यापिकाओं को पांच वर्ष की सेवा से लाभ देने की तैयारी में था, जिन्होंने याचिका दाखिल की। इसका अन्य अध्यापिकाओं ने याचिका करके विरोध किया। ऐसे में कोर्ट ने सभी शिक्षिकाओं के आवेदन लेने का आदेश दिया है। 

यह प्रकरण कई दिन से शासन में लंबित रहा है। अब विशेष सचिव एस राजलिंगम ने आदेश जारी किया है कि सामान्य शिक्षकों (महिला या पुरुष) के अंतर जिला तबादले में आवेदन में पांच वर्ष की सेवा पूरी हुए विचार नहीं होगा। लेकिन, विशेष परिस्थिति में उन अध्यापिकाओं के आवेदन पत्र स्वीकार होंगे जो अपने पति के निवास स्थान या फिर ससुराल वाले जिले में जाना चाहती हैं। शासन ने आदेश दिया है कि ऐसी शिक्षिकाओं से ऑनलाइन आवेदन लेने व विशेष परिस्थति का परीक्षण कर जिले में रिक्त उपलब्धता के आधार कार्यवाही की जाए। तबादले की बाकी शर्ते 13 जून 2017 के अनुरूप होंगी। 

ज्ञात हो कि जिन शिक्षकों ने आवेदन किया है उनकी काउंसिलिंग तीन फरवरी को होनी थी लेकिन, परिषद ने उसे रोक दिया था। अब जल्द ही नए आदेश जारी होंगे।

पुरुष शिक्षकों की विशेष स्थिति दरकिनार 

परिषदीय स्कूलों में ऐसे तमाम पुरुष भी हैं, जो इकलौते पुत्र हैं, उनके माता-पिता गंभीर रूप से बीमार हैं या फिर खुद बीमारी व समस्या से ग्रस्त हैं। ऐसे शिक्षक भी विशेष परिस्थिति की मांग कर रहे थे, ताकि वह भी अपने जिले में लौट सकें लेकिन, उनकी मांग दरकिनार हो गई है। हाईकोर्ट में इस मामले की सुनवाई छह फरवरी को होनी है। उसके पहले ही शासन ने आदेश जारी किया है।




 UPTET  / टीईटी TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  / शिक्षक भर्ती /  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  
UP-TET 201172825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
 Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,

CTETTEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET)NCTERTEUPTETHTETJTET / Jharkhand TETOTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility TestWest Bengal TET / WBTETMPTET / Madhya Pradesh TETASSAM TET / ATET
UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TETHPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
 

महिलाओं के स्थानांतरण की विशेष परिस्थितियां क्या हो सकती है देखें - -

महिलाओं के स्थानांतरण की विशेष परिस्थितियां क्या हो सकती है देखें   - 

क्या प्राथमिकताएं हो सकती हैं:-

केंद्र व राज्य सरकार के नियम परिवार व बच्चों को एक साथ रखने पर जोर देते हैं, और इस विशेष परिस्थिति के लिए पहले से ही नियम बना रखा है :-
1. पति व पत्नी अलग अलग जगह पोस्टेड हों, और सरकारी नोकरी में हों तब विशेष परिस्थिति स्वत बनती है कि परिवार एक साथ कैसे रहे।
हालांकि कोई भी एक ट्रांसफर हासिल कर ले तो परिवार एक जगह आ जाता है।
इस क्रम में पत्नी अपने पति के पास पोस्टिंग करा लेती है, तो पति को स्थानांतरण की फिर आवश्यकता नहीं।
बेसिक में महिलाओं के लिए नियम होने से एक का दूसरे के पास ट्रांसफर होने से समस्या हल हो जाती है।

लेकिन पति अगर बेसिक में हो और पत्नी किसी और विभाग में, तो पतियों का भी कहना है कि हम भी विशेष परिस्थिति में आते  हैं, लेकिन दूसरे विभाग में कार्यरत पत्नी अपने विभाग में प्रयास कर ट्रांसफर ले या फिर इसका हल कोर्ट से करे तो शायद संभव हो क्योंकि नियमावली में इसके बारे में कुछ नहीं लिखा , हालांकि कोर्ट  अधिकांशत ट्रांसफर पॉलिसी नियमो में दखल नही देती ।
सिर्फ ट्रांसफर नियमो के अनुपालन नहीं होने आदि पर ही रिप्रेजेंटेशन पर विचार करने के निर्देश देती है।

2.शिक्षिका ससुराल से दूर हो , और विपरीत हालात हों।
मसलन ससुरालीजन किन्ही परिस्थिति की वजह से शिक्षिका के पास जा कर रहने में असमर्थ हों।
तो भी विशेष परिस्थिति बनती है कि अकेली महिला कैसे बच्चों की देखभाल करे और शिक्षक दायित्व पूरे करे।

अविवाहित शिक्षिकाओ के लिए नियमावली में कुछ नहीं है, शायद ये इस कारण होगा कि उनके बच्चे नहीं पति नहीं हैं, तो उनके सामने समस्याएं कम हैं, मुश्किलों में माता पिता साथ रहने जा सकते हैं।

3. कुछ लोगो का कहना है कि वृध्दावस्था 
में  माता पिता की सेवा भी विशेष परिस्थिति में आती है, लेकिन 
कुछ जानकार कहते हैं कि उस केस में माता पिता पुत्र या पुत्री के पास जाकर रह सकते हैं।
और यह मामला विवाहित महिलाओं से अलग है जिसमे पति की अन्यत्र जॉब के चलते दोनों को अलग अलग रहना पड़ता है, बच्चे की परवरिश में कठिनाइयों का सामना करना पड़ता है। और शायद इसी कारण बेसिक में  विवाहित  शिक्षिकाओं को रियायत दी गई है

4. कई सवाल इस बात के उठे हैं कि अगर पति/पत्नी प्राइवेट जॉब में हो तो सरकारी नोकरी वालों के लिए ही क्यों नियम है।
बेसिक में ऐसा कोई नियम नहीं है ऊपर सिर्फ एक उदाहरण दिया है, लेकिन यह केंद्र व राज्य सरकार का नियम हैं अतः सर्वोच्च प्राथमिकता संभावित है, 
सरकारी कर्मचारियों की लिए शायद नियम इसलिए रहा होगा, क्योंकि प्राइवेट जॉब बदलकर नोकरी दूसरी जगह की जा सकती है,
और पति पत्नी सरकारी सेवा में होने पर दोनों का नियोक्ता एक ही देश की सरकार ही है तो शायद ये भी कारण हो सकता है।
एक अन्य बात ये भी है कि पति पत्नी वर्किंग है तो दोनों ही अपनी अपनी जगह ट्रांसफर के लिए आवेदन कर सकते हैं, विशेष परिस्थिति तब उत्पन्न होती है जब किसी एक का नियोक्ता स्पउज़ की जगह ट्रांसफर करने में किसी कारण से असमर्थ हो, तब यह दूसरे नियोक्ता का दायित्व है कि वह अपने स्तर अच्छा कर दूसरे स्पउज़ को एक ही जगह पोस्ट कर।






 UPTET  / टीईटी TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  / शिक्षक भर्ती /  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  
UP-TET 201172825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
 Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,

CTETTEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET)NCTERTEUPTETHTETJTET / Jharkhand TETOTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility TestWest Bengal TET / WBTETMPTET / Madhya Pradesh TETASSAM TET / ATET
UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TETHPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET