UPTET SARKARI NAUKRI News -Both JRT + PRT Candidate Order, Agar Vacancies Rehtee hain to Primary Mein Abhyarthan Bakrar Rahegaa -
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 67816 of 2015
Petitioner :- Neeraj Mani Tiwari And 7 Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Radhey Raman Mishra
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Bhanu Pratap Singh
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to implead the Director, SCERT, Lucknow as one of the respondents during the course of the day.
All the 8 petitioners are working as Assistant Teachers (Mathematics and Science) in the Senior Basic Schools.
Previously, an advertisement was made on 30.11.2011 for recruitment of the Assistant Teachers in the Junior Basic Schools against 72825 vacancies. Later on, vide advertisement dated 11.07.2013, the respondents called applications for the appointment of 29334 Assistant Teachers (Mathematics and Science) in Senior Basic Schools.
It is stated that the petitioners have applied against both the advertisement and they have been selected as Assistant Teachers (Mathematics and Science) in the Senior Basic Schools and as Trainee Teachers in the Junior Basic Schools. The petitioners have completed their six months training as Trainee Teachers in the Junior Basic School but at present they are working as Assistant Teachers (Mathematics and Science) in the Senior Basic Schools.
Their grievance is that the entire recruitment process pursuant to the advertisement dated 11.07.2013 is under cloud as various writ petitions and special appeals in this Court are pending.
In the meantime, fourth round of counselling is going on for the Trainee Teachers wherein the petitioners have been directed to submit their original educational testimonials within 15 days, failing which, their selection as Trainee Teachers in the Junior Basic School shall stand cancelled.
Learned counsel for the petitioners further submit that the original educational testimonials have been deposited with the authorities of the Senior Basic Schools, therefore, they are unable to produce it for their appointment as Trainee Teachers.
It is submitted by Learned Standing Counsel and Sri B.P. Singh, learned counsel for the respondents that in case any interim order is granted, it would cause serious prejudice to complete the selection of the Training Teachers in compliance of the order of Supreme Court.
Learned counsel for the petitioner in rejoinder submits that there are still large number of vacancies of the Trainee Teachers even after completing the present counselling for the Training Teachers.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, a direction is issued to respondents to complete the present counselling and the selection in compliance of the order of the Supreme Court but the petitioners shall be considered in the last round of the counselling, if the post remains vacant.
Learned Standing Counsel is granted six weeks time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within a week thereafter.
List after expiry of the aforesaid period.
Till the last selection is completed, the claim of the petitioners shall not be cancelled.
Order Date :- 17.12.2015
ssm
*********************************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 66559 of 2015
Petitioner :- Sanjay Bijaraunia And 26 Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 11 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Pal
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Arun Kumar,Dhananjay Pratap Singh,Pranesh Dutt Tripathi,Rajesh Khare,Santosh Kumar,Shashi Kant Verma,Shyam Krishna Gupta,Vijai Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to implead the Director, SCERT, Lucknow as one of the respondents during the course of the day.
All the 27 petitioners are working as Assistant Teachers (Mathematics and Science) in the Senior Basic Schools.
Previously, an advertisement was made on 30.11.2011 for recruitment of the Assistant Teachers in the Junior Basic Schools against 72825 vacancies. Later on, vide advertisement dated 13.07.2013, the respondents called applications for the appointment of 29334 Assistant Teachers (Mathematics and Science) in Senior Basic Schools.
It is stated that the petitioners have applied against both the advertisement and they have been selected as Assistant Teachers (Mathematics and Science) in the Senior Basic Schools and as Trainee Teachers in the Junior Basic Schools. The petitioners have completed their six months training as Trainee Teachers in the Junior Basic School but at present they are working as Assistant Teachers (Mathematics and Science) in the Senior Basic Schools.
Their grievance is that the entire recruitment process pursuant to the advertisement dated 11.08.2013 is under cloud as various writ petitions and special appeals in this Court are pending.
In the meantime, fourth round of counselling is going on for the Trainee Teachers wherein the petitioners have been directed to submit their original educational testimonials within 15 days, failing which, their selection as Trainee Teachers in the Junior Basic School shall stand cancelled.
Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the original educational testimonials have been deposited with the authorities of the Senior Basic Schools, therefore, they are unable to produce it for their appointment as Trainee Teachers.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the respondents that in case any interim order is granted, it would cause serious prejudice to complete the selection of the Training Teachers in compliance of the order of Supreme Court.
Learned counsel for the petitioners in rejoinder submits that there are still large number of vacancies of the Trainee Teachers even after completing the present counselling for the Training Teachers.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, a direction is issued to respondents to complete the present counselling and the selection in compliance of the order of the Supreme Court but the petitioners shall be considered in the last round of the counselling, if the post remains vacant.
Learned Standing Counsel is granted six weeks time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within a week thereafter.
List after expiry of the aforesaid period.
Till the last selection is completed, the claim of the petitioners shall not be cancelled.
Order Date :- 10.12.2015
ssm
****************************************
UPTET / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates / Teacher Recruitment / शिक्षक भर्ती / SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet News Hindi | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,
CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET ,
Rajasthan TET / RTET, BETET / Bihar TET, PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 67816 of 2015
Petitioner :- Neeraj Mani Tiwari And 7 Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Radhey Raman Mishra
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Bhanu Pratap Singh
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to implead the Director, SCERT, Lucknow as one of the respondents during the course of the day.
All the 8 petitioners are working as Assistant Teachers (Mathematics and Science) in the Senior Basic Schools.
Previously, an advertisement was made on 30.11.2011 for recruitment of the Assistant Teachers in the Junior Basic Schools against 72825 vacancies. Later on, vide advertisement dated 11.07.2013, the respondents called applications for the appointment of 29334 Assistant Teachers (Mathematics and Science) in Senior Basic Schools.
It is stated that the petitioners have applied against both the advertisement and they have been selected as Assistant Teachers (Mathematics and Science) in the Senior Basic Schools and as Trainee Teachers in the Junior Basic Schools. The petitioners have completed their six months training as Trainee Teachers in the Junior Basic School but at present they are working as Assistant Teachers (Mathematics and Science) in the Senior Basic Schools.
Their grievance is that the entire recruitment process pursuant to the advertisement dated 11.07.2013 is under cloud as various writ petitions and special appeals in this Court are pending.
In the meantime, fourth round of counselling is going on for the Trainee Teachers wherein the petitioners have been directed to submit their original educational testimonials within 15 days, failing which, their selection as Trainee Teachers in the Junior Basic School shall stand cancelled.
Learned counsel for the petitioners further submit that the original educational testimonials have been deposited with the authorities of the Senior Basic Schools, therefore, they are unable to produce it for their appointment as Trainee Teachers.
It is submitted by Learned Standing Counsel and Sri B.P. Singh, learned counsel for the respondents that in case any interim order is granted, it would cause serious prejudice to complete the selection of the Training Teachers in compliance of the order of Supreme Court.
Learned counsel for the petitioner in rejoinder submits that there are still large number of vacancies of the Trainee Teachers even after completing the present counselling for the Training Teachers.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, a direction is issued to respondents to complete the present counselling and the selection in compliance of the order of the Supreme Court but the petitioners shall be considered in the last round of the counselling, if the post remains vacant.
Learned Standing Counsel is granted six weeks time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within a week thereafter.
List after expiry of the aforesaid period.
Till the last selection is completed, the claim of the petitioners shall not be cancelled.
Order Date :- 17.12.2015
ssm
*********************************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 66559 of 2015
Petitioner :- Sanjay Bijaraunia And 26 Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 11 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Pal
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Arun Kumar,Dhananjay Pratap Singh,Pranesh Dutt Tripathi,Rajesh Khare,Santosh Kumar,Shashi Kant Verma,Shyam Krishna Gupta,Vijai Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to implead the Director, SCERT, Lucknow as one of the respondents during the course of the day.
All the 27 petitioners are working as Assistant Teachers (Mathematics and Science) in the Senior Basic Schools.
Previously, an advertisement was made on 30.11.2011 for recruitment of the Assistant Teachers in the Junior Basic Schools against 72825 vacancies. Later on, vide advertisement dated 13.07.2013, the respondents called applications for the appointment of 29334 Assistant Teachers (Mathematics and Science) in Senior Basic Schools.
It is stated that the petitioners have applied against both the advertisement and they have been selected as Assistant Teachers (Mathematics and Science) in the Senior Basic Schools and as Trainee Teachers in the Junior Basic Schools. The petitioners have completed their six months training as Trainee Teachers in the Junior Basic School but at present they are working as Assistant Teachers (Mathematics and Science) in the Senior Basic Schools.
Their grievance is that the entire recruitment process pursuant to the advertisement dated 11.08.2013 is under cloud as various writ petitions and special appeals in this Court are pending.
In the meantime, fourth round of counselling is going on for the Trainee Teachers wherein the petitioners have been directed to submit their original educational testimonials within 15 days, failing which, their selection as Trainee Teachers in the Junior Basic School shall stand cancelled.
Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the original educational testimonials have been deposited with the authorities of the Senior Basic Schools, therefore, they are unable to produce it for their appointment as Trainee Teachers.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the respondents that in case any interim order is granted, it would cause serious prejudice to complete the selection of the Training Teachers in compliance of the order of Supreme Court.
Learned counsel for the petitioners in rejoinder submits that there are still large number of vacancies of the Trainee Teachers even after completing the present counselling for the Training Teachers.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, a direction is issued to respondents to complete the present counselling and the selection in compliance of the order of the Supreme Court but the petitioners shall be considered in the last round of the counselling, if the post remains vacant.
Learned Standing Counsel is granted six weeks time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within a week thereafter.
List after expiry of the aforesaid period.
Till the last selection is completed, the claim of the petitioners shall not be cancelled.
Order Date :- 10.12.2015
ssm
****************************************
UPTET / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates / Teacher Recruitment / शिक्षक भर्ती / SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet News Hindi | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,
CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET ,
Rajasthan TET / RTET, BETET / Bihar TET, PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
No comments:
Post a Comment
To All,
Please do not use abusive languages in Anger.
Write your comment Wisely, So that other Visitors/Readers can take it Seriously.
Thanks.