Showing posts with label LT Grade Teacher Recruitment UP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label LT Grade Teacher Recruitment UP. Show all posts
Tuesday, July 15, 2014
LT Grade Teacher Recruitment UP : राजकीय हाईस्कूलों में भर्ती को ऑनलाइन लिए जाएंगे आवेदन
LT Grade Teacher Recruitment UP : राजकीय हाईस्कूलों में भर्ती को ऑनलाइन लिए जाएंगे आवेदन
मुख्य सचिव ने कहा कि 193 मॉडल स्कूलों में जल्द पढ़ाई शुरू करा दी जाए।
रखे जाएंगे 7000 शिक्षक, स्कूल भवन के घटिया निर्माण पर होगी कार्रवाई
लखनऊ
(ब्यूरो)। राष्ट्रीय माध्यमिक शिक्षा अभियान के तहत प्रदेश में खोले जा
रहे राजकीय हाईस्कूलों में 7000 शिक्षकों की भर्ती होगी। इसके लिए ऑनलाइन
आवेदन लिए जाएंगे। इसके लिए जल्द ही प्रस्ताव तैयार कर अनुमोदन लिया जाएगा।
मॉडल स्कूलों में सीबीएसई पैटर्न पर शिक्षा दी जाएगी। मुख्य सचिव आलोक
रंजन ने सोमवार को राष्ट्रीय माध्यमिक शिक्षा अभियान परिषद शासी निकाय की
बैठक में ये जानकारियां दीं।
मुख्य सचिव ने
कहा कि शैक्षिक दृष्टि से पिछडे़ 680 विकास खंडों में माध्यमिक स्तर की
शिक्षा लेने वाली छात्राओं के लिए केंद्रीय मदद से छात्रावास का निर्माण
कराया जाएगा। उन्होंने माध्यमिक शिक्षा अभियान में बनने वाले स्कूलों का
निर्माण मानक के अनुसार समय से पूरा कराने को कहा। उन्होंने कहा कि निर्माण
एजेंसियों के उपयोगिता प्रमाण पत्र देने पर दो सप्ताह में पैसे दे दिए
जाएंगे। अधीक्षण व अधिशासी अभियंता स्वयं निर्माण कार्यों का निरीक्षण
करेंगे जिससे स्कूलों के निर्माण में कोई कमी न रहे। स्कूलों का घटिया
निर्माण होने पर संबंधित निर्माण एजेंसियों के खिलाफ सख्त कार्रवाई की
जाएगी।
News Source Sabhaar : Amar Ujala (15.07.2014)
Saturday, July 12, 2014
LT Grade Teacher Recruitment UP : पुरुषों व महिलाओं के लिए बराबर पद
LT Grade Teacher Recruitment UP : पुरुषों व महिलाओं के लिए बराबर पद
ऑनलाइन आवेदन से भर्ती की तैयारी
माध्यमिक शिक्षा अभियान में 6000 शिक्षकों की भर्ती को हरी झंडी
L T Grade, LT Grade, LT Grade Teacher Recruitment UP, LT Grade Teacher Uttar Pradesh, ऑनलाइन आवेदन से भर्ती की तैयारी
माध्यमिक शिक्षा अभियान में 6000 शिक्षकों की भर्ती को हरी झंडी
- शासन ने पुरुषों व महिलाओं के लिए अलग-अलग 3000-3000 पदों का निर्धारण कर दिया है
लखनऊ (ब्यूरो)। शासन ने राष्ट्रीय माध्यमिक शिक्षा अभियान के अंतर्गत खोले गए हाईस्कूलों में 6000 शिक्षकों की तैनाती को मंजूरी दे दी है। विभाग ने इस संबंध में कार्यवाही शुरू कर दी है।
प्रदेश में राष्ट्रीय माध्यमिक शिक्षा अभियान के अंतर्गत राष्ट्रीय हाईस्कूल खोले गए हैं। इन स्कूलों में कुल 8500 शिक्षकों की आवश्यकता है। शासन ने पहले चरण में शिक्षकों के 6000 पदों पर भर्ती की अनुमति दे दी है। इन 6000 पदों में पुरुषों व महिलाओं को बराबर मौके मिलेंगे। शासन ने पुरुषों व महिलाओं के लिए अलग-अलग 3000-3000 पदों का निर्धारण कर दिया है। विभाग ने इन पदों पर नियुक्तियों के लिए नियमावली में जरूरी संशोधन की कार्यवाही शुरू कर दी है। शिक्षकों की भर्ती के लिए ऑनलाइन आवेदन लेने की योजना है।
News Source / Sabhaar : Amar Ujala (12.07.14)
*****************
एल टी ग्रेड भर्ती से सम्बंधित कुछ अन्य जानकारियां :-
To See All LT Grade Teacher News, Please Click Here : http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com/search/label/L%20T%20Grade#ixzz37DJuwO3j
LT GRADE Teacher Recruitment : केंद्र सरकार
ने झटका दिया
- एलटी नियुक्ति को टीईटी-दो अनिवार्य
Similar requirement of TET Qualification happens for TGT
Recruitment in KVS (Kendriya Vidyalay Sangathan) and Delhi State Govt.
Recruitment DSSSB etc.
See news -
देहरादून :
प्रदेश में एलटी
शिक्षक के रूप
में नियुक्ति की
राह तक रहे
हजारों बीएड प्रशिक्षितों
को केंद्र सरकार
ने झटका दिया
है। उन्हें शिक्षक
पात्रता परीक्षा (टीईटी) से
निजात नहीं मिलने
वाली। रोजगार के
लिए उन्हें भी
टीईटी-दो अनिवार्य
रूप से पास
करना होगा। केंद्र
सरकार के इस
फरमान के बाद
अब राज्य को
एलटी नियमावली में
संशोधन करना होगा।
शिक्षा महकमा इस कवायद
में जुट गया
है। इस वजह
से टीईटी परीक्षा
भी अब जल्द
कराने की तैयारी
है।
प्रदेश में एलटी
शिक्षकों के चार
हजार से ज्यादा
पद रिक्त हैं।
सिर्फ राष्ट्रीय माध्यमिक
शिक्षा अभियान के तहत
खुले 228 स्कूलों में शिक्षकों
के तकरीबन दो
हजार पद रिक्त
हैं। इन पदों
पर नियुक्ति के
लिए भी अब
बीएड प्रशिक्षितों को
टीईटी-दो पास
करना होगा। दरअसल,
एलटी शिक्षक कक्षा
छह से दसवीं
कक्षा तक पढ़ाते
हैं। छठवीं, सातवीं
और आठवीं कक्षा
इसके दायरे में
होने के कारण
केंद्र सरकार ने एलटी
नियुक्तियों में भी
टीईटी-दो को
अनिवार्य किया है।
इस बाबत राज्य
सरकार ने केंद्र
सरकार को पत्र
भेजा। अब केंद्र
सरकार ने राज्य
को पत्र भेजकर
इस संबंध में
स्थिति साफ कर
दी है। केंद्र
सरकार ने एलटी
नियुक्तियों के लिए
टीईटी-दो को
अनिवार्य बताया है। मौजूदा
व्यवस्था में एलटी
शिक्षकों की नियुक्ति
के लिए टीईटी-दो पास
करने का प्रावधान
नहीं है। कक्षा
छह से आठवीं
तक अध्यापकों के
सीटी संवर्ग को
काफी पहले मृत
संवर्ग घोषित कर एलटी
संवर्ग में समायोजित
किया जा चुका
है।
एलटी नियुक्तियों के लिए
टीईटी-दो पास
करने की व्यवस्था
अभी एलटी नियमावली
में नहीं है।
लिहाजा नियमावली में संशोधन
किया जाएगा। केंद्र
का फरमान मिलने
के बाद राज्य
सरकार के लिए
फिलहाल असहज स्थितियां
बन गई हैं।
सरकार अब बोर्ड
परीक्षा का मूल्यांकन
कार्य निपटने के
बाद टीईटी और
टीईटी-दो जल्द
आयोजित करने की
तैयारियों में जुट
गई है। शिक्षा
सचिव मनीषा पंवार
ने एलटी नियुक्तियों
के लिए टीईटी-दो अनिवार्य
किए जाने के
केंद्र सरकार के निर्देशों
की पुष्टि की।
उन्होंने कहा कि
एलटी की नई
नियुक्तियां नई व्यवस्था
के तहत होंगी।
इसके लिए नियमावली
में संशोधन किया
जा रहा है।
उन्होंने स्वीकार किया कि
टीईटी जल्द आयोजित
की जाएगी
News Source / Sabhaar : Jagran (Updated on: Thu, 25 Apr 2013
07:34 AM (IST)) / jagran.com/uttarakhand/dehradun-city-10333134.html
Sunday, June 29, 2014
खुशियां ही खुशियां
खुशियां ही खुशियां
सब लोगों को छप्पर फाड़ कर खुशियां ही खुशियां मिलने जा रही है ,
एल ग्रेड का फ़ाइनल रिज़ल्ट भी इसी हफ्ते , मतलब जूनियर वालों , और प्राइमरी वालों को फायदा
जूनियर भर्ती 10 जुलाई तक होने पर प्राइमरी में टेट कम अंको वालों का भी हो जायेगा
प्राइमरी में लगभग 1 लाख लोगों को फायदा
58 हज़ार शिक्षा मित्रों को भी 31 जुलाई तक समायोजन
पहले से काम कर रहे शिक्षकों को मनचाहे ट्रांसफर
ब्लॉग संपादक की तरफ से सभी को ढेरों बधाइयाँ
72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog : http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com/
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com/ for
Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) , UPTET Latest News
Friday, June 27, 2014
LT GRADE TEACHER RELATED IMPORTANT ALLAHABAD HIGHCOURT ORDERS
LT GRADE TEACHER RELATED IMPORTANT ALLAHABAD HIGHCOURT ORDERS
LT GRADE MALE AUR FEMALE TEACHER KI PURANEE RECRUITMENT MEIN POST GRADUATION KE EXTRA MARKS KO LEKAR NIYUKTI FANSEE HUEE HAI,
NAYEE NIYUKTION MEIN PG MARKS KEE WEIGHTAGE KHATM KAR DEE GAYEE HAI
*************
L T Grade, LT Grade, LT Grade Teacher Recruitment UP, LT Grade Teacher Uttar Pradesh,
Join LT Grade Teacher Facebook Group : https://www.facebook.com/groups/ltgradeteacher/
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com/#ixzz35qxcHqfz
*****************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 21317 of 2014
Petitioner :- Ankur Madhukar And 4 Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Sunil Kumar Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Vikram Nath,J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioners claim to have done their post graduation in
one of the subjects which was a part of their post graduation degree. This
Court in the case of Ravindra Babu Shriwas and Others versus State of U.P. and
others (Writ Petition No.6333 of 2013) vide injunction order dated 8.2.2013 and
05.03.2013 had restrained appointment of the candidates who had obtained post
graduation in a subject which was not part of their co-curriculum in graduation
degree. Pursuant to the said order passed in the case of Ravindra Babu Shriwas
the Director of Education (Secondary) completely stopped the appointments of
all candidates. Lateron large number of candidates who had obtained their post
graduation in one of the subjects which was part of their gradation degree
approached this Court whereupon the matter was clarified and the Director was
directed to pass appropriate orders after verifying educational degrees of such
candidates claiming to have done their post graduation in one of the subjects
which was part of their graduation course.
In the present case also it has been stated in paragraphs 9
to 12 that all the five petitioners have obtained post graduation degrees in a
subject which was one of the subjects in their graduation course as such would
not be covered by injunction granted in the case of Ravindra Babu Shriwas.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case this
petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.2, Director of
Education (Secondary) to take an appropriate decision on the claim of the
petitioners which they may submit alongwith relevant supporting material and
certified copy of this order, within a period of four weeks from the date of
filing of such representation and certified copy of this order. decree.
Order Date :- 15.4.2014
RPS
*******************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 19018 of 2014
Petitioner :- Mohit Kumar And 3 Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Sunil Kumar Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J.
Heard Shri Sunil Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned standing counsel for the respondents.
According to the petitioners, petitioner no. 1 has done his Graduation in Maths and Chemistry and Post Graduation In Chemistry, petitioner no. 2 has done is Graduation in Maths and Chemistry and Post Graduation in Physics, petitioner no. 3 has done his Graduation in Maths and Chemistry and Post Graduation in Physics and petitioner no. 4 has done his Graduation in Economics and Medieval History and Post Graduate in Medieval History.
The contention of the petitioner is that for appointment on the post of Trained Graduate Teacher the requirement is to have Graduation and Post Graduation in the same subject. This has been held by this Court also in two writ petitions being W.P. No. 24579 of 2013, Devendra Singh Vs. State of U.P. and others and W.P. No. 6333 of 2013, Ravindra Babu Shriwas and others Vs. State of U.P. and others. There was no restrait order and whatever restrait there was, was only in respect of candidates who had obtained Post Graduation in a subject other than the one in which they had� done their Graduation. This legal position was further reiterated by the Court in W.P. No. 59120 of 2009 Devendra Singh and two others Vs. State of U.P. and others. From the averments in paragraphs 9, 10, 11 and 12 of the writ petition it is noticed that the petitioners no. 1 and 4 have done their Graduation and Post Graduation in the same subject. Whereas the petitioner no. 2 and 3 have done their Graduation and Post Graduation in different subjects.
Shri Sunil Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner no. 2 and 3 have also done Graduation and Post Graduation in the same subject or at least one of the subject in which they have done their Graduation which have been left out due to misprint in the writ petition.
In this view of the matter without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 2-Director of Education (Secondary) Government of U.P. Lucknow to consider the claim of the petitioners for appointment as Trained Graduate Teachers after carefully examining their Graduation and Post Graduation Degrees.� This exercise shall be completed by the respondent no. 2 within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order is received in his office.
Order Date :- 4.4.2014
o.k.
http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=3222707
*******************************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 19018 of 2014
Petitioner :- Mohit Kumar And 3 Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Sunil Kumar Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J.
Heard Shri Sunil Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned standing counsel for the respondents.
According to the petitioners, petitioner no. 1 has done his Graduation in Maths and Chemistry and Post Graduation In Chemistry, petitioner no. 2 has done is Graduation in Maths and Chemistry and Post Graduation in Physics, petitioner no. 3 has done his Graduation in Maths and Chemistry and Post Graduation in Physics and petitioner no. 4 has done his Graduation in Economics and Medieval History and Post Graduate in Medieval History.
The contention of the petitioner is that for appointment on the post of Trained Graduate Teacher the requirement is to have Graduation and Post Graduation in the same subject. This has been held by this Court also in two writ petitions being W.P. No. 24579 of 2013, Devendra Singh Vs. State of U.P. and others and W.P. No. 6333 of 2013, Ravindra Babu Shriwas and others Vs. State of U.P. and others. There was no restrait order and whatever restrait there was, was only in respect of candidates who had obtained Post Graduation in a subject other than the one in which they had� done their Graduation. This legal position was further reiterated by the Court in W.P. No. 59120 of 2009 Devendra Singh and two others Vs. State of U.P. and others. From the averments in paragraphs 9, 10, 11 and 12 of the writ petition it is noticed that the petitioners no. 1 and 4 have done their Graduation and Post Graduation in the same subject. Whereas the petitioner no. 2 and 3 have done their Graduation and Post Graduation in different subjects.
Shri Sunil Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner no. 2 and 3 have also done Graduation and Post Graduation in the same subject or at least one of the subject in which they have done their Graduation which have been left out due to misprint in the writ petition.
In this view of the matter without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 2-Director of Education (Secondary) Government of U.P. Lucknow to consider the claim of the petitioners for appointment as Trained Graduate Teachers after carefully examining their Graduation and Post Graduation Degrees.� This exercise shall be completed by the respondent no. 2 within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order is received in his office.
Order Date :- 4.4.2014
o.k.
http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=3222707
******************
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 71082 of 2013
Petitioner :- Ravindra Anand
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Secy. And 9 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Navin Kumar Sharma,Neeraj Tiwari
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J.
Sri Navin Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner
states that the controversy in the present case is identical to that of Writ
Petition No.6333 of 2013 (Ravindra Babu Shriwas & Ors. Vs. State of U.P.
& Anr.) and other connected writ petitions.
Learned Standing Counsel�
prays for and is granted four weeks' time for filing counter affidavit.
List after four weeks alongwith the record of Writ Petition
No.6333 of 2013.
Order Date :- 2.1.2014
N Tiwari
http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=3012758
********************TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST MANDATORY FOR CLASS 1 TO 8
CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION
(An Autonomous Organisation under the Union
Ministry of Human Resource Development Govt. of India)
“SHIKSHA KENDRA”, 2, COMMUNITY CENTRE, PREET VIHAR, DELHI – 110 301
Gram : CENBOSEC, Delhi – 92 Phone: 011-22426938, 22520242
E-Mail:cbseaff.nic.in Fax: 011-22540655 website:www.cbse.nic.in
CBSE/AFF./CIRCULAR/2011 April 14, 2011
Circular No.4
All the Heads of Schools
Affiliated to the CBSE
Subject: Norms for Teacher Qualifications for appointment as a teacher in classes I to VIII under
the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education (RTE) Act 2009 and conduct of Central Teacher Eligibility Test 2011 by the CBSE.
Sir/Madam,
In accordance with the provisions of sub-section (1) of Section 23 of the RTE Act-2009, the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) had vide Notification dated 23rd August, 2010 laid down the minimum qualifications for a person to be eligible for appointment as a teacher in classes I to VIII. A copy of the said no tification is available on the official website of the NCTE www.ncte-india.org
and at www.education.nic.in
.
The NCTE Notification dated 23.08.2010 inter-alia provided that one of the essential qualifications for a person to be eligible for appointment as a teacher in any of the schools referred to in clause (n) of section 2 of the RTE Act is that he/she should pass the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) which
will be conducted by the appropriate Government in accordance with the Guidelines framed by the NCTE.
Therefore, all the appointments of teachers in classes I to VIII in the schools affiliated or to be affiliated with the CBSE are to be made in accordance with the minimum qualifications notified by the NCTE.
Now, the Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India has entrusted the responsibility of conducting the Central Teacher Eligibility Test (CTET) to the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE).
This CTET shall apply to the schools affiliated or to be affiliated with the CBSE in the following manner:-
(i) CTET conducted by the CBSE is applicable to the schools of the Central Government (KVS, NVS, and Central Tibetan Schools etc.) and schools under the administrative control of UT of Chandigarh and Andaman & Nicobar Islands.
(ii) Unaided private schools may exercise the option of considering the CTET conducted by the CBSE or TET conducted by the State Government.
(iii) The schools owned and managed by the State Government/local bodies and aided schools shall ei
ther consider the TET conducted by the State Government or the CTET conducted by the CBSE.
The first CTET viz CTET 2011 is scheduled to be conducted by the CBSE on 26th June, 2011 and the details of the CTET 2011 are available on the CBSE Website www.cbse.nic.in .
All the schools/school managements are advised to take appropriate action accordingly.
With regards,
Yours faithfully,
Sd/-
(JOSEPH EMMANUEL)
DEPUTY SECRETARY(AFFLN)
Distribution:
1. All the Principals of the schools afiliated with the CBSE.
2. All the Managers of the private unaided schools affiliated with the CBSE.
3. The Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, 18-Institutional Area, Shaheed Jeet Singh Marg, New Delhi-110 016.
4. The Commissioner, Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti, A-28, Kailash Colony,New Delhi.
5. The Director of Education, Directorate of Education, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Old Secretariat, Delhi-110 054.
6. The Director of Public Instructions (Schools), Union Territory Secretariat, Sector 9, Chandigarh-160 017.
7. The Director of Education, Govt. of Sikkim, Gangtok,Sikkim – 737 101.
8. The Director of School Education, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar- 791 111
9. The Director of Education, Govt. of A&N Islands, Port Blair-744 101.
10. The Secretary, Central Tibetan School Administration, ESS ESS Plaza,Community Centre, Sector 3, Rohini, Delhi-110 085
11. All the members of the Governing Body of CBSE
12. All the Regional Officers of CBSE
13. The Joint Secretary (IT)
with the request to put this circular on the CBSE website.
14. The PRO, CBSE
15. The Library and Information Officer, CBSE
16. All the Officers of the Board upto the level of Section Officer
Sd/-
Deputy Secretary (Affiliation)
Source : http://cbse.gov.in/circulars/Circular_TE-2011.pdf
(An Autonomous Organisation under the Union
Ministry of Human Resource Development Govt. of India)
“SHIKSHA KENDRA”, 2, COMMUNITY CENTRE, PREET VIHAR, DELHI – 110 301
Gram : CENBOSEC, Delhi – 92 Phone: 011-22426938, 22520242
E-Mail:cbseaff.nic.in Fax: 011-22540655 website:www.cbse.nic.in
CBSE/AFF./CIRCULAR/2011 April 14, 2011
Circular No.4
All the Heads of Schools
Affiliated to the CBSE
Subject: Norms for Teacher Qualifications for appointment as a teacher in classes I to VIII under
the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education (RTE) Act 2009 and conduct of Central Teacher Eligibility Test 2011 by the CBSE.
Sir/Madam,
In accordance with the provisions of sub-section (1) of Section 23 of the RTE Act-2009, the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) had vide Notification dated 23rd August, 2010 laid down the minimum qualifications for a person to be eligible for appointment as a teacher in classes I to VIII. A copy of the said no tification is available on the official website of the NCTE www.ncte-india.org
and at www.education.nic.in
.
The NCTE Notification dated 23.08.2010 inter-alia provided that one of the essential qualifications for a person to be eligible for appointment as a teacher in any of the schools referred to in clause (n) of section 2 of the RTE Act is that he/she should pass the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) which
will be conducted by the appropriate Government in accordance with the Guidelines framed by the NCTE.
Therefore, all the appointments of teachers in classes I to VIII in the schools affiliated or to be affiliated with the CBSE are to be made in accordance with the minimum qualifications notified by the NCTE.
Now, the Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India has entrusted the responsibility of conducting the Central Teacher Eligibility Test (CTET) to the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE).
This CTET shall apply to the schools affiliated or to be affiliated with the CBSE in the following manner:-
(i) CTET conducted by the CBSE is applicable to the schools of the Central Government (KVS, NVS, and Central Tibetan Schools etc.) and schools under the administrative control of UT of Chandigarh and Andaman & Nicobar Islands.
(ii) Unaided private schools may exercise the option of considering the CTET conducted by the CBSE or TET conducted by the State Government.
(iii) The schools owned and managed by the State Government/local bodies and aided schools shall ei
ther consider the TET conducted by the State Government or the CTET conducted by the CBSE.
The first CTET viz CTET 2011 is scheduled to be conducted by the CBSE on 26th June, 2011 and the details of the CTET 2011 are available on the CBSE Website www.cbse.nic.in .
All the schools/school managements are advised to take appropriate action accordingly.
With regards,
Yours faithfully,
Sd/-
(JOSEPH EMMANUEL)
DEPUTY SECRETARY(AFFLN)
Distribution:
1. All the Principals of the schools afiliated with the CBSE.
2. All the Managers of the private unaided schools affiliated with the CBSE.
3. The Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, 18-Institutional Area, Shaheed Jeet Singh Marg, New Delhi-110 016.
4. The Commissioner, Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti, A-28, Kailash Colony,New Delhi.
5. The Director of Education, Directorate of Education, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Old Secretariat, Delhi-110 054.
6. The Director of Public Instructions (Schools), Union Territory Secretariat, Sector 9, Chandigarh-160 017.
7. The Director of Education, Govt. of Sikkim, Gangtok,Sikkim – 737 101.
8. The Director of School Education, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar- 791 111
9. The Director of Education, Govt. of A&N Islands, Port Blair-744 101.
10. The Secretary, Central Tibetan School Administration, ESS ESS Plaza,Community Centre, Sector 3, Rohini, Delhi-110 085
11. All the members of the Governing Body of CBSE
12. All the Regional Officers of CBSE
13. The Joint Secretary (IT)
with the request to put this circular on the CBSE website.
14. The PRO, CBSE
15. The Library and Information Officer, CBSE
16. All the Officers of the Board upto the level of Section Officer
Sd/-
Deputy Secretary (Affiliation)
Source : http://cbse.gov.in/circulars/Circular_TE-2011.pdf
LT Grade Teacher Recruitment UP : एल टी ग्रेड टीचर उत्तर प्रदेश भर्ती न्यूज़
LT Grade Teacher Recruitment UP : एल टी ग्रेड टीचर उत्तर प्रदेश भर्ती न्यूज़
L T Grade, LT Grade, LT Grade Teacher Recruitment UP, LT Grade Teacher Uttar Pradesh,
उत्तर प्रदेश में आने वाली आठ हज़ार एल टी ग्रेड और इस से सम्बंधित न्यूज़ की पल पल ख़बरों के लिए ब्लॉग से जुड़े रहें
एल टी ग्रेड भर्ती से सम्बंधित कुछ अन्य जानकारियां :-
LT GRADE Teacher Recruitment : केंद्र सरकार
ने झटका दिया
- एलटी नियुक्ति को टीईटी-दो अनिवार्य
UPTET / टीईटी / TET - Teacher Eligibility Test Updates / Teacher Recruitment News
Join LT Grade Teacher Facebook Group : https://www.facebook.com/groups/ltgradeteacher/
UPTET, 72825 Teacher Recruitment, Counseling of 72825 Teacher as per Supreme Court Order
UPTET PASS GIRL CANDIDATE can JOIN THIS GROUP : https://www.facebook.com/groups/uptetgirlsgroup/
UPTET PASS CANDIDATE can JOIN this GROUP :https://www.facebook.com/groups/uptetteachersgroup
29334 Junior High School Teacher Aspirant Group : https://www.facebook.com/groups/uptetjnrteacher/
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com/#ixzz35qq9Ynd7
UPTET PASS GIRL CANDIDATE can JOIN THIS GROUP : https://www.facebook.com/groups/uptetgirlsgroup/
UPTET PASS CANDIDATE can JOIN this GROUP :https://www.facebook.com/groups/uptetteachersgroup
29334 Junior High School Teacher Aspirant Group : https://www.facebook.com/groups/uptetjnrteacher/
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com/#ixzz35qq9Ynd7
Similar requirement of TET Qualification happens for TGT
Recruitment in KVS (Kendriya Vidyalay Sangathan) and Delhi State Govt.
Recruitment DSSSB etc.
See news -
देहरादून :
प्रदेश में एलटी
शिक्षक के रूप
में नियुक्ति की
राह तक रहे
हजारों बीएड प्रशिक्षितों
को केंद्र सरकार
ने झटका दिया
है। उन्हें शिक्षक
पात्रता परीक्षा (टीईटी) से
निजात नहीं मिलने
वाली। रोजगार के
लिए उन्हें भी
टीईटी-दो अनिवार्य
रूप से पास
करना होगा। केंद्र
सरकार के इस
फरमान के बाद
अब राज्य को
एलटी नियमावली में
संशोधन करना होगा।
शिक्षा महकमा इस कवायद
में जुट गया
है। इस वजह
से टीईटी परीक्षा
भी अब जल्द
कराने की तैयारी
है।
प्रदेश में एलटी
शिक्षकों के चार
हजार से ज्यादा
पद रिक्त हैं।
सिर्फ राष्ट्रीय माध्यमिक
शिक्षा अभियान के तहत
खुले 228 स्कूलों में शिक्षकों
के तकरीबन दो
हजार पद रिक्त
हैं। इन पदों
पर नियुक्ति के
लिए भी अब
बीएड प्रशिक्षितों को
टीईटी-दो पास
करना होगा। दरअसल,
एलटी शिक्षक कक्षा
छह से दसवीं
कक्षा तक पढ़ाते
हैं। छठवीं, सातवीं
और आठवीं कक्षा
इसके दायरे में
होने के कारण
केंद्र सरकार ने एलटी
नियुक्तियों में भी
टीईटी-दो को
अनिवार्य किया है।
इस बाबत राज्य
सरकार ने केंद्र
सरकार को पत्र
भेजा। अब केंद्र
सरकार ने राज्य
को पत्र भेजकर
इस संबंध में
स्थिति साफ कर
दी है। केंद्र
सरकार ने एलटी
नियुक्तियों के लिए
टीईटी-दो को
अनिवार्य बताया है। मौजूदा
व्यवस्था में एलटी
शिक्षकों की नियुक्ति
के लिए टीईटी-दो पास
करने का प्रावधान
नहीं है। कक्षा
छह से आठवीं
तक अध्यापकों के
सीटी संवर्ग को
काफी पहले मृत
संवर्ग घोषित कर एलटी
संवर्ग में समायोजित
किया जा चुका
है।
एलटी नियुक्तियों के लिए
टीईटी-दो पास
करने की व्यवस्था
अभी एलटी नियमावली
में नहीं है।
लिहाजा नियमावली में संशोधन
किया जाएगा। केंद्र
का फरमान मिलने
के बाद राज्य
सरकार के लिए
फिलहाल असहज स्थितियां
बन गई हैं।
सरकार अब बोर्ड
परीक्षा का मूल्यांकन
कार्य निपटने के
बाद टीईटी और
टीईटी-दो जल्द
आयोजित करने की
तैयारियों में जुट
गई है। शिक्षा
सचिव मनीषा पंवार
ने एलटी नियुक्तियों
के लिए टीईटी-दो अनिवार्य
किए जाने के
केंद्र सरकार के निर्देशों
की पुष्टि की।
उन्होंने कहा कि
एलटी की नई
नियुक्तियां नई व्यवस्था
के तहत होंगी।
इसके लिए नियमावली
में संशोधन किया
जा रहा है।
उन्होंने स्वीकार किया कि
टीईटी जल्द आयोजित
की जाएगी
News Source / Sabhaar : Jagran (Updated on: Thu, 25 Apr 2013
07:34 AM (IST)) / jagran.com/uttarakhand/dehradun-city-10333134.html
Wednesday, June 25, 2014
LT Grade Female Teacher Recruitment GGIC : एल टी ग्रेड महिला शिक्षक भर्ती 2011
एल टी ग्रेड महिला शिक्षक भर्ती 2011
LT Grade Female Teacher Recruitment GGIC,
L T Grade, LT Grade, LT Grade Teacher Recruitment UP, LT Grade Teacher Uttar Pradesh
Matter in Allahabad High court : -
एल टी ग्रेड महिला शिक्षकों की भर्ती के सम्बन्ध में एक याचिका डाली गयी , और बाद में एल टी ग्रेड महिला और एल टी ग्रेड पुरष शिक्षक भर्ती की याचिकाओं को जोड़ दिया गया , और पूरी भर्ती इन रिट याचिकाओं के अंतिम परिणाम पर निर्भर करेगी ,
हालाँकि 11 जुलाई 2013 के बाद की सुनवाई का मामला नहीं दिखा है ,
अगर किसी को ज्यादा जानकारी हो तो कमेंट के माध्यम से सूचित कर सकता है
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 30
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 34698 of 2011
Petitioner :- Madhuri Devi And Another
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Nisheeth Yadav,C.B. Yadav,Subhash Singh Yadav
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,K.K. Chand
Hon'ble Amreshwar Pratap Sahi,J.
For orders, see order of the date passed in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 6333 of 2013 Ravindra Babu Shriwas & Ors. Vs. State of U.P. & Anr.
Order Date :- 5.3.2013
Sahu
Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=2418965
*********************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 30
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 34698 of 2011
Petitioner :- Madhuri Devi And Another
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Nisheeth Yadav,C.B. Yadav,Subhash Singh Yadav
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,K.K. Chand
Hon'ble V.K. Shukla,J.
In the present case respondent nos. 6 to 20 have been impleaded as private respondent and their address in question has been prescribed as C/o Regional Director of Secondary Education, Allahabad Division, Allahabad. Petitioners are contending that they are not aware of respondent address, in view of this as the respondents are functioning under the Regional Director of Secondary Education, Allahabad Division, Allahabad, as such the said address was given.
In view of this, Regional Director of Secondary Education, Allahabad Division, Allahabad, is directed to supply a copy of address of respondent nos. 6 to 20 to one of the petitioners, preferably within next two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, and coupled with this the Regional Director of Secondary Education, Allahabad Division, Allahabad shall also ensure that on official level all these respondents are informed of ongoing litigation, so that they can have say in that matter.
List this matter on 3rd January, 2012.
Order Date :- 23.11.2012
Shekhar
http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=2210655
********************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 34698 of 2011
Petitioner :- Madhuri Devi And Another
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Nisheeth Yadav,C.B. Yadav,Subhash Singh Yadav
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Heard Mr. C. B. Yadav, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Nisheeth Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents no. 1 to 4 and have gone through the record.
It is contended that for recruitment on the post of Assistant Teacher in Government Girls Secondary School, the U.P. Subordinate Educational (Trained Graduates Grades) Service Rules 1983 are applicable and for direct recruitment the qualification prescribed under Rule 8 of the Rules 1983 for the post of Assistant Teacher (physical education) is Bachelor Degree from recognized university or a degree recognized by the Government as equivalent thereto and diploma in physical education but there is no provision under which Post Graduate qualification in any other discipline (other than physical education) can be considered to be relevant qualification for the purpose of quality point marks as per Appendix-D and therefore the manner in which selection is being made in the present case pursuant to an advertisement dated 29.12.2010 is illegal and contrary to the rules.
It is contended that in condition no. 7 of the advertisement the different quality point marks provided for the Post Graduate qualification is illegal.
A perusal of Appendix -D shows that for the purpose of quality points, marks awarded to various qualification up to graduation is provided but in respect to the Post Graduate the provision in Appendix-D is silent. In what manner it would be considered has to be seen.
The matter requires consideration.
Admit.
Issue notice to the respondents no. 6 to 20 returnable at an early date.
Steps be taken within a week.
Respondents may file counter affidavit within a month. Petitioners will have a weeks' time to file rejoinder affidavit, if any.
List thereafter.
However, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the selection in question is proceeding, I direct that the selection and appointment, if any, pursuant to the impugned advertisement shall be subject to the final decision in this writ petition.
Order Date :- 22.6.2011
RKS/
http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=1282722
उत्तर प्रदेश राजकीय कॉलेज एल टी ग्रेड शिक्षकों के पोस्ट ग्रेजुएट के अतिरिक्त अंक सम्बन्धी याचिका
उत्तर प्रदेश राजकीय कॉलेज एल टी ग्रेड शिक्षकों के पोस्ट ग्रेजुएट के अतिरिक्त अंक सम्बन्धी याचिका
L T Grade, LT Grade, LT Grade Teacher Recruitment UP, LT Grade Teacher Uttar Pradesh,
उत्तर प्रदेश में एल टी ग्रेड शिक्षकों की भर्ती में पोस्ट ग्रेजुएट करने वालों को 15 अतिरिक्त अंको का चयन में बी=वेटेज दिया जा रहा था ,
लेकिन बहुत से लोग ऐसे भी थे जिन्होंने पोस्ट ग्रेजुएट किसी और विषय से किया था , और भर्ती में ग्रेजुएट विषय के शिक्षक बनने का लाभ उठा रहे थे ,
उदाहरणार्थ - किसी ने बी एस सी - गणित विषय ( गणित , भौतिकी , रसायन ) से किया और बाद में पोस्ट ग्रेजुएट किसी और विषय - भौतिकी , रसायन ,आर्ट्स , पत्रकारिता, कंप्यूटर, प्रोफेशनल कोर्सेस आदि आदि से कर लिया
ऐसे में सामान विषय में ग्रेजुएशन , पोस्ट ग्रेजुएशन करने वालों को नुक्सान हो रहा था, और वे लोग कोर्ट गए , और उसकी याचिका की कार्यवाही इस प्रकार है , 25 July 2013 ya iske baad kee karyvahee ka pata nahin chal paa raha hai : -
(इस से पहले महिला जी जी आई सी एल टी ग्रेड भर्ती में ग्रेजुएट , पोस्ट ग्रेजुएट विषय अलग अलग होने पर भी ग्रेजुएट विषय के टीचर बनने की बहुत सारी बातें सामने आयी थी ,, भर्ती कई राउंड में चली थी , और पता नहीं चला की भर्ती पूर्ण रूप से कम्प्लीट हुई की नहीं )
Important Point happens in Court is : -
even in the case of Science subject if the requirement is of a bachelors degree with Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics or Biology then in that event a post graduation degree in Arts will not be a degree against which quality point marks could be awarded under the Appendix - D.
for example a candidate possessing a post graduate decree in Urdu against the post of a subject in Science will be able to score higher quality point marks thereby eliminating a candidate who actually belongs to the same subject.
नोट: नयी एल टी ग्रेड शिक्षकों की भर्ती में पोस्ट ग्रेजुएट विषय के अतिरिक्त अंको को समाप्त कर दिया गया है
****************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 33
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6333 of 2013
Petitioner :- Ravindra Babu Shriwas And Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru Secy & Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Radha Kant Ojha
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,J.H. Khan
Hon'ble Manoj Misra,J.
Ref: Civil Misc. Impleadment Application No. 113669 of 2013
Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for and is allowed two weeks time to file rejoinder-affidavit to the impleadment application.
List this petition for admission before appropriate Court on 25.07.2013. When the petition is listed next, the name of Sri Vasistha Tiwari will be shown as one of the counsel for the respondents.
Order Date :- 11.7.2013
Sunil Kr Tiwari
***********
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 30
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6333 of 2013
Petitioner :- Ravindra Babu Shriwas And Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru Secy & Ors.
Petitioner Counsel :- Radha Kant Ojha
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Amreshwar Pratap Sahi,J.
Sri Upendra Singh, learned Standing Counsel states that a counter affidavit as desired by this Court is under preparation in respect of other reasons as well so as to provide complete information with regard to status of selections.
Put up on Tuesday next.
Order Date :- 12.3.2013
Manish
http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=2439902
****************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Court No. 30
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 6333 of 2013
Ravindra Babu Shriwas & Ors. Vs. State of U.P. & Anr.
With
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 6835 of 2013
Gaurav Tiwari & Ors. Vs. State of U.P. & Ors.
With
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 8847 of 2013
Ashutosh Sharma Vs. State of U.P. & Anr.
With
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 52188 of 2012
Km. Neelam Singh Vs. State of U.P. & Ors.
With
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 34343 of 2011
Pratibha Singh & Ors. Vs. State of U.P. & Anr.
With
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 34698 of 2011
Smt. Madhuri Devi & Anr. Vs. State of U.P. & Ors.
*****
Hon'ble A.P. Sahi,J.
These batch of writ petitions relate to an issue that was earlier raised in writ petition no. 34698 of 2011 and has again been raised in the other writ petitions which has been noted in the order passed in writ petition no. 6333 of 2013 on 8.2.2013. The dispute in short relates to the award of quality point marks as against the possession of a post graduate degree as per Rule 15(2) read with Appendix - D of the Uttar Pradesh, Subordinate Educational Service Rules, 1983.
The rules read with the appendix make a provision that a candidate has to be awarded quality point marks in accordance with the calculation given in the said appendix and if a candidate possesses a post graduate decree for appointment against Trained Graduate Teaching Post, then for first division marks fifteen quality point marks will be awarded, for second division, ten quality point marks will be awarded and for third division, five additional marks will be awarded.
The petitioners in all these writ petitions contend that this award of a post graduate degree weightage should be in respect of the subject concerned for which the selection is being made and not in any other subject. For illustration, if the selection is being made of a science teacher and he has subsequently obtained a post graduate degree in Arts then the same should not be counted for the purpose of weightage.
The learned Standing Counsel for the State had been granted time to file a counter affidavit whereafter the learned Additional Advocate General, Sri C.B. Yadav had appeared and had made a request that the matter be adjourned to enable him to obtain instructions in the matter.
The Government Order obtained through the Director of Education on 4th of March, 2013 is as follows:-
^^QSDl@le;c)
la[;k&368 @15&2&2013
isz"kd]
jktsUnz izlkn]
la;qDr lfpo]
mRrj izns'k 'kkluA
lsok esa]
f'k{kk funs'kd ¼ek0½
mRrj izns'k] y[kuÅA
f'k{kk vuqHkkx&2 y[kuÅ fnukad 4 ekpZ] 2013
fo"k;& fjV la[;k&6333@ 2013 Jh johUnz ckcw Jhokl o vU; ds laca/k esa ek0 U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 08-02-13 ds laca/k essa fnukad 05-03-13 dks izfr'kiFk&i= nkf[ky fd;s tkus laca/k esaA
egksn;]
mi;qZDr fo"k;d vkids i= la[;k&fu;qfDr¼,y0Vh0½ @2343@ 2012&13] fnukad 01-03-13 ds lanHkZ esa eq>s ;g dgus dk funsZ'k gqvk gS fd jktdh; ek/;fed fo|ky;ksa esa izf'kf{kr Lukrd osrudze ¼iq:"k 'kk[k½ dh HkrhZ m0iz0 v/khuLFk f'k{kk ¼izf'kf{kr Lukrd Js.kh½ lsok fu;ekoyh 1983 ¼;Fkk la'kksf/kr½ ¼izFke la'kks/ku½ lsok fu;ekoyh&1992 rFkk f}rh; la'kks/ku lsok fu;ekoyh] 2010 rFkk vf/klwpuk la[;k&05@15&2&27¼268½@ 2008 fnukad 03-01-2012 esa fufgr fu;ekoyh ds vUrxZr fu;e& 8] 14 rFkk fu;e& 15¼2½ ds vUrxZr ,oa ifjf'k"V&Mh ds vk/kkj ij vH;fFkZ;ksa ds p;u dh izfdz;k lEikfnr dh xbZ gSA fu;e& 15¼2½ ds vUrxZr ifjf'k"V&Mh esa fufgr fu;ekoyh esa LukrdksRrj mikf/k/kkjdksa dks dze'k% izFke Js.kh esa 15] f}rh; Js.kh esa 10 rFkk r`rh; Js.kh esa 05 vad fn;s tkus dh O;oLFkk fo|eku gSA
vr% mDr O;oLFkk ds vUrxZr ek0 mPp U;k;ky; dh vis{kkuqlkj fLFkfr Li"V djrs gq, izfr'kiFk&i= nkf[ky fd;s tkus dh dk;Zokgh lqfuf'pr djus dk d"V djsaA
¼jktsUnz izlkn½
la;qDr lfpo^^
Sri C.B. Yadav however inspite of these instructions which clearly indicate that the selections are being held as per Rules contends that if the argument of the petitioners is accepted then the court can proceed to correlate the possession of the post graduation degree to the subjects which have been mentioned in the qualification at the graduation level to be possessed by the candidate.
Learned counsel for the petitioners have not been able to counter this position taken by Sri C.B. Yadav and to the mind of the court the same also appears to be reasonable that the post graduation degree should be correlated to any of the subjects of the candidate for the post in question at the bachelors level, for example, if the requirement at the graduate level is of a bachelors degree in History, Geography, Political Science or Economics for the post of an Assistant Teacher General (History, Geography, Civics, Economics) then the post graduation degree should relate to any of the said four subjects.
***************
Similarly, even in the case of Science subject if the requirement is of a bachelors degree with Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics or Biology then in that event a post graduation degree in Arts will not be a degree against which quality point marks could be awarded under the Appendix - D.
************
This being the position, the matter could have been disposed of with the aforesaid interpretation in relation to the possession of a post graduation degree for the purpose of quality point marks as per Rule 15,
but in the meantime during the pendency of these writ petitions, it is informed that some selections have been finalized and candidates have joined on the basis of the selections held. At this juncture it may be relevant to point out that even with regard to previous years selection the order passed by the Court was clearly to the effect that any selections made shall be subject to the result of the writ petition against the advertisement then issued.
In the instant cases of the year 2013 a similar order has been passed on 8.2.2013. Accordingly, it would be appropriate that the State files an affidavit indicating as to the results which have been declared and appointments were made prior to passing of the interim order dated 8.2.2013 alongwith the names of the candidates alongwith their place of posting. It is further provided that the said affidavit shall be filed within a week.
The respondents shall in the light of what has been stated above shall now not proceed to issue any letter of appointment to a candidate who has been extended the benefit of quality point marks on the basis of a post graduate degree other than the subjects at the graduate level until further orders of the court.
Put up on Tuesday next.
A copy of the order may be given to the learned Standing Counsel, Sri Upendra Singh free of charges for communicating it to the authority within 24 hours.
Order date: 5.3.2013
Sahu
Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=2419133
*************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 30
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6333 of 2013
Petitioner :- Ravindra Babu Shriwas And Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru Secy & Ors.
Petitioner Counsel :- Radha Kant Ojha
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Amreshwar Pratap Sahi,J.
Heard Sri R.K. Ojha, learned counsel, for the petitioners and Sri C.B. Yadav, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Sri Upendra Singh, learned Standing Counsel, for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
Sri Yadav prays that he will be obtaining his instruction in the matter as this issue has been raised in a large number of petitions and shall be assisting the Court on the legal issues as framed in the order passed in the present writ petition.
He prays that the matter be taken up on Tuesday.
As prayed, put up on Tuesday.
Order Date :- 27.2.2013
Manish
http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=2408463
***************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 30
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6333 of 2013
Petitioner :- Ravindra Babu Shriwas And Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru Secy & Ors.
Petitioner Counsel :- Radha Kant Ojha
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Amreshwar Pratap Sahi,J.
Heard Sri R.K. Ojha, learned counsel for the petitioners.
This writ petition raises an issue on the ground of Article 14 of the Constitution of India whereby the petitioners contend that the criteria for awarding additional marks against the possession of a post graduate decree is irrational, inasmuch as, the selections are being held in particular subjects and therefore the award of marks in the post graduate decree should have a nexus with the subject in which the selections are being made. In short the weightage should be extended provided the post-graduate decree is in the subject concerned.
Sri Ojha submits that the criteria adopted violates Article 14, and as an illustration, Sri Ojha submits that a candidate being a graduate in Science applying against the post of Science, may be having the best qualifications in his subject, but he is likely to be superseded by a lesser meritorious candidate in the event such a candidate has a post graduate decree in a different subject. He therefore submits that for example a candidate possessing a post graduate decree in Urdu against the post of a subject in Science will be able to score higher quality point marks thereby eliminating a candidate who actually belongs to the same subject. The weightage therefore has to relate to the subject for which the post is advertised.
The matter does require scrutiny, inasmuch as, earlier also, writ petition no. 34698 of 2011 was filed in which this Court had called upon the respondent State to file a counter affidavit. A copy of the counter affidavit filed therein, has been placed before the Court but the same does not answer the aforesaid issue at all.
In the aforesaid circumstances, list this writ petition alongwith the connected writ petitions including writ petition no. 34698 of 2011 on 27th of February, 2013 by which time the respondent State shall also file a counter affidavit in the present writ petition as well and answer the issue raised and referred to hereinabove as well.
The selections that are proposed to be held on the basis of the said criteria shall abide by the final outcome of the writ petition. All the connected writ petitions would also be governed by this order.
Order Date :- 8.2.2013
Sahu
http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=2367049
************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 30
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6333 of 2013
Petitioner :- Ravindra Babu Shriwas And Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru Secy & Ors.
Petitioner Counsel :- Radha Kant Ojha
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Amreshwar Pratap Sahi,J.
Put up on Friday i.e. on 8.2.2013 alongwith the records of Writ Petition No. 52188 of 2012 and 24698 of 2011.
Order Date :- 5.2.2013
Sahu
http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=2359948
L T Grade, LT Grade, LT Grade Teacher Recruitment UP, LT Grade Teacher Uttar Pradesh,
उत्तर प्रदेश में एल टी ग्रेड शिक्षकों की भर्ती में पोस्ट ग्रेजुएट करने वालों को 15 अतिरिक्त अंको का चयन में बी=वेटेज दिया जा रहा था ,
लेकिन बहुत से लोग ऐसे भी थे जिन्होंने पोस्ट ग्रेजुएट किसी और विषय से किया था , और भर्ती में ग्रेजुएट विषय के शिक्षक बनने का लाभ उठा रहे थे ,
उदाहरणार्थ - किसी ने बी एस सी - गणित विषय ( गणित , भौतिकी , रसायन ) से किया और बाद में पोस्ट ग्रेजुएट किसी और विषय - भौतिकी , रसायन ,आर्ट्स , पत्रकारिता, कंप्यूटर, प्रोफेशनल कोर्सेस आदि आदि से कर लिया
ऐसे में सामान विषय में ग्रेजुएशन , पोस्ट ग्रेजुएशन करने वालों को नुक्सान हो रहा था, और वे लोग कोर्ट गए , और उसकी याचिका की कार्यवाही इस प्रकार है , 25 July 2013 ya iske baad kee karyvahee ka pata nahin chal paa raha hai : -
(इस से पहले महिला जी जी आई सी एल टी ग्रेड भर्ती में ग्रेजुएट , पोस्ट ग्रेजुएट विषय अलग अलग होने पर भी ग्रेजुएट विषय के टीचर बनने की बहुत सारी बातें सामने आयी थी ,, भर्ती कई राउंड में चली थी , और पता नहीं चला की भर्ती पूर्ण रूप से कम्प्लीट हुई की नहीं )
Important Point happens in Court is : -
even in the case of Science subject if the requirement is of a bachelors degree with Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics or Biology then in that event a post graduation degree in Arts will not be a degree against which quality point marks could be awarded under the Appendix - D.
for example a candidate possessing a post graduate decree in Urdu against the post of a subject in Science will be able to score higher quality point marks thereby eliminating a candidate who actually belongs to the same subject.
नोट: नयी एल टी ग्रेड शिक्षकों की भर्ती में पोस्ट ग्रेजुएट विषय के अतिरिक्त अंको को समाप्त कर दिया गया है
****************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 33
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6333 of 2013
Petitioner :- Ravindra Babu Shriwas And Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru Secy & Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Radha Kant Ojha
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,J.H. Khan
Hon'ble Manoj Misra,J.
Ref: Civil Misc. Impleadment Application No. 113669 of 2013
Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for and is allowed two weeks time to file rejoinder-affidavit to the impleadment application.
List this petition for admission before appropriate Court on 25.07.2013. When the petition is listed next, the name of Sri Vasistha Tiwari will be shown as one of the counsel for the respondents.
Order Date :- 11.7.2013
Sunil Kr Tiwari
***********
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 30
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6333 of 2013
Petitioner :- Ravindra Babu Shriwas And Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru Secy & Ors.
Petitioner Counsel :- Radha Kant Ojha
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Amreshwar Pratap Sahi,J.
Sri Upendra Singh, learned Standing Counsel states that a counter affidavit as desired by this Court is under preparation in respect of other reasons as well so as to provide complete information with regard to status of selections.
Put up on Tuesday next.
Order Date :- 12.3.2013
Manish
http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=2439902
****************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Court No. 30
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 6333 of 2013
Ravindra Babu Shriwas & Ors. Vs. State of U.P. & Anr.
With
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 6835 of 2013
Gaurav Tiwari & Ors. Vs. State of U.P. & Ors.
With
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 8847 of 2013
Ashutosh Sharma Vs. State of U.P. & Anr.
With
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 52188 of 2012
Km. Neelam Singh Vs. State of U.P. & Ors.
With
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 34343 of 2011
Pratibha Singh & Ors. Vs. State of U.P. & Anr.
With
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 34698 of 2011
Smt. Madhuri Devi & Anr. Vs. State of U.P. & Ors.
*****
Hon'ble A.P. Sahi,J.
These batch of writ petitions relate to an issue that was earlier raised in writ petition no. 34698 of 2011 and has again been raised in the other writ petitions which has been noted in the order passed in writ petition no. 6333 of 2013 on 8.2.2013. The dispute in short relates to the award of quality point marks as against the possession of a post graduate degree as per Rule 15(2) read with Appendix - D of the Uttar Pradesh, Subordinate Educational Service Rules, 1983.
The rules read with the appendix make a provision that a candidate has to be awarded quality point marks in accordance with the calculation given in the said appendix and if a candidate possesses a post graduate decree for appointment against Trained Graduate Teaching Post, then for first division marks fifteen quality point marks will be awarded, for second division, ten quality point marks will be awarded and for third division, five additional marks will be awarded.
The petitioners in all these writ petitions contend that this award of a post graduate degree weightage should be in respect of the subject concerned for which the selection is being made and not in any other subject. For illustration, if the selection is being made of a science teacher and he has subsequently obtained a post graduate degree in Arts then the same should not be counted for the purpose of weightage.
The learned Standing Counsel for the State had been granted time to file a counter affidavit whereafter the learned Additional Advocate General, Sri C.B. Yadav had appeared and had made a request that the matter be adjourned to enable him to obtain instructions in the matter.
The Government Order obtained through the Director of Education on 4th of March, 2013 is as follows:-
^^QSDl@le;c)
la[;k&368 @15&2&2013
isz"kd]
jktsUnz izlkn]
la;qDr lfpo]
mRrj izns'k 'kkluA
lsok esa]
f'k{kk funs'kd ¼ek0½
mRrj izns'k] y[kuÅA
f'k{kk vuqHkkx&2 y[kuÅ fnukad 4 ekpZ] 2013
fo"k;& fjV la[;k&6333@ 2013 Jh johUnz ckcw Jhokl o vU; ds laca/k esa ek0 U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 08-02-13 ds laca/k essa fnukad 05-03-13 dks izfr'kiFk&i= nkf[ky fd;s tkus laca/k esaA
egksn;]
mi;qZDr fo"k;d vkids i= la[;k&fu;qfDr¼,y0Vh0½ @2343@ 2012&13] fnukad 01-03-13 ds lanHkZ esa eq>s ;g dgus dk funsZ'k gqvk gS fd jktdh; ek/;fed fo|ky;ksa esa izf'kf{kr Lukrd osrudze ¼iq:"k 'kk[k½ dh HkrhZ m0iz0 v/khuLFk f'k{kk ¼izf'kf{kr Lukrd Js.kh½ lsok fu;ekoyh 1983 ¼;Fkk la'kksf/kr½ ¼izFke la'kks/ku½ lsok fu;ekoyh&1992 rFkk f}rh; la'kks/ku lsok fu;ekoyh] 2010 rFkk vf/klwpuk la[;k&05@15&2&27¼268½@ 2008 fnukad 03-01-2012 esa fufgr fu;ekoyh ds vUrxZr fu;e& 8] 14 rFkk fu;e& 15¼2½ ds vUrxZr ,oa ifjf'k"V&Mh ds vk/kkj ij vH;fFkZ;ksa ds p;u dh izfdz;k lEikfnr dh xbZ gSA fu;e& 15¼2½ ds vUrxZr ifjf'k"V&Mh esa fufgr fu;ekoyh esa LukrdksRrj mikf/k/kkjdksa dks dze'k% izFke Js.kh esa 15] f}rh; Js.kh esa 10 rFkk r`rh; Js.kh esa 05 vad fn;s tkus dh O;oLFkk fo|eku gSA
vr% mDr O;oLFkk ds vUrxZr ek0 mPp U;k;ky; dh vis{kkuqlkj fLFkfr Li"V djrs gq, izfr'kiFk&i= nkf[ky fd;s tkus dh dk;Zokgh lqfuf'pr djus dk d"V djsaA
¼jktsUnz izlkn½
la;qDr lfpo^^
Sri C.B. Yadav however inspite of these instructions which clearly indicate that the selections are being held as per Rules contends that if the argument of the petitioners is accepted then the court can proceed to correlate the possession of the post graduation degree to the subjects which have been mentioned in the qualification at the graduation level to be possessed by the candidate.
Learned counsel for the petitioners have not been able to counter this position taken by Sri C.B. Yadav and to the mind of the court the same also appears to be reasonable that the post graduation degree should be correlated to any of the subjects of the candidate for the post in question at the bachelors level, for example, if the requirement at the graduate level is of a bachelors degree in History, Geography, Political Science or Economics for the post of an Assistant Teacher General (History, Geography, Civics, Economics) then the post graduation degree should relate to any of the said four subjects.
***************
Similarly, even in the case of Science subject if the requirement is of a bachelors degree with Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics or Biology then in that event a post graduation degree in Arts will not be a degree against which quality point marks could be awarded under the Appendix - D.
************
This being the position, the matter could have been disposed of with the aforesaid interpretation in relation to the possession of a post graduation degree for the purpose of quality point marks as per Rule 15,
but in the meantime during the pendency of these writ petitions, it is informed that some selections have been finalized and candidates have joined on the basis of the selections held. At this juncture it may be relevant to point out that even with regard to previous years selection the order passed by the Court was clearly to the effect that any selections made shall be subject to the result of the writ petition against the advertisement then issued.
In the instant cases of the year 2013 a similar order has been passed on 8.2.2013. Accordingly, it would be appropriate that the State files an affidavit indicating as to the results which have been declared and appointments were made prior to passing of the interim order dated 8.2.2013 alongwith the names of the candidates alongwith their place of posting. It is further provided that the said affidavit shall be filed within a week.
The respondents shall in the light of what has been stated above shall now not proceed to issue any letter of appointment to a candidate who has been extended the benefit of quality point marks on the basis of a post graduate degree other than the subjects at the graduate level until further orders of the court.
Put up on Tuesday next.
A copy of the order may be given to the learned Standing Counsel, Sri Upendra Singh free of charges for communicating it to the authority within 24 hours.
Order date: 5.3.2013
Sahu
Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=2419133
*************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 30
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6333 of 2013
Petitioner :- Ravindra Babu Shriwas And Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru Secy & Ors.
Petitioner Counsel :- Radha Kant Ojha
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Amreshwar Pratap Sahi,J.
Heard Sri R.K. Ojha, learned counsel, for the petitioners and Sri C.B. Yadav, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Sri Upendra Singh, learned Standing Counsel, for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
Sri Yadav prays that he will be obtaining his instruction in the matter as this issue has been raised in a large number of petitions and shall be assisting the Court on the legal issues as framed in the order passed in the present writ petition.
He prays that the matter be taken up on Tuesday.
As prayed, put up on Tuesday.
Order Date :- 27.2.2013
Manish
http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=2408463
***************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 30
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6333 of 2013
Petitioner :- Ravindra Babu Shriwas And Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru Secy & Ors.
Petitioner Counsel :- Radha Kant Ojha
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Amreshwar Pratap Sahi,J.
Heard Sri R.K. Ojha, learned counsel for the petitioners.
This writ petition raises an issue on the ground of Article 14 of the Constitution of India whereby the petitioners contend that the criteria for awarding additional marks against the possession of a post graduate decree is irrational, inasmuch as, the selections are being held in particular subjects and therefore the award of marks in the post graduate decree should have a nexus with the subject in which the selections are being made. In short the weightage should be extended provided the post-graduate decree is in the subject concerned.
Sri Ojha submits that the criteria adopted violates Article 14, and as an illustration, Sri Ojha submits that a candidate being a graduate in Science applying against the post of Science, may be having the best qualifications in his subject, but he is likely to be superseded by a lesser meritorious candidate in the event such a candidate has a post graduate decree in a different subject. He therefore submits that for example a candidate possessing a post graduate decree in Urdu against the post of a subject in Science will be able to score higher quality point marks thereby eliminating a candidate who actually belongs to the same subject. The weightage therefore has to relate to the subject for which the post is advertised.
The matter does require scrutiny, inasmuch as, earlier also, writ petition no. 34698 of 2011 was filed in which this Court had called upon the respondent State to file a counter affidavit. A copy of the counter affidavit filed therein, has been placed before the Court but the same does not answer the aforesaid issue at all.
In the aforesaid circumstances, list this writ petition alongwith the connected writ petitions including writ petition no. 34698 of 2011 on 27th of February, 2013 by which time the respondent State shall also file a counter affidavit in the present writ petition as well and answer the issue raised and referred to hereinabove as well.
The selections that are proposed to be held on the basis of the said criteria shall abide by the final outcome of the writ petition. All the connected writ petitions would also be governed by this order.
Order Date :- 8.2.2013
Sahu
http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=2367049
************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 30
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6333 of 2013
Petitioner :- Ravindra Babu Shriwas And Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru Secy & Ors.
Petitioner Counsel :- Radha Kant Ojha
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Amreshwar Pratap Sahi,J.
Put up on Friday i.e. on 8.2.2013 alongwith the records of Writ Petition No. 52188 of 2012 and 24698 of 2011.
Order Date :- 5.2.2013
Sahu
http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=2359948
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)