UPTET : Handicap Candidate faces arbitrary treatment in T.E.T exam
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 30
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 37606 of 2013
Petitioner :- Km.Renu Pandey
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijay Gautam
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble V.K. Shukla,J.
Petitioner's submission before this Court is that she is visually impaired candidate� and as per condition no. 14 of the admit card visually impaired candidate was entitled to carry out one writer with her and rider was mention therein that said writer should not� be more than Intermediate pass and certificate should also be there. Petitioner submits that she appeared in the examination and writer Sumit Kumar S/o Gauri Shankar Yadav who has passed Intermediate examination in the year 2011 was with her. Petitioner submits that she was not permitted to utilise the service� of writer on account of the fact that invigilator in question informed that writer should have pass intermediate in academic year 2012-13. Petitioner submits that in view of this her answer sheet etc has taken away. Petitioner submits that arbitrary treatment has been metted to her as in the admit card no such requirement has been mentioned that only such writer is permitted who has passed Intermediate in academic session 2012-13. Petitioner has already represented the matter before the Deputy Director of Education (Secondary) Directorate U.P. at Allahabad.
Consequently, in the facts of the case Deputy Director of Education (Secondary) Directorate U.P. at Allahabad is direct to look into the grievance of the petitioner and redress the same preferably within next six weeks from the date of presentation of certified copy of the order passed by this Court by means of reasoned order.
With the above direction present writ petition is disposed of.�
Order Date :- 16.7.2013
Dhruv
****************
?Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 37606 of 2013
Petitioner :- Km.Renu Pandey
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijay Gautam
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. This writ petition relates to admission in T.E.T. and, therefore, is not cognizable by this Bench.
2. Put up tomorrow before appropriate Bench.
Order Date :- 15.7.2013
AK
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 37606 of 2013
Petitioner :- Km.Renu Pandey
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 3 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijay Gautam
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. This writ petition relates to admission in T.E.T. and, therefore, is not cognizable by this Bench.
2. Put up tomorrow before appropriate Bench.
Order Date :- 15.7.2013
AK
अक्तूबर से
