Join Uttar Pradesh Teacher Eligibility Test UPTET News

Wednesday, July 3, 2013

UPTET 2011 : Good News - Hon'ble Justice Sushil Harkol ji and and Hon'ble Justice Manoj Mishra ji will hear / dispose bunch cases related to UPTET

UPTET / टीईटी / TET - Teacher Eligibility Test Updates / Teacher Recruitment News

As per information displayed on Allahabad High court website, Cause list shown is -

Good News,

AT 10.00 A.M.

COURT NO.33

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUSHIL HARKAULI

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA

Fresh,order,admission,hearing and all listed Special Appeals arising out of serv

-ice and education matters, cases underIntellectual Property Rights, Medical Adm

-ission Matters on priority basis;AND Listed Misc. Writs upto the year 2008 for

Orders, Admission and hearing including Bunch Cases.

For Final Hearing/Disposal

22.       237/2013   SHIV KUMAR PATHAK AND OTHERS    V.K. SINGH               
                                                       G.K. SINGH
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       A.K. YADAV
 WITH SPLA- 150/2013   NAVIN SRIVASTAVA AND OTHERS     ABHISHEK SRIVASTAVA      
                                                       SHASHI NANDAN
                                                       ASHEESH MANI TRIPATHI
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       C.B.YADAV
                                                       BHANU PRATAP SINGH
 WITH SPLA- 149/2013   SUJEET SINGH AND OTHERS         NAVIN KUMAR SHARMA       
                                                       SHAILENDRA
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
 WITH SPLA- 152/2013   RAJEEV KUMAR YADAV              SADANAND MISHRA          
                                                       SEEMANT SINGH
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       SHYAM KRISHNA GUPTA
 WITH SPLA- 159/2013   ANIL KUMAR AND OTHERS           SIDDHARTH KHARE          
                                                       ASHOK KHARE
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       A.K. YADAV
 WITH SPLA- 161/2013   ALOK SINGH AND OTHERS           ABHISHEK SRIVASTASVA     
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       A.K. YADAV
                                                       R.A. AKHTAR
 WITH SPLA- 205/2013   AMAR NATH YADAV AND OTHERS      PANKAJ LAL               
                                                       INDRA RAJ SINGH
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       MRIGRAJ SINGH
                                                       B.P. SINGH
                                                       S. NADEEM AHMAD
 WITH SPLA- 206/2013   YAJUVENDRA SINGH CHANDDEL AND   KSHETRESH CHANDRA SHUKLA 
                       -ANOTHER
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       R.A. AKHTAR
 WITH SPLA- 220/2013   AMITESHWARI DUBEY AND OTHERS    MANOJ KUMAR DUBEY        
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. THRU' SECRY.  C.S.C.                   
                       - BASIC EDUCATION LOK. AND ORS. A.K. YADAV
                                                       R.A. AKHTAR
 WITH SPLA- 244/2012   DR. PRASHANT KUMAR DUBEY        ALOK MISHRA              
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
 WITH SPLA- 246/2013   PRIYANKA BHASKAR AND OTHERS     VIJAY SHANKAR TRIPATHI   
                                                       VINOD SHANKAR TRIPATHI
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       RAM CHANDRA SINGH
 WITH SPLA- 248/2013   UMA SHANKER PATEL AND OTHERS    NAVIN KUMAR SHARMA       
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       R.A. AKHTAR
                                                       A.K. YADAV
 WITH SPLA- 249/2013   DEVESH KUMAR AND OTHERS         NAVIN KUMAR SHARMA       
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       MRIGRAJ SINGH
                                                       R.A. AKHTA R
 WITH SPLA- 261/2013   SANJAY KUMAR AND OTHERS         HEMANT KUMAR RAI         
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       R.B. PRADHAN
 WITH SPLA- 262/2013   SANJAY KUMAR AND OTHERS         HEMANT KUMAR RAI         
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
 WITH SPLA- 264/2013   RAMA TRIPATHI AND OTHERS        HEMANT KUMAR RAI         
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
 WITH SPLA- 265/2013   NAGENDRA KUMAR YADAV AND OTHER  NAVIN KUMAR SHARMA       
                       -S
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       R.A. AKHTAR
                                                       SANJAY CHATURVEDI
 WITH SPLA- 266/2013   HARVENDRA SINGH AND OTHERS      NAVIN KUMAR SHARMA       
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       R.A. AKHTAR
                                                       Y.S. BOHAR
 WITH SPLA- 268/2013   RAJIV KUMAR SRIVASTAVA AND OTH  NAVIN KUMAR SHARMA       
                       -ERS
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       R.A. AKHTAR
                                                       B.P. SINGH
 WITH SPLA- 307/2013   VINEET KUMAR SINGH AND OTHERS   JAGDISH PATHAK           
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       A.K. YADAV
 WITH SPLA- 333/2013   SATENDRA SINGH AND OTHERS       R.K. MISHRA              
                                                       G.K. MISHRA
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       H.K. YADAV
                                                       ILLEGIBLE
 WITH SPLAD-200/2013   RAJPAL SINGH AND OTHERS         MURTUZA ALI              
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       AYANK MISHRA
                                                       R.A. AKHTAR
                                                       SHYAM KRISHNA GUPTA
 WITH SPLAD-227/2013   PRAVEEN KUMAR                   IRSHAD ALI               
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       SHYAM KRISHNA GUPTA
 WITH SPLAD-228/2013   MAHENDRA KUMAR VERMA AND OTHER  VIJAY CHAURASIA          
                       -S
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
 WITH SPLAD-302/2013   RAM BABOO SINGH AND OTHERS      NAVIN KUMAR SHARMA       
                                                       NEERAJ TIWARI
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       A.K. YADAV

************

May be before retirement, HON'BLE JUSTICE SUSHIL HARKAULI ji finalize UPTET bunch cases.

Shiksha Mitra UP News : शिक्षा मित्रों को 5000 मानदेय देने की तैयारी

लखनऊ। प्रदेश के 1.74 लाख शिक्षा मित्रों के लिए एक अच्छी खबर है। बेसिक शिक्षा विभाग उनका मानदेय 3500 से बढ़ाकर 5000 रुपये करने पर विचार कर रहा है। विभाग ने इस संबंध में एक प्रस्ताव बनाकर मुख्यमंत्री अखिलेश यादव के पास भेजा है। इस पर मुख्यमंत्री को अंतिम निर्णय करना है। मानदेय बढ़ाने से करीब 26.10 करोड़ रुपये का अतिरिक्त भार आएगा।

प्रदेश में सर्व शिक्षा अभियान के तहत प्राइमरी स्कूलों में वर्ष 2000 में शिक्षा मित्रों को रखने की प्रक्रिया शुरू हुई थी। मौजूदा समय प्राइमरी स्कूलों में तैनात 1.74 लाख शिक्षा मित्रों को 3500 रुपये प्रतिमाह मानदेय दिया जा रहा है। राज्य सरकार शिक्षा मित्रों को दो वर्षीय दूरस्थ शिक्षा के माध्यम से बीटीसी प्रशिक्षण कराकर शिक्षक बनाने की तैयारी कर चुकी है, पर शिक्षा मित्र चाहते हैं कि शिक्षक बनाए जाने तक उनका मानदेय 7300 रुपये कर दिया जाए। इसके लिए शिक्षा मित्रों ने प्रशिक्षु शिक्षकों के लिए तय किए गए मानदेय का उदाहरण दिया है।

उत्तर प्रदेश शिक्षा मित्र वेलफेयर एसोसिएशन और उत्तर प्रदेश शिक्षा मित्र संघ ने इसको लेकर दिल्ली के जंतर-मंतर पर धरना देने के साथ मानव संसाधन विकास मंत्रालय को ज्ञापन भी दिया था। वहां से प्रमुख सचिव बेसिक शिक्षा सुनील कुमार को मानदेय बढ़ाने संबंधी पत्र भेजा गया है। इसमें कहा गया है कि शिक्षा मित्रों का मानदेय बढ़ाने का अधिकार राज्य सरकार के पास है। इसके आधार पर बेसिक शिक्षा विभाग ने प्रस्ताव बनाकर मुख्यमंत्री कार्यालय भेजा है

Sabhaar : अमर उजाला

Tuesday, July 2, 2013

UPTET 2011 : 72825 Teacher Recruitment Case , Allahabad High court Doble Bench Change at new Judges - Justice Laxmi Kanta Mohapatra and Justice Sunita Agarwal will hear the case

UPTET / टीईटी / TET - Teacher Eligibility Test Updates / Teacher Recruitment News

As per some sources Bench comprising Justice Harkoli has changed and new Judges - Justice Laxmi Kanta Mohapatra and Justice Sunita Agarwal will hear the caseon 8th July 2013

About Justice Laxmi Kanta Mohapatra -

Name	Hon’ble Mr. Justice Laxmi Kanta Mohapatra Member Administrative Comm.
Source	Bar
Date of Birth	10/06/1954
Initial Joining	16/09/1999
Joining at Allahabad	17/10/2012
Date of Retirement	09/06/2016
Graduated in Law from M S Law College, Cuttack in 1977. Enrolled as an advocate on Jan 25, 1978. Practised mainly on Civil, Criminal, Service and Labour Laws. Was the retainer for South Eastern Railway, IPICOL, OSFC, Stock Exchange, Bhuwaneshwar, IMFA and others. Elevated as Judge of High Court of Orissa on Sep 16, 1999. Transferred to Allahabad High Court and took oath on Oct 17, 2012.
Posting	Allahabad
Address
E-mail Id	lkmohapatra@allahabadhighcourt.in

About Justice Sunita Agarwal -

Name	Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Sunita Agarwal (Addl.) Administrative Judge for the District: Sonbhadra
Source	Bar
Date of Birth	30/04/1966
Initial Joining	21/11/2011
Joining at Allahabad	21/11/2011
Date of Retirement	29/04/2028
Graduated in the Law from Awadh University in the year 1989. Enrolled as an advocate on December 16, 1990. Practised in Civil side at Allahabad High Court. Elevated as Additional Judge on Nov 21, 2011.
Posting	Allahabad

E-mail Id	sunitaagarwal@allahabadhighcourt.in

Source : http://www.allahabadhighcourt.in

***********************

Background of Case -

Hearing in Triple Bench and Decision And Important Parts (After this decision , Base of Selection etc matter

back to Double Bench of Allahabad High Court) -

Our court is fully aware of the huge problems that are being faced in this branch of elementary education with the influx of temporary methods of providing instruction through teachers like Shiksha Mitra and Preraks. In this background, the emphasis of quality teachers attains more importance.

This norm therefore cannot be diluted. Apart from this, the State Government has to take notice of the fact that weightage has to be given in the recruitment process as well

We wish to clarify that the binding effect of the notifications and the guidelines is such that the weightage which is contemplated under the guidelines dated 11th February, 2011 cannot be ignored. The minimum score that is required of a candidate is 60% to pass the teacher eligibility test. A concession of 5% has been made in favour of the reserved category candidates including the physically challenged and disabled persons.
This norm therefore cannot be diluted. Apart from this, the State Government has to take notice of the fact that weightage has to be given in the recruitment process as well. It is for the State Government to suitably adopt the said guidelines and we do not wish to add anything further at this stage as we are only concerned with the essentiality of the qualification of the teacher eligibility test to be possessed by any candidate aspiring to be appointed as a teacher.

We wish to make it clear that the law has to be followed in the manner in which it has been legislated. It cannot be diluted on account of the inaction of the State. In such circumstances all teachers whose appointment relate to the period after 23.8.2010 have to be possessed of TET.

There also the word qualification came up for consideration and the apex court after having noticed the requirement came to the conclusion that there has to be a uniform scrutiny of all the candidates as they are possessed of educational and training qualifications from different sources.

The questions that have been therefore framed by us are answered as follows:-

1. The teacher eligibility test is an essential qualification that has to be possessed by every candidate who seeks appointment as a teacher of elementary education in Classes 1 to 5 as per the notification dated 23.8.2010 which notification is within the powers of the NCTE under Section 23(1) of the 2009 Act.

2. Clause 3(a) of the notification dated 23.8.2010 is an integral part of the notification and cannot be read in isolation so as to exempt such candidates who are described in the said clause to be possessed of qualifications from the teacher eligibility test.

3. We approve of the judgment of the division bench in Prabhakar Singh's case to the extent of laying down the interpretation of the commencement of recruitment process under Clause 5 of the notification dated 23.8.2010 but we disapprove and overrule the ratio of the said decision in relation to grant of exemption and relaxation from teacher eligibility test to the candidates referred to in Clause 3 (a) of the notification dated 23.8.2010, and consequently, hold that the teacher eligibility test is compulsory for all candidates referred to in Clause 1 and Clause 3 (a).

Let the judgement be accordingly placed before the respective benches for appropriate orders.

Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=2617665

UPTET 2011 : 72825 Teacher Recruitment Case , Allahabad High court Doble Bench Change at new Judges - Justice Laxmi Kanta Mohapatra and Justice Sunita Agarwal will hear the case

UPTET / टीईटी / TET - Teacher Eligibility Test Updates / Teacher Recruitment News

As per some sources Bench comprising Justice Harkoli has changed and new Judges - Justice Laxmi Kanta Mohapatra and Justice Sunita Agarwal will hear the caseon 8th July 2013

About Justice Laxmi Kanta Mohapatra -

Name	Hon’ble Mr. Justice Laxmi Kanta Mohapatra Member Administrative Comm.
Source	Bar
Date of Birth	10/06/1954
Initial Joining	16/09/1999
Joining at Allahabad	17/10/2012
Date of Retirement	09/06/2016
Graduated in Law from M S Law College, Cuttack in 1977. Enrolled as an advocate on Jan 25, 1978. Practised mainly on Civil, Criminal, Service and Labour Laws. Was the retainer for South Eastern Railway, IPICOL, OSFC, Stock Exchange, Bhuwaneshwar, IMFA and others. Elevated as Judge of High Court of Orissa on Sep 16, 1999. Transferred to Allahabad High Court and took oath on Oct 17, 2012.
Posting	Allahabad
Address
E-mail Id	lkmohapatra@allahabadhighcourt.in

About Justice Sunita Agarwal -

Name	Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Sunita Agarwal (Addl.) Administrative Judge for the District: Sonbhadra
Source	Bar
Date of Birth	30/04/1966
Initial Joining	21/11/2011
Joining at Allahabad	21/11/2011
Date of Retirement	29/04/2028
Graduated in the Law from Awadh University in the year 1989. Enrolled as an advocate on December 16, 1990. Practised in Civil side at Allahabad High Court. Elevated as Additional Judge on Nov 21, 2011.
Posting	Allahabad

E-mail Id	sunitaagarwal@allahabadhighcourt.in

Source : http://www.allahabadhighcourt.in

***********************

Background of Case -

Hearing in Triple Bench and Decision And Important Parts (After this decision , Base of Selection etc matter

back to Double Bench of Allahabad High Court) -

This norm therefore cannot be diluted. Apart from this, the State Government has to take notice of the fact that weightage has to be given in the recruitment process as well

The questions that have been therefore framed by us are answered as follows:-

Let the judgement be accordingly placed before the respective benches for appropriate orders.

Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=2617665

UPTET 2013 : सवाल गलत तो परीक्षार्थियों का नहीं होगा नुकसान

UPTET / टीईटी / TET - Teacher Eligibility Test Updates / Teacher Recruitment News

-परीक्षार्थियों ने लगाई आपत्तियों की झड़ी

इलाहाबाद : राज्य शैक्षिक पात्रता परीक्षा (टीईटी) में यदि कोई सवाल और उसके उत्तर गलत पाए जाते हैं तो उससे परीक्षार्थियों का नुकसान नहीं होगा। अधिकारियों के अनुसार इसके दो ही उपाय हो सकते हैं कि या तो सवाल को हटा दिया जाए या फिर उसके नंबर सबको बराबर दे दिए जाएं। दोनों ही स्थितियों में परीक्षार्थियों के परिणाम पर असर नहीं पड़ेगा। हालांकि अभी यह तय नहीं हुआ है कि ऐसा स्थिति में क्या कया जाएगा।

टीईटी की उत्तरमाला वेबसाइट पर लोड होने के बाद से परीक्षार्थियों ने आपत्तियों की झड़ी लगा रखी है। यह संख्या मंगलवार को पांच सौ के करीब पहुंच गई बताई जाती है। कुछ सवालों पर तो परीक्षार्थियों ने प्रमाण के साथ यह बताया कि उनके उत्तर गलत हैं। सूत्रों के अनुसार सिर्फ प्राथमिक और अपर प्राथमिक परीक्षा ही नहीं बल्कि भाषा के सवालों पर भी परीक्षार्थियों ने सवाल उठाए हैं। अब विशेषज्ञ समिति इस पर विचार करेगी। परीक्षा नियामक प्राधिकारी कार्यालय से जुड़े लोग हालांकि इसे असहज नहीं मानते। उनका कहना है कि चूंकि आपत्तियां ईमेल से मांगी गई हैं, इसलिए उनकी संख्या अधिक है। यदि रजिस्ट्री के जरिए आपत्तियां मांगने की पुरानी प्रक्रिया को बरकरार रखा जाता तो उनकी संख्या कम होती।

रजिस्ट्रार विभागीय परीक्षाएं नवल किशोर स्पष्ट करते हैं कि आपत्तियों से परीक्षा का परिणाम पर कोई पेंच नहीं फंसेगा। यदि सवाल गलत होते हैं तो आम तौर पर दो ही निर्णय लिए जाते हैं कि या तो सवाल को निरस्त कर दिया जाए या फिर उनके नंबर बराबर बांट दिए जाएं। नंबर बांट दिए जाने की संभावनाएं ही अधिक हैं। यदि सवाल निरस्त कर दिया जाए तो उक्त नंबर को कम करके औसत का निर्धारण किया जाता है ताकि परीक्षार्थियों को नुकसान न पहुंचे

Sabhaar : Jagran ( 2.7.13)