सैकड़ों की संख्या में जे आर टी + पी आर टी दोनों में काउंसलिंग के याचियों को हाई कोर्ट ने अनुमति दी
आज सैकड़ों की संख्या में जे आर टी + पी आर टी दोनों काउंसलिंग के लिए याची कोर्ट पहुंचे ।
और
लोगों ने बड़ी संख्या में आपस में मिल कर चंदा एकत्र कर अदालत में याचिका
पेश कर दोनों जे आर टी + पी आर टी की काउंसलिंग की अनुमति ले ली
जज साहब सारे दिन ऐसे मामलों में बिजी रहे और तमाम लोगों का आज नंबर नहीं आया ,
और उनका नंबर कल आएगा । इस तरह से कल भी बड़ी संख्या में तमाम लोगों को जे आर टी + पी आर टी की काउंसलिंग की अनुमति मिलने वाली है
ऐसे तमाम केस हैं , एक ग्रुप ने 133 लोगों के साथ मिल कर जे आर टी + पी आर टी दोनों की काउंसलिंग की अनुमति ले ली :-
अभी बहुत से जे आर टी काउंसलिंग करा चुके आवेदकों ने टेट मार्क्स काम होने के कारण पी आर टी काउंसलिंग की तरफ रुख नहीं किया है ,
लेकिन जे आर टी व पी आर टी काउंसलिंग के आगामी चरण बढ़ने व जे आर टी में नियुक्ति पर स्टे बकरार रहने पर पर बहुत से लोग कोर्ट का
रुख कर सकते हैं
देखीय आज के तमाम केस -
Is case mein 133 Petitioners hain, aur Respondant 25 (Matlab Tamaam BSA bhee sammilt hain)
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 53130 of 2014
Petitioner :- Parul And 132 Ors
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 24 Ors
Counsel for Petitioner :- D.K. Singh,V.K. Singh
Counsel
for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.K. Yadav,B.P. Singh,Harendra Yadav,Jayram
Pandey,K.K. Chand,Mohd. Shere Ali,Mrigraj Singh,Nadeem Ahmad,R.B.
Pradhan,R.B. Yadav,R.P. Shukla,R.P. Singh,S.K. Chaudhary,Sanjay
Chaturvedi,Sanjay Kumar Srivastava,Santosh Kumar,Shyam Krishna
Gupta,Sunil Kumar Singh,U.S. Upadhyay
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J.
Learned
Counsel for the petitioners has made a request that the matter is
urgent as the counselling is going on and in case the matter is not
taken up, the petitioners shall suffer irreversible loss to their job
prospect.
With the consent of learned Counsel appearing for the parties, the matter is taken on the Board.
The
petitioners have preferred this writ petition for a direction upon the
respondents to permit them to appear in the counselling being conducted
for the recruitment of Assistant Teachers (Mathematics & Science) in
Senior Basic Schools and Trainee Teachers (Prashikshu Shikshak) in
Primary Schools run by the U.P. Board of Basic Education.
Learned
Counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners want to
participate in the counselling. He has placed reliance on an order dated
19.09.2014 passed in Writ-A No. 48111 of 2014 (Mayank Yadav and 6
others v. State of U.P. & 7 others), wherein this Court has issued a
direction to the respondents to allow the petitioners therein to
participate in the counselling for trainee teachers on the basis of
their duly attested educational testimonials.�
Learned Counsel for the respondent nos. 5 to 25 have not disputed the said fact.�
Accordingly,
a direction is issued upon the respondent nos. 5 to 25 to allow the
petitioners to participate in the current counselling without insisting
to submit their original testimonials. The petitioners are permitted to
submit their attested educational testimonials. Their selection shall
abide by the result of the writ petition.�
Reply be filed by all the respondents within six weeks. Rejoinder affidavit, if any may be filed within a week thereafter.
Tag this writ petition alongwith the record of Writ-A No. 48111 of 2014.�
Order Date :- 25.9.2014
SKT/DS/-
***************
?Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 52435 of 2014
Petitioner :- Ashutosh Pandey And 11 Ors
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Ors
Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Dubey
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C .
?Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 52568 of 2014
Petitioner :- Monika Yadav And 10 Ors
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 8 Ors
Counsel for Petitioner :- S.K. Mishra
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.K. Yadav,Mrigraj Singh,R.P. Shukla
Case Nos:
?Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 52478 of 2014
Petitioner :- Chetan Singh
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Ors
Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Sharma
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C .,K. Shahi
?Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 53128 of 2014
Petitioner :- Pratima Srivastava
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Ors
Counsel for Petitioner :- Tripurari Sharan Shukla
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashok Kumar Singh
?Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 52579 of 2014
Petitioner :- Sunil Singh And 9 Ors
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 9 Ors
Counsel for Petitioner :- R.K. Vaish
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,B.P. Singh,Pankaj Kumar Tyagi,R.C. Singh,S.C. Yadav,Shyam Krishna Gupta,V.K. Srivastav
