Wednesday, January 16, 2013

UPTET / Allahabad High court : Discussion on Facebook


UPTET / Allahabad High court : Discussion on Facebook

*******************
To Join My Group on Facebook, Click Here ->>>> 

*******************


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 

?Court No. - 38 

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 67396 of 2012 

Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar Shukla 
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Through Principal Secretary & Ors. 
Petitioner Counsel :- Ashok Kumar Singh 
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Harandra Yadav 

Hon'ble Arun Tandon,J. 
Counsel for the petitioner states that the writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn as relevant facts pertaining to making of the application under the advertisement dated 07th December, 2012 had not been stated. 
Writ petition is dismissed with liberty to file a proper petition disclosing the complete facts. 
Order Date :- 16.1.2013 
Pkb/ 






आज फेसबुक पर जो डिसकसन हुआ है कोर्ट की कार्यवाही को लेकर -

************
Tripathi Vishwesh
kuch order jo sunnane me aa raha hai.
1-HIGH Court me 16 jan ko Akhilesh
Tripathi ki writ hui kharij.
2-Upper agr aur Lower age vale hue
manya .
3-Bharti par nahi lag saki koi rok . 4-JINHONE MANUALLY SCERT KO
AVEDAN BHEJA HAI VO BHI HUYE
MANYA .
5-TET weightage jaisa koi case nahi hai
baki Court me. Vo sirf paisa pasoolne
ke liye kuch logo ki hai afvah. SP sarkar me hue badlav ko court me mana ja
chuka hai sahi . Ek anya case me: BTC
SBTC 2007.08 B.ed sm sbko division
bench se tet se choot 15 din k ander
niukti ka adesh.

*******************
Amit Singhania
मित्रोँ आज मुझे कुछ अनोखी चीज़ देखने को मिली । जिस समय कोर्ट मेँ सुनवायी हो रही थी और टण्डन जी एक-एक याचिका खारिज करते जा रहे थे, तो गुणाँक वाले भाइयोँ के चेहरे पर अजीब सी झुँझलाहट दिखायी पड़ रही थी और उस समय तो मुझे बड़ा ही अजीब लगा जब अखिलेश त्रिपाठी की याचिका खारिज हुयी तो मेरे बगल मेँ बैठे महान गुणाँकधारियोँ के चेहरे पे पसीना आ गया।
आखिर क्योँ???
टण्डन जी ने तो वही किया जो ये लोग चाहते थे, फिर भी मस्तक पर पसीना !
शायद इनको अपनी जीत मेँ भी हार का आभास हो गया है या फिर हम हार कर भी जीत गए हैँ?
Like ·  · Follow Post · 19 minutes ago via mobile
Vinay Pandey and Vijay Verma like this.

Raj Mishra Wo bhi yahi chahte rahe honge ki jabtak bharti poori na ho jaye case Tondon ki bench me hee rahe jisase unaki seat pakki rahe aur ab case single bench se kharij hone se shayad unako bhi SC ka dar satane laga hai.

******************
Anand Kumar
Aaj pehli baar up ke adhyay me talented aur yogya shikshako ka selection hone ja raha tha lekin pehle kapil uske baad govt ab hc s. bench aade aaya. Ab dekhna hai ki india ki sheersha nyaypalika inko rahat deti hai ya phir gise pite acd jo kisi tarah tet me pass ho gaye hai unke chayan ko theek thahraati hai. Waise up me single bench sadav govt ke fvr me decision aur sc uske against me decision deti hai. So pray to god sc give the right decision yani old advt jo game start hone se pehle bana tha aur sc ne jyadater cases me ise hi theek kaha hai.

************
Rajesh Pratap Singh
Aj jo hua,

1-15th amendment ke dwara purane vigyapan ko radd karna unlawful tha kyunki amendment prospective hota hai.
Par ye vacancy bad hai means add me technikal problem hai isliye ise kharij kr dena chahiye aur akhlsh tripathi ki writ kharij.

2-age ke mudde par relaxtion diya means 18 to 40,
inko 21 tak avedan krna hai kaisi ye odr se pata chalega.
Inhi logon ke sath jinhone purane avedan ki suchna scert bheji hai unhe bhi phir avedan karna hai.

3-advct anil tiwari je ne alag alag universts ke b'ed ke theory/practcl ke marks ka chart lekar aye the unhone 200/400 ke practcl se ane vale diff ko bahut achchi tarah se rakha aur kaha ki ye artical 14 ka voiletn hai use bhi nahi suna kharij kiya.
Waitg kharij kiya dena na dena sarkar ka right.

Good things,

ye mana ki post vahi hai vacancy vahi hai,
ye mana ki amendment prospectiv hota hai,
15 amendmnt se add radd krna unlawful.
Age ko mana. 

Db ka ground mazboot kiya.
Inka maqsad bharti krvana lag raha tha nyay nahi.

Hume inse aur kuch ki ummeed bhi nahi thi inse picha chuta ye kya kam hai.

Kal shailendraje ki writ par bahas hai satrday ko db me writ file ho jayegi.
Jai hind jai tet.


********************

आप अपने कमेन्ट, ब्लॉग पोस्ट पर सभ्य / उचित तरीके से दे सकते हैं 
आप लोग धेर्य रखें और अपनी बात को मर्यादित शब्दावली में यथोचित रूप से व्यक्त करें 


हालाँकि सही सुचना आपको कोर्ट का  ऑर्डर देख कर मिलेगी और सम्बंधित ख़बरें आप प्रतिष्ठित समाचार पत्रों के माध्यम से भी प्राप्त कर सकते हैं 
सही सूचना  के लिये सम्बंधित अधिकारीयों / विभागों से जानकारी प्राप्त की जा सकती है 

Note - For Correct information , You need to contact relevant authority / concerned department.


धन्यवाद 

Thanking you.

UPTET / Allahabad High court : Hearing Details Regarding Teacher Recruitment in UP


UPTET / Allahabad High court : Hearing Details Regarding Teacher Recruitment in UP


*******************To Join My Group on Facebook, Click Here ->>>> 

http://www.facebook.com/groups/uptetallinone/

*******************


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 

?Court No. - 38 
Civil Misc. Intervener Application No.5013 of 2013. 
��������������������������������� IN 

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 39674 of 2012 

Petitioner :- Akhilesh Tripathi & Others 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others 
Petitioner Counsel :- Siddharth Khare,Ashok Khare 
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,A.K. Yadav 

Hon'ble Arun Tandon,J. 
The applicants, who are six in number, seek intervention in the present proceedings. From the records, it is apparent that all the applicants had completed two years BTC training course from DIET at Allahabad in the year 2012. The exact date of completion of the BTC training has been disclosed as 17.12.2012 in paragraph 12 of the present application. 
This writ petition has been filed for quashing of the Government Order dated 26.07.2012. By means of the amendment application, prayer has been made to quash the Government Order dated� 31.08.2012, whereby the State Government decided to treat TET examination as a eligibility qualification and has decided to cancel the earlier advertisement, whereunder an assurance was notified that the candidates who have passed TET examination, shall be offered appointment on the basis of the marks secured in the said examination only.� The petitioners have also prayed for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to complete the process of appointment as per the advertisement dated 30.11.2011. 
In my opinion, the applicants, who were not even eligible� to make an application in terms of the advertisement dated 30.11.2011 � are neither necessary nor proper party in the present writ petition. Their application is therefore rejected. However, a right is reserved� in their favour to assist the Court during the course of arguments. 
Order Date :- 9.1.2013. 
Rks. 

**************************
Abhyartheyon ne BTC 2012 mein complete kee hai. Ve demand kar rahe the kee TET merit se bhrtee kee jaye aur Govt. ka TET ko patrta pariksha mane jane ko kharij kiya jaye.

Court ka kehna thaa kee jab ye candidate 30.11.2011 ke advertisement ke application ke leeye hee eligible nahin hai to inkee yachika ko kaise consider kiya ja saktaa hai aur isleeye inkee writ application rejected kar deee.

Agar aapke paas koee achhee vyakhyaa / interpretation ho to comment ke madhyam se de sakte hain.

UPTET : टीईटी पास अभ्यर्थियों ने लगाई गुहार


UPTET : टीईटी पास अभ्यर्थियों ने लगाई गुहार


इलाहाबाद। टीईटी पास बीएड अभ्यर्थियों ने मंगलवार को चन्द्रशेखर आजाद पार्क में बैठक करके शिक्षक भर्ती के विज्ञापन की शर्तों के अनुरूप मेरिट बनाने की मांग की है। इन अभ्यर्थियों का कहना है कि टीईटी के समय ही यूपी बोर्ड ने परीक्षा में शामिल होने वालों को भी अवसर देने की बात कही थी। अब भर्ती के समय उन्हें इस चयन से बाहर रखने का निर्णय मनमाना है


दरोगा भर्ती अम्यर्थियों का प्रदर्शन
इलाहाबाद। दरोगा भर्ती अभ्यर्थियों ने मंगलवार को फिर चंद्रशेखर आजाद पार्क में प्रदर्शन किया। अभ्यर्थियों ने मांग किया कि 50 प्रतिशत प्राप्त करने वालों को शारीरिक मानक परीक्षण में शामिल किया जाए।

News Source : Amar Ujala (16.1.13)

To Join UP Police SI Recruitment Group on Facebook, Click Here - http://www.facebook.com/groups/UPPoliceSIRecruitment/

UPTET : शिक्ष्‍ाक भ्‍ार्ती ः घर पहुंचेगा पुराने आवेदकों का पैसा


UPTET : शिक्ष्‍ाक भ्‍ार्ती ः घर पहुंचेगा पुराने आवेदकों का पैसा

*************
To Join UPTET Facebook Group , Click Here ->>>> 

http://www.facebook.com/groups/uptetallinone/

**************

इलाहाबाद(ब्यूरो)। सहायक अध्यापक भर्ती 2011 विज्ञापन के आधार पर आवेदन करने वाले लाखों आवेदकों का फीस का पैसा जल्द ही उनके घर पहुंचेगा। सभी आवेदकों के शुल्क वापस करने की प्रक्रिया शुरू हो गई है। शुल्क की राशि चेक के माध्यम से उनके घरों तक पहुंचेगी।

शुल्क वापसी के लिए आवेदकों को उन सभी जिलों के डायट में आवेदन करना होगा, जहां उन्होंने मूल बैंक ड्राफ्ट लगाया है।

 ड्राफ्ट और आवेदनपत्र की फोटोकॉपी समेत डायट द्वारा मांगे गए दस्तावेजों को उपलब्ध कराना होगा। क्रॉस चेकिंग के बाद आवेदकों को उनके दिए गए पते पर चेक के माध्यम से राशि भेजी जाएगी।


News Source : Amar Ujala (16.1.13)

Monday, January 14, 2013

UPTET/ Allahabad Highcourt : Tomarrow is Hearing of many connected cases related to UPTET/ Primary Teacher Recruitment


UPTET/ Allahabad Highcourt : Tomarrow is Hearing of many connected cases related to UPTET/ Primary Teacher Recruitment

CAUSE LIST ALLAHABAD

Additional Cause List
15/01/2013

Additional Cause List
15/01/2013

                    COURT NO.38
                    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN TANDON

                                      For Admission
 WRIT - A                                
   1. DF-TU 39674/2012 AKHILESH TRIPATHI & OTHERS      SIDDHARTH KHARE          
                                                       ASHOK KHARE
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS      C.S.C.                   
                                                       A.K. YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 76355/2011 SARASWATI SRIVASTAVA            SAROJ YADAV              
                       Vs. THE STATE OF U.P. AND OTHE  C.S.C.                   
                       -RS                             C.N.TRIPATHI
                                                       R.A.AKHTAR
 WITH WRIA- 76392/2011 SHIVANI
 Decided on 27/09/2012 Vs.THE STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
 WITH WRIA- 76595/2011 SABA ANJUM & OTHERS             INDRASEN SINGH TOMAR     
                                                       AMIT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ANOTHER     C.S.C.                   
                                                       K.S. KUSHWAHA
 WITH WRIA- 1442/2012  VASUDEV CHAURASIA & OTHERS      RAVINDRA PRAKASH SRIV.   
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS      C.S.C.                   
                                                       AKHILESH KUMAR
                                                       R.A. AKHTAR
 WITH WRIA- 75392/2011 VIJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI & ANOTHER  AJOY KUMAR BANERJEE      
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS      C.S.C.                   
                                                       K.A. USMANI
 WITH WRIA- 2614/2012  MAHESH CHANDRA                  BHUPENDRA PAL SINGH      
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS      C.S.C.                   
                                                       S.S. BHADAURIYA
 WITH WRIA- 2608/2012  MOHD. SADAB                     SYED IRFAN ALI           
                                                       MOHD. NAUSHAD
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS      C.S.C.                   
                                                       ILLEGIBLE
 WITH WRIA- 6826/2012  VIMLESH KUMAR                   ALOK KUMAR YADAV         
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS      C.S.C.                   
                                                       R.S. PRASAD
                                                       R.A. AKTAR
 WITH WRIA- 17607/2012 PAWAN KUMAR                     BHAWESH PRATAP SINGH     
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ANOTHER     C. S. C.                 
 WITH WRIA- 29/2012    SHIV PRAKASH KUSHWAHA           S.K. MISHRA              
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS      C.S.C.                   
                                                       RAJESHWAR SINGH
                                                       R.A. AKTAR
                                                       K.S.KUSHWAHA
 WITH WRIA- 24062/2012 KAUSHAL KUMAR SHUKLA AND OTHER  SUDEEP DWIVEDI           
                       -S
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
 WITH WRIA- 40323/2012 SHIV KUMAR PATHAK  & OTHERS     V.K. SINGH               
                                                       G.K. SINGH
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS      C.S.C.                   
                                                       A.K. YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 41286/2012 SANJAY KUMAR & OTHERS           NAVIN KUMAR SHARMA       
                                                       SHASHI NANDAN
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS      C.S.C.                   
                                                       A.K. YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 43114/2012 RAMA TRIPATHI & OTHERS          SANTOSH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA 
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS      C.S.C.                   
 WITH WRIA- 39664/2012 RATNESH KUMAR PAL & OTHERS      ABHISHEK SHUKLA          
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS      C.S.C.                   
                                                       R.A. AKHTAR
                                                       A.K. YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 76039/2011 YADAV KAPILDEV LAL BAHADUR
 Decided on 03/09/2012 Vs.STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS
 WITH WRIA- 49827/2012 SATYA DEV GANGWAR AND OTHERS    GOPAL JI RAI             
                                                       P.N.SAXENA
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.AND ANOTHER    C.S.C.                   
 WITH WRIA- 49509/2012 RAJ PAL SINGH AND OTHERS        MURTUZA ALI              
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.AND OTHERS     C.S.C.                   
                                                       R.A.AKHTAR
                                                       SHYAM KRISHNA GUPTA
 WITH WRIA- 49105/2012 SANJAY KUMAR AND OTHERS         HEMANT KUMAR RAI         
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       R.B. PRADHAN
 WITH WRIA- 49833/2012 ALOK KUMAR SINGH AND OTHERS     H.P.MISHRA               
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.AND OTHERS     C.S.C.                   
                                                       A.K.YADAV
                                                       B.P.SINGH
                                                       MRIGRAJ SINGH
                                                       S.N.AHMAD
 WITH WRIA- 51404/2012 RAMAGYA YADAV AND ANOTHER       SANJAY KUMAR YADAV       
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.AND OTHERS     C.S.C.                   
                                                       SANJAY CHATURVEDI
 WITH WRIA- 49587/2012 MAHENDRA KUMAR VERMA AND OTHER  B.R.SHARMA               
                       -S
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.AND OTHERS     C.S.C.                   
                                                       MOHD. SHERE ALI
 WITH WRIA- 45901/2012 MOHAN PANDEY & OTHERS           ARVIND KUMAR SINGH       
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS      C.S.C.                   
 WITH WRIA- 52182/2012 SURESH KUMAR AND ANOTHER        PRABHAT KR SRIVASTAVA    
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS      C. S. C.                 
                                                       R.A. AKHTAR
                                                       YATINDRA
 WITH WRIA- 51535/2012 VIJAY KUMAR MAURYA AND ANOTHER  R.P.YADAV                
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.AND OTHERS     C.S.C.                   
                                                       R.A.AKHTAR
                                                       C.N.TRIPATHI
 WITH WRIA- 60956/2012 SMT. KUSUM KUMARI               RAHUL MISHRA             
                                                       DILEEP CHANDRA MISHRA
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       R.A.KHAN
                                                       S.K.CHAUDHARY
 WITH WRIA- 63129/2012 RAJIV KUMAR SRIVASTAVA AND OTH  NAVIN KUMAR SHARMA       
                       -ERS
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       B.P.SINGH
                                                       R.A.AKHTAR
 WITH WRIA- 62668/2012 HARVENDRA SINGH AND ORS.        NAVIN KUMAR SHARMA       
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       R.A.AKHTAR
                                                       Y.S.BOHRA
 WITH WRIA- 62862/2012 AMITESHARI DUBEY AND OTHERS     RAJENDRA KUMAR PANDEY    
                                                       MANOJ KUMAR DUBEY
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       A.K.YADAV
                                                       R.A.AKHTAR
 WITH WRIA- 62714/2012 PRIYANKA BHASKAR AND OTHERS     VIJAY SHANKAR TRIPATHI   
                                                       VINOD SHANKAR TRIPATHI
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       R.C.SINGH
 WITH WRIA- 62690/2012 RAJEEV KUMAR AND ORS.           K.S.MISHRA               
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       A.K.YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 61549/2012 THAKUR DAS BHASKAR              VIJAY SHANKAR TRIPATHI   
                                                       VINOD SHANKAR TRIPATHI
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       R.C.SINGH
 WITH WRIA- 61826/2012 UMA SHANKER PATEL AND ORS.      NAVIN KUMAR SHARMA       
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       A.K.YADAV
                                                       R.A.AKHTAR
 WITH WRIA- 64659/2012 DEVESH KUMAR AND OTHERS         NAVIN KUMAR SHARMA       
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       MRIG RAJ SINGH
                                                       R.A.AKHTAR
 WITH WRIA- 64709/2012 MOHD.AFJAL ARVI AND OTHERS      SANJEEV KUMAR YADAV      
                                                       SOHAN LAL YADAV
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       A.K.YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 65124/2012 SWARN LATA DIVEDI               RISHI KANT RAI           
                                                       C.P.MISHRA
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.AND OTHERS     C.S.C.                   
                                                       SANJAY CHATURVEDI
 WITH WRIA- 64936/2012 KM. RICHA                       ABHISHEK SRIVASTAVA      
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.AND OTHERS     C.S.C.                   
                                                       S.C.YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 65452/2012 KM. NEHA RAI                    ATUL KUMAR               
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.  AND ANOTHER  C.S.C.                   
 WITH WRIA- 65201/2012 BHAVNA SRIVASTAVA               S.S.SAZALY               
                                                       ANAND SRIVASTAVA
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.AND OTHERS     C.S.C.                   
 WITH WRIA- 65444/2012 JITENDRA PRATAP SINGH AND OTHE  SIDDHARTH KHARE          
                       -RS                             ASHOK KHARE
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.AND OTHERS     C.S.C.                   
                                                       ASHOK KUMAR YADAV
                                                       ASHISH YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 65556/2012 C/M BANSIDHAR MAHAVIDALAYA, TH  RAJIV KUMAR TRIPATHI     
                       -RU. MANAGER UMESH CHANDRA& ORS P.N.SAKSENA
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS      C.S.C.                   
                                                       A.S.G.I.(2012/5850)
                                                       R.A.AKHTAR
 WITH WRIA- 64659/2012 DEVESH KUMAR AND OTHERS         NAVIN KUMAR SHARMA       
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       MRIG RAJ SINGH
                                                       R.A.AKHTAR
 WITH WRIA- 63691/2012 SANJAY KUMAR AND OTHERS         HEMANT KUMAR RAI         
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH PRINC  C.S.C.                   
                       -IPAL SECRETARY & ORS.          R.B.PRADHAN
 WITH WRIA- 65201/2012 BHAVNA SRIVASTAVA               S.S.SAZALY               
                                                       ANAND SRIVASTAVA
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.AND OTHERS     C.S.C.                   
 WITH WRIA- 65444/2012 JITENDRA PRATAP SINGH AND OTHE  SIDDHARTH KHARE          
                       -RS                             ASHOK KHARE
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.AND OTHERS     C.S.C.                   
                                                       ASHOK KUMAR YADAV
                                                       ASHISH YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 65452/2012 KM. NEHA RAI                    ATUL KUMAR               
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.  AND ANOTHER  C.S.C.                   
 WITH WRIA- 64709/2012 MOHD.AFJAL ARVI AND OTHERS      SANJEEV KUMAR YADAV      
                                                       SOHAN LAL YADAV
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       A.K.YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 64936/2012 KM. RICHA                       ABHISHEK SRIVASTAVA      
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.AND OTHERS     C.S.C.                   
                                                       S.C.YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 63964/2012 ARTI MISHRA                     V.K.AGNIHOTRY            
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH SECRE  C.S.C.                   
                       -TARY & ORS.                    A.K.YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 65124/2012 SWARN LATA DIVEDI               RISHI KANT RAI           
                                                       C.P.MISHRA
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.AND OTHERS     C.S.C.                   
                                                       SANJAY CHATURVEDI
 WITH WRIA- 65640/2012 ABHISHEK DUBEY AND ANOTHER      GIRIJESH TIWARI          
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS      C.S.C.                   
                                                       K.SHAHI
 WITH WRIA- 65713/2012 PRADEEP KUMAR JAISAWAL          GOPALJI RAI              
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS      C.S.C.                   
                                                       A.K.YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 65716/2012 ANKUR YADAV AND OTHERS          GOPALJI RAI              
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ANOTHER     C.S.C.                   
                                                       B.K.YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 65800/2012 SMT. MEENU                      VIJAY CHAURASIA          
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS      C.S.C.                   
                                                       SANTOSH KUMAR
 WITH WRIA- 65811/2012 ASHISH MISHRA                   SIDDHARTH KHARE          
                                                       ASHOK KHARE
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS      C.S.C.                   
                                                       PANKAJ KUMAR SINGH
 WITH WRIA- 65973/2012 SHOBHIT SHUKLA                  YOGISH KUMAR SAXENA      
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THRU PRINCIPA  C.S.C.                   
                       -L SECY. AND ORS.               S.K.PANDEY
 WITH WRIA- 65985/2012 MANOJ KUMAR BARNWAL             P.P.SRIVASTAVA           
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       AWADHESH KUMAR
 WITH WRIA- 66029/2012 PRASHANT RANJAN PANDEY AND OTH  SATYA PRAKASH PANDEY     
                       -ERS
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHER     C.S.C.                   
                                                       A.K.YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 66041/2012 RAJESH KUMAR                    SHEO KINKAR SINGH        
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH PRINC  C.S.C.                   
                       -IPAL SECRETARY & ORS.          A.K.YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 66067/2012 SHAILESH MANI TRIPATHI AND OTH  SADANAND MISHRA          
                       -ERS                            SEEMANT SINGH
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       S.K. GUPTA
 WITH WRIA- 66087/2012 BEAUTY SINGH                    ACHAL SINGH VATS         
                                                       RAJENDRA PRASAD
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. THRU SECY. B  C.S.C.                   
                       -ASIC EDUCATION AND ORS.        K.SHAHI
 WITH WRIA- 66208/2012 RAJESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA         SANJAY SINGH             
                                                       AKHILESH TRIPATHI
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       NISHEETH YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 66223/2012 ASHISH KUMAR KHARE              MANISH GOYAL             
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH SECRE  C.S.C.                   
                       -TARY BASIC EDUCATION AND OTHER C.K.RAI
 WITH WRIA- 66257/2012 KAILASH YADAV                   RAM JANM                 
                                                       PREM PRAKASH YADAV
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH PRINC  C.S.C.                   
                       -IPAL SECRETARY & ORS.          A.K.YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 66261/2012 BHARTI MISHRA                   GOPAL JI RAI             
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH PRINC  C.S.C.                   
                       -IPAL SECRETARY & ORS.          A.K.YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 66288/2012 KUMARI SWATI TRIPATHI AND ANOT  GOPAL JI RAI             
                       -HER
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THRU SECY BAS  C.S.C.                   
                       -IC EDUCATION & ORS.            S.K.PANDEY
 WITH WRIA- 66340/2012 AMBUJ UPADHYAY                  SRI PRAKASH MISHRA       
                                                       BAL MUKUND SINGH
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ORS.        C.S.C.                   
                                                       A.K. YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 66364/2012 SATYA PRAKASH SINGH  AND OTHER  P.K.TIWARI               
                       -S                              UJJAWAL PRATAP SINGH
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.AND OTHERS     C.S.C.                   
                                                       A.K.YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 66371/2012 ASHUTOSH YADAV AND OTHERS       SHYAM LAL YADAV          
                                                       AWADHESH KUMAR
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.AND OTHERS     C.S.C.                   
 WITH WRIA- 66374/2012 VINOD KUMAR                     JITENDRA SINGH           
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.AND OTHERS     C.S.C.                   
 WITH WRIA- 66011/2012 NAGENDRA KUMAR YADAV AND OTHER  NAVIN KUMAR SHARMA       
                       -S                              RAJESH GUPTA
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       R.A.AKHTAR
                                                       SANJAY CHATURVEDI
 WITH WRIA- 65556/2012 C/M BANSIDHAR MAHAVIDALAYA, TH  RAJIV KUMAR TRIPATHI     
                       -RU. MANAGER UMESH CHANDRA& ORS P.N.SAKSENA
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS      C.S.C.                   
                                                       A.S.G.I.(2012/5850)
                                                       R.A.AKHTAR
 WITH WRIA- 66822/2012 DIWAKAR SHUKLA AND ANOTHER      P.K.TIWARI               
                       Vs. STATE O FU.P.AND OTHERS     C.S.C.                   
                                                       A.K.YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 66825/2012 NIZAMUDDIN AND OTHERS           DARWARI LAL              
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.AND OTHERS     C.S.C.                   
 WITH WRIA- 66834/2012 MANOJ KUMAR DWIVEDI             NEERAJ PANDEY            
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.AND OTHERS     C.S.C.                   
                                                       PANKAJ TYAGI
 WITH WRIA- 66837/2012 JAYPRAKASH SUKLA                BRIJESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI 
                                                       RAJ KISHOR MISHRA
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.AND OTHERS     C.S.C.                   
 WITH WRIA- 66947/2012 LAL KRISHAN                     MADHU RANJAN PANDEY      
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH SECY   C.S.C.                   
                       -BASIC EDUCATION AND OTHERS     SANJAY KUMAR SINGH
 WITH WRIA- 66637/2012 SOBIT KUMAR                     ANURAG PATHAK            
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       PREM PRAKASH YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 66664/2012 SARVESH KUMAR                   KAMLESHWAR SINGH         
                                                       MAHENDRA SINGH RAJPOOT
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       SANJAY KUMAR SINGH
 WITH WRIA- 66695/2012 SHAILENDRA KUMARI               VIJAI KUMAR OJHA         
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       SAYED NADEEM AHMAD
 WITH WRIA- 66743/2012 SMT. GEETA UPADHYAY             PURUSHOTTAM UPADHYAY     
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS      C.S.C.                   
 WITH WRIA- 66562/2012 ADITYA PANDEY                   KAMLESHWAR SINGH         
                                                       MAHENDRA SINGH RAJPOOT
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       SANJAY KUMAR SINGH
 WITH WRIA- 66602/2012 KM. JYOTI SINGH                 D.P. SINGH               
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C                    
                                                       B.P. SINGH
 WITH WRIA- 67262/2012 DEVENDRA NARAYAN PANDEY AND OT
 Decided on 09/01/2013 -HERS
                       Vs.STATE OF U.P.THROUGH PRINC
                       -CIPAL SECRETARY & ORS.
 WITH WRIA- 67099/2012 THAKUR DAS BHASKAR              LAL PRABHAKAR SINGH      
                                                       SHARAD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH SECRE  C.S.C.                   
                       -TARY & ORS.                    A.K.YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 67126/2012 LOKENDRA SINGH AND OTHERS       V.P.GUPTA                
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH SECRE  C.S.C.                   
                       -TARY & ORS.                    R.A.AKHTAR
 WITH WRIA- 67150/2012 SRI BALAJI SENIOR SECONDARY ED  VINOD SINHA              
                       -UCATIONAL ACADEMY              VINAY KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH PRINC  C.S.C.                   
                       -IPAL SECRETARY & ORS.          A.K.YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 67153/2012 SANJAY KUMAR DIXIT AND ANOTHER  V.C.DIXIT                
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH PRINC  C.S.C.                   
                       -IPAL SECRETARY & ORS.          A.K.YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 67231/2012 SAROJ KUMAR SINGH AND OTHERS    SIDDHARTH KHARE          
                                                       ASHOK KHARE
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH PRINC  C.S.C.                   
                       -IPAL SECRETARY & ORS.
 WITH WRIA- 67279/2012 AMRISH KUMAR AGRAHARI           GOPAL JI RAI             
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH SECRE  C.S.C.                   
                       -TARY & ORS.                    ASHOK KUMAR
 WITH WRIA- 67284/2012 KM. VAISHALI KHANNA             MANISH KUMAR NIGAM       
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH SECRE  C.S.C.                   
                       -TARY & ORS.                    SANTOSH KUMAR
 WITH WRIA- 67361/2012 AJEET KUMAR SRIVASTAVA          VIKAS SHARMA             
                                                       SANJAY SINGH
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH SECY   C.S.C.                   
                       -BASIC EDUCATION & ORS.
 WITH WRIA- 67368/2012 VANDANA AGARWAL                 DINESH KUMAR CHADHA      
                                                       AJIT SINGH
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH PRINC  C.S.C.                   
                       -IPAL SECRETARY & ORS.          U.S.UPADHYAY
 WITH WRIA- 67371/2012 KM.ARTI                         R.K.PANDEY               
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH PRINC  C.S.C.                   
                       -IPAL SECRETARY & ORS.          R.B.YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 67374/2012 MADHU RANI                      MANJU R CHAUHAN          
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH PRINC  C.S.C.                   
                       -IPAL SECRETARY & ORS.          B.P.SINGH
 WITH WRIA- 67376/2012 VIKASH KUMAR JAIN               MANJU R CHAUHAN          
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH PRINC  C.S.C.                   
                       -IPAL SECRETARY & ORS.          SANJAY KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
 WITH WRIA- 67396/2012 ARVIND KUMAR SHUKLA             ASHOK KUMAR SINGH        
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH PRINC  C.S.C.                   
                       -IPAL SECRETARY & ORS.          HARANDRA YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 67399/2012 SHASHIMA SINGH                  ASHOK KUMAR SINGH        
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH PRINC  C.S.C.                   
                       -IPAL SECRETARY & ORS.          MRIGRAJ SINGH
 WITH WRIA- 67400/2012 DR.SAROJ BALA AND ANOTHER       ARUN KUMAR TRIPATHI      
                                                       DILIP KUMAR GOSWAMI
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH SECRE  C.S.C.                   
                       -TARY & ORS.                    A.K.YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 67414/2012 DILIP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA          PANKAJ KUMAR SRIVASTAVA  
                                                       SASMITA SRIVASTAVA
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH SECRE  C.S.C.                   
                       -TARY & ORS.                    A.K.YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 67474/2012 RAVINDRA NATH SHARMA            BABHRU VAHAN SINGH       
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH SECRE  C.S.C.                   
                       -TARY & ORS.
 WITH WRIA- 67479/2012 SEEMA SINGH                     ATUL PANDEY              
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH PRINC  C.S.C.                   
                       -IPAL SECRETARY & ORS.          B.P.SINGH
 WITH WRIA- 67484/2012 PRASHANT KUMAR SHARMA           MANISH YADAV             
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH SECRE  C.S.C.                   
                       -TARY & ORS.                    B.K.YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 67538/2012 SMT.NIDHI RASTOGI               BHARAT GARG              
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH SECRE  C.S.C.                   
                       -TARY & ORS.                    A.K.YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 67555/2012 YOGITA VERMA AND ANOTHER        LAXMI KANT               
                                                       KRISHNA KANT
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH PRINC  C.S.C.                   
                       -IPAL SECRETARY & ORS.          A.K.YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 68006/2012 KM. ARTI VALTAR  AND OTHERS     RAJ KUMAR MISHRA         
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH CHIEF  C.S.C.                   
                       - SECY AND OTHERS               A.K.YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 68105/2012 PANKAJ YADAV                    ABHISHEK MISHRA          
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH CHIEF  C.S.C.                   
                       - SECY. BASIC EDUCATION AND OTH SHRI MRIGRAJ SINGH
 WITH WRIA- 68034/2012 SUMAN UPADHYAY                  VIVEK YADAV              
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. &OTHERS       C.S.C.                   
                                                       A.K.YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 67999/2012 MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA               MAN MOHAN SINGH          
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH PRINC  C.S.C.                   
                       -IPAL SECRETARY & ORS.          B.P.SINGH
 WITH WRIA- 67992/2012 LAKSHMAN THAKUR                 MANOJ KUMAR SINGH        
                                                       GIRISH KUMAR SINGH
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH PRINC  C.S.C.                   
                       -IPAL SECRETARY & ORS.
 WITH WRIA- 67975/2012 ASHOK KUMAR SHUKLA              GHANSHYAM OJHA           
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH SECY   C.S.C.                   
                       -BASIC EDUCATION & OTHERS       R.P.SHUKLA
 WITH WRIA- 67931/2012 NIRBHAY NARAYAN RAI AND OTEHRS  RISHI KANT RAI           
                                                       PUNEET KUMAR VERMA
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       SANJAY CHATURVEDI
 WITH WRIA- 67920/2012 SANJAY KUMAR                    BABU LAL RAM             
                                                       GYANENDRA KUMAR
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
 WITH WRIA- 67903/2012 KM. SHIVANI TYAGI AND OTHERS    RAMESH PUNDIR            
                                                       SMT. REKHA PUNDIR
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       YATINDRA
 WITH WRIA- 67868/2012 MADHURI SINGH                   INDRASEN SINGH TOMAR     
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH PRINC  C.S.C.                   
                       -IPAL SECRETARY & ORS.          R.B.YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 67867/2012 KOMAL TRIPATHI                  S.D.S.JADAUN             
                                                       ARVIND SRIVASTAVA
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       ILLEGABLE
 WITH WRIA- 67857/2012 KM. MANISHA MISHRA              VISHWANATH MISHRA        
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       HARENDRA YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 67853/2012 VED PRAKASH SINGH & ANOTHER     SATYA PRAKASH PANDEY     
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. &OTHERS       C.S.C.                   
                                                       A.K. YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 67851/2012 VIJETA MALIK                    J.P.S.CHAUHAN            
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.AND OTHERS     C.S.C.                   
                                                       VIRENDRA CHAUBEY
 WITH WRIA- 67842/2012 ANIL KUMAR AND OTHERS           ATUL KUMAR SINGH         
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.AND OTHERS     C.S.C.                   
                                                       JAY RAM PANDEY
 WITH WRIA- 67840/2012 YOGESH KUMAR UPADHYAY & ANOTHE  HARI PRATAP GUPTA        
                       -R
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. &OTHERS       C.S.C.                   
                                                       SUNIL KUMAR SINGH
 WITH WRIA- 67834/2012 KM. SMITA                       ANURAG SHUKLA            
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH SECRE  C.S.C.                   
                       -TARY BASIC EDUCATION AND OTHER PANKAJ KUMAR SINGH
 WITH WRIA- 67832/2012 VARUN KUMAR YADAVE              VINOD KUMAR SHARMA       
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. &OTHERS       C.S.C.                   
                                                       SANJAY CHATURVEDI
 WITH WRIA- 67815/2012 KAMAL SHARMA                    SHEETLA SAHAI            
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH PRINC  C.S.C.                   
                       -IPAL SECRETARY & ORS.          A.K.YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 67812/2012 SHALINI AGARWAL                 DINESH KUMAR             
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.AND OTHERS     C.S.C.                   
                                                       A.K.YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 67809/2012 KM. HARHITA SINGH               PRAMOD KUMAR SINGH       
                                                       L.P.SINGH
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH PRINC  C.S.C.                   
                       -IPAL SECRETARY & ORS.          SANJAY CHATURVEDI
 WITH WRIA- 67801/2012 ASHISH KUMAR GUPTA &OTHERS      NISHANT KHARE            
                                                       PUNIT KHARE
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. &OTHERS       C.S.C.                   
                                                       A.K. YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 67783/2012 KM. RINKI                       MRITUNJAY KHARE          
                                                       KRISHAN JI KHARE
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH PRINC  C.S.C.                   
                       -IPAL SECRETARY & ORS.          A.K.YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 67779/2012 SMT. KIRTI SAXENA               S.P. SRIVASTAVA          
                                                       ASHISH SRIVASTAVA
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C                    
                                                       R.A. AKHTAR
 WITH WRIA- 67793/2012 Decided 
 WITH WRIA- 67750/2012 SMT. PRITI TIWARI               PATANJALI MISHRA         
                                                       R.P.DUBEY
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH SECRE  C.S.C.                   
                       -TARY & ORS.
 WITH WRIA- 67749/2012 AVINASH CHAND SHARMA            AWADHESH KUMAR SHARMA    
                                                       RANVIJAY KUMAR SHARMA
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH SECRE  C.S.C.                   
                       -TARY & ORS.                    K.SHAHI
                                                       D.K.YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 67740/2012 AVANEESH KUMAR YADAV AND OTHER  ABHISHEK SRIVASTAVA      
                       -S
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    R.A.AKHTAR               
                                                       A.K.YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 67717/2012 DEEPAK PARASHAR                 SUNIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA   
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       K.K.CHAND
 WITH WRIA- 68178/2012 RAGHVENDRA SINGH YADAV          KAMAL SINGH YADAV        
                                                       RAY SAHAB YADAV
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THRU SECY BAS  C.S.C.                   
                       -IC EDUCATION AND OTHERS        A.K.YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 68197/2012 MADHURI DEVI AND ANOTHER        INDRA RAJ SINGH          
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH PRINC  C.S.C.                   
                       -IPAL SECRETARY & ORS.          NISHEETH YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 68206/2012 PRAVEEN KUMAR                   IRSHAD ALI               
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH PRINC  C.S.C.                   
                       -IPAL SECRETARY & ORS.          SHYAM KRISHNA GUPTA
 WITH WRIA- 68229/2012 SAURABH YADAV                   AMBRISH KUMAR            
                                                       HIMANSHU
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THRU PRINCIPA  C.S.C.                   
                       -L SECY BASIC EDUCATION AND OTH SANJAY KUMAR SINGH
 WITH WRIA- 68234/2012 DAYA SHANKAR                    MANOJ KUMAR KESHARI      
                                                       BEERENDRA SINGH PAL
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THRU CHIEF SE  C.S.C.                   
                       -CRETARY  AND OTHERS
 WITH WRIA- 68236/2012 SHAILENDRA KUMAR SUMAN AND ANO  ANIL KUMAR               
                       -THER
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THRU SECY GOV  C.S.C.                   
                       -T. OF U.P. AND OTHERS          R.A.AKHTAR
                                                       ASHOK KUMAR
 WITH WRIA- 68241/2012 VINOD KUMAR YADAV               BAIJNATH YADAV           
                                                       SHARAD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH SECRE  C.S.C.                   
                       -TARY & ORS.                    A.K.YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 68242/2012 SHRUTI SINGH AND OTHERS         S.N.TIWARI               
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH SECRE  C.S.C.                   
                       -TARY SECONDARY EDUCATION & ORS
 WITH WRIA- 68245/2012 KM. SHIKSHA YADAV               SHASHANK SHEKHAR         
                                                       SHEO RAM SINGH
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH CHIEF  C.S.C.                   
                       - SECRETARY & ORS.              SHIVAM YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 50/2013    POONAM YADAV                    K.AJIT                   
                       Vs. STASTATE OF U.P.THROUGH SE  C.S.C.                   
                       -CRETARY & ORS.                 S.K.VERMA
 WITH WRIA- 80/2013    RAM KRISHNA SHUKLA              NARSINGH PANDEY          
                                                       R.S.UPADHYAY
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH PRINC  C.S.C.                   
                       -IPAL SECRETARY & ORS.          A.K.YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 68319/2012 SAVITA SINGH                    AJAY KUMAR SINGH         
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       NISHEETH YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 68333/2012 AVNISH KUMAR DUBEY              P.C.MISHRA               
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       S.K.VERMA
 WITH WRIA- 68361/2012 SHAILENDRA KUMAR TIWARI         RAJESH KUMAR DUBEY       
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       SHYAM KRISHNA GUPTA
 WITH WRIA- 68378/2012 NAVIN SRIVASTAVA  AND OTHERS    ASHEESH MANI TRIPATHI    
                                                       RAVINDRA TRIPATHI
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       A.K.YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 68398/2012 RANJANA GARG                    B.P.MISHRA               
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH SECRE  C.S.C.                   
                       -TARY & ORS.                    A.K.YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 68401/2012 VIJAY SINGH                     AWADHESH PRASAD          
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       R.B.PRADHAN
 WITH WRIA- 68409/2012 PRAMOD KUMAR                    P.N.TRIPATHI             
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH PRINC  C.S.C.                   
                       -IPAL SECRETARY & ORS.          R.A.AKHTAR
 WITH WRIA- 68423/2012 SAKET JAIN AND ANOTHER          GOPAL JI RAI             
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH SECRE  C.S.C.                   
                       -TARY & ORS.                    B.K.YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 68441/2012 NEELAM SAXENA                   VEENA SINGH              
                                                       P.C.SINGH
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       SUNIL KUMAR SINGH
 WITH WRIA- 68443/2012 VINOD PRAKASH SHARMA            S.P.SHARMA               
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       B.K.YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 68502/2012 VIBHA SRIVASTAVA                P.C.SRIVASTAVA           
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH PRINC  C.S.C.                   
                       -IPAL SECRETARY & ORS.          A.K.YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 68521/2012 SMT. ANJU                       S.P.SINGH                
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH PRINC  C.S.C.                   
                       -IPAL SECRETARY & ORS.          SUNIL KUMAR SINGH
 WITH WRIA- 68523/2012 SMT. SANGEETA DEVI              RAJESH NARAIN SRIVASTAVA 
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH SECRE  C.S.C.                   
                       -TARY & ORS.
 WITH WRIA- 68528/2012 PUSHPA CHAUBEY                  YASHPAL                  
                                                       RAJESH YADAV
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH PRINC  C.S.C.                   
                       -IPAL SECRETARY & ORS.          SUNIL KUMAR SINGH
 WITH WRIA- 68549/2012 PRASHANT MISHRA                 ASHOK GUPTA              
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. &OTHERS       C.S.C.                   
                                                       R.P. SHUKLA
 WITH WRIA- 68632/2012 KM. VARSHA CHAURASIA            ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY       
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. &OTHERS       C.S.C.                   
                                                       A.K. YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 365/2013   RANJEET SINGH YADAV AND ORS.    ABHISHEK SRIVASTAVA      
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THRU PRINCIPA  C.S.C.                   
                       -L SECRETARY & ORS.             A.K.YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 367/2013   KM. JYOTI AND OTHERS            ABHISHEK SRIVASTAVA      
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THRU PRINCIPA  C.S.C.                   
                       -L SECRETARY & ORS.             A.K.YADAV
 WITH WRIA- 381/2013   SMT. ARCHANA SHUKLA             B.D.PANDEY               
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P.THRU PRINCIPA  C.S.C.                   
                       -L SECRETARY & ORS.             K SHAHI



Source : http://allahabadhighcourt.in/causelist/judge.jsp (Allahabad HC ->>Additional Cause List -> Judge A Tandon

Shiksha Mitara / Allahabad Highcourt - SM Appointment and Right To Education Act


Shiksha Mitara / Allahabad Highcourt - SM Appointment and Right To Education Act, No Relief

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. - 30

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 533 of 2013

Petitioner :- Smt. Anita Devi
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru Secy & Ors.
Petitioner Counsel :- Ashok Kumar Rai
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Mahesh Narain Singh,Mrigraj Singh

Hon'ble V.K. Shukla,J.
Petitioner in the present case requests for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the District Basic Education Officer, Jaunpur, respondent No.3 to appoint the petitioner on the post of Shikshamitra in pursuance of order dated 19.07.2006 passed by the District Magistrate, Jaunpur. 

BTC/ Allahabad Highcourt : Candidature is rejected due to discrepancy in Marksheet


BTC/ Allahabad Highcourt : Candidature is rejected due to discrepancy in Marksheet

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH 

Court No. - 20 

Case :- MISC. SINGLE No. - 6891 of 2011 

Petitioner :- Ram Swarup 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Basic Education & Ors 
Petitioner Counsel :- Jitendra Singh 
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,R.K. Kushwaha,Shashi Prakash Singh 

Hon'ble Devendra Kumar Arora,J. 
Heard Shri Jitendra Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel and Shri Shashi Prakash Singh, learned counsel for Chhatrapati Shahuji Mahraj University, Kanpur. 
By means of present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned order dated 12.10.2011 passed by the District Magistrate, Lakhimpur Kheri, denying to admit the petitioner in Special B.T.C. Training-2007.  Petitioner is further seeking a writ in the nature of mandamus for commanding the opposite parties to consider and admit the petitioner, counting the marks of correct mark-sheet of B.A. third year and if he comes in the merit list then he may be sent for Special B.T.C. Training-2007. 

UPTET/ Allahabad Highcourt : Petitioner Candidate Obtains 82 Marks


UPTET/ Allahabad Highcourt : Petitioner Candidate Obtains 82 Marks and wants Qualify TET on Such Marks. Petition Dismissed and No Relief to Candidate


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 

?Court No. - 30 

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 383 of 2013 

Petitioner :- Kamta Prasad 
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru Special Secretary & Ors. 
Petitioner Counsel :- Manoj Kumar Yadav 
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Archana Tyagi 

Hon'ble V.K. Shukla,J. 
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Pankaj Tyagi, Advocate for respondents. 
Applications have been invited by means of advertisement dated 5th December, 2012 and the said advertisement in question proceeds to mention that only those candidates are eligible to apply, who have successfully passed the U.P. Teacher Eligibility Test. The said advertisement in question proceeds to mention that those candidates would be treated as eligible who in U.P. Teacher Eligibility Test have secured 60% marks and in reference to Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe and OBC category, who have received 55% marks. 
Accepted position is that petitioner has secured 54.67% marks as he has secured 82 marks in U.P. Teacher Eligibility Test out of 150 marks and petitioner's submission is that from the total number of 150 questions, it is an impossibility for a candidate to secure 55% marks as no candidate can achieve 82.5 marks in the said examination. Petitioner has further proceeded to mention that either a candidate will secure 82 marks which would mean 54.67% marks or 83 marks which would mean 55.33% marks and in view of this securing 55% marks by a candidate i.e. 82.5 is an impossibility. Petitioner in this background has contended that 54.67% marks should be rounded up and treated as 55% marks. 
Shri Manoj Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, contended that a practically impossible situation has been created as awarding of 82.5 marks which is equal to 55% marks is an impossibility and in view of this writ petition deserves to be allowed by considering 54.67 marks as 55%. 
Countering the said submission Shri Pankaj Tyagi, Advocate on the other hand contended that a candidate who has to be accepted as successful has to secure on the minimum side 55% marks and in view of this only those candidates who have secured 83 marks in U.P. Teacher Eligibility Test are being treated as eligible and 54.67% cannot be treated to be equivalent to 55%, as such present writ petition is liable to be dismissed. 
Question is can 54.67% marks in aggregate be treated minimum 55% in aggregate? Admittedly 54.67% marks in aggregate are less than 55% marks in aggregate. In view of this by no stretch of imagination it can be accepted that petitioner has to his credit the eligibility criteria so prescribed. Said issue in the past has already been negated by this Court, as per the judgement in the case of Ranjana Kushwaha Vs. state of U.P. 2009 (2) E&MC 94, wherein also requirement was 45% and candidate had received 44.8%, therein candidate have been held to be ineligible, and in the said judgement, have been the two earlier judgements have been referred to wherein 49.67% and 49.66% have not been accepted as equivalent to 50%, namely the case of Vani Pali Tripathi Vs. Director, 2003(1) UPLBEC 427; Pranjal Bishnoi Vs. U.P. Technical University 2003 (3) ESC 1470. In such a situation 54.67% marks cannot be treated as equivalent to 55% when emphasis is given in the eligibility criteria, to the minimum mark to be there, then said minimum makes has to be obtained by concerned candidate and there can not be any scope of compromise with the same by invoking principal of rounding up

Apex Court in the case of Orissa Public Service Commissioner. vs Rupashree Chowdhary & Anr (CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6201 OF 2011) decided on 02.08.2011 reported in 2011 (8) SCC 108 has taken view that in order to qualify in the written examination a candidate has to obtain a minimum of 33% marks in each of the papers and not less than 45% of marks in the aggregate in all the written papers in the Main examination. When emphasis is given in the Rules itself to the minimum marks to be obtained making it clear that at least the said minimum marks have to be obtained by the concerned candidate there cannot be a question of relaxation or rounding off. Relevant extract of the aforesaid judgement is being extracted below: 

"9. A bare reading of the aforesaid rules would make it crystal clear that in order to qualify in the written examination a candidate has to obtain a minimum of 33% marks in each of the papers and not less than 45% of marks in the aggregate in all the written papers in the Main examination. When emphasis is given in the Rules itself to the minimum marks to be obtained making it clear that at least the said minimum marks have to be obtained by the concerned candidate there cannot be a question of relaxation or rounding off. 
10. There is no power provided in the statute/Rules permitting any such rounding off or giving grace marks so as to bring up a candidate to the minimum requirement. In our considered opinion, no such rounding off or relaxation was permissible. The Rules are statutory in nature and no dilution or amendment to such Rules is permissible or possible by adding some words to the said statutory rules for giving the benefit of rounding off or relaxation. 
11. We may also draw support in this connection from a decision of this Court in District Collector & Chairman, Vizianagaram Social Welfare Residential School Society, Vizianagaram and Another. v. M. Tripura Sundari Devi reported in (1990) 3 SCC 655. In the said judgment this Court has laid down that when an advertisement mentions a particular qualification and an appointment is made in disregard of the same then it is not a matter only between the appointing authority and the appointee concerned. The aggrieved are all those who had similar or even better qualifications than the appointee or appointees but who had not applied for the post because they did not possess the qualifications mentioned in the advertisement. 
12. The entire record of the main written examination was also produced before us which indicates that there are also candidates who have got more than the respondent in the aggregate but has not been able to get 33% marks in each paper and have missed it only by a whisker. In case, the contention of the counsel appearing for the respondent is accepted then those candidates who could not get 33% marks in each paper in the Main written examination could and should have also been called for viva-voce examination, which would amount to a very strange and complicated situation and also would lead to the violation of the sanctity of statutory provision. 
13. When the words of a statute are clear, plain or unambiguous, i.e., they are reasonably susceptible to only one meaning, the courts are bound to give effect to that meaning irrespective of consequences, for the Act speaks for itself. There is no ambiguity in the language of Rule 24 leading to two conclusions and allowing an interpretation in favour of the respondent which would be different to what was intended by the Statute. Therefore, no rounding off of the aggregate marks is permitted in view of the clear and unambiguous language of Rule 24 of the Rules under consideration." 

The requirement under law is of having 55% marks by a candidate and in view of this a candidate who has secured less than 55% marks i.e. less than 82.5 marks in U.P. Teacher Eligibility Test, cannot be treated as eligible by any means and those candidates who have got less than 55% on plain mathematical calculation have been treated to be ineligible, accordingly, theory as has been suggested by petitioner that as it would be an act of impossibility cannot be accepted. 
Consequently no relief or reprieve can be accorded to the petitioner, and writ petition is accordingly, dismissed. 
Order Date :- 7.1.2013 
Shekhar 


UPTET / Allahabad Highcourt : Petitioner faces cancellation of appointment and after that he clears TET exam and obtain B. Ed degree


UPTET / Allahabad Highcourt : Petitioner faces cancellation of appointment and after that he clears TET exam and obtain B. Ed degree. Therefore as per Law he should be appointed on compassionate ground

*************
To Join My Group on Facebook, Click Here ->>>> 

http://www.facebook.com/groups/uptetallinone/
**************

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 

?Court No. - 30 
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1705 of 2013 
Petitioner :- Arun Kumar Gautam 
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru Principal Secretary & Ors. 
Petitioner Counsel :- Niraj Tiwari 
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Shri Mrigraj Singh 

Hon'ble V.K. Shukla,J. 
Petitioner submits that earlier he had been offered appointment on the post of Assistant Teacher (Untrained) vide order dated 30th July, 2011. Petitioner submits that thereafter the said appointment in question has been cancelled vide order dated 25th June, 2012. Petitioner further submits that he has got to his credit B.Ed. degree on 25th November, 2011 and now he has even cleared the Teacher Eligibility Test, in view of this petitioner submits that there is no legal impediment whatsoever in offering appointment to him on compassionate basis. 
Consequently, in the facts of the case, District Basic Education Officer, Jaunpur, is directed to consider and redress the grievance of petitioner for grant of appointment on compassionate basis, in accordance with law, preferably within next eight weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 
With these observations and directions, writ petition stands disposed of. 
Order Date :- 11.1.2013 
Shekhar 



UPTET / Allahabad Highcourt : Candidate/Petiotioner Demanded Interpretation of Clause 3 of Notification Regarding TET


UPTET / Allahabad Highcourt : Candidate/Petiotioner Demanded Interpretation of Clause 3 of Notification Regarding TET

*******************
To Join My Group on Facebook, Click Here ->>>> 
*******************

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 

?Court No. - 37 

Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 2366 of 2011 

Petitioner :- Prabhakar Singh And Others 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others 
Petitioner Counsel :- Siddharth Khare,Ashok Khare 
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,R.A. Akhtar,Rajiv Joshi 

Hon'ble Ashok Bhushan,J. 
Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J. 
This appeal along with other connected matters were heard and judgment was reserved on 16th October, 2012. 
One of the issues, which has been raised in some of the appeals, is regarding the interpretation of Clause 3 of notification dated 23rd August, 2010 issued in exercise of power conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 23 of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. Although some of the appellants have contended that without they having passed Teacher Eligibility Test, are eligible for appointment as Assistant Teacher to teach Class I to V but the stand of the State has not been clarified during the submissions regarding Clause 3 of the notification dated 23rd August, 2010. Thus it is necessary to further hear the learned counsel for the parties in above context. It is also necessary to note the steps taken by the State regarding appointment of teachers of basic schools during pendency of the appeal for deciding the appeals. 
Put up this appeal and other connected matters for further hearing on 10th January, 2013. 
Learned counsel for the parties be informed of the date fixed accordingly. 
Order Date :- 7.1.2013 
Rakesh 


UPTET : अभ्यर्थियों ने जलाई आदेश की प्रतियां


UPTET : अभ्यर्थियों ने जलाई आदेश की प्रतियां

To Join My Group on Facebook, Click Here ->>>> 

http://www.facebook.com/groups/uptetallinone/

बस्ती : बेसिक शिक्षा परिषद द्वारा प्रशिक्षु शिक्षक के पदों पर की जा रही भर्ती प्रक्रिया से वर्ष 2012 के बीएड डिग्री धारकों को बाहर किए जाने पर मंडल के चार हजार बीएड, टीईटी पास अभ्यर्थियों में गहरी नाराजगी है। परिषद के इस फैसले के विरोध में अभ्यर्थियों ने बैठक कर आंदोलन की रणनीति तैयार की और आदेश की प्रतियां जलाकर अपना विरोध दर्ज कराया।

सोमवार को जहां एक तरफ लोग मकर संक्रांति का पर्व मना रहे थे वहीं दूसरी तरफ बीएड और टीईटी पास अभ्यर्थी प्रशिक्षु शिक्षक भर्ती प्रक्रिया से बाहर किए जाने के विरोध में आयुक्त न्यायालय के सामने प्रदर्शन आदेश की प्रतियां जला रहे थे। इससे पहले अभ्यर्थियों ने बैठक कर आंदोलन की रणनीति तैयार की।

अभ्यर्थियों ने बताया कि बेसिक शिक्षा सचिव आइपी शर्मा ने यह कहा था कि वर्ष 2011-12 के बीएड और टीईटी पास अभ्यर्थी मान्य है यह बात उन्होने कभी नहीं कही कि वह भर्ती प्रक्रिया में सम्मिलित नहीं हा सकते। जब प्रदेश में हजारों छात्रों ने आवेदन कर दिया जो स्वीकार भी हो गए। अब यह कहना कि वर्ष 12 में पास अभ्यर्थियों का आवेदन अस्वीकार कर दिया गया है।

इस अवसर पर अमित सिंह, अजय पाल, कृष्ण विहारी पांडेय, दिनेश कुमार, मनोज कुमार, राजेश कुमार, प्रदीप कुमार और शिखा श्रीवास्तव सहित मंडल के तमाम और अभ्यर्थी मौजूद रहे

News Source : Jagran (14.1.13)