Monday, January 14, 2013

UPTET / Allahabad Highcourt : Candidate/Petiotioner Demanded Interpretation of Clause 3 of Notification Regarding TET


UPTET / Allahabad Highcourt : Candidate/Petiotioner Demanded Interpretation of Clause 3 of Notification Regarding TET

*******************
To Join My Group on Facebook, Click Here ->>>> 
*******************

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 

?Court No. - 37 

Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 2366 of 2011 

Petitioner :- Prabhakar Singh And Others 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others 
Petitioner Counsel :- Siddharth Khare,Ashok Khare 
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,R.A. Akhtar,Rajiv Joshi 

Hon'ble Ashok Bhushan,J. 
Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J. 
This appeal along with other connected matters were heard and judgment was reserved on 16th October, 2012. 
One of the issues, which has been raised in some of the appeals, is regarding the interpretation of Clause 3 of notification dated 23rd August, 2010 issued in exercise of power conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 23 of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. Although some of the appellants have contended that without they having passed Teacher Eligibility Test, are eligible for appointment as Assistant Teacher to teach Class I to V but the stand of the State has not been clarified during the submissions regarding Clause 3 of the notification dated 23rd August, 2010. Thus it is necessary to further hear the learned counsel for the parties in above context. It is also necessary to note the steps taken by the State regarding appointment of teachers of basic schools during pendency of the appeal for deciding the appeals. 
Put up this appeal and other connected matters for further hearing on 10th January, 2013. 
Learned counsel for the parties be informed of the date fixed accordingly. 
Order Date :- 7.1.2013 
Rakesh 


1 comment:

  1. KYA 2011-2012 WALON TUMHARA UPTET KA CERTIFICATE VALID H? NO BCOZ U ALL ARE NOT APPEARING CANDIDATES. ISLIYE COURT AND SARKAR TUMHARI KOI HELP NAHI KAR SAKTI.
    KOI MUJHE YE BATAYE KI YE 2011-2012 B.ED SESSION WALE KAISE IS BHARTI PRAKRIYA M SHAMIL HONE KA DAWA KAR RAHE HAIN AUR YE BAR BAR COURT JANE KI DHAMKI DE RAHE HAIN AUR SARKAR PAR DAWAV BANANE KI KOSHIS KAR RAHE HAIN. SARKAR AGAR KUCH KAR SAKTI TO WO SABSE PEHLE MUALLIM URDU DEGRE WALON KO TEACHER BANI LEKIN WO AISA NAHI KAR PA RAHI, KARAN H NCTE KI GUIDLINE JISKE ACCORDING BINA TET PASS KISI KO BHI PRIMARY YA UPPER PRIMARY TEACHER NAHI BANA SAKTE.
    JAB 2011 ME UPTET KA EXAM HUA THA TO USME KEWAL B.ED PASS YAB.ED APPEARING CANDIDATES KO SHAMIL KIYA GAYA THA NA KI UN CANDIDATES KO JINHONE 2011 M JULY M SESSION SHURU HONE PAR ADMISSION LIYA THA.
    APPEARING KA MATLAB HOTA H JO US YEAR EXAM ME BAITH RAHE HAIN JAB KOI EXAM HONA HAI YA EXAM DE CHUKE HON AUR RESULT KA WAIT KAR RAHE HON.
    2011-2012 WALE CANDIDATES KA EXAM 2012 M HUA THA AUR RESULT BHI 2012 M AAYA THA AUR IN ME SE KISI NE BHI NOV 2011 WALE ADVERTISEMENT M FORM NAHIN DALA THA.
    SABSE BADI BAT HAI KI 2011-2012 B.ED SESSION WALON KA UPTET KA CERTIFICATE HI VALID NAHI HAI TO NA TO HIGHCOURT NA HI SUPREME COURT AUR NA HI SARKAR INKI KOI MADAD KAR SAKTI HAI.
    PEHLE PROVE KARKE TO DIKHAO KI 2011-2012 WALE B.ED SESSION K UPTET KA CERTIFICATE VALID HAI.
    JAB UPTET KA CERTIFICATE HI VALID NAHI HAI TO CHAHE DHARNA DE LO YA ANSHAN KAR LO KYA FAYDA

    ReplyDelete

To All,
Please do not use abusive languages in Anger.
Write your comment Wisely, So that other Visitors/Readers can take it Seriously.
Thanks.