Thursday, February 21, 2013

UP AnganBari Recruitment : फिर लटक सकती हैं आंगनबाड़ी नियुक्तियां


UP AnganBari Recruitment : फिर लटक सकती हैं आंगनबाड़ी नियुक्तियां


- हाईकोर्ट के शासनादेश निरस्त करने के बाद बदले हालात

- आरक्षण प्रक्रिया को भी समाप्त करने के आदेश

 एटा: बाल विकास एवं पुष्टाहार विभाग में नियुक्तियों के लिए जारी शासनादेश भी हजारों आवेदकों को राहत देता नहीं दिख रहा। हाईकोर्ट ने इसे निरस्त कर नियुक्तियों में आरक्षण प्रक्रिया पर रोक लगाने के निर्देश जारी किये हैं। इनका पालन कराने के लिए शासन को चार सप्ताह का समय दिया है। ऐसी स्थिति में नियुक्तियां फिर अटकेंगी।

रिक्त व नये आंगनबाड़ी केंद्रों की नियुक्ति प्रक्रिया पिछली सरकार से ही अटकी थी, जिसके बाद सपा सरकार ने नियुक्तियों के लिए निर्देश देकर शासनादेश जारी करने की कार्रवाई भी शुरू करा दी थी। इसी प्रक्रिया के बीच में हाईकोर्ट की लखनऊ पीठ में प्रोविंशियल चाइल्ड डवलमेंट प्रोजेक्ट ऑफीसर्स वेलफेयर एसोसिएशन की ओर से याचिका दायर की गई। इसमें नये शासनादेश व आरक्षण व्यवस्था को लेकर विरोध व्यक्त किया गया। इसी के अनुरूप हाईकोर्ट ने शासन व विभाग को झटका देते हुए शासनादेश निरस्त व आरक्षण पर रोक लगाने के निर्देश जारी किये हैं

चूंकि एटा व कासगंज क्षेत्रों में भी सैकड़ों पदों पर नियुक्तियां होनी हैं। इस कारण हजारों महिलाओं ने वर्कर पदों के लिए अपने आवेदन किये थे। पहले से ही लेटलतीफी को लेकर आवेदक महिलाएं परेशान थीं, लेकिन हाईकोर्ट के निर्देशों के बाद उनकी परेशानी और बढ़ती नजर आ रही है। यदि नियुक्त प्रक्रिया निरस्त होकर पुन: शुरू हुई तो एक बार फिर हजारों आवेदकों को निराश होना पड़ेगा।

इस संबंध में जिला कार्यक्रम अधिकारी एटा एस.के. शुक्ला का कहना है कि अभी तक शासन से किसी तरह के निर्देश नहीं मिले हैं। इस कारण पूर्व निर्देशों के अनुरूप नियुक्ति की कार्रवाई जारी है। जो भी अग्रिम निर्देश मिलेगा, उसी के अनुरूप कार्रवाई की जायेगी


News Source : Jagran (Updated on: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 08:28 PM (IST)) /  http://www.jagran.com/uttar-pradesh/etah-10153429.html
*********************
UP Police Recruitment : एक माह के लिए भर्ती स्थगित
   
बरेली: पुलिस लाइन में चल रही भर्ती परीक्षा एक महीने के लिए स्थगित कर दी गयी है।

एसएसपी आकाश कुलहरि ने बताया कि पुलिस लाइन में चल रही शारीरिक दक्षता परीक्षा को एक माह तक स्थगित किया गया है। अग्रिम तिथि पुलिस भर्ती एवं प्रोन्नति बोर्ड लखनऊ द्वारा ही निर्गत की जाएगी


News Source : Jagran (Updated on: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:41 AM (IST))/ http://www.jagran.com/uttar-pradesh/bareilly-city-10151544.html
*************************

Many other big recruitment in UP like Police Recruitment, 72825 Teacher Recruitment etc. faces problems.

And lakhs of candidates expecting earliest recruitment as recruitment matter continues from a long time.

UPTET : सहायक अध्यापक भर्ती मामले में सुनवाई टली


UPTET : सहायक अध्यापक भर्ती मामले में सुनवाई टली

सरकार ने मांगा समय, 27 को होगी सुनवाई

इलाहाबाद। प्रदेश में 72,825 सहायक अध्यापकों के चयन और नियुक्ति के मामले में मंगलवार को सुनवाई टल गई। प्रदेश सरकार की ओर से जवाब दाखिल करने के लिए और समय दिए जाने की मांग को स्वीकार करते हुए अदालत ने सुनवाई के लिए 27 फरवरी की तिथि नियत की है। मामले की सुनवाई न्यायमूर्ति सुशील हरकौली और न्यायमूर्ति मनोज मिश्र की खंडपीठ कर रही है। पूर्व में न्यायालय ने सहायक अध्यापक भर्ती प्रक्रिया को रोकने को आदेश दिया था। यह रोक अगले आदेश तक प्रभावी रहेगी।
प्रदेश सरकार की ओर से अपर महाधिवक्ता सीबी यादव ने कहा कि टीईटी परीक्षा में धांधली के मामले में बरामद हार्ड डिस्क की फोरेंसिक लैब रिपोर्ट अभी प्राप्त नहीं हो सकी है इसलिए जवाब दाखिल करने के लिए और समय दिया जाए। कोर्ट ने उनकी मांग को मंजूर करते हुए सुनवाई के लिए 27 फरवरी की तिथि नियत की है


News Source : Amar Ujala (21.2.2013)
*********************************************
To See HC Order -


UPTET / Allahabad Highcourt : Stay on Primary Teacher Recruitment Extended Till 27th February 2013

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 

?Court No. - 33 

Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 150 of 2013 

Petitioner :- Navin Srivastava And Others 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others 
Petitioner Counsel :- Abhishek Srivastava,Shashi Nandan 
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Bhanu Pratap Singh,C.B.Yadav 

Hon'ble Sushil Harkauli,J. 
Hon'ble Manoj Misra,J. 
The learned Additional Advocate General seeks an adjournment till 27th February, 2013. 
As prayed by him, list this case along with all connected cases on 27th February, 2013. Interim order will continue till the next date of listing. 


(Manoj Misra,J.) � � (Sushil Harkauli,J.) 
Order Date :- 20.2.2013 
S.Prakash



Wednesday, February 20, 2013

UPTET / Allahabad Highcourt : Stay on Primary Teacher Recruitment Extended Till 27th February 2013


UPTET / Allahabad Highcourt : Stay on Primary Teacher Recruitment Extended Till 27th February 2013

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 

?Court No. - 33 

Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 150 of 2013 

Petitioner :- Navin Srivastava And Others 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others 
Petitioner Counsel :- Abhishek Srivastava,Shashi Nandan 
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Bhanu Pratap Singh,C.B.Yadav 

Hon'ble Sushil Harkauli,J. 
Hon'ble Manoj Misra,J. 
The learned Additional Advocate General seeks an adjournment till 27th February, 2013. 
As prayed by him, list this case along with all connected cases on 27th February, 2013. Interim order will continue till the next date of listing. 


(Manoj Misra,J.) � � (Sushil Harkauli,J.) 
Order Date :- 20.2.2013 
S.Prakash

*********************
As per information shared on Facebook by candidates,
Hearing information -

प्रदेश में की जा रही 72825 शिक्षकों की भर्ती प्रक्रिया एक बार फिर लटक गयी है। हाईकोर्ट में दायर याचिका की आज बुधवार को सुनवाई होनी थी। जिस पर टीईटी अभ्यर्थियों की निगाहें टिकी हुईं थीं लेकिन हाईकोर्ट में तारीख आगे बढ़ जाने की सूचना मिल रही है। अगली तारीख 27 फरवरी बतायी गयी है। सूत्रों के मुताबिक अगली 27 तारीख तक सरकार ने यूपी टीईटी की सीडी व हार्डडिस्क की फोरेंसिंक जांच लखनऊ में कराने की बात कही है। जिसके बाद हाईकोर्ट ने सरकार को समय देकर अगली तारीख 27 फरवरी दे दी है।
विदित हो कि प्रदेश में बसपा शासन काल में ही 72 हजार 825 पदों के लिए प्रशिक्षु सहायक अध्यापकों की भर्ती के लिए 2011 में विज्ञापन जारी किया गया था। जिसके आधार पर प्रदेश में लाखों अभ्यर्थियों ने आवेदन किये। लेकिन बाद में टीईटी परीक्षा में घोटाला घपला सामने आने के बाद भर्ती प्रक्रिया अदालती कार्यवाही में लटक गयी। जिसके बाद प्रदेश में शासन बदल गया और जिसके साथ ही भर्ती प्रक्रिया की तस्वीर भी बदल दी गयी व पिछला विज्ञापन व भर्ती प्रक्रिया निरस्त कर दी गयी।
समाजवादी पार्टी के शासनकाल में दोबारा भर्ती का खाका तैयार कर गुणांक मैरिट के आधार पर आवेदन 7 दिसम्बर 2012 को आवेदन मांगे गये। जिसके क्रम में प्रदेश में लगभग 69 लाख अभ्यर्थियों ने आवेदन किये। 22 जनवरी को कटआफ मैरिट भी जारी कर दी गयी। लेकिन 4 फरवरी को जैसे ही काउंसलिंग शुरू की गयी तो हाईकोर्ट ने इस पर रोक लगा दी। हाईकोर्ट ने उत्तर प्रदेश सरकार से टीईटी में पायी गयीं धांधली के साक्ष्य मांगे। जिस पर अब उत्तर प्रदेश सरकार साक्ष्य जुटाने में लगी है। अब माना जा रहा है कि यदि उत्तर प्रदेश सरकार पुख्ता सबूत न जुटा पायी तो भर्ती प्रक्रिया का क्या होगा।
बुधवार 20 फरवरी को जिस पर सुनवाई होनी थी। आज मात्र 10 मिनट सुनवाई हुई। अगली सुनवाई की तिथि 27 फरवरी निश्चित की गई है। कोर्ट को सरकारी वकील द्वारा बताया गया कि पूरकहलफनामा तथ्यों की जाँच के बाद उपलब्धकराया जा सकेगा । मामले की जाँच अभी पूरी नही हो पाई है । जिस पर उच्च न्यायालय ने सुनवाई की अगली तारीख 27 फरवरी कर दी है


UPTET : Allahabad Highcourt Hearing on 20 Feb 2012 (Today) Regarding Stay on 72825 Primary Teachers Recruitment


UPTET : Allahabad Highcourt Hearing on 20 Feb 2012 (Today) Regarding Stay on 72825 Primary Teachers Recruitment




CAUSE LIST ALLAHABAD
Cause List
20/02/2013
AT 10.00 A.M.
COURT NO.33
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUSHIL HARKAULI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA

29. DF 150/2013 NAVIN SRIVASTAVA AND OTHERS ABHISHEK SRIVASTAVA 
SHASHI NANDAN
Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS C.S.C. 
C.B.YADAV
BHANU PRATAP SINGH
WITH SPLA- 149/2013 SUJEET SINGH AND OTHERS NAVIN KUMAR SHARMA 
SHAILENDRA
Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS C.S.C.


********************************
On Facebook, Candidates are discussing that may be Government has not given counter , therefore date may extend also OR depends on DB.
****************************
29. DF    150/2013   NAVIN SRIVASTAVA AND OTHERS     ABHISHEK SRIVASTAVA      
                                                       SHASHI NANDAN
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       C.B.YADAV
                                                       BHANU PRATAP SINGH
 WITH SPLA- 149/2013   SUJEET SINGH AND OTHERS         NAVIN KUMAR SHARMA       
                                                       SHAILENDRA
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
 WITH SPLA- 152/2013   RAJEEV KUMAR YADAV              SADANAND MISHRA          
                                                       SEEMANT SINGH
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       SHYAM KRISHNA GUPTA
 WITH SPLA- 159/2013   ANIL KUMAR AND OTHERS           SIDDHARTH KHARE          
                                                       ASHOK KHARE
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       A.K. YADAV
 WITH SPLA- 161/2013   ALOK SINGH AND OTHERS           ABHISHEK SRIVASTASVA     
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       A.K. YADAV
                                                       R.A. AKHTAR
 WITH SPLA- 205/2013   AMAR NATH YADAV AND OTHERS      PANKAJ LAL               
                                                       INDRA RAJ SINGH
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       MRIGRAJ SINGH
                                                       B.P. SINGH
                                                       S. NADEEM AHMAD
 WITH SPLA- 206/2013   YAJUVENDRA SINGH CHANDDEL AND   KSHETRESH CHANDRA SHUKLA 
                       -ANOTHER
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                                                       R.A. AKHTAR
 WITH SPLA- 220/2013   AMITESHWARI DUBEY AND OTHERS    MANOJ KUMAR DUBEY        
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. THRU' SECRY.  C.S.C.                   
                       - BASIC EDUCATION LOK. AND ORS. A.K. YADAV
                                                       R.A. AKHTAR

http://allahabadhighcourt.in/causelist/courtA.jsp


Tuesday, February 19, 2013

UPTET : Amazing in HC, petitioner has not qualified the Teachers' Eligibility Test

UPTET : Amazing in HC, petitioner has not qualified the Teachers' Eligibility Test wants compassionate appointment
Kamaaal hai, See -

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH 

?Court No. - 6 
Case :- SERVICE SINGLE No. - 552 of 2013 
Petitioner :- Km. Pankshi Singh 
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru Its Secy.Basic Edu.Civil Sect.Lucknow &Ors 
Petitioner Counsel :- Anurag Srivastava 
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C. 

Hon'ble Shabihul Hasnain,J. 
Heard Sri Anurag Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ghaus Beg for opposite party No.s 4 to 6 and learned Standing counsel for the State. 
Petitioner was granted compassionate appointment after the death of his father on the post of Assistant Teacher vide order dated 30.9.2011.
He says that the same is being sought to be taken away vide annexure No.2 dated 9.7.2012. Counsel for the opposite party says that that the petitioner has not qualified the Teachers' Eligibility Test (in short T.E.T). Petitioner says that once an appointment has been given to her in pursuance of a statutory law, the same can not be taken away. It is further argued that T.E.T. is a written test, which should not be forced upon the petitioner for compassionate appointment.
On the other hand, learned counsel for opposite parties has placed before this Court judgment and order of this Court passed at Allahabad in a petition bearing Writ-A No.33828 of 2012. He says that
benefit of this appointment can not be given to the petitioner unless he has qualified T.E.T. as has been held in aforesaid judgment. 
Learned counsel for the petitioner has, however, submitted that the said order is under challenge in special appeal and the special appeal is pending before this Court at Allahabad. He says that compassionate appointemnt is a benevolent law which should be interpreted in all possible ways to help a person whose bread earner has been snatched away by the cruel hands of death. The sudden penury which strikes the family is sought to be nullified by the authorities under Dying in Harness Rules. 
Under the circumstances, the petition is finally disposed of with a direction to the opposite parties to consider the case of the petitioner for the compassionate appointemnt on another suitable post for which the petitioner is eligible under Dying in Harness Rules applicable for appointment. The same shall be decided expeditiously, say within a maximum period of one month from the date a certified copy of this order is placed before him. 
The termination of petitioner's services shall remain subject to the final decision of the special appeal which is pending before this Court at Allahabad. 
Order Date :- 1.2.2013/RKM. 


Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=2353989
*****************************
Meree samjah mein decision nahin aa rahe hain,
Kya Mritak Aashrit ke leeye TET must hai.
Abhee pichle decsion mein to mujhe lagta hai ki TET jarooree nahin batayaa.Please koee explain kare.
Thanks,

UPTET : BA / BSc 50% + B Ed Candidates are Eligible to Become Teachet AND TET Qualification can be Obtained till 2014


UPTET : BA / BSc 50% + B Ed Candidates are Eligible to Become Teachet AND TET Qualification can be Obtained till 2014

Jahan tak mene decision padaa aur samjhaa hai, uske anusaar B Ed candidates ko TET(PRT) ke leeye UP Sarkar Ne Kendra se 31 March 2014 tak Relaxation le leeyaa hai.
इसलिये बी एड धारियों को 2014 तक टी ई टी पास करने की छूट मिल गयी है 
अगर आप इस निर्णय को पढ़ कर कुछ सुधार /जानकारी जोड़ना चाहें 
तो कमेन्ट के माध्यम से दे सकते हैं 
I am not a legal expert, and therefore for authenticity/ and better understanding, you can obtain 
authentic copy from Allahabad HC and can take help of legal expert to better understand below decision.


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 

Court No. - 30 

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5471 of 2013 

Petitioner :- Vineet Kumar Singh And Ors. 
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru Principal Secretary & Ors. 
Petitioner Counsel :- Jagdish Pathak 
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C. 

Hon'ble V.K. Shukla,J. 
Petitioners have approached this Court with a request to declare the UPTET Certificate 2011 of such candidates invalid, who have taken admission in their B.Ed. Course after the last date of filling of the application forms of examination of UPTET 2011 i.e. 18.10.2011 for which the examination has been held on 13th November, 2011 in view of the eligibility rules framed for UPTET 2011 and further prayer has been made that such candidates be not considered for appointment on the post of teachers in primary schools in pursuance of advertisement dated 7th December, 2012
Under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act 2009, the National Council for Teachers Education (NCTE) was authorized to lay down the qualifications and as per the qualification laid down by NCTE, a candidate for the recruitment on the post of Assistant Teacher in Government schools is required to possesses TET qualification in addition to his academic and training qualification. The Central Government enacted the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act 2009 on 26.08.2009 in which under Section 23 it is provided that any person possessing such minimum qualification as laid down by the Academic Authority authorized by the Central Government by notification shall be eligible for appointment as a Teacher. While exercising power under Section 23 (1) the Central Government issued notification on 31.03.2010, by which, the Central Government authorized the NCTE as Academic Authority to lay down the minimum qualification for a person to be eligible for appointment as a Teacher. 
After getting authorization under Section 23 (1) of the Act of 2009, the NCTE issued notification dated 23.08.2010 whereby the qualification was prescribed for the recruitment on the post of Assistant Teacher in Government schools in which in addition to the academic qualification and training, another qualification which is Teachers' Eligibility Test (TET) has been inserted and in the notification it has been specifically provided that candidates should pass the TET to be conducted by the appropriate Government in accordance with the guidelines framed by NCTE for the said purpose. After issuance of the aforesaid notification, another notification dated 29.07.2011 was issued by the NCTE whereby certain amendments were made in the qualification by the NCTE, but the eligibility of passing TET remained the same. 
Appointment as Assistant Teacher to Junior Basic Schools is made in accordance with the procedure prescribed under U.P. Basic Education Teachers Service Rules 1981. In pursuance of the guidelines prescribed by NCTE aforesaid rules have been amended by the State Government vide notification dated 09.11.2011, which is a basis of selection for appointment as Assistant Teacher. The aforesaid amendment is apart from other qualifications specified for the appointment. The candidate must have passed U.P. Teachers Eligibility Test as an essential qualification for getting such appointment as Assistant Teachers. The NCTE issued guidelines vide letter dated 11.02.2011 for introducing TET as an essential qualification for appointment as Assistant Teachers in classes I to VIII under the provisions of Section 23 of Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act 2009. In pursuance of the aforesaid guidelines dated 11.02.2011 issued by NCTE, the State Government has issued Government Order dated 07.09.2011 for conducting TET examination in the state of U.P. In pursuance of the aforesaid Government Order, U.P. Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad at Allahabad issued advertisement dated 26.09.2011 seeking applications for the TET examination from the eligible candidates, who have passed B.Ed. course. The educational qualification required for appearing in TET examination 2011 was having obtained graduate degree with B.Ed. 
The State Government made several amendments regarding the TET examination 2011 including the amendment notification dated 24.09.2011 stating therein again the eligibility qualification of graduate followed by certificate of B.Ed. course. Thereafter, the State Government had issued another notification dated 04.10.2011 making some amendments in the minimum qualification for appearing in UPTET examination, where a new amendment has been made that such candidates, who are appearing in the B.Ed. examination are also permitted to appear in the U.P. Teacher Eligibility Test Examination 2011. 
Petitioners' submission is that due to misinterpretation of the amendment introduced on 04.10.2011 thousands of candidates, who were not entitled even to appear in U.P. Teacher Eligibility Test Examination 2011, have been allowed to appear in the said examination and have also been issued the UPTET certificate for the year 2011. Petitioners submit that such issuance of certificate is against the spirit of amendment dated 04.10.2011 as well as against the eligibility criteria required for Teacher Eligibility Test. Petitioners in this background submit that the merit of the selected candidates would be raised on a higher side. Petitioners have submitted that only the B.Ed. certificate obtained in the session 2010-11 can be accepted to be valid degree and the B.Ed. certificate obtained in the session 2011-12 could not have been entertained and accordingly requisite relief be accorded. At this juncture present writ petition has been filed with the prayer mentioned above. 
Shri Jagdish Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that as per the amendment, which has been so made only appearing candidates were permitted to appear in U.P. Teacher Eligibility Test 2011 and accordingly the candidates of academic session 2011-12 cannot be accepted as appearing candidates, and in view of this, such candidates were ineligible for undertaking U.P. Teacher Eligibility Test 2011 and accordingly requisite relief be accorded by this Court. 
Countering the said submission learned Standing Counsel on the other hand contended that Teacher Eligibility Test is merely an essential qualification to enable incumbents to be appointed as a teacher and in view of this once a conscious decision has been taken to permit such incumbents also, who were in the process of acquiring B.Ed. degree i.e. who were in the process of undertaking examination, then to non-suit their certificate of Teacher Eligibility Test on said grounds cannot be accepted and specially in the background that candidates who have passed BA/BSc with 50% and are B.Ed. are fully eligible for appointment as Assistant Teacher without having passed TET examination, as per the judgment of this Court in Special Appeal No. 2366 of 2011, Prabhakar Singh and others Vs. State of U.P. and others, delivered on 16.01.2013. 
After respective arguments have been advanced the factual situation which is so emerging in the present case that the eligibility criteria which has been so prescribed for undertaking Teacher Eligibility Test, a candidate was required to have B.Ed. degree to his credit along with graduation degree. The said eligibility criteria had been subsequently modified on 04.10.2011 and as per the same, apart from an incumbent, who has to his credit graduation degree along with one year B.Ed. degree incumbents, who were to appear in the examination of B.Ed. were also entitled to apply. Petitioners submit that in this background the candidates, who have got degree of B.Ed. in the year 2011-12 cannot be said to be appearing candidates at the time of filling up the application form of U.P. Teacher Eligibility Test 2011 and accordingly cannot be accepted as eligible. Candidates, who have obtained their B.Ed. Degree after passing TET examination 2011 should be restrained from participating in process of selection in pursuance of Advertisement dated 07.12.2012. As of date, said arguments are neither here nor there, as candidates having passed BA/BSc with 50% and B.Ed. have been accepted as eligible, as they have been accorded relaxation from TET upto 31.03.2014 by the Central Government. Said aspect of the matter has been examined at length in Special Appeal No. 2366 of 2011, Prabhakar Singh and others Vs. State of U.P. and others, decided on 16.01.2013. Accordingly, no relief or reprieve can be given to petitioners and present writ petition is dismissed accordingly
Order Date :- 31.1.2013 
Shekhar 




UPTET : Allahabad HighCourt Dismissed Selection Through TET Merit


UPTET : Allahabad HighCourt Dismissed Selection Through TET Merit


It is a SINGLE BENCH Decision, And DB Hearing Which is to be Happen Tomorrow will Have Great Impact On Recruitment

************************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 

?Court No. - 30 
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5746 of 2013 
Petitioner :- Dharmendra Kumar Singh And Others 
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru Principal Secretary & Ors. 
Petitioner Counsel :- Kausar Raza Faridi 
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Sunil Kumar Singh 

Hon'ble V.K. Shukla,J. 
In the present case petitioner has requested to quash Para-10 of the Government Order dated 05.12.2012 regarding selection process on the basis of academic qualification and marks is concerned. 
Challenge which has been so made cannot be entertained for the simple reason that the criteria in question has been prescribed under U.P. Basic Education (Teachers) Service Rules 1981. Once criteria which has been mentioned in the Government Order dated 05.12.2012 is backed and based on the aforesaid Rules in question then challenge as has been made by the petitioner cannot be entertained. In view of this prayer no. 1 cannot be accorded by any means. 
As far as prayer no. 2 is concerned, wherein request� has been made to prepare the list of eligible candidates for Apprentice Teacher in the Primary School Governed by the Uttar Pradesh Basic Shiksha Parishad on the basis of marks obtained by the petitioner in U.P. Teacher Eligibility Test 2011 is concerned suffice is to mention that prescribed procedure for making selection and appointment has also been provided under U.P. Basic Education (Teachers) Service Rules 1981 wherein Rules 14 clearly proceeds to mention that marks in question are to be computed as per Appendix-II and therein prescribed criteria has also been prescribed providing� the way and manner in which marks is to be computed.� 
Once such is the factual situation that selection and appointment is governed by statutory Rules then relief as has been claimed by means of prayer no. 2 cannot be subscribed. 
Consequently, present writ petition is dismissed. 
Order Date :- 1.2.2013 
Dhruv 


UPTET Breaking NEWS : TET is NOT MANDATORY to Become TECHER (RTE)


UPTET Breaking NEWS : TET is NOT MANDATORY to Become TECHER (RTE)

Jahan tak Mene Padaa Aur Samjhaa Hai, Uske Anusaar 
(Yadi Mein Kahin Galat hoon is Judgemenyt ko Padne Mein to Aaap Comment Ke Madhyam Se Sahee Judgement keee Jaan Karee / Vichaar De Sakte Hain) 
-



I felt from statement -
"Once such is the factual situation that candidates, who have passed B.A./B.Sc. with 50% and are B.Ed. being fully eligible for appointment as Assistant Teacher to teach classes 1 to 5 as per Clause 3 of the notification dated 23rd August, 2010, as amended from time to time, are entitled to be considered for their appointment on vacant posts of Assistant Teachers in classes 1 to 5, even they have not cleared TET examination. "
****************

Kuch candidaten B. Ed 2012 vaalon ko bhrtee se OUT karne ke leeye unkee TET Qualification ko Sahee Nahin Batayaa, Aur Court Mein Petition Daalee.

Jis par High Court ne bolaa kee TET is NOT Mandatory Qualification as per notification dated 23rd August, 2010.

 Isleeye in Candidates ke pass TET Qualification hai kee Nahin, usse koee Fark nahin Padtaaa.


See Complete Judgement -

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 

?Court No. - 30 

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5749 of 2013 

Petitioner :- Ravindra Kumar Yadav And Anr. 
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru Principal Secretary & Ors. 
Petitioner Counsel :- Alok Kumar Yadav 
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Mrigraj Singh 

Hon'ble V.K. Shukla,J. 
Petitioners by means of the present writ petition have requested before this Court to issue writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents not to consider the candidature of the candidates, who have passed their B.Ed. Examination after 25th November, 2011 or 1st January, 2012. 
Petitioners' submission is that due to misinterpretation of the amendment introduced on 04.10.2011 thousands of candidates, who were not entitled even to appear in U.P. Teacher Eligibility Test Examination 2011, have been allowed to appear in the said examination and have also been issued U.P. TET Certificate for the year 2011, in view of this, as they were ineligible to appear in U.P. TET Examination 2011, accordingly, such a restriction be imposed upon them. 
The request, as has been made by petitioners, cannot be accepted as of now and the arguments, which have been advanced, is of no avail for the simple reason that in Special Appeal No. 2366 of 2011 (Prabhakar Singh and others Vs. State of U.P. and others) decided on 16th January, 2013 following directions have been issued. 
"In the result all the Special appeals are disposed of with the following directions: 

(i)The appellants/other eligible candidates who have passed BA/BSc with 50% and are B.Ed being fully eligible for appointment as Assistant Teacher to teach Classes I to V as per Clause 3 of the notification dated 23rd August, 2010, as amended from time to time, are entitled for consideration for their appointment on vacant posts of Assistant Teachers in Classes I to V. The State authorities including the concerned District Basic Education Officers are directed to consider the claim of such persons while considering the appointment on the post of Assistant Teacher in institutions to teach Classes I to V. 

(ii)The State is directed to issue a corrigendum so that all eligible candidates as per clause 3 of the notification dated 23.8.2010 as amended i.e. candidates having 50% marks in B.A./B.Sc. with B.Ed. should also be permitted to participate in the ongoing process of appointment of trainee teachers. At least 15 days time be allowed to submit applications by abovementioned candidates. 

(iii)The prayer of the appellants possessing BTC/Special BTC qualifications obtained after 23.8.2010 to issue direction to appoint them giving benefit of paragraph 5 of the notification dated 23rd August, 2010 cannot be accepted. 

Parties shall bear their own costs." 
Once such is the factual situation that candidates, who have passed B.A./B.Sc. with 50% and are B.Ed. being fully eligible for appointment as Assistant Teacher to teach classes 1 to 5 as per Clause 3 of the notification dated 23rd August, 2010, as amended from time to time, are entitled to be considered for their appointment on vacant posts of Assistant Teachers in classes 1 to 5, even they have not cleared TET examination. 
In view of this, request of petitioner, as has been made in the present writ petition cannot be accepted by this Court and writ petition is dismissed accordingly. 
Order Date :- 1.2.2013 



Monday, February 18, 2013

UPTET : Allahabad Highcourt Contempt Application Regarding Teachers Recruitment


UPTET : Allahabad Highcourt Contempt Application Regarding Teachers Recruitment


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 

?Court No. - 40 

Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 759 of 2013 

Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Tiwari 
Respondent :- Sunil Kumar, Principal Secry., Basic Education And Another 
Petitioner Counsel :- R.K. Mishra,G.K. Mishra 

Hon'ble Devendra Pratap Singh,J. 
It is alleged that the order dated 16.1.2013 passed by this court in Writ Petition No.65811 of 2012 has been violated. From a perusal of the petition, a prima facie case is made out. 
Issue notice to the opposite parties within a week returnable within six weeks. The opposite parties need not appear in person at this stage. 
The counter affidavit may be filed within the aforesaid period or else charges may be framed. 
However, one more opportunity is granted to the opposite parties to comply with the order. 
The office may send a copy of this order along with the notice. 
List in the week commencing 8th of April, 2013. 
Order Date :- 18.2.2013 
PKG 



Sunday, February 17, 2013

UPTET : मेरिट के आधार पर नियुक्ति करे सरकार


UPTET : मेरिट के आधार पर नियुक्ति करे सरकार


आजमगढ़ : उत्तर प्रदेश टीईटी उत्तीर्ण संघर्ष मोर्चा की बैठक रविवार को मेहता पार्क में हुई। इसमें मेरिट के आधार पर शिक्षक नियुक्ति की मांग की गई। मांग पूरी न होने पर अभ्यर्थियों ने आंदोलन की चेतावनी भी दी।

रवींद्रनाथ यादव ने कहा कि देश व समाज का विकास योग्य नागरिकों द्वारा होता है। योग्य नागरिक के निर्माण में प्राथमिक विद्यालय के शिक्षकों की भूमिका महत्वपूर्ण होती है। इसलिए सरकार को बिना किसी भेदभाव के टीईटी मेरिट के आधार पर शिक्षक नियुक्ति का रास्ता साफ करना चाहिए। अरविंद यादव ने कहा कि सरकार को समझना चाहिए कि यदि टीईटी मेरिट के आधार पर नियुक्ति नहीं हुई तो अयोग्य लोग व्यवस्था को प्रभावित करेंगे। उमेश कुमार ने कहा कि मामला न्यायालय में विचाराधीन है। हमें विश्वास है की जीत हमारी होगी। बस जरूरत है कि टीईटी उत्तीर्ण अभ्यर्थी एकजुट होकर संघर्ष करें। इस मौके पर राजेश, उमेश कुमार, उमेश वर्मा, सुभाष चंद्र तिवारी, बृजभान चौहान, राजेश, शिवानंद, अखिलेश, मिथिलेश, संतोष कुमार, सत्यप्रकाश, भोला, मनोज, सूर्यभान, भारत भूषण आदि उपस्थित थे



News Source : Jagran (Updated on: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 07:05 PM (IST))
***************************
TET Merit Supporter Candidates filled with enthusiasm when they heard Double Bench Allahabad High Court and they are expecting a positive decision from Allahabad Highcourt.
However other side, Some candidates expecting to continue running process.

UP SHIKSHA MITRA NEWS : शिक्षा मित्रों ने मुख्यमंत्री को भेजा रजिस्टर्ड पत्र


UP SHIKSHA MITRA NEWS : शिक्षा मित्रों ने मुख्यमंत्री को भेजा रजिस्टर्ड पत्र
News Sabhar :Jagran Paper

(संत कबीर नगर) : पौली क्षेत्र के प्राथमिक विद्यालयों में कार्यरत करीब एक सौ पांच शिक्षा मित्रों ने मुख्यमंत्री को रजिस्टर्ड पत्र भेजा है। पत्र में मानदेय 7300 रुपये निजी खाते के माध्यम से देने की संस्तुति के साथ विगत 28 जनवरी को बेसिक शिक्षा मंत्री के साथ हुए समझौते को अमल में लाने की मांग की गयी है ।

उक्त बातें रविवार को आदर्श शिक्षा मित्र वेलफेयर एसोसिएशन के ब्लाक अध्यक्ष दुर्गा प्रसाद यादव ने शनिचरा मे आयोजित ब्लाक पदाधिकारियों की बैठक में कही। उन्होंने बताया कि प्रदेश अध्यक्ष जितेन्द्र शाही के निर्देश पर प्रदेश के समस्त शिक्षा मित्र अपनी पीड़ा को पत्र के माध्यम से मुख्यमंत्री तक पहुंचाने का प्रयास कर रहे है, क्योंकि नौकर शाह शिक्षा मित्रों को गुमराह कर रहे है। ब्लाक मंत्री अहमद खान ने कहा कि मुख्यमंत्री का ध्यान आकर्षित करने हेतु उनके गृह जनपद इटावा से पचीस हजार शिक्षा मित्र साइकिल रैली निकालेंगे

बैठक में हनुमंत यादव, श्यामलाल, नित्यानंद तिवारी, मधुकर यादव, हीरालाल, संजय कुमार, राजेन्द्र प्रसाद, महेन्द्र प्रसाद ,ममता मिश्रा, उर्मिला, गुलाब, अखिलेश तिवारी, शशिभूषण सहित तमाम लोग मौजूद रहे



News Source : Jagran (Updated on: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 07:36 PM (IST))
*******************************************

शिक्षामित्रों ने उत्पीड़न को लेकर किया मंथन


निज प्रतिनिधि, एटा: समस्याओं और उत्पीड़न को लेकर शिक्षामित्रों में रोष पनपने लगा है। रविवार को उत्तर प्रदेश प्राथमिक शिक्षामित्र संघ के प्रांतीय नेतृत्व के निर्देश पर शहीदपार्क में शिक्षामित्रों ने बैठक कर समस्याओं पर चिंतन किया। यही नहीं नेतृत्व द्वारा शिक्षामित्रों के हितों के लिए किए जा रहे प्रयासों पर भी चर्चा की।

इस अवसर पर शिक्षामित्र संघ के प्रांतीय उपाध्यक्ष सुशील तिवारी एवं जिलाध्यक्ष मनोज यादव ने कहा कि किसी भी कीमत पर शिक्षामित्रों का उत्पीड़न बर्दाश्त नहीं किया जाएगा। उनकी समस्याओं के समाधान के लिए हर संभव प्रयास किए जाएंगे। महामंत्री आलोक मिश्र तथा सुधोतकर यादव ने बताया कि संघ द्वारा बीटीसी और विशिष्ट बीटीसी में प्रशिक्षण प्राप्त कर चुके शिक्षामित्रों के समायोजन के लिए नेतृत्व द्वारा प्रयास किए जा रहे हैं। उन्होंने चेतावनी दी कि प्राथमिक विद्यालय पृथ्वीराजपुर में शिक्षामित्र मोहनप्रताप पर लगे झूठे हरिजन एक्ट के मुकदमें को अविलंब वापस लिया जाए। महिला मोर्चा अध्यक्ष अनीता शाक्य और रूबी यादव ने कहा कि शिक्षामित्रों का मानदेय 7300 करने के लिए संघ लगातार शासन स्तर पर दवाब बनाए है और उनके मानदेय को आनलाइन खाते में भेजने की व्यवस्था की जा रही है।

इसके अलावा ब्लाक अध्यक्ष सुनील चौहान, एसके राजपूत, संतोष यादव, रंजना सिंह, ईश्वरदेव ने भी बैठक को संबोधित किया। इस दौरान राजेश यादव, होशियार सिंह, पंकज, धर्मेन्द्र यादव, विजेन्द्र यादव, गिर्राजकिशोर, प्रदीप, किरन शर्मा, सैब्या, शशि, मीना, निशा, नीरज कुमारी, रीना यादव, गीता, संध्या गौतम, भूपेन्द्र यादव, सुखवीर, रामवीर, ब्रजलता, नीलम, अंजना श्रीवास्तव, सुरजीत, लक्ष्मीकांत, दिनेश कुमार, दुष्यंत कुमार, दुर्वीन सिंह, विजय तिवारी, प्रेमलता, रजनेश कुमार, राजीव यादव, लालसिंह, अतेन्द्र सिंह सहित अनेक शिक्षामित्र मौजूद थे। बैठक की अध्यक्षता सुनील यादव, संचालन मो. इशहाक ने किया


News Source : Jagran (Updated on: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 06:53 PM (IST))
************************************************

चार माह से शिक्षा मित्रों को नहीं मिला मानदेय

  
विकासनगर : शिक्षा मित्र महासंघ की बैठक में विगत चार माह से मानदेय न मिलने पर रोष प्रकट किया गया। शिक्षा मित्रों का कहना था कि सरकार ने मानदेय बढ़ाने की घोषणा मात्र की है, मानदेय दिया नहीं है। आक्रोशित शिक्षा मित्रों ने एक मार्च से जिला शिक्षाधिकारी कार्यालय पर धरना देने की चेतावनी भी दी।

यहां आयोजित शिक्षा मित्रों की बैठक में नवंबर से मानदेय न मिलने से आक्रोशित शिक्षा मित्रों ने सरकार को एक मार्च से धरना प्रदर्शन करने की चेतावनी दी। शिक्षा मित्र संघ के जिला अध्यक्ष संदीप कुमार ने कहा कि नवंबर में बढ़े हुए मानदेय की घोषणा के बाद से सरकार की ओर से शिक्षा मित्रों को वित्त विभाग की ओर से बजट निर्गत न होने का बहाना बनाकर मानदेय न दिया जाना, उनके साथ विश्वासघात करने के समान है। उन्होंने शासन को चेताया कि यदि फरवरी में भी मानदेय आवंटित नहीं हुआ तो समस्त शिक्षा मित्र एक मार्च से जिला शिक्षा अधिकारी कार्यालय पर धरना प्रदर्शन करेंगे।

इस दौरान महासंघ के मंत्री खुशीराम पांडे, गजेंद्र सिंह, रणवीर सिंह, अनीता चौहान, महावीर सिंह, बलदेव सिंह, सुरजीत सिंह, बलदेव सिंह, संजय डोभाल, खजान राणा, कमल सुयाल, गुलाब सिंह, पूर्णिमा शर्मा, मीरा राणा, शिखा सक्सैना आदि मौजूद थे


News Source : Jagran (Updated on: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:23 PM (IST))

UPTET : श्रद्दा और सबरी


UPTET : श्रद्दा और सबरी 


आप लोगो  को दोनों - समय व सेलरी का बहुत नुक्सान 
हुआ है और भविष्य अभी भी अनिश्चितता के अन्धकार में है ।
धेर्य व संयम (सबरी) बनाये रखें अब समय बहुत व्यतीत हो चुका  , 

 साईं बाबा जरूर आप पर कृपा करेंगे 





UPTET : Another News Related to High Court Hearing on 20 Feb 2013


UPTET : Another News Related to High Court Hearing on 20 Feb 2013

********
आप अपनी समस्याओं के हल के लिए फेस बुक पर यू पी टी ई टी का ग्रुप 

भी ज्वाइन कर सकते हैं 

ग्रुप का नाम - यू पी टी ई टी आल इन वन 

TO JOIN UPTET GROUP in FACEBOOK - 
(UPTET ALL IN ONE ), Click Here - 

*********


This news is Circulated on Facebook Groups -


********
आप अपनी समस्याओं के हल के लिए फेस बुक पर यू पी टी ई टी का ग्रुप 

भी ज्वाइन कर सकते हैं 

ग्रुप का नाम - यू पी टी ई टी आल इन वन 

TO JOIN UPTET GROUP in FACEBOOK - 
(UPTET ALL IN ONE ), Click Here - 

*********