UPTET / Allahabad High Court Cases : B. Ed Candidates are Eligible for UPTET-2013 Primary Level OR not ?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
?Court No. - 5
Case :- MISC. SINGLE No. - 3433 of 2013
Petitioner :- Geeta Verma & Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Prin. Secy. Basic Education & Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Anil Kumar Mishra,Rakesh Kumar Shukla
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ritu Raj Awasthi,J.
Notice on behalf of opposite parties has been accepted by the learned Chief Standing Counsel.
Learned counsel for petitioners submits that vide impugned Government Order dated 17.4.2013 the eligibility condition prescribed for UP-TET primary level class I to V provides Graduation with B.T.C. or D.Ed. only, it does not provide qualification of B.Ed. which otherwise entitle the candidate for the post of Teacher.
Learned Standing Counsel is directed to seek instructions in the matter.
List the matter after one week, as fresh.
Order Date :- 24.5.2013
Santosh/-
********************
See Other Cases :
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 30
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 21756 of 2013
Petitioner :- Mahasachiv Madhyamik Vidhyalaya Prabhand Samit
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 2 Ors.
Petitioner Counsel :- Gopal Misra
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Amreshwar Pratap Sahi,J.
Heard Sri Gopal Misra, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.
Learned standing counsel informs the Court that a Government Order has been very recently issued imposing condition on possession of qualification of Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) in relation to appointments in Primary Schools attached to Intermediate Colleges.
In the circumstances there is no occasion to proceed further with the matter.
The writ petition is consigned to record.
Order Date :- 23.4.2013
A. Verma
**********************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 30
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 28524 of 2013
Petitioner :- Km. Pooja And 2 Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 3 Ors.
Petitioner Counsel :- T.P.Dubey
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,P.P.Yadav
Hon'ble Amreshwar Pratap Sahi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.
The petitioners' services have been terminated on the ground that they do not possess the teacher eligibility test qualification.
The contention of the petitioners is that they were appointed on compassionate basis and they are at least entitled to the payment of salary for the period they have worked.
A similar writ petition was disposed of by this court and special appeal no. 1467 of 2012 has been filed against the same which is pending consideration before this court.
List after decision in the said special appeal.
Order Date :- 21.5.2013
Sahu
***********************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 30
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 28379 of 2013
Petitioner :- Sandeep Kumar Tiwari And 27 Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P.& 3 Ors.
Petitioner Counsel :- Dhananjay Mishra
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,R.A.Akhtar
Hon'ble Amreshwar Pratap Sahi, J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri R.A. Akhtar for the respondents.�
The petitioners have come up with a prayer that they should also be permitted to appear in the Teacher Eligibility Test.
The date of filling up of the application Form has been extended by the respondent - State itself in compliance of the judgment of this Court which has already published in the newspaper.
In view of this, the petitioner may pursue the matter, accordingly.
With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of
Order Date :- 20.5.2013
Irshad
