UPTET Shiksha Mitra News -29334 विज्ञान गणित के भरे जाएँ रिक्त पद -

UPTET Shiksha Mitra   News -29334 विज्ञान गणित के भरे जाएँ रिक्त पद - 

 



 UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  / शिक्षक भर्ती /  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
 Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
 

Transfer News - बिभा सिंह की तर्ज पर ट्रांसफर पाने वालीं की झड़ी लगी, सचिव को निर्णय लेने के निर्देश - Husband Wife Posting Same Place

Transfer  News - बिभा सिंह की तर्ज पर ट्रांसफर पाने वालीं की झड़ी लगी, सचिव को निर्णय लेने के निर्देश - 
Husband Wife Posting Same Place



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 

?Court No. - 19 

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 51027 of 2017 

Petitioner :- Smt. Punam Kumari 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Shri Krishna Mishra 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Santosh Kumar 

Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J. 
Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 
Petitioner is working as Assistant Teacher, whereas, husband of the petitioner is residing in Delhi Cantt. and is working with Indian Armed Force (Civilian). 
Petitioner by the instant writ petition seeks the following relief : 
"i.) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No. 2 to transfer the petitioner from Primary Vidhyalaya Vizidpur Khurd, Block Khatauli, District Muzaffar Nagar to some Primary Vidhyalaya in District Ghaziabad." 
Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon decision rendered by this Court in Bibha Singh Kushwaha vs. U.P. Basic Education Board and others (Writ A No. 30808 of 2017) decided on 19 July 2017. 
Learned counsel appearing for the second respondent would submit that the second respondent-Secretary, Basic Education Board, Allahabad, shall pass appropriate order expeditiously. 
In regard thereto, writ petition, on consent, stands disposed of directing the second respondent-Secretary, Basic Education Board, Allahabad, to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner by a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law, in terms of decision rendered in Bibha Singh (supra) expeditiously, preferably, within eight weeks from the date of filing of certified copy of this order. 
It is made clear that the Court has not considered the claim and contention of the petitioner on merits. 
Order Date :- 2.11.2017 
S.Prakash 



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 

?Court No. - 19 

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 51536 of 2017 

Petitioner :- Vinita Rai 
Respondent :- U.P. Basic Education Board,Allahabad Thru.Its Secy. & 2 Ors. 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhishek Kumar,Anjani Kumar Rai 
Counsel for Respondent :- Ras Bihari Pradhan 

Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J. 
Heard learned counsel for the parties. 
Petitioner is working as assistant teacher in Junior Basic School, Surwat-I, Block Kasimabad, District Ghazipur, whereas, husband of the petitioner is working as assistant teacher in Junior Basic School, Delhupur, Block Lalganj, District Pratapgarh. 
By means of the instant writ petition, petitioner seeks the following relief: 
"I. To issue writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to transfer the husband of petitioner, posted as Assistant teacher in the Junior Basic School run by U.P. Board of Basic Education at District Pratapgarh to District Ghazipur or transfer the petitioner posted as Assistant Teacher in Junior Basic School run by U.P. Board of Basic Education at District Ghazipur to District Pratapgarh." 
Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon decision rendered by this Court in Bibha Singh Kushwaha Versus U.P. Basic Education Board and others (Writ-A No. 30808 of 2017) decided on 19 July 2017. 
Learned counsel appearing for the first respondent would submit that the first respondent, U.P. Basic Education Board, Allahabad through its Secretary, shall pass appropriate order expeditiously. 
In regard thereto, writ petition, on consent, stands disposed of directing the first respondent, U.P. Basic Education Board, Allahabad through its Secretary, to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner by a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law, in terms of decision rendered in Bibha Singh (supra) expeditiously, preferably, within eight weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 
It is made clear that the Court has not considered the claim and contention of the petitioner on merits. 
Order Date :- 3.11.2017 
K.K. Maurya 


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 

?Court No. - 19 
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 51525 of 2017 
Petitioner :- Smt. Talat Parveen 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Dhirendra Kumar Srivastav,Rajiv Sisodia 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Daya Ram,Shivam Yadav 

Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J. 
Heard learned counsel for the parties. 
Petitioner is working as Headmaster in Primary School Hadipur Kalan, Block and District Amroha, whereas, husband of the petitioner is working as assistant teacher in Primary School, Jaroda, District Meerut. 
By means of the instant writ petition, petitioner seeks the following relief: 
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 05.10.2017 as per provision of the Rule 8(d) of the Uttar Pradesh Basic Education (Teachers) (Posting) Rules, 2008;" 
Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon decision rendered by this Court in Bibha Singh Kushwaha Versus U.P. Basic Education Board and others (Writ-A No. 30808 of 2017) decided on 19 July 2017. 
Learned counsel appearing for the second respondent would submit that the second respondent, shall pass appropriate order expeditiously. 
In regard thereto, writ petition, on consent, stands disposed of directing the second respondent, Board of Basic Education, Allahabad through Secretary, to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner by a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law, in terms of decision rendered in Bibha Singh (supra) expeditiously, preferably, within eight weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 
It is made clear that the Court has not considered the claim and contention of the petitioner on merits. 
Order Date :- 3.11.2017 

K.K. Maurya 


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 

?Court No. - 19 

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 51543 of 2017 

Petitioner :- Smt. Heena 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Manisha Chaturvedi 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashok Kumar Yadav,Ram Prakash Shukla 

Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J. 
Heard learned counsel for the parties. 
Petitioner is working as assistant teacher at Primary School, Bairi Inarapar, Block Deegh, District Sant Ravidas Nagar (Bhadohi), whereas, husband of the petitioner is working as Lecturer, Biology in Mustafa Rasheed Sherwani Inter College, Salahpur, Allahabad. 
By means of the instant writ petition, petitioner seeks the following relief: 
"i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/directing the respondents (especially, the respondent no. 2) to transfer petitioner as Assistant Teacher of Parishadiya Primary School from her present place of posting i.e., Primary School, Bairi Inarapar, Block Deegh, District Sant Ravidas Nagar (Bhadohi) to District Allahabad in view of the provisions contained under Rule 8(2)(d) of the U.P. Basic (Teachers)(Posting) Rules, 2008 (as amended in the year 2010)." 
Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon decision rendered by this Court in Bibha Singh Kushwaha Versus U.P. Basic Education Board and others (Writ-A No. 30808 of 2017) decided on 19 July 2017. 
Learned counsel appearing for the first respondent would submit that the third respondent, District Basic Education Officer, Sant Ravidas Nagar (Bhadohi), shall pass appropriate order expeditiously. 
In regard thereto, writ petition, on consent, stands disposed of directing the third respondent, District Basic Education Officer, Sant Ravidas Nagar (Bhadohi), to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner by a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law, in terms of decision rendered in Bibha Singh (supra) expeditiously, preferably, within eight weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 
It is made clear that the Court has not considered the claim and contention of the petitioner on merits. 
Order Date :- 3.11.2017 

K.K. Maurya 





 UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  / शिक्षक भर्ती /  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
 Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
 

पति पत्नी आधार पर ट्रांसफर की ढेरों याचिकाएं दाखिल, बिभा सिंह कुशवाह की तर्ज पर सभी आदेशों में सचिव को निर्देश दिया कि याची के ट्रांसफर रिप्रेजेंटेशन आधार पर विचार करे, क्लियर ऑर्डर किसी मे भी नही , देखें केस - -

पति पत्नी आधार पर ट्रांसफर की ढेरों याचिकाएं दाखिल, बिभा सिंह कुशवाह की तर्ज पर सभी आदेशों में सचिव को निर्देश दिया कि याची के ट्रांसफर रिप्रेजेंटेशन आधार पर विचार करे, क्लियर ऑर्डर किसी मे भी नही , देखें केस - - 


********
वकील साहब भी अपनी पत्नी का ट्रांसफर क्लियर ऑर्डर के तहत नही ले पाए, डायरेक्शन का ऑर्डर बिभा की तर्ज पर ले लिया है, बिभा का केस एक नजीर बन गया सैकड़ों ट्रांसफर की याचिकाओं के लिए:-
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 

?Court No. - 19 

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 51221 of 2017 

Petitioner :- Bimla Joshi 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Yash Tandon 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Jai Krishna Tiwari 

Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J. 
Heard learned counsel for the parties. 
Petitioner is working as assistant teacher at Primary School Pipra Nandi Par, Block Nakha, Lakhimpur Khiri, whereas, husband of the petitioner who is a lawyer resides in Ghaziabad and being a lawyer he always goes to out of station. Petitioner's mother-in-law is aged about 73 years and very week lady, no one is to lookafter her. 
By means of the instant writ petition, petitioner seeks the following relief: 
"(i) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 4 to decide the transfer application of the petitioner, dated 8.1.2017 and the subsequent reminders within a specific time as stipulated by this Hon'ble Court. 
(ii) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 to transfer the petitioner from the institution to a Junior Basic School in district Ghaziabad (district of her husband and in laws)." 
Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon decision rendered by this Court in Bibha Singh Kushwaha Versus U.P. Basic Education Board and others (Writ-A No. 30808 of 2017) decided on 19 July 2017. 
Learned counsel appearing for the fourth respondent would submit that the fourth respondent, Secretary, Basic Shiksha Parishad, Allahabad, shall pass appropriate order expeditiously. 
In regard thereto, writ petition, on consent, stands disposed of directing the fourth respondent, Secretary, Basic Shiksha Parishad, Allahabad, to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner by a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law, in terms of decision rendered in Bibha Singh (supra) expeditiously, preferably, within six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 
It is made clear that the Court has not considered the claim and contention of the petitioner on merits. 
Order Date :- 2.11.2017 
K.K. Maurya 

**********
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 

?Court No. - 19 

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 50964 of 2017 

Petitioner :- Surbhi Bansal 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Babboo Ram 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. 

Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J. 
Heard learned counsel for the parties. 
Petitioner is working as assistant teacher at Prathmik Vidyalaya Harshapur, Block Belasar, District Gonda, whereas, husband of the petitioner is working as assistant teacher District Hapur. 
By means of the instant writ petition, petitioner seeks the following relief: 
"i) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 08.10.2017 (Annexure No. 4 to the writ petition) with regard to the transfer of the petitioner from Prathmik Vidyalaya Harshapur, Block Belsar District Gonda to any Basic School in District Hapur or any adjacent District without giving effect to the Government Order dated 13th June, 2017 issued by respondent no. 1." 
Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon decision rendered by this Court in Bibha Singh Kushwaha Versus U.P. Basic Education Board and others (Writ-A No. 30808 of 2017) decided on 19 July 2017. 
Learned counsel appearing for the third respondent would submit that the third respondent, U.P. Basic Education Board, Allahabad through its Secretary, shall pass appropriate order expeditiously. 
In regard thereto, writ petition, on consent, stands disposed of directing the third respondent, U.P. Basic Education Board, Allahabad through its Secretary, to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner by a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law, in terms of decision rendered in Bibha Singh (supra) expeditiously, preferably, within eight weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 
It is made clear that the Court has not considered the claim and contention of the petitioner on merits. 
Order Date :- 2.11.2017 
K.K. Maurya 
*************
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 

?Court No. - 19 
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 50903 of 2017 
Petitioner :- Roshni Singh 
Respondent :- U.P.Basic Education,Board,Allahabad And 3 Others 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Indra Raj Singh,Adarsh Singh 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Deo Dayal,Mrigraj Singh 

Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J. 
Heard learned counsel for the parties. 
Petitioner is working as assistant teacher at Junior Basic School, Alampur, Sakaldiha, District Chandauli, whereas, husband of the petitioner is working as assistant teacher at Sarvoday Vidyapeeth Inter College, Mirganj, District Jaunpur. 
By means of the instant writ petition, petitioner seeks the following relief: 
"I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 1 U.P. Basic Education, Board, Allahabad through its Secretary to consider the transfer of the petitioner from District Chandauli to District Jaunpur on the post of assistant teacher in any Junior Basic School of the District Jaunpur managed by U.P. Basic Education Board, within stipulated time as may be fixed by this Hon'ble court." 
Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon decision rendered by this Court in Bibha Singh Kushwaha Versus U.P. Basic Education Board and others (Writ-A No. 30808 of 2017) decided on 19 July 2017. 
Learned counsel appearing for the first respondent would submit that the first respondent, U.P. Basic Education Board, Allahabad through its Secretary, shall pass appropriate order expeditiously. 
In regard thereto, writ petition, on consent, stands disposed of directing the first respondent, U.P. Basic Education Board, Allahabad through its Secretary, to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner by a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law, in terms of decision rendered in Bibha Singh (supra) expeditiously, preferably, within eight weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 
It is made clear that the Court has not considered the claim and contention of the petitioner on merits. 
Order Date :- 1.11.2017 

K.K. Maurya 
*********
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 

?Court No. - 19 

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 49762 of 2017 

Petitioner :- Smt. Neelam Devi 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Deepak Kumar Pal 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Jay Ram Pandey,Pranesh Dutt Tripathi 

Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J. 
Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 
Petitioner is working as Assistant Teacher in Prathamik Vidhalaya Kothara Kantit Vikas Khand Chhianbey, District Mirzapur, whereas, husband of the petitioner is Assistant Clerk at U.P. Police Head Quarter, Allahabad. By the instant writ petition, petitioner seeks the following relief: 
Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 2 U.P. Basic Education Board, Allahabad, through its Secretary to consider transfer of the petitioner from District Mirzapur to District Kaushambi for posting on the post of Assistant Teacher in any Junior Basic Schools within stipulated time as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court. 
Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon a decision rendered in Bibha Singh Kushwaha vs. U.P. Basic Education Board and others (Writ - A No. 30808 of 2017) decided on 19 July 2017. 
Learned counsel appearing for the second and fourth respondent would submit that the second respondent-U.P. Basic Education Board, Allahabad, shall pass appropriate order expeditiously. 
In regard thereto, writ petition, on consent, stands disposed of directing the U.P. Basic Education Board, Allahabad, to consider and decide the claim/represention of the petitioner by a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law, in terms of Bibha Singh (supra) case, expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months from the date of filing of certified copy of this order. 
It is made clear that the Court has not considered the claim and contention of the petitioner on merits. 
Order Date :- 27.10.2017 

Mukesh Kr. 
************
Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 

?Court No. - 19 

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 50047 of 2017 

Petitioner :- Smt. Meena Chandra 
Respondent :- Secy. Basic Shiksha Parishad U.P. 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Ranjit Saxena 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Vikram Bahadur Singh 

Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J. 
Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 
Petitioner is working as Assistant Teacher posted at Principal District Education and Training Institute Etawah, whereas, husband of the petitioner is Office Assistant Grade-2, Chief Engineer Cadre, and is residing in Harduaganj Power Station at Aligarh. By the instant writ petition, petitioner seeks the following relief: 
issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to transfer the petitioner from Prathmic Vidyalaya, Dayalpura, Jaswant Nagar, Etawah to any of the School (1) Harduaganj Power Station Prathmic Vidyalaya (2) Prathmic Vidyalaya Chhota Jawan (3) Prathmic Vidyalaya Bada Jawan, (4) Prathmic Vidyalaya Khushalgarhi (5) Prathmic Vidyalaya Nagola as Assistant Teacher following the policy of husband and wife to be posted in one district as per the U.P. Govt. Policy dated 13.06.2017 No.1078/79-5-2016-15(149)/2010. 
Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon a decision rendered in Bibha Singh Kushwaha vs. U.P. Basic Education Board and others (Writ - A No. 30808 of 2017) decided on 19 July 2017. 
Learned counsel appearing for the one and fourth respondent would submit that the first respondent-Secretary, Basic Shiksha Parishad, U.P., Govt. Allahabad, shall pass appropriate order expeditiously. 
In regard thereto, writ petition, on consent, stands disposed of directing the first respondent-Secretary, Basic Shiksha Parishad, U.P., Govt. Allahabad, to consider and decide the claim/representation of the petitioner by a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law, in terms of Bibha Singh (supra) case, expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months from the date of filing of certified copy of this order. 
It is made clear that the Court has not considered the claim and contention of the petitioner on merits. 
Order Date :- 30.10.2017 
Mukesh Kr. 


 *********
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 

?Court No. - 19 
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 49266 of 2017 
Petitioner :- Sangeeta Rathore 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Neeraj Pandey 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashok Kumar 

Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J. 
Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 
Petitioner is working as Assistant Teacher, whereas, husband of the petitioner is residing in Lalitpur and is working as D.L.R.C. in the Collector Office. 
Petitioner by the instant writ petition seeks the following relief: 
"a.) issue a writ, order or direction of a suitable nature commanding the respondent no. 2 to consider and decide the representation dated 20.7.2017 of the petitioner (Annexure No. 5 to the writ petition) with regard to the transfer of the petitioner from Prathmik Vidyalaya, Khamhaura-1, Block Mahua, District Banda to any Basic School in District Lalitpur on the grounds mentioned in the aforesaid representation without giving effect to the Government Order No. 1078/79-5-2016-15(149)/2017 Lucknow dated 13 June 2017 issued by Respondent no. 1 (Annexure No. 6 to the writ petition) within a stipulated time." 
Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon a decision rendered in Bibha Singh Kushwaha vs. U.P. Basic Education Board and others (Writ A No. 30808 of 2017) decided on 19 July 2017. 
Learned counsel appearing for the second respondent would submit that the second respondent-Secretary, Basic Education Board, Allahabad, shall pass appropriate order expeditiously. 
In regard thereto, writ petition, on consent, stands disposed of directing the second respondent-Secretary, Basic Education Board, Allahabad, to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner by a reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with law, in terms of Bibha Singh (supra) expeditiously, preferably, within eight weeks from the date of filing of certified copy of this order. 
It is made clear that the Court has not considered the claim and contention of the petitioner on merits. 
Order Date :- 25.10.2017 

S.Prakash 





 UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  / शिक्षक भर्ती /  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
 Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
 

पति पत्नी को एक स्थान पर पोस्टिंग देने का इलाहबाद हाई कोर्ट का स्पष्ट आदेश देखें , पति पत्नी बैंक एम्प्लॉई हैं पति ने प्रमोशन छोड़ कर पत्नी की पोस्टिंग के स्थान पर ट्रांसफर लिया , Husband Wife Transfer at One Place in case of Bank Employees too, Husband declined promotion and taken posting at Wife's place of Posting

पति पत्नी को एक स्थान पर पोस्टिंग देने का इलाहबाद हाई कोर्ट का स्पष्ट आदेश देखें , पति पत्नी बैंक एम्प्लॉई हैं पति ने प्रमोशन छोड़ कर पत्नी की पोस्टिंग के स्थान पर ट्रांसफर लिया ,
Husband Wife Transfer at One Place in case of Bank Employees too,

Husband declined promotion and taken posting at Wife's place of Posting


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH 

?Court No. - 3 

Case :- SERVICE BENCH No. - 1209 of 2015 

Petitioner :- Gyan Prakash Bajpai 
Respondent :- State Bank Of India Throu Its General Manager Lko.& Ors. 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Sharad Pathak 
Counsel for Respondent :- Sudeep Seth 

Hon'ble Shri Narayan Shukla,J. 
Hon'ble Akhtar Husain Khan,J. 
Heard Sri Sharad Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sudeep Seth, learned counsel for the respondent Bank. 
By means of this petition, the petitioner has assailed the order dated 05.07.2015 passed by opposite party no.4-Branch Manager, Kanpur whereby he has been posted at Varanasi as also the order dated 15.07.2015 passed by opposite party no.3-Assistant General Manager, Lucknow whereby his representation to retain his posting at Kanpur has been rejected. 
The respondent-Bank has rejected the petitioner's representation on the ground that the petitioner has been allotted the place of posting at Varanasi on his promotion and in terms of the guidelines that on promotion, he has to leave out of Kanpur. 
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is working in the State Bank of India at Kanpur and his� wife is also posted in the Bank of Baroda at Kanpur. The Government of India as well as the Bank concerned has framed the policy to post the spouse at the same station or to the nearest station. 
In view of the policy framed by the Bank, learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the petitioner has a right of posting at Kanpur itself since his wife is posted at Kanpur. In support of his submission, he has also cited a decision of a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court rendered in Smt. Deepa Vashishtha Vs. State of U.P. and others; 1996 (73) FLR946 (Alld) in which this Court held that the administration is bound to follow the guidelines which has to be adhered in its terms. In this case, the identical issues was dealt with and the Court opined that the husband and wife be transferred to different places only in exceptional circumstances. It is imperative for the authority concerned to allow the posting of husband and wife at one place, though the posting of spouse at different places has not been declined but it has been held that the spouse posting at different place may create a difficulty in their family. 
In view of the aforesaid submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that his request for allowing him to continue at Kanpur on the post of promotion be considered. 
In reply, Mr. Sudeep Seth has submitted that the order dated 05.07.2015, whereby, the petitioner has been allotted the place of posting at Varanasi, had been subject matter of the Writ Petition No.666 (M/B) of 2015, wherein, this Court dealt with the matter and held that "these are not matters involving any statutory violation. The transfer is an exigency of service and hence we see no reason to entertain the petition. The case of the petitioner is that his spouse is working and is presently posted at Kanpur. Such issue or individual hardships are for the competent authority to decide in accordance with the prevalent norms". This Court left it open to the petitioner to submit representation in this regard and further observed that in case the petitioner submits representation before the competent authority that may be looked into expeditiously and an appropriate orders, in accordance with law, may be passed. 
The order dated 15.07.2015 is a result of the petitioner's representation though learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that it is absolutely non-speaking order, yet when we examined the order, we found that the authority concerned has observed that the petitioner was well aware with the fact that on promotion he would be allotted to other administrative office as per the Bank's Guidelines. 
Therefore, we do not appreciate the petitioner's contention to invoke the jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the order impugned. 
In the result, the writ petition stands dismissed. 
Order Date :- 13.8.2015 
akverma������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 
After dictation of the aforesaid order but before signing it, the petitioner moved a supplementary affidavit, whereby, he has shown his readiness to forego his promotion in view of great family problems and illness of his wife, who is suffering from liver abscess. The supplementary affidavit is taken on record. 
Since, the petitioner has been posted at Varanasi on promotion and now he foregoes his promotion, we, hereby, direct the concerned authority of the Bank to reconsider his posting at Kanpur on his original post. On his posting at Kanpur at the original post, the petitioner's promotion to the post of Junior Management Grade Scale-I shall stand cancelled. 
Order Date :- 13.8.2015 
akverma 
(Akhtar Husain Khan,J)��������� (Shri Narayan Shukla,J) 



 UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  / शिक्षक भर्ती /  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
 Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
 

पति पत्नी को एक स्थान पर पोस्टिंग देने का इलाहबाद हाई कोर्ट का स्पष्ट आदेश देखें , अगर कोई प्रशासनिक अड़चन , नियम क़ानूनी अड़चन न हो तो ट्रांसफर देने में कोई समस्या नहीं, Husband Wife Posting at Same Place, Good Order

पति पत्नी को एक स्थान पर पोस्टिंग देने का इलाहबाद हाई कोर्ट का स्पष्ट आदेश देखें , अगर कोई प्रशासनिक अड़चन , नियम क़ानूनी अड़चन न हो तो 
ट्रांसफर देने में कोई समस्या नहीं,
Husband Wife Posting at Same Place, Good Order 



DEEPA VASHISHTHA V. STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.


CASE NO.
Civil Misc. W. P. No. 31810 of 1995
JUDGES
Mr. Justice B.M. Lal
Mr. Justice R.K. Mahajan

ADVOCATES
R.G.Padia
Prakash Padia

ACTS
article 226 of the constitution of india,

22 NOV 1995  |   ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

B. M. Lal, J.-

By this petition under article 226 of the constitution of india, petitioner-Salt. Deepa Vashistha challenges an order dated 26-9-1995, passed by the Director, Higher Education, U.P., Allahabad (respondent No. 2) contained in Annexure 28 to this petition.

2. By the order impugned, while rejecting petitioner's representations dated 6-8-1995, 25-8-1995 and 28-8-1995, she is directed to join at Ranikhet, district Almora where she has been transferred vide order dated 4-6-1994 (Annexure 2).

3. For brevity of the case, few facts which are necessary to be stated for the purpose of this case, are thus :

4. Petitioner Smt. Deepa Vashistha, is a Lecturer (Vocal Music) pre­sently posted at Government Post Graduate Degree College, Rampur,

5. Petitioner's husband-Dr. S. C. Vashistha is also in Government service and presently posted at Project Officer, Non-Formal Education, at Rampur. Thus, husband wife both are at Rampur.

6. The order dated 4-6-1994 transferring the petitioner from Rampur to Ranikhet referred to above, was challenged by the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 674 of 1994 before Lucknow Bench of this Court, and that petition was finally disposed of vide order dated 1-7-1994 (Annexure 5) whereby the respon­dents were directed to decide petitioner's representation and in the meantime not to compel her to join at Ranikhet.

7. Accordingly, the petitioner's representation was disposed of, but the same did not find favour by order dated 22-7-1995 (Annexure 7).

8. Thereafter, successive representations were made, but of no avail.

9. Therefore, the petitioner filed second petition being Writ Petition No. 22620 of 1995 before this Court against the said transfer order dated 4-7-1994 as well as the order dated 22-7-1994 rejecting the representation.

10. This Court presided over by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Paritosh K. Mukherjee and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shitla Pd. Srivastava vide order dated 21-8-1995 directed the respondents to decide petitioner's representation within two months and further directed that till disposal of the representation the transfer order shall not be given effect to.

11. The order of this Court dated 21-8-1995 is reproduced herein below in verbatim :-

"By means of the instant petition, the petitioner has challenged the order of transfer, dated 22-7-1994, set out at Annexure 7 to the writ petition.

Against the said order, the petitioner has filed two representations dated 30-8-1994 and 10-4-1995 (Annexures 8 and 13 to the writ petition) which are pending before (Higher Education), Directorate of Higher Education, Allahabad respondent No. 2.

Annexure-14 is a communicate dated 17-5-1995 which has been sent to respondent No. 2 by the Chancellor of the Universities i. e, Governor of the State. The relevant portion of the said com­munication is quoted :

"Nirdeshanusar amodh hai ki Kripya Smt. Deepa Vashistha ke sthanantran ko nirast kar ki gayi karwahi se kulpati mahodaya ke suchanarth mujhe avgat karane ka kast Karen. Yadi is sambandh men koi kathinai ho to use avgat karey koanki yeh prakaran kafi samai aapke vibhag me Iambi thai or kai baar patra likhne ke baad bhi koi karwahi nahin ki gayi hai. Yadi aap Lucknow aa rahen hon to kripya vaktigat roop se maha-mahitn se milkar unhen sthit se avgat kara den."
Thus, it will appear from the aforesaid observations of the Chancellor of the Universities that a direction was issued to the respondent to give suitable posting at the same place to both the petitioner and her husband, but he did not comply the said direction.

That being the factual position, we direct that aforesaid representations filed by the petitioner shall be decided by respondent No. 2 within two months from the date of production of a certified copy before him in the light of the directions issued by the Chancellor of the Universities and relevant Government Orders operating in the field.

In the meantime, the impugned order dated 22-7-1994 shall not be given effect to until the representations of the petitioner is dig-posed of by respondent No. 2.

With the aforesaid directions/observation, the writ petition is disposed of."

12. The Director Higher Education (respondent No. 2) in pursuance of the order of this Court dated 21-8-1995, has passed the order dated 26-9-1995, which is under challenge in this petition.

13. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that direction issued by this Court on 21-8-1995 referred to above, has not been complied with. The petitioner's representation has been disposed of in a cursory manner and not in consonance with the Court's order dated 21-8-1995.

14. It is further submitted that instant transfer is contrary to various Government Orders/guidelines/instructions issued time to time in this regard which specifically speak that the spouses (husband and wife) may be posted at the same station.

15. In respect of transfer of employees, law is well settled. Time and again the Courts have ruled that transfer of Government employee is a con­comitant of service. Since transfers are made for administrative reasons or in public interest, therefore, no interference with the same is called for in the writ jurisdiction, save in exceptional cases where ex facie it is demonstrated that $he transfer is contrary to any statutory mandatory provisions of law or it is vitiated on the ground of mala fide or it has been made in colourable exercise of power such as frequent transfers within a short span of period resulting into harassment of the employee on the one hand and unnecessary loss to the public exchequer on the other or transfer is made during mid academic session resulting into disturbance and discontinuation of studies of the children of transferee.

16. But, if transfer is made against any guidelines or instructions having no statutory force of law, that cannot attract right of the employee to chal­lenge the same in the writ jurisdiction. At the most what the employee could do in this regard is that he may represent the matter to the higher depart­mental authority apprising him of his problems and difficulties, and it is for the authority to consider the1 plight of the transferee. See AIR 1991 SC 532 -Mrs. Shilpi Rose v. State of Bihar, JT 1993 (3) SC 678-Union of India v. S. L. Abbas and 1994 (2) Supp SCC 666-Director of School Education, Madras v. O. Katuppa Thevan.

17. However, in a recent pronouncement of the Apex Court rendered in Home Secretary, U. T. Chandigarh v. Darshjit Singh Grewal, JT 1993 (4) SC 387, Their Lordships have ruled that policy guidelines are relatable to the executive power of the administration, and having enunciated a policy of general application and having communicated it to all concerned, the Adminis­tration is bound by it. It can, no doubt, change the policy but until that is done, it is bound to adhere to it.
18. Now, coming to the case in hand, the Government Orders/guide­lines/policy said to have not been adhered to, are contained in Annexures 16, 17 and 18 to this petition and they lay down thus :

(1) If the couple is in education department, they both should be kept at one station at the time of appointment and transfer.

(2) If one of the husband and wife, belongs to education department and another to different department, even then efforts should be made to transfer one of them to that place where the other is posted.

(3) Husband and wife posted at the same station should not be transferred.

(4) On account of their postings to different places, husband and wife suffer difficulties, therefore, as far as possible they should be kept at one place.

19. Thus, the guidelines in respect of couple in Government service, have taken care of that husband and wife should be placed at one station. Placing the words "as far as possible", it is couched not in negatives form and accordingly the same is interpreted by the Apex Court.

20. Taking into account the human considerations and social needs, the aforesaid guidelines have been framed and the basic idea behind it is that whole set up of the family may not be disturbed notwithstanding the fact that said guidelines are not in imperative form. Thus, it needs consideration with positive approach till the policy is not changed or amended in view of the decision in Home Secretary, V. T. Chandigarh's case (supra), and if it is not possible to keep husband and wife at one place, cogent reasons in such cases are excepted to be assigned so that transferee husband or wife, as the case may be, able to know the reasons. If any policy has been framed and still opera­tive, the executive actions are excepted to be in conformity with the same and not to negate it.

21. In other words, in the garb of public interest or administrative exigencies, it is not at the whims of the authority to disturb the family by transferring one of the husband and wife to a different place since the guidelines are not in imperative form or they have no force of law. If the administrative exigencies or public interest so requires, certainly husband and wife may be transferred to different places but only in exceptional cases i, e. rarest of rare cases, for which no illustration can be given.

22. But, now a days it is invariably seen that for the reasons best known to the department, this kind of transfers are being made disturbing the couple. In the opinion of this Court, such practice needs to be deprecated.

23. What kind of perplexities and difficulties, a spouse could confront with in the event of another being posted at a different place, can easily be imagined by anyone by putting himself/herself in that situation and then it would be realised that now torturous and painful it really is, to leave husband and children at one place and to lead a solitary life at the transfer place. Therefore, to avoid such disturbance and mental agony, the aforesaid guide­lines are framed.

24. Thus, from the discussion aforesaid, the order impugned dated 26-9-1995 (Annexure 28) being not in consonance with the earlier order passed by this Court on 21-8-1995, therefore, we direct the authority concerned to reconsider the order impugned in the light of what we have said above and decide the petitioner's representation afresh expeditiously, to say, within a period of 15 days from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order.

25. With the above direction, this petition is finally disposed of.

Petition disposed of.




 UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  / शिक्षक भर्ती /  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
 Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
 

Breaking News -अब मरीजों को सस्ती जेनरिक दवाई बेहद कम कीमत पर उपलब्ध होंगी , 3000 प्रधानमंत्री जन ओषधि स्टोर फ़िलहाल 2700 जन ओषधि स्टोर संचालित हैं , डॉक्टरों को जेनरिक दवाइयां लिखने को कहा गया -

Breaking   News -अब मरीजों को सस्ती जेनरिक दवाई बेहद कम कीमत पर उपलब्ध होंगी , 3000 प्रधानमंत्री जन ओषधि स्टोर  फ़िलहाल 2700 जन ओषधि स्टोर संचालित हैं  , डॉक्टरों को जेनरिक दवाइयां लिखने को कहा गया  - 



सरकार ने चिकित्सकों से जेनेरिक दवाएं लिखने को कहा

मुंबई। सरकार ने कहा है कि चिकित्सक मरीजों को सस्ती जेनेरिक दवाएं लिखें। ये दवाएं देश भर में जन औषधि स्टोर पर उपलब्ध होंगी। सरकार दिसंबर तक 300 और जन औषधि स्टोर उपलब्ध खोलेगी और इससे ऐसे स्टोर की संख्या करीब 3,000 हो जाएगी।

केंद्रीय सामाजिक न्याय एवं अधिकारिता राज्य मंत्री रामदास अठावले ने कहा, ‘‘सबके लिए जेनेरिक दवाएं आज की जरूरत है तथा हम महाराष्ट्र में शुरुआत करके खुश हैं। स्वास्थ्य सेवा के क्षेत्र में यह क्रांतिकारी कदम होगा और हम चिकित्सकों से भी आग्रह करेंगे कि वे जेनेरिक दवाएं लिखें। इससे लोगों के पैसे बचेंगे और राहत मिलेगी। ’’ प्रधानमंत्री जन औषधि योजना के तहत इस साल दिसंबर तक कुल 3000 स्टोर खोले जाएंगे

Govt wants doctors to prescribe generic drugs

At present, about 2,700 Jan Aushadhi 'Kendras' are providing affordable medicines to the people

Mumbai: The government wants doctors to prescribe cheaper generic drugs which will be available at the Jan Aushadhi stores across the country.

The government will soon add around 300 more Jan Aushadhi stores, to take their numbers to around 3,000 by December.

"Generic drugs for one and all are the need of the hour and we are glad to begin the same in Maharashtra. This will be a revolutionary step in healthcare and we will also urge doctors to prescribe generic drugs. This will help people save money and bring relief to them," Union Minister of State for Social Justice and Empowerment, Ramdas Athawale said at workshop on Jan Aushadhi here on Monday.

Under the 'Pradhan Mantri Jan Aushadhi Yojana', a total of 3,000 stores will be opened by December this year, which will provide quality drugs at affordable prices, the minister said.

Addressing the event, Bureau of Pharma PSUs of India (BPPI) chief executive Biplab Chatterjee said, "We are seeking application for setting up of more Jan Aushadhi 'Kendras' across the country."

At present, about 2,700 Jan Aushadhi 'Kendras' are providing affordable medicines to the people. These stores are in 426 districts across 30 states and Union territories. Only 80 centers were opened between 2008 and 2014.  




 UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  / शिक्षक भर्ती /  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
 Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
 

UPTET News - Himanshu Rana कला वर्ग की उच्च प्राथमिक में सीधी भर्ती के समर्थन में, आखिर क्यों कला वर्ग का टेट लिया जा रहा है

UPTET   News - Himanshu Rana कला वर्ग की उच्च प्राथमिक में सीधी भर्ती  के समर्थन में, आखिर क्यों कला वर्ग का टेट लिया जा रहा है



Himanshu Rana


एन०सी०टी०ई की गाइडलाइन्स केवल शिक्षकभर्ती हेतु शिक्षकों की नियुक्ति के लिए शिक्षकों की न्यूनतम अहर्ताओं को निर्धारित करने की है , उत्तरप्रदेश में विज्ञान/गणित की सीधी भर्ती में ये प्रावधान अमल में लाया गया था और वहां उच्च-प्राथमिक टीईटी उत्तीर्ण ही लिए गए थे परन्तु उच्च-प्राथमिक कला वर्ग का टीईटी क्यों हो रहा था यूपी में अब तक समझ नहीं आया है क्यूंकि ये पद प्रमोशन से भरे जाते हैं नाकि सीधी नियुक्तियों से | 

कोर्ट द्वारा आदेश दिया गया है तो न्याय-प्रिय सरकार को इसमें दो कार्य करने पड़ेंगे या तो एनसीटीई की गाइडलाइन्स बदलवा दें या प्रमोशन खत्म करके समस्त कला एवं विज्ञान/गणित के शिक्षक सीधी भर्ती हेतु रखे जिसमे शिक्षकों से लेकर अचयनित वर्ग का हर तबका सीधे दौड़ में शामिल हो जिसकी उम्मीद अधिक है और जल्द ही संशोधन की भी उम्मीद है | 

आज के परिपेक्ष्य में जब एनसीटीई की गाइडलाइन्स में प्रमोशन जैसा कुछ है ही नहीं और केवल नियुक्ति की बात में टीईटी उत्तीर्ण करना है जिसे पूर्ववर्ती सरकार को हर सीधी भर्ती में फॉलो भी किया गया हो तो राज्य सरकार टीईटी तभी लागू कर सकती है जब उच्च-प्राथमिक के कला वर्ग के पदों पर भी खुली और सीधी भर्ती हो और प्रमोशन का प्रावधान खत्म किया जाए |

हाँ सरकार नियमावली में संशोधन करके कार्यरत शिक्षकों की अन्य किसी परीक्षा को लेने के लिए स्वतन्त्र है लेकिन टीईटी नाम नहीं अगर सीधी भर्ती नहीं है तो | 

बाकी होगा कुछ धमाका ही प्रमोशन के लिए धकेलने की प्रथा का समापन खत्म ही होगा और होना भी चाहिए , पढ़ेगा शिक्षक तभी तो आगे बढ़ेगा शिक्षक | 

😁👍

 UPTET  / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates /   Teacher Recruitment  / शिक्षक भर्ती /  SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS  
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
 Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825  Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825  Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet News Hindi | 72825  Teacher Recruitment  Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,

CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET  ,
Rajasthan TET /  RTET,  BETET / Bihar TET,   PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET