UPTET Shiksha Mitra News - -
इलाहाबाद हाईकोर्ट ने लगाई परिषदीय स्कूलों में 21 August tak Surplus Teachers ke समायोजन पर रोक, देखें आदेश
**********************
Blog Point : According to Government order for recruitment of 29334 Science Math Teacher, Valid Qualification holder for Science & Mathematics are very less in Junior Basic Schools.
For Mathematics : Mathematics in Graduation Subjects
For Science : See Advertisement 29334 JRT Teachers
******************
इलाहाबाद (जेएनएन)। प्राथमिक और उच्च प्राथमिक विद्यालयों में अध्यापकों के समायोजन पर इलाहाबाद हाईकोर्ट ने रोक लगा दी है और राज्य सरकार से जवाब मांगा है। सुनवाई 21 अगस्त को होगी। अजय कुमार मिश्र व अन्य की याचिका पर न्यायमूर्ति पीकेएस बघेल ने यह आदेश दिया।
याचीगण के अधिवक्ता अशोक खरे, राधाकांत ओझा और नवीन शर्मा का कहना था कि प्राथमिक स्कूलों में 31 जुलाई तक दाखिले होते हैं। उच्च प्राथमिक स्कूलों में गणित, विज्ञान और सामाजिक विज्ञान का एक-एक अध्यापक होना जरूरी है। कहा कि प्रदेश सरकार ने समायोजन करते समय इसका ध्यान नहीं रखा है। हालांकि शासन ने उच्च प्राथमिक स्कूलों में तीन शिक्षक अनिवार्य रूप से होने का संशोधित आदेश बाद में जारी किया है, लेकिन समायोजन के शासनादेश में इसका जिक्र नहीं है
*हाई कोर्ट इलाहाबाद*
सरप्लस मुद्दे पे सुनवाई हुई जिसमे अब तक जितने भी शिक्षक सरपल्स हुए हैं उनके समायोजन पे रोक लगा दी है
महत्वपूर्ण बात ये है कि सरकारी वकील ने सुप्रीम कोर्ट के जजमेंट का ज़िक्र खुद कर दिया है और कोर्ट से समय माँगा है ये जानने के लिए की उस जजमेंट से कितने लोग प्रभावित हो रहे हैं अगली सुनवाई 21 अगस्त को होनी है तब तक के लिए किसी भी शिक्षक जोकि सरप्लस की लिस्ट में है उसे विद्यालय से रिलीव नहीं किया जायेगा
31 जुलाई की छात्र संख्या के आधार पर समायोजन के आसार बने
21 aug को अगली डेट तब तक समायोजन प्रक्रिया पर रोक
प्रांतीय उपाध्यक्ष अजय सिंह की याचिका पर मिला स्टे आर्डर
Court No. - 17
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 30538 of 2017
Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Singh And 4 Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Shivendu Ojha,Radha Kant Ojha
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashok Kumar Yadav
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J.
This writ petition has been preferred by the five petitioners for
the common cause of action and for the same relief. All the
petitioners are working as Assistant Teachers in Junior Basic
Schools and Senior Basic Schools conducted and managed by
the U.P. Board of Basic Education under the U.P. Basic
Eduction Act, 1972.
They are aggrieved by the Government Order dated 13.6.2017
whereby a decision has been taken to transfer/ adjust the excess
teachers working in Junior and Senior Basic Schools for the
academic session 2017-18.
It is contended on behalf of the petitioners that the Government
order has not taken into consideration the provisions of the
Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.
It is submitted that Section 19 of the Act, 2009 lays down
norms and standards for School, which have been specified in
the Schedule framed thereunder. In the Schedule the teacher and
student ratio is provided. It also lays down that there shall be at
least one teacher per class (for sixth class to eight class) so that
there shall be at least one teacher for (i) Science and
Mathematics; (ii) Social Studies; and, (iii) Languages.
It is also contended that the State Government has extended the
last date of admission in the Basic Schools till 31.7.2017, thus
without taking into consideration the correct number of students
a large number of teachers are being declared surplus.
I have heard Sri R.K. Ojha, learned Senior Advocate assisted by
Sri Shivendu Ojha, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned
Standing Counsel, and Sri A.K. Yadav, learned counsel for the
third respondent.
Sri A.K. Yadav has received instructions, which are on the
record. On the strength of the instructions he submits that no
last date has been fixed for admission. It is also mentioned that
if in an institution there is only one Science Teacher he/she shall� not be replaced.
The instructions are wholly unsatisfactory. From a perusal of
the instructions it is manifest that the State Government has not
taken into consideration the provisions of the Right of Children
to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 and the Schedule
framed therein.
Sri Yadav has also submitted that in view of the subsequent
development that the Supreme Court has found that the
appointments of Shiksha Mitras are not valid, a fresh decision
has to be taken considering the effect of the said judgment. He
states that it will take some time to implement the impugned
Government order.
Learned Standing Counsel is granted two weeks' time to seek
instructions in the matter.
Put up this case on 21st August, 2017 in the additional cause
list. Till then the teachers who have been declared surplus will�
not be relieved
order date 31/7/2017
UPTET / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates / Teacher Recruitment / शिक्षक भर्ती / SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet News Hindi | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,
CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET ,
Rajasthan TET / RTET, BETET / Bihar TET, PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
इलाहाबाद हाईकोर्ट ने लगाई परिषदीय स्कूलों में 21 August tak Surplus Teachers ke समायोजन पर रोक, देखें आदेश
**********************
Blog Point : According to Government order for recruitment of 29334 Science Math Teacher, Valid Qualification holder for Science & Mathematics are very less in Junior Basic Schools.
For Mathematics : Mathematics in Graduation Subjects
For Science : See Advertisement 29334 JRT Teachers
******************
इलाहाबाद (जेएनएन)। प्राथमिक और उच्च प्राथमिक विद्यालयों में अध्यापकों के समायोजन पर इलाहाबाद हाईकोर्ट ने रोक लगा दी है और राज्य सरकार से जवाब मांगा है। सुनवाई 21 अगस्त को होगी। अजय कुमार मिश्र व अन्य की याचिका पर न्यायमूर्ति पीकेएस बघेल ने यह आदेश दिया।
याचीगण के अधिवक्ता अशोक खरे, राधाकांत ओझा और नवीन शर्मा का कहना था कि प्राथमिक स्कूलों में 31 जुलाई तक दाखिले होते हैं। उच्च प्राथमिक स्कूलों में गणित, विज्ञान और सामाजिक विज्ञान का एक-एक अध्यापक होना जरूरी है। कहा कि प्रदेश सरकार ने समायोजन करते समय इसका ध्यान नहीं रखा है। हालांकि शासन ने उच्च प्राथमिक स्कूलों में तीन शिक्षक अनिवार्य रूप से होने का संशोधित आदेश बाद में जारी किया है, लेकिन समायोजन के शासनादेश में इसका जिक्र नहीं है
*हाई कोर्ट इलाहाबाद*
सरप्लस मुद्दे पे सुनवाई हुई जिसमे अब तक जितने भी शिक्षक सरपल्स हुए हैं उनके समायोजन पे रोक लगा दी है
महत्वपूर्ण बात ये है कि सरकारी वकील ने सुप्रीम कोर्ट के जजमेंट का ज़िक्र खुद कर दिया है और कोर्ट से समय माँगा है ये जानने के लिए की उस जजमेंट से कितने लोग प्रभावित हो रहे हैं अगली सुनवाई 21 अगस्त को होनी है तब तक के लिए किसी भी शिक्षक जोकि सरप्लस की लिस्ट में है उसे विद्यालय से रिलीव नहीं किया जायेगा
31 जुलाई की छात्र संख्या के आधार पर समायोजन के आसार बने
21 aug को अगली डेट तब तक समायोजन प्रक्रिया पर रोक
प्रांतीय उपाध्यक्ष अजय सिंह की याचिका पर मिला स्टे आर्डर
Court No. - 17
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 30538 of 2017
Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Singh And 4 Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Shivendu Ojha,Radha Kant Ojha
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashok Kumar Yadav
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J.
This writ petition has been preferred by the five petitioners for
the common cause of action and for the same relief. All the
petitioners are working as Assistant Teachers in Junior Basic
Schools and Senior Basic Schools conducted and managed by
the U.P. Board of Basic Education under the U.P. Basic
Eduction Act, 1972.
They are aggrieved by the Government Order dated 13.6.2017
whereby a decision has been taken to transfer/ adjust the excess
teachers working in Junior and Senior Basic Schools for the
academic session 2017-18.
It is contended on behalf of the petitioners that the Government
order has not taken into consideration the provisions of the
Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.
It is submitted that Section 19 of the Act, 2009 lays down
norms and standards for School, which have been specified in
the Schedule framed thereunder. In the Schedule the teacher and
student ratio is provided. It also lays down that there shall be at
least one teacher per class (for sixth class to eight class) so that
there shall be at least one teacher for (i) Science and
Mathematics; (ii) Social Studies; and, (iii) Languages.
It is also contended that the State Government has extended the
last date of admission in the Basic Schools till 31.7.2017, thus
without taking into consideration the correct number of students
a large number of teachers are being declared surplus.
I have heard Sri R.K. Ojha, learned Senior Advocate assisted by
Sri Shivendu Ojha, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned
Standing Counsel, and Sri A.K. Yadav, learned counsel for the
third respondent.
Sri A.K. Yadav has received instructions, which are on the
record. On the strength of the instructions he submits that no
last date has been fixed for admission. It is also mentioned that
if in an institution there is only one Science Teacher he/she shall� not be replaced.
The instructions are wholly unsatisfactory. From a perusal of
the instructions it is manifest that the State Government has not
taken into consideration the provisions of the Right of Children
to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 and the Schedule
framed therein.
Sri Yadav has also submitted that in view of the subsequent
development that the Supreme Court has found that the
appointments of Shiksha Mitras are not valid, a fresh decision
has to be taken considering the effect of the said judgment. He
states that it will take some time to implement the impugned
Government order.
Learned Standing Counsel is granted two weeks' time to seek
instructions in the matter.
Put up this case on 21st August, 2017 in the additional cause
list. Till then the teachers who have been declared surplus will�
not be relieved
order date 31/7/2017
UPTET / टीईटी / TET - Teacher EligibilityTest Updates / Teacher Recruitment / शिक्षक भर्ती / SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS
UP-TET 2011, 72825 Teacher Recruitment,Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), 72825 teacher vacancy in up latest news join blog , UPTET , SARKARI NAUKRI NEWS, SARKARI NAUKRI
Read more: http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.com
http://joinuptet.blogspot.com
Shiksha Mitra | Shiksha Mitra Latest News | UPTET 72825 Latest Breaking News Appointment / Joining Letter | Join UPTET Uptet | Uptet news | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Latest News | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Breaking News | 72825 Primary Teacher Recruitment Uptet Fastest News | Uptet Result 2014 | Only4uptet | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet News Hindi | 72825 Teacher Recruitment Uptet Merit cutoff/counseling Rank District-wise Final List / th Counseling Supreme Court Order Teacher Recruitment / UPTET 72825 Appointment Letter on 19 January 2015A | 29334 Junior High School Science Math Teacher Recruitment,
CTET, TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST (TET), NCTE, RTE, UPTET, HTET, JTET / Jharkhand TET, OTET / Odisha TET ,
Rajasthan TET / RTET, BETET / Bihar TET, PSTET / Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test, West Bengal TET / WBTET, MPTET / Madhya Pradesh TET, ASSAM TET / ATET
, UTET / Uttrakhand TET , GTET / Gujarat TET , TNTET / Tamilnadu TET , APTET / Andhra Pradesh TET , CGTET / Chattisgarh TET, HPTET / Himachal Pradesh TET
No comments:
Post a Comment
To All,
Please do not use abusive languages in Anger.
Write your comment Wisely, So that other Visitors/Readers can take it Seriously.
Thanks.