UPTET / ALLAHABAD HIGHCOURT : SC/ST/Reserved Category Having Marks Below 60% in UPTET Can Fight for GENERAL CATEGORY POSTS as TET is ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 30
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3169 of 2013
Petitioner :- Pawan Kumar Singh And Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru Secy & Ors.
Petitioner Counsel :- Arvind Srivastava
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble V.K. Shukla,J.
Petitioners have rushed to this Court with request to direct the respondents to consider only those candidates belonging to OBC,SC,ST category, who have secured 60% marks in the Teacher Eligibility Test Examination-2011 for the post of assistant teacher under general category in each of the district where the petitioners have applied and prepare the merit list accordingly.
Petitioners claim that they have qualified Teacher Eligibility Test which is required for being offered appointment on the post of Assistant Teacher at Primary School run and manage by the Board of Basic Education. Petitioners claim that they are from general category and minimum percentage required for qualifying teacher eligibility test is 60% for general candidate and 55% for O.B.C. category candidates. Petitioners submit that one thousand post of assistant teachers in the primary school run and maintain by the Board of Basic Education in District Allahabad were advertised by means of an advertisement of Assistant Teacher of District Mirzapur in daily news paper "Dainik Jagaran" dated 7.12.2012. Similar advertisement� has been issued for other district of State of Uttar Pradesh. The petitioners have applied for consideration of their candidature on the post of Assistant Teacher in Primary School run and maintain by the Board of Basic Education under general category.
The State Government has formulated a procedure for selection of an assistant teacher by calculating the merit list on the basis of the marks obtained by the candidate in his High School, Intermediate, Degree and Training qualification. The merit is prepared by adding 10% of High School marks of 20% of Intermediate marks 40% of Degree marks and 30% of B.Ed marks. Grievance of the petitioners is that they are being made to compete with OBC category candidates against the post of assistant teacher which are meant for candidates belonging to general category.
Petitioners' further submission is that State Government having lowered the marks for qualifying the T.E.T. Test for O.B.C. candidates has clearly earmarked two classes of candidates namely candidates belonging to general category and candidates belonging to O.B.C. category and further for reservation of 50% of the post of assistant teacher for O.B.C. candidates and rest 50% only for general candidate. Petitioners in this background submit that such action is totally discriminatory and does not provide equal opportunity for being considered against the post of assistant teacher in general category and accordingly requisite relief be accorded.
Sri. Arvind Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners contended with vehemence that in the present case State Government having lowered the marks for qualifying the T.E.T. test for O.B.C. candidates has clearly earmarked two classes of candidates belonging to general category and candidates belonging to O.B.C. category and in view of this the reserved category candidates should not be permitted to consider against the general category seats and as such accordingly writ petition should be allowed.
Countering the said submission, learned Standing Counsel on the other hand contended that T.E.T. Test is mere eligibility test and merit of T.E.T. test is not at all to be seen and relevant criteria of selection would be by calculating merit list on the basis of marks obtained by the candidates in High School, Intermediate, Degree and Training qualification and as such writ petition deserves to be dismissed.
After respective arguments have been advanced, factual situation which has so emerged that T.E.T. test is a test� required to be passed for being appointed as Assistant Teacher after enforcement of U.P. Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Rules, 2009. In reference to general category candidate, eligibility criteria has been provided for as 60% and in reference to OBC/SC/ST category candidates minimum eligibility criteria is 55%. Said criteria has been prescribed strictly as per guidelines of� National Council For Teacher Education. Selection is not at all based on the basis of marks obtained in T.E.T. test, rather candidate has to merely pass the aforementioned qualifying test and thereafter, selection is accordingly governed by procedure as provided under Rule 14 of U.P. Basic Education Teacher Services Rules, 1981 wherein� marks are to be competed on the basis of marks obtained by candidate in High School, Intermediate, Degree and Training qualification. Contention of petitioners is that candidates� who have secured 55% marks in T.E.T. examination should not be considered in open market, cannot be accepted, inasmuch as reservation has a purposes and here only in order to see that candidate has passed T.E.T. criteria of 60% for General category� and 55%� for OBC/SC/ST category� candidate has been prescribed and thereafter, selection in question is to be made strictly as per Rule 14 of U.P. Basic Education Teacher Services Rules, 1981.
In view of this, challenge made is misconceived and� present writ petition is accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 21.1.2013
T.S.
Govt H C ka order nahi manti
ReplyDeleteover age walo ke saath sarkar aisa kar rahi hai jaise sarkar ki over age walo se koi dusmani ho.Sarkar court aur desh ki janta ko gumrah kar rahi hai.sarkar ne up ke verojgaro se khoon pasine ki ghadi kamai form bharbane ke bahane se sarkar ne 500 corror ki kamai kar li.verojgaro se kamai kar sarkar verojgari bhatta,kanya dhan,leptop,tab,dekar bhala banna chati hai.jabki paisa sab verojgaro se loota gaya hai.
ReplyDeleteOver Age Verojgaro ka dard up ke cm kya jaane kyu ki inhe to kursi bhi birasat mai mili hai.ager inhone padhai kar ke kabhi nokri ka form bhara hota tab inhe pata hota.
hum over age walo ko bahar kar sarkar jo bura kar rahi hai bo bahut galat hai.hum sab overage verojgaro ki baddua sarkar ko ek na ek din jaroor lagegi.
hamare pass ye antim mauka tha nokri paane ka.bo bhi sarkar cheen rahi hai.
hum jivan bhar sarkar ko koste rahenge.paani pe pe kar gaali dete rahenge.
ghamand to Ravan Ka bhi nahi Raha to Sarkar ka kya rahega.
sabhi over age wale apne-2 iswar ki kasam khai ki kabhi jeevan mai AY ki party ko vote nahi denge,
jai hind, jai bharat
Aapka
9837120282
pawan gupta jee bilkul theek kaha hai aapne ek din aisa ayega ki inka naam lene wala bhi koi nahin hoga jis tarah ravan ka ahankar sri ram ne choor choor kar diya tha aur aaj ravan ke vansh me uska naam lene wala bhi koi nahin hai
ReplyDeletecinnta na karo sc say purana add jinda hoga
ReplyDeletesunil ji apne theek kaha ye sara kara dhara acdmc walo ka hai warna aj ek sal ho gya hota nokri krte hue.shayad ap log ni jante aur kch log jan kr khush bi na ho k hamare tet samarthak dost ab tk tet mrt k liye lad rahe hain.aur wo ye ladai SC tk le gye hain.hamre case ki special sunwai monday ko hai.i still blv that tet mrt win at the end aur ap bi dua karo.tet mrt zindabad.
ReplyDelete16 .01.13 ka decision may bahut virodabas hay "the order of gov date 26.07.12 is not in confirmty in Law the decision of cancilation of date 30.11.11 add is not acording to law iskay bad decision apnay app katam nayay jarror milaga lakin supreem coart may
ReplyDeleteab SC hi is nakara sarkar ko thikane lagayegi.SP sarkar ab tk ki sbse ghatiya sarkar sabit hui hai.
ReplyDeletejitendra ji ye sb acd walo ne karaya hai warna aisa kch ni hota.ab khud ko bhi jhelna pad raha hai.hamari PIL SC me lag chuki hai mndy ko sunwai hai.hamare vakeel RAZA FAREEDI hain.dua kre faisla hamare haq me ho purana ad bahal ho jaye.
ReplyDeleteटेट मेरिट के अभ्यर्थ्यॊ के लिए
ReplyDeleteअब कोर्ट ने हमारा साथ दिया है और भर्ती पर स्टे लगा दिया. पर समस्या यह है की आज सरकार हमारे खिलाफ है और सोचने वाली बात यह है की सरकार हमारे खिलाफ क्यूं है ..वो अकादमिक का साथ क्यूं दे रही है.? कमी शायद हममे भी है क्योंकी हमने कभी सरकार को मनाने की कोशिश ही नहीं की..हम केवल सरकार से लडते रहे, कभी आन्दोलन कर के, कभी नारे बाजी करके , कभी जुलूस निकल कर..गाँधी जी ने कहा था अगर किसी को अपनी बात पहुचनी है तो अहिंसा ही परम धर्म है, अहिंसा का मतलब है की अपने विरोधी से भी प्यार करो और ऐसा मार्ग अपनाओ जिससे उसके अन्दर स्वयं ही आपके प्रति प्रेम उत्पन्न हो..अखिलेश जी की शायद यही गलती है की उन्होने वही प्रतिक्रिया की जो हमने किया गलत ढंग से विरोधी की तरह उनके सामने पेश आये, लखनऊ मे घिराव किया और आमंत्रद दिया उन्हे की वोह हमें निकल दे ..हमारा हर्ष भी यही हुआ की आज सरकार पूरी तरह से हमारे विरुद्ध है...दोस्तों आग मे घी डालने का काम अकादमिक वालो ने किया और हमारे जुलूश को गलत दिशा दिया ...आप लोगो से विनर्म प्राथना है की आप लोग थोडा प्रेम का सहारा लो और मुख्यमंत्री जी को यह एहसास दिलाए की हम भी उनके अपने है और हम उनका सम्मान करते है ..अपने छोटे भाई बहनों को वो समझे...आप लॊग टेट मेरिट के लिए एक ग्रीटिंग भेजो शिक्षा निदेशालय इलाहाबाद की "हमारा क्या कुसूर, टेट मेरिट से कृपया भर्ती करिए" हो सके तो फूल, गुलदस्ता भेजें ताकि मुख्यमंत्री जी को भी यह एहसास हो की हमें आदर्श कूट कूट के भरा है..8/2/2012 को हम लॊग इलाहाबाद शिक्षा निदेशालय मे फूल, गुलदस्ता भेज रहे है, आप लॊग साथ दो, जीत हमारी होगी क्यूँकि सच की जीत हमेशा होती है
· aap, aur aap apney doston sae kahey ki woh greeting bhejein ..jeet hogi