UPTET: Hearing in Allahabad Highcourt on 3rd Sept. 2012

UPTET: Hearing in Allahabad Highcourt on 3rd Sept. 2012

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 

?Court No. - 53 

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 76039 of 2011 

Petitioner :- Yadav Kapildev Lal Bahadur 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others 
Petitioner Counsel :- Alok Kumar Yadav,Rajesh Yadav 
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,K.S. Kushwaha 

Hon'ble Arun Tandon,J. 
Petitioner before this Court seeks quashing of the advertisement dated 30th November, 2011. 
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that advertisement itself has been withdrawn by the State Government under� the subsequent notification published in newspaper on 2nd September, 2012. 
In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition has become infructuous. 
It is, accordingly, dismissed as having become infructuous. 
Interim order, if any, stands discharged. 

(Arun Tandon, J.) 

Order Date :- 3.9.2012 
Sushil/-
Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=2050937
****************************

Analysis (What I think by reading above) : 
Kapil Yadav's petition is - Advt. is not published according to rules.
And court gets information (from Petitioner Counsel i.e  party behalf of Kapil Yadav) from state government that - Advertisement is cancelled on 2nd Sept. 2012 therefore Kapil Yadav's  petition has no meaning now.And stay also vacated (i.e.  interim order ).

When petitioner admits that there is no meaning to fight more as advt. is cancelled, then why court will go ahead with this case.
If any body having better understanding then they can give light and elaborate the matter.