UPTET /Allahabad Highcourt/ Selection of Teachers in UP : Different University Marks Can Be used to Make Common Merit OR Not

UPTET  /Allahabad Highcourt/ Selection of Teachers in UP : Different University Marks Can Be used to Make Common Merit OR Not

अलग अलग यूनिवर्सिटी के मार्क्स की तुलना /मेरिट बनाना सही है या नहीं 

अदालत ने कहा की सरकार का कोई भी  पालिसी डिसीजन अगर अनुच्छेद 14 व 16 का उल्लंघन करता है 

तो अदालत उसका परीक्षण  कर सकती है 

अनुच्छेद 14 नागरिकों के समानता के नियम को प्रतिपादित करता है 

अदालत ने सरकार को काउंटर एफिडेविट लगाने के लिए २ हफ्ते का समय दिया है 

अगली सुनवाई 29 अप्रैल 2013 को निर्धारित की गयी है ,

देखिये अदालत की कार्यवाही -

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 

?Court No. - 33 

Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 548 of 2013 

Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar Shukla And 3 Ors. 

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Ors. 

Petitioner Counsel :- Anil Tiwari 

Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Harendra Yadav 

Hon'ble Sushil Harkauli,J. 

Hon'ble Manoj Misra,J. 

It has been argued from the side of the petitioner-appellant that although the examination has taken place but the result has not yet been declared because of the stay order continuing in some other case. 

The Rule has been amended by the State.� Its authority is under challenge on the ground that the method of computation of quality point marks in respect of B.Ed. degree is illegal.� This method of computation, which is provided in the amended Rule namely Adding of the Marks obtained in Theory and Practical and thereafter calculating the percentage leads to discrimination between candidates who have passed their B.Ed. examination from different Universities, which allot different marks for theory and practical. 

Therefore, Counter affidavit will examine this aspect as to whether the suggested method namely calculation of percentage of marks separately in theory and practical for B.Ed. adding� the two and dividing them by 2 would remove the discrimination alleged. 

We are passing this order after going through� the decision of learned Single Judge of this Court dated 21.01.2008 passed in a Bunch of writ petitions headed by the writ petition no. 54049 of 2007 which was set aside in a Bunch of Special� Appeals headed by Special Appeal No. 166 of 2008 decided on 03.04.2008 in as much as apparently the appellate judgment did not consider the case of discrimination� with regard the candidates passing B.Ed. from different Universities, which have different marks for theory and practical.� Moreover, because in that case the Special Appellate Bench refused to interfere on the ground that it was a policy decision.� Whereas, prima facie, even� a� policy decision, which results in discrimination and thus, violates the fundamental right guaranteed under Articles 14 and 16 could be� examined by the writ Court and lastly the decision of the Special Appeal was� also based on consideration of the situation.� Here� the result has not been declared because of the interim order passed in another case, which gives ample time to the writ Court to take corrective measures so far as the discrimination alleged is concerned. 

Counter affidavit will be filed within two weeks. 

List in the week commencing 29.04.2013. 

���� (Manoj Misra,J.) (Sushil Harkauli,J.) 

Order Date :- 11.4.2013/-MAA/- 

Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=2496206

***************************************

फ़िलहाल समस्त भारत में शिक्षक भर्ती के लिए अकादमिक अंको का भी वेटेज दिया जा रहा है , जैसे कि - गुजरात ,बिहार , एस एस ए चंडीगढ़ , एल टी ग्रेड शिक्षक भर्ती उत्तर प्रदेश , तमिलनाडु  इत्यादि