लखनऊ कोर्ट महिलाओं को जे आर टी + पी आर टी काउंसलिंग की अनुमति, इलाहबाद हाई कोर्ट में अनुमति नहीं

लखनऊ कोर्ट महिलाओं को जे आर टी + पी आर टी  काउंसलिंग की अनुमति, इलाहबाद हाई कोर्ट में अनुमति नहीं

Both JRT + PRT Counseling Order,
इलाहबाद हाई कोर्ट में महिलाओं की काउंसलिंग बीत जाने के कारण , महिलाओं को जे आर टी + पी आर टी दोनों काउंसलिंग की अनुमति नहीं मिली ,

लेकिन लखनऊ कोर्ट के आदेश में महिलाओं को भी पी आर टी काउंसलिंग की अनुमति मिली है ,

लगता है की याचियों के वकील इस मामले में कमजोर पड़े , और उन्होंने तीसरी काउंसलिंग / विशेष काउंसलिंग आदि के बारे में शायद याची का पक्ष ठीक से नहीं रखा

क्यूंकि ऐसा नहीं है की दुसरी काउंसलिंग में सारी सीट्स भर जाएंगी और सामान्यत इसके बाद तीसरी काउंसलिंग बची हुई सीट के लिए होती या छूटे हुए लोगों के लिए कोई विशेष काउंसलिंग भी हो सकती थी


देखिए क्या आर्डर दिया लखनऊ बेंच ने :-
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH

?Court No. - 10

Case :- SERVICE SINGLE No. - 5594 of 2014

Petitioner :- Neetu Tiwari & 5 Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Through Secy. Basic Edu. Lko. & Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Udai Bhan Pandey
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Jyoti Sikka,M.M.Asthana,Manish Mishra,Navendu Srivastava

Hon'ble Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Smt. Jyoti Sikka, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.2-Basic Education Officer, Unnao, Shri Manish Mishra, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.3-Basic Education Officer, Lucknow, Shri Navendu Srivastava, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.4, Basic Education Officer, Raibareli and Shri M.M. Asthana, learned counsel appearing for respondents no. 5 and 6.
Keeping in view the order dated 19.09.2014 passed by this Court in Writ-A No.48111 of 2014, Mayank Yadav and others vs. State of U.P. and others, the District Basic Education Officers concerned are directed to allow the petitioners to participate in the counselling for trainee teachers on production of their educational testimonials duly attested. The selection of the petitioners, if any, shall abide the result of the writ petition.
This order shall be communicated to the District Basic Education Officers concerned today itself by their respective Standing Counsels without waiting for a certified copy of this order.
Order Date :- 26.9.2014
akhilesh/-

Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=3637960
http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=3636581

 **********************


और क्या आर्डर दिया इलाहबाद बेंच ने
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD


?Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 53399 of 2014
Petitioner :- Kalpana Yadav And 7 Ors
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 11 Ors
Counsel for Petitioner :- D.K. Singh,V.K. Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.K. Yadav,Deo Dayal,R.P. Singh

Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J.
Learned Counsel for the petitioners has made a request that the matter is urgent as the counselling is scheduled to be held between 27-30th September, 2014 and in case the matter is not taken up, the petitioners shall suffer irreversible loss to their job prospect.
With the consent of learned Counsel appearing for the parties, the matter is taken on the board.
The petitioners have preferred this writ petition for a direction upon the respondents to permit them to appear in the counselling being conducted for the recruitment of Assistant Teachers (Mathematics & Science) in Senior Basic Schools and Trainee Teachers (Prashikshu Shikshak) in Primary Schools run by the U.P. Board of Basic Education.
Learned Counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners want to participate in the counselling at Mainpuri, Ghazipur, Allahabad, Ambedkar Nagar, Farrukhabad, Mathura, Jalaun and Chandauli. He has placed reliance on an order dated 19.09.2014 passed in Writ-A No. 48111 of 2014 (Mayank Yadav and 6 others v. State of U.P. & 7 others), wherein this Court has issued direction to the respondents to allow the petitioners therein to participate in the counselling for trainee teachers on the basis of their duly attested educational testimonials.
Learned Standing Counsel states that counselling in respect of female category is over. Therefore, no interim order can be passed at this stage in respect of petitioner nos. 1, 3, 5, 6 and 7, who are female candidates. �
Sri Deo Dayal, Sri S.K. Varma, Sri R.B. Pradhan, Sri A.K. Yadav, Sri K.K. Chand and Sri R.P. Singh, learned Counsel appearing for the respective District Basic Education Officers, have not disputed the said fact.
Accordingly, a direction is issued upon the respondent nos. 5 to 12 to allow the petitioner nos. 2, 4 and 8 to participate in the current counselling without insisting to submit their original testimonials. The petitioner nos. 2, 4 and 8 are permitted to submit their attested educational testimonials. Their selection shall abide by the result of the writ petition.
Reply be filed by all the respondents within six weeks. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within a week thereafter.
Tag and list this writ petition along with the record of Writ-A No. 48111 of 2014.
This interim order will be applicable only in respect of petitioner nos. 2, 4 and 8.
Order Date :- 26.9.2014
SKT/-
http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=3637672
**************

?Court No. - 1

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 53471 of 2014

Petitioner :- Yashpal And 23 Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 13 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- D.K. Singh,V.K. Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C., K.P. Singh,Nand Kishore Singh,R.C. Singh,S.K. Chaudhary,S.K. Varma,Sanjay Kumar Srivastava,Sunil Kumar Singh,V.K. Srivastava,Vikram Bahadur Singh

Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J.
Learned Counsel for the petitioners has made a request that the matter is urgent as the counselling scheduled is to be held� between 27-30th September, 2014 and in case the matter is not taken up, the petitioners shall suffer irreversible loss to their job prospect.
With the consent of learned Counsel appearing for the parties, the matter is taken on the board.
The petitioners have preferred this writ petition for a direction upon the respondents to permit them to appear in the counselling being conducted for the recruitment of Assistant Teachers (Mathematics & Science) in Senior Basic Schools and Trainee Teachers (Prashikshu Shikshak) in Primary Schools run by the U.P. Board of Basic Education.
Learned Counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners want to participate in the counselling at the districts of respondent nos. 5 to 14. He has placed reliance on an order dated 19.09.2014 passed in Writ-A No. 48111 of 2014 (Mayank Yadav and 6 others v. State of U.P. & 7 others), wherein this Court has issued direction to the respondents to allow the petitioners therein to participate in the counselling for trainee teachers on the basis of their duly attested educational testimonials.
Learned Standing Counsel states that the counselling in respect of female category is over. Therefore, no interim order can be passed at this stage in respect of petitioner no. 8, who is a female candidate. �
Learned Counsel appearing for the respective District Basic Education Officers i.e. respondent nos. 5 to 14, have not disputed the said fact.
Accordingly, a direction is issued upon the respondent nos. 5 to 14 to allow the petitioners (except petitioner no. 8) to participate in the current counselling without insisting to submit their original testimonials. The petitioners (except petitioner no. 8) are permitted to submit their attested educational testimonials. Their selection shall abide by the result of the writ petition.
Reply be filed by all the respondents within six weeks. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within a week thereafter.
Tag and list this writ petition along with the record of Writ-A No. 48111 of 2014.
This inteirm order will not be applicable in respect of petitioner no. 8.
Order Date :- 26.9.2014
SKT/-
http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=3639488
-----------
?Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 53467 of 2014
Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Gautam And 22 Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 12 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- D.K. Singh,V.K. Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.K. Yadav,B.K. Yadav,Harendra Yadav,K.K. Chand,Nishit Yadav,Sanjay Chaturvedi,Sayed Nadeem,Shyam Krishna Gupta

Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J.
Learned Counsel for the petitioners has made a request that the matter is urgent as the counselling is scheduled to be held between 27-30th September, 2014 and in case the matter is not taken up, the petitioners shall suffer irreversible loss to their job prospect.
With the consent of learned Counsel appearing for the parties, the matter is taken on the board.
The petitioners have preferred this writ petition for a direction upon the respondents to permit them to appear in the counselling being conducted for the recruitment of Assistant Teachers (Mathematics & Science) in Senior Basic Schools and Trainee Teachers (Prashikshu Shikshak) in Primary Schools run by the U.P. Board of Basic Education.
Learned Counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners want to participate in the counselling at the districts of respondent nos. 5 to 13. He has placed reliance on an order dated 19.09.2014 passed in Writ-A No. 48111 of 2014 (Mayank Yadav and 6 others v. State of U.P. & 7 others), wherein this Court has issued direction to the respondents to allow the petitioners therein to participate in the counselling for trainee teachers on the basis of their duly attested educational testimonials.
Learned Standing Counsel states that counselling in respect of female category is over. Therefore, no interim order can be passed at this stage in respect of petitioner nos. 6, 9, 17, 19, 20, 21 and 23, who are female candidates.
Learned Counsel appearing for the respective District Basic Education Officers i.e. respondent nos. 5 to 13, have not disputed the said fact.
Accordingly, a direction is issued upon the respondent nos. 5 to 13 to allow the petitioners (except the petitioner nos. 6, 9, 17, 19, 20, 21 and 23) to participate in the current counselling without insisting to submit their original testimonials. They are permitted to submit their attested educational testimonials. Their selection shall abide by the result of the writ petition.
Reply be filed by all the respondents within six weeks. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within a week thereafter.
Tag and list this writ petition along with the record of Writ-A No. 48111 of 2014.
This interim order will not be applicable in respect of petitioner nos. 6, 9, 17, 19, 20, 21 and 23.
Order Date :- 26.9.2014
SKT/-
Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=3639485