UPTET-2011 Primary : Candidates Secured 82 Marks Demands Successful, Allahabad HC
permitted as per NCTE Guidelines and instructed secretary
**********
अगर 82 मार्क्स पर कैंडिडेट पास होते हैं तो भर्ती पर कोई विशेष प्रभाव नहीं पड़ने वाला । क्यूंकि चयन की मेरिट
टीईटी मार्क्स पर आधारित है लेकिन यह जरूर हो सकता है की कुछ एस टी / पी एच (विकलांग ) / शिक्षा मित्र अभ्यर्थीयों को लाभ मिले , विशेषकर
सीतापुर, लखीमपुर , गोंडा जैसे जिलों में जहाँ सीटों की संख्या अधिक है
और एस टी / पी एच (विकलांग ) अभ्यर्थीयों की मेरिट सामान्यत: काम जाती है:
टीईटी मार्क्स पर आधारित है लेकिन यह जरूर हो सकता है की कुछ एस टी / पी एच (विकलांग ) / शिक्षा मित्र अभ्यर्थीयों को लाभ मिले , विशेषकर
सीतापुर, लखीमपुर , गोंडा जैसे जिलों में जहाँ सीटों की संख्या अधिक है
और एस टी / पी एच (विकलांग ) अभ्यर्थीयों की मेरिट सामान्यत: काम जाती है:
**********
UPTET / टीईटी / TET - Teacher Eligibility Test Updates / Teacher Recruitment News
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 19920 of 2014
Petitioner :- Satendra Pratap Singh And 4 Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Navin Kumar Sharma,Neeraj Tiwari
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,R.A. Akhtar
Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J.
By this writ petition, the petitioners are seeking a direction to the respondents to issue certificate of� Teacher Eligibility Test-2011 ( Primary Level) to the petitioners in pursuance of decision taken by the respondent no. 5 on 10.1.2014.
According to the petitioners, petitioners no. 1, 2,3 and 5� had� appeared in TET 2011 (Primary) but had been declared unsuccessful but subsequently a decision has been taken by the respondent no. 5-Chairman, N.C.T.E., Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi to allow rounding off of marks and the petitioners are therefore claiming the benefit of the said decision of the respondent no. 5 dated 10.1.2014.
I have heard Shri Naveen Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned standing counsel for the respondents no. 1 to 4 and Shri R. A. Akhtar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no. 5.
No useful purpose would be served in keeping this writ petition pending.
Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 1-Secretary, Basic Education, U.P. at Lucknow to take a decision in the matter of the petitioners if their case falls within the case of rounding of marks as provided by the NCTE-respondent no. 5 in its circular dated 10.1.2014 within a period of one month from the date a certified copy of this order is received in his office.
Order Date :- 4.4.2014
Asha
No comments:
Post a Comment
To All,
Please do not use abusive languages in Anger.
Write your comment Wisely, So that other Visitors/Readers can take it Seriously.
Thanks.